Title: Fanelli Laparoscopic Endobiliary Stent
1FanelliLaparoscopic Endobiliary Stent
- Robert D. Fanelli, MD, FACS
- Assistant Professor of SurgeryUniversity of
Massachusetts Medical SchoolDirector of Surgical
EndoscopyBerkshire Medical Center
2Laparoscopic Endobiliary Stent Placement
- Eliminates need for T-tubes, cystic duct
catheters, external drains when Laparoscopic
Transcystic Common Bile Duct Exploration (LTCBDE)
or Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration
(LCBDE) performed - Eliminates need for LTCBDE or LCBDE for Common
Bile Duct Stones (CBDS) - Protects ductal closures, limits risks of bile
leak
3Laparoscopic Endobiliary Stent Placement
- Prevents complications associated with retained
CBDS - Virtually assures success of postoperative ERCP
- Necessary equipment inexpensive, readily
available - Suitable for use in ASCs as well as hospitals
4Laparoscopic Endobiliary Stent Placement
- First described as adjunct to LCBDE, eliminating
T-tubes - 16 patients (1993-1995)
- 100 clearance CBDS by LTCBDE and LCBDE
- No bile leaks, complications
- 36 to 72 hour LOS
- Gersin, Fanelli.Surgical Endoscopy, vol.12
(4),April 1998 p. 301.
5Laparoscopic Endobiliary Stent Placement
- Most surgeons rely on postoperative ERCP for CBDS
- Patients face risks of retained CBDS,
pancreatitis, cholangitis, stump leak - ERCP results vary based on volume
- High volume centers, gt 95 selective cannulation
rate - Low volume centers, lt 60 selective cannulation
rate - Average rates of selective cannulation, 80 to 85
- 20 patients face reoperation, PTC, or referral
for second ERCP for CBDS left at time of LC - Conversion, T-tubes, drains deprive patients of
low morbidity, quick recovery of LC - T-tubes, drains require constant management,
delay discharge
6Laparoscopic Endobiliary Stent Placement
- Our current experience (SSAT Scientific Session,
May 2000) - 372 consecutive LC during 36 months, ending July
1999 - Hasson cannula, three 5 mm upper abdominal ports,
general anesthesia, CO2 insufflation, routine
fluorocholangiography (FC) - FC accomplished in all patients
- CBDS or suspicious FC identified in 48 (12.9)
- No attempt made to clear CBDS, all patients
treated with stents - Stent placement added 9 to 26 minutes to LC
operative time - Cystic duct balloon dilation necessary in 14
(29.2) - Laparoscopic suturing, advanced skills were not
utilized
7Laparoscopic Endobiliary Stent Placement
- Hemorrhage, bile duct injury, duodenal
perforation, sub-optimal stent placement, stent
migration did not occur - Longest f/u 46 months original series, 80 month
f/u - 44 (92) treated as outpatients
- 4 (8) admitted overnight with average LOS 30
hours - Indications for admission
- PONV (2)
- surgery completed too late for discharge (1)
- weather too severe for safe discharge (1)
- Outpatient ERCP with ES 1 to 4 weeks later
- 100 successful for clearance of CBDS
- CBDS found in all patients -- no false positive
FC - No ERCP, stent related complications to date,
including pancreatitis
8Laparoscopic Endobiliary Stent Technique
- Routine FC via epigastric port
- Flexible tip cholangiogram catheter with
three-way adapter - Three-way adapter permits saline, contrast
injection, and placement of wire guide
9Laparoscopic Endobiliary Stent Technique
- 150 cm Tracer Hybrid Wire Guide advanced through
cholangiogram catheter - Wire guide positioned across ampulla, past CBDS
- Cholangiogram catheter, removed over wire guide
- Finger occlusion of epigastric port prevents loss
of CO2 - Stent introducer port can be used if desired
- Cystic duct dilated if necessary
10Laparoscopic Endobiliary Stent Technique
- Continuous fluoroscopy
- Stent assembly advanced over wire guide
- Position stent across ampulla
- Radiographic markers assure proper positioning
- Stent is fixed to delivery mechanism
- Stent location adjusted as needed prior to
deployment - Once position perfect, release safety to prepare
for deployment
11Laparoscopic Endobiliary Stent Technique
- Radiographic markers
- Marker 1 - distal tip
- Marker 2 - distal flange
- Marker 3 - proximal flange
- Marker 4 - proximal tip
- Markers signal deployment
- Markers 3, 2, and 1 pass through 4 during release
- After 3, 2, and 1 clear 4, stent is free of
delivery system
12Laparoscopic Endobiliary Stent Technique
- Stent successfully deployed
- Positioned across ampulla
- Contrast rapidly drains from CBD
- Cystic duct ligated
- Cholecystectomy completed
- Drains are not placed
- Patient is discharged when alert
- Placement of stent added 20 minutes to LC
operative time
13Laparoscopic Endobiliary Stent Technique
- ERCP 1 to 4 weeks postop
- Same admission feasible
- Various ERCP methods
- Snare removal of stent prior to cannulation,
sphincterotomy - Wire guide placed via stent prior to retrieval
- Precut sphincterotomy over stent
- Cannulate beside stent for sphincterotomy
(preferred method)
14Laparoscopic Endobiliary Stent Kit
- Stent and pusher assembly
- 150 cm Tracer Hybrid Wire Guide
- Additional Components
- Introducer set
- 12 French cystic duct dilation balloon
- Cholangiogram catheter with three-way adapter,
short wire
15Conclusions
- There are numerous methods for treating CBDS
during LC - LCBDE is quick and highly successful, but
requires refined laparoscopic suturing skills and
carries risks of choledochotomy - LTCBDE is time consuming, requires expensive
equipment and endoscopic, fluoroscopic skills,
but avoids choledochotomy - Both employ external drains, T-tubes, or cystic
duct catheters - Laparoscopic stent placement is fast, involves
minimal expense, does not require
choledochotomy, eliminates external tubes and
drains, and virtually assures success of
postoperative ERCP
16References
- Gersin KS, Fanelli RD. Laparoscopic Endobiliary
Stenting as an Adjunct to Common Bile Duct
Exploration. Surg Endosc 1998 Apr12(4)301-304. - Fanelli RD, Gersin KS. Laparoscopic Endobiliary
Stenting A Simplified Approach to the Management
of Occult Common Bile Duct Stones. J Gastrointest
Surg 2001 Jan/Feb 5(1)74-80. - Fanelli RD, Gersin KS, Mainella MT. Laparoscopic
Endobiliary Stenting Significantly Improves
Success of Postoperative ERCP in Low Volume
Centers. Surg Endosc 2002 Mar16(3)487-491. - Wu JS, Soper NJ. Comparison of Laparoscopic
Choledochotomy Closure Techniques. Surg Endosc
2002 Sep16(9)1309-1313.