Analysis and interpretation of unclassified variants UVs - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 16
About This Presentation
Title:

Analysis and interpretation of unclassified variants UVs

Description:

Can occur either in the coding region of the gene, or in the intronic, 5' ... Occurs in functional domain; conserved in 8 available sequences (human-zebrafish) ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:185
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 17
Provided by: NHSG
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Analysis and interpretation of unclassified variants UVs


1
Analysis and interpretation of unclassified
variants (UVs)
  • Aberdeen
  • November 26th 2008

2
What is a UV?
  • Novel sequence change detected in a gene of
    interest
  • Clinical significance of the variant is unknown
  • Can occur either in the coding region of the
    gene, or in the intronic, 5UTR or 3UTR regions
  • Usually substitutions but may also include
    in-frame deletions/insertions

3
How common are they?
  • In BRCA1 represent 27 of the sequence
    changes detected (excluding common neutral
    variants)
  • no cases to date of UV in both BRCA1/2 genes
  • In Long QT represent 29 (minimum) of the
    sequence changes detected (excluding common
    variants)
  • no cases to date of UV in gt1 gene
  • Problems arise when reporting these variants
    are they responsible for the phenotype or are
    they novel, rare variants of no clinical
    significance??

4
Guidelines for analysis and reporting
  • Best Practice Meeting (CMGS) April 2007
  • Formed an agreed set of standards that
    laboratories should follow to assist in
    determination of the clinical significance of
    these variants
  • http//cmgsweb.shared.hosting.zen.co.uk/BPGs/pdfs
    20current20bpgs/UV20GUIDELINES20ratified.pdf

5
Lines of evidence
  • Literature, mutation databases (curated?), SNP
    databases
  • Testing controls
  • Co occurrence in trans with deleterious mutations
  • Co-segregation with phenotype in family
  • De novo variant occurrence
  • Species conservation
  • In silico prediction- missense and splicing
    effects
  • RNA/splicing studies
  • Functional studies
  • Not all possible for each variant
  • Summarise results and decide on likelihood of
    pathogenicity

6
Intronic variants
  • In silico analysis programmes available Splicing
    sequences finder EMBL
  • alternative splicing site Fruitfly etc
  • Approximately 1/3 of UVs in BRCA1 and LQT are
    intronic

7
Intronic considerations
  • Dependent on region of intronic variant only
    some programmes available- consensus of results
  • Nonsense mediated decay - site of variant in gene
  • Establishing both copies present in RNA studies
    if no effect other variants in region of
    interest
  • Level of gene expression in tissue available for
    RNA work
  • Are we identifying all intronic variants of
    interest dependent on position of primers in
    screen

8
BRCA1 c.5194-12GgtA
  • Not detected previously in over 1000 control
    chromosomes
  • Not in SNP databases
  • Recorded several times in BIC database unknown
    clinical significance
  • In silico analysis (3/5) suggests putative
    cryptic splice site created
  • Three affected family members (3 generations)
    demonstrate sequence change
  • Likely to be pathogenic????

9
BRCA1 c.5194-12GgtA
Sequencing revealed new splice site created at
site of variantled to inclusion of 10bp
intronic sequence in transcript to create
frameshift mutation

exon19/ exon20
AAA ATG CTG AAT GAG /CAT GAT
TTT GAA (WT) A
ATG AG T TTC TTT CAG CAT GAT TTT GAA (NEW)

fsx5
Lower level of mutant sequence detected
efficiency of new site/degradation of
mutant? Likely to be cause of phenotype
pathogenic?? More family members.. unaffecteds?
10
KCNQ1 c.478-56TgtG
  • Sudden death case - 12 year old boy (playing
    football)
  • Not detected previously in over 200 control
    chromosomes
  • Not in SNP databases, or inherited arrhythmias
    mutation databases
  • No other variants in KCNQ1, KCNH2 (to date)
  • In silico analysis (3/3) suggests branch point
    destroyed
  • But no other tissue available .
  • No other affected family member
  • Have requested parental samples

11
Missense variants
In silico analysis programmes available Clustal,
SIFT, Polyphen, Align GVGD etc
12
Missense considerations
  • Availability of suitable sequences for
    conservation analysis
  • Range of available sequences wide spectrum of
    species (human to pufferfish ideal)
  • Alignments (own vs programme)
  • Basis of analysis residue conservation vs
    structural vs chemical difference
  • Functional studies dependent on gene and region
    of gene that variant resides
  • Effect on splicing if at exon boundary
  • ESE, ESS etc

13
BRCA1 c.181TgtG p.cys61gly
Not detected in gt1000 control chromosomes Publishe
d variant Recorded numerous times in BIC
clinically significant Very well conserved in
protein in a functional domain (ring finger) In
silico analysis suggests not tolerated Multiple
papers of functional studies indicate
deleterious .pathogenic
14
KCNQ1 c.458CgtT p.thr153met
  • Sudden death at 6 weeks (fiscal case)
  • Not detected in 200 control chromosomes
  • No other variants detected to date in other LQT
    genes
  • Not in SNP databases nor in inherited arrhythmias
    mutation database
  • Occurs in functional domain conserved in 8
    available sequences (human-zebrafish)
  • In silico analysis suggests variant not
    tolerated/tolerated
  • No functional studies published
  • Likelihood of
    pathogenicity?????
  • Next step??? awaiting parental samples

15
BRCA1 c.5207TgtC p.val1736ala
  • Detected in 4 individuals (apparently unrelated
    but 3 from Orkney?)
  • Published variant
  • Recorded 17x in BIC unknown significance
  • Recorded 1x in DMuDB
  • Recorded in SNP database but no frequency data
  • Conserved in protein in a functional domain
  • In silico analysis suggests not tolerated
  • One paper of functional studies suggest
    deleterious
  • Likelihood of pathogenicity??
  • Next step to confirm - additional family
    members??

16
Reporting considerations
  • Missense variants more difficult to interpret (if
    RNA available, ex vivo splicing assays becoming
    more routine)
  • Ethnicity
  • Time taken to analyse (manual vs automated)
  • Complete screening
  • gt1 mutation causative in disorder
  • Penetrance/ expressivity/ phenocopies
  • Lack of clinical information with referral (test
    only affecteds??)
  • Small family sizes limited family members
    available
  • Test for presence of variant in family
  • ? Affected
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com