Title: OutPatient anesthesia
1OutPatient anesthesia
21970
- Phoenix Surgicenter opened
- First (modern) free standing ambulatory surgery
center - Founded by two anesthesiologists Dr. John Ford
and Dr. Wallace Reed
31981
- American College of Surgeons officially endorses
the concept of ambulatory surgery
4- 1995 66 of all surgeries performed were done on
an - out-patient basis 2000 80
-
5Factors influencing growth of ambulatory surgery
- Advances in anesthetic agents and techniques
- Advances in surgical techniques
- Third party payer push to decrease costs
6Advances in Anesthetic Agents and Techniques
- Fast onset agents
- Rapid re-distribution / metabolism
- Examples
- propofol
- Fentanyl Family
7Advances in Anesthetic Agents and Techniques
- Cleaner Agents with fewer side effects
- More agents to deal with common post-op problems
(pain and nausea)
8Advances in Anesthetic Agents and Techniques
- Liberal use of local anesthetic at surgical site
- Infusion of local anesthetic/duramorph following
arthroscopies - Local nerve blocks in operative field
9Advances in surgical techniques
- Less invasive endoscopic techniques replacing
open surgical procedures - Proliferation of lasers leading to reduced tissue
damage and reduced blood loss - Increased awareness of outpatient capabilities
(both surgeon and patient)
10Third party payer push to decrease costs
- Introduction of Diagnosis Related Groups (early
1980s) which disallow overnight admission for
specific procedures
11Third party payer push to decrease costs
- Changes in Medicare reimbursement in 1987
increased the number of approved codes for
outpatient procedures to include over 1600
surgical codes
12Economics of Free Standing Ambulatory Surgery
Centers
- Do not have to support costly services of
hospitals - ER, ICU, food service, laundry
- Facility fees for specific procedures
significantly lower than hospitals - Buyers Guide Outpatient Procedures. Published
by Missouri Dept. of Health, 1995
13Patient Selection is the Key for Successful
Outpatient Surgery
14Patient considerations for outpatient surgery
- ASA status
- Proposed procedure
- Significant history
- Optimized coexisting diseases
- Discharge criteria
15Patient considerations
- ASA status Vs. level of proposed surgical assault
/ required anesthetic intervention
16Patient considerations
- If ASA 3 patient acceptable for MAC hernia repair
why not do outpatient exploratory laproscopy? - Has coexisting disease been optimized?
17Coexisting Disease
- Encourage surgeons to obtain consult early.
- Educate surgeons about anesthetic considerations
of coexisting diseases. - Offer suggested questions for consult.
18Patient Considerations Significant history
- Malignant Hyperthermia
- Latex allergy
- Morbid obesity
- Difficult airway
19Common Logistical Problems
- Preoperative workup
- Preoperative medications
- NPO status
- Anxiety
- Coordination of Transportation
- Home care
20Other Logistical Problems
- Accreditation of freestanding clinic
- Medical Emergencies
- Admission following complications
21Patient Considerations Discharge Criteria
- When will patient be able to meet discharge
criteria? - Which discharge criteria do you use?
- Aldrete / PDSS
22Patient Considerations Discharge Criteria
- Does patient have someone to drive them home?
23Anesthetic Considerations for Ambulatory Surgery
- What level of monitoring is acceptable?
- How to minimize post-anesthetic hang-over
- What regional anesthetics are appropriate?
24Anesthetic Considerations Monitoring
- ASA basic standards
- Invasive monitors?
25What Level of Monitoring Is Acceptable?
- AANA Standards for monitoring
- Invasive monitoring
- A-line, CVP, PA Catheter, TEE, EEG
26Anesthetic Considerations Drugs
- Minimize postop sedation, pain, N/V
- Economics
- cost/case Vs time to discharge
27Sodium Pentothal Vs. Propofol
- Time to discharge
- propofol - 103 minutes
- sodium pentothal - 115 minutes
- Postop anxiety more frequent with sodium
pentothal (Plt0.05) - Nausea/emesis less frequent with propofol
- Acta Anesth Scand 1995 May39(4)503-7
28Sevoflurane Vs Halothane
- Emergence times Sevoflurane - 7.11 min /
Halothane - 9.58 minutes - Time to discharge criteria Sevo - 184 min /
Halothane - 189 minutes (no clinical diff)J Clin
Anesth 1995 Aug 7(5)398-402
29Isoflurane Vs Sevoflurane
- Time to open eyes Isoflurane - 4.1 min
Sevoflurane - 2.3 minutes - Time to fluid intake Isoflurane - 35 min
Sevoflurane - 37 minutes - Time to discharge Isoflurane - 242 min
Sevoflurane - 281 minutes - Acta Anesth Scand 995 Apr39(3)377-80
30How to minimize post-anesthesia hangover
- Nausea one of largest factors delaying time to
discharge - Frequency of postop nausea directly related to
type of surgery (strabismus correction,
laproscopy) and duration of anesthetic
31How to minimize post-anesthesia hang over
(Contd)
- Droperidol effective anti-emetic at
- 25-75 mcg/kg
- best when given prior to surgery
-
32Droperidol vs. Ondansetron (Post Op Nausea
Vomiting)
- Droperidol 2.5 mg Vs. Ondansetron 8 mg
- PONV absent in 88 of droperidol group, absent in
68 of ondansetron group
33Droperidol Vs. Ondansetron
- Time to discharge
- droperidol - 229 min
- ondansetron - 171 minutes
- Anesth Analg 1995 Sep81(3)603-7
34What regional anestheticsare appropriate?
- Well defined end-point when performing block
- Quick onset
- Easily reproducible surgical anesthetic depth
35What regional anesthetics are appropriate?
36What regional anestheticsare appropriate?
- Bier block success rate gt98 , minimal morbidity
- J Hand Surg 1995 Oct20(5) 679-680
- Bier block success rate same when utilizing
dorsum hands vein Vs antecubital fossa -
37What regional anestheticsare appropriate?
- Subarachnoid block
- small gauge, pencil point needle
- Pediatric caudal
- 22 gauge angiocath passes easily ONLY into caudal
space
38Less appropriateregional anesthetics
- Take more time to perform
- Less well defined end point
- Slower onset, less dependable surgical depth
- Examples epidural, brachial plexus block
(interscalene, supraclavicular, axillary),
fem-sciatic block
39Discharge Criteria
- Vital signs
- Ambulation / mental status
- Pain / nausea / vomiting
- Surgical bleeding
- Intake and output
40Have Machine Will Travel
41Common Problems
- Patients physical status
- Equipment / Physical constraints
- Support Personnel
- Transport of a sick patient
- Postanesthesia recovery
- Environmental hazards
42Environmental Hazards
- Unfamiliar area
- Small room
- Temperature
- Radiation
- Noise
43Common Anesthetizing Areas
- Computed Tomography (CT)
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
- Diagnostic x-ray
- Gastroenterology
- Emergency Room
44 Common Anesthetizing Areas
- Cardiology
- Electroshock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)
- Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT)
- Cancer Center
45Computed Tomography
- Patient either claustrophobic or trauma patient
- Room very small
- Cold temperature
- Radiation risk
- May be a stop en route to OR
46MRI
- Distant location
- Magnetic risk
- equipment and monitors must be adapted for the
magnetic environment - noise
47Diagnostic X-Ray
- Small room already full of equipment (watch your
head) - Radiation
- Contrast media
- X-Ray staff unable to help with anesthetic
emergency - Transport to recovery
48Gastroenterology
- Remote location
- Very sick patients
- they do their own sedation on most patients
- Awkward patient position
49Emergency Room
- Trauma patients
- need airway
- need IV access
- May need stops en route to OR
- Many chiefs (whos in charge?)
- Needle stick risk
50Cardiology
- Cardioversion
- Angioplasty
- very sick patient in remote area and you dont
have your normal monitors or supplies
51ESWL
- Noise hazard
- May be in remote location
- MAC versus General Anesthesia
- transport to recovery
52ECT
- May be in remote area
- Brief general anesthesia is needed
- transport to recovery
- Airway management
53Cancer Center
- Chemotherapy or radiation therapy
- Sick patients
- physiologic effects of chemo
- Nausea
- Fluid needs
54Office Anesthesia
55Long Term Care Facilities
56Home Care
57Pain Management