Public Policy in Texas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Public Policy in Texas

Description:

Public Policy in Texas Chapter 8 – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:261
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: ACCE52
Learn more at: https://www.austincc.edu
Category:
Tags: income | policy | public | texas

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Public Policy in Texas


1
Public Policy in Texas
  • Chapter 8

2
Introduction
  • Economic Policies
  • Policies that affect economic activities or have
    economic consequences for individuals or groups
  • Social Policies
  • Policies that guide our development as human
    beings and our relationships with other humans
    and our broader environment

3
Roots of Public Policy
  • Leader and straggler in economic regulation
    Railroad Commission provided leadership PUC
    developed late
  • Economic assistance during the New Deal
  • Great Society programs expanded support for
    social welfare and economic regulation
  • Deregulation during the 1990s

4
Public Policy Process
  • Agenda setting
  • Getting an issue to be considered by the
    government
  • Policy making
  • Making public policy through one of the branches
    of government
  • Implementation
  • Bureaucracy makes rules and regulations for a
    policys implementation
  • Evaluation
  • Assessing the policys effectiveness

5
Policy Actors
  • Economic, political, and governmental elites
  • Wealthy Texans
  • Foundations and Think Tanks
  • Texas Research League
  • Texas Public Policy Foundation
  • Media
  • Newspapers, magazines, Blogs
  • Academia
  • Universities

6
Policy Outcomes
  • Political Economy
  • Web of economic, social, governmental, and
    political institutions and processes
  • Subsidy grant of economic resources by
    government
  • Regulation government restriction on economic
    activities
  • Roles of Government
  • Nourish the elements that make innovation
    possible skilled workers, investment money,
    system that fosters innovation and change
  • Bring the poor into the growth process

7
State Finance
  • Budgeting
  • A plan for how much money one expects to receive
    and how much one proposes to spend
  • Biennial budget
  • Fiscal year September 1 August 31

8
State Finance
  • Budgeting Restrictions
  • Balanced budget
  • Bonds and debt
  • Comptrollers revenue estimate and certification
  • Dedicated funds
  • Constitutional spending limit based on economic
    growth calculated by the LBB (1978)
  • Limit on welfare spending 1 percent of budget
    (1982)
  • Budget execution authority (1985)

9
State Revenues FY 2008 86.98 Billion
  • State taxes (47.5.3)
  • Federal funds grants-in-aid (30.2)
  • Licenses, fees, permits, fines, and penalties
    (11.8)
  • Interest and investment income (2.7)
  • Lottery (1.8)
  • Land income (1.2)
  • Sales of Goods and Services (0.6)
  • Settlement of claims (0.6)
  • Contribution to employee benefits 0.0)
  • Other (3.6)
  • Source http//www.window.state.tx.us/taxbud/reven
    ue.html

10
Principles of Taxation
  • Adequacyraises enough money
  • Equityeveryone pays their share according to
    ability to pay
  • Economic competitivenessenhances state and local
    economic development
  • Balanceavoids over-reliance on any one tax or
    set of taxes
  • Stabilitywithstands shifts in economy
  • Simplicityminimal compliance and enforcement
    costs

11
State Taxes FY 2008 41.36 Billion
  • Sales tax (54.2)
  • Franchise tax (10.8)
  • Motor vehicle sales tax (8.1)
  • Motor fuels taxes (7.5)
  • Natural gas production tax (6.5)
  • Insurance Occupation Taxes (3.5)
  • Source Texas Comptroller
  • Cigarette and tobacco taxes (3.5)
  • Oil production tax (3.5)
  • Alcoholic beverages taxes (1.9)
  • Utility taxes (1.2)
  • Hotel and motel tax (0.9)
  • Inheritance tax
  • Other taxes (0.4)

12
State and Local Tax Burden, 2008
13
Level of Taxation in Texas
  • Texas state and local taxes took 8.4 percent of
    Texans personal income in 2008.
  • Texas ranks 43th in state and local tax burden
    (2008).
  • Federal taxes took 22,539 per household in 2007.
  • Texas ranked 20th in federal tax burden in 2007.
  • Source Tax Foundation, http//www.taxfoundation.o
    rg/

14
Effects of Taxation
  • Progressive taxes
  • Percentage of individuals income paid in taxes
    increases as individuals income increases
  • Regressive taxes
  • Percentage of individuals income paid in taxes
    decreases as individuals income increases
  • Proportional taxes
  • Percentage of individuals income paid in taxes
    is the same for all income levels

15
Effects of TaxationTexas
16
Effects of TaxationTexas
17
State Expenditures FY 200881.94 Billion
  • Education
  • 30.8 billion (37.6)
  • Health and Human Services
  • 29.7 billion (36.2)
  • Transportation
  • 7.7 billion (9.4)
  • Public Safety and Corrections
  • 4.0 billion (4.9)
  • Employee Benefits (3.6)
  • General Government (3.1)
  • Natural Resources/Recreation Service (2.6)
  • Source http//www.window.state.tx.us/taxbud/expen
    d.html

18
Public Education
  • Structure of Elementary and Secondary Education
  • Texas Education Agency (TEA)
  • Independent School Districts (ISDs)

19
Education Funding
  • San Antonio ISD v. Rodriguez (1973)
  • Edgewood ISD v. Kirby (1989)
  • 1990, legislature increased allocation to poor
    districts. Supreme Court declared
    unconstitutional in 1991.
  • 1991, legislature created property tax, which the
    Supreme Court invalidated as a statewide property
    tax.
  • 1993, current system adopted. Ruled
    constitutional in 1995.

20
Education Funding
  • Property rich districts (305,000 in assessed
    valuation per pupil) distribute funds to poor
    districts
  • Consolidate with a poor district
  • Detach property and transfer it to poor district
    (tax purposes only)
  • Send money to the state (attendance credits)
  • Pay for education of students in poor district
  • Consolidate tax bases with poor district

21
Funding Public Education
  • West Orange-Cove CISD v. Alanis (2001)
  • Issues
  • Adequacy The plaintiffs argued that the state
    did not provide sufficient funding to meet the
    requirement that students pass the TAKS test.
  • Cap on Property Tax for M O The plaintiffs
    argued that the state created an unconstitutional
    statewide property tax by setting the ceiling on
    school districts property tax.
  • Equity The plaintiffs argued that the state did
    not provide sufficient funds for building
    maintenance and construction.
  • Neeley v. West Orange-Cove CISD (2005)

22
Education Funding
  • Legislative Solution
  • Retained Revenue Sharing
  • New Business TaxBusiness Margins Tax
  • Up to 1 percent of gross receipts minus payroll
    costs or costs of goods sold
  • Shifts burden from capital-intensive businesses
    to service providers
  • Increased cigarette tax
  • Cut property taxes for 2007-2008
  • 1.00/100 assessed valuation by 2008

23
Higher Education
  • Institutions of Higher Education
  • Public Universities
  • Community Colleges
  • Funding Higher Education
  • Permanent University Fund (PUF)
  • Available University Fund
  • Higher Education Fund
  • Tuition deregulation
  • Access to Higher Education
  • Closing the Gaps initiative HECB

24
Health and Human Services
  • Federal-State Partnership
  • Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF)
  • Block Grant
  • Limits on eligibility
  • Food, Shelter, Clothing, Protection
  • Food stamps
  • Women, Infant, and Children nutrition program
    (WIC)

25
Health and Human Services
  • Health Care
  • Medicaid
  • Childrens Health Insurance Program (CHIP)
  • Adequacy of Health and Human Services Programs

26
Transportation Policy
  • Texas Department of Transportation
  • Texas Good Roads Association (TGRA)
  • Toll Roads
  • Regional Mobility Authorities (CTRMA)
  • Trans-Texas Corridor

27
Join the Debate Privatizing Public Assistance
  • Arguments for Privatization
  • Reduction in time to receive services
  • Reduction in personal time
  • Increased accuracy of eligibility
  • Arguments against Privatization
  • Concerns about clients rights and company
    accountability
  • Loss of state jobs
  • Insufficient employees to handle demands
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com