Title: Quality%20System%20Model%20ICH%20Q10
1Quality System ModelICH Q10
2Agenda
- What is ICH Q10
- History
- Why do we need a modern effective Quality
System? - The elements and enablers of a Quality System
- Model of Pfizers Quality System
- Review the website
3Pharmaceutical Quality System
- The ICH Q10 document on Pharmaceutical Quality
System was recommended for adoption to the
regulatory bodies of the EU, Japan and USA, June
2008. - The document establishes a tripartite guideline
describing a model for an effective quality
management system a management system to direct
and control a pharmaceutical company with regard
to quality. - The specifics of a pharmaceutical quality
system vary depending with the stage of the
product lifecycle, but the
overall principles and components
are the same.
4History
Evolution of regional GMPs 1970s
Evolution of ISO 9000 approaches 1980s
FDA 21st Century initiative 2002
ICH Quality Vision / Q8, Q9 2003
Guidance for Industry - Quality System Approach to Pharmaceutical cGMP Regulations 2006
ICH Q10 Pharmaceutical Quality System 2008
5Comprehensive Model
- Based on International Standards Organization
(ISO) quality concepts - Includes applicable GMP regulations
- Complements both
- ICH Q8 Pharmaceutical Development,
- ICH Q9 Quality Risk Management
- Not intended to create new expectations beyond
current regulatory environment
6A Modern Effective Quality System?
- Good business practice!
- Significant changes in external business
environment - Fewer new products / blockbusters
- Reduced margins / greater competition / low-cost
sources - Focus of efficient, effective organizations
- Lean processes
- Pharmaceutical industry is behind other
industries in Quality Management philosophies /
practices - Marketed products ARE safe and efficacious
- BUT costs of quality are high
- Often reactive, not designed-in / preventative
7Why do we need a Modern Effective Quality
System?
- Implementation should
- Facilitate innovation and continual improvement
- Inflexible regulatory environment
- Focus on Compliance, not Science and Risk-Based
approach - Industry margins did not provide drive for change
- Strengthen the link between pharmaceutical
development and manufacturing - GMPs do not provide a full modern Quality
System - Originated in 1970s incremental additions
- ISO Quality Management thinking not embedded
- Need to be complemented with Q8 and Q9
8Pharmaceutical Quality System
9An Effective Quality System
- GMPs
- Management Responsibility
- Elements - Continual Improvement
- Enablers Knowledge and Risk Management
- Lifecycle approach
10An Effective Quality System
- GMPs
- Management Responsibility
- Elements - Continual Improvement
- Enablers Knowledge and Risk Management
- Lifecycle approach
11Management Responsibilities
- Essential component of a Quality System
- Not just about compliance
- Visible leadership to establish and maintain a
company wide culture and commitment to Quality
and improvement - Monitor performance of the Quality System for
both internal and outsourced activities - Quality can not be owned only
by the Q Unit - Management is accountable
- But independent assessments are key
12Management Responsibilities
- Management Commitment
- Quality Policy
- Quality Planning
- Resource Management
- Internal Communication
- Management Review
- Outsourced Activities
- Change in Product Ownership
13Management Commitment
- Signed Quality Commitments are commonplace and
are not indicative of Management Commitment - What is Indicative?
- Plant Managers aware of the issues
- Management Team that works together
- Quality as a Trusted Partner
14Clear Roles, Responsibilities, Processes
- Quality Policy Sets the standards and direction
of organization - Quality Planning Converts into objectives
plans - Resources Allocations and competence
- Communication Quality items to appropriate
audience - Management Reviews
- Product and Process performance
- Quality System performance
15Quality Policies
- Comprehensive and Balanced
- Flexibility/adaptability defined is consistent
- Interconnectivity of a Quality System requires a
comprehensive approach in the design -
16Quality Plans
- Written Quality Plans are becoming more common
- What is Indicative?
- Quality Planning Process is dynamic
- Defined process for evaluating issues to bring
into the quality planning process. - Tracking progress against an agreed upon Quality
Plan - Adequate resources are made available
17Resource Management
- Adequate resources are made available
- Resources include time, money, equipment and
people - What is Indicative?
- Clear prioritization of resources in line with
- Reasonable number of projects with
- Realistic commitment time frames
18Internal Communication
- Issues will occur
- Escalation of issues, actions, decisions and
impact - What is Indicative?
- Trusting relationship between manufacturing
quality assurance - Understanding of why timeliness is important
- Communication uses defined processes and is
transparent - Escalation of issue is not viewed as punitive
- The Operations Team is wholly accountable
- Adequate resources are made available
19Management Review
- Grounded in the device regulations, periodic
Management Reviews are becoming more common - What is Indicative?
- Linkage between Quality Plan and Management
Reviews - Linage between Key Quality Indicators
- In a hierarchal company, how information flows
- Depth and frequency of Reviews
- Attendance at the Management Review
- How is the information used?
- Opportunity to align priorities and resources
- Not punitive
20Outsourced Activities and Purchased Materials
- Pharmaceutical firm (i.e., Management) is
ultimately responsible to assure processes are in
place - Process must be in place to
- Assess suitability of contractors / suppliers
before use - Ensure use of approved suppliers and a defined
supply chain - Define responsibilities and communication
processes for quality related activities - Review performance and make improvements
21An Effective Quality System
- GMPs
- Management Responsibility
- Elements - Continual Improvement
- Process Performance and Product Quality
- Corrective Action / Preventive Action
- Change Management
- Management Review
- Enablers Knowledge and Risk Management
- Lifecycle approach
22Continual Improvement
- Continuous Improvement of product quality is a
key objective of the quality system, irrespective
of the stage of the lifecycle. - Four specific elements of the quality system
support achieving continuous improvement - Process performance and product quality
monitoring - Corrective action and preventative action
- Change management
- Management review of process
- performance and product quality
23Product Quality and Process Performance
- Use knowledge, Quality by Design, Product and
Process understanding and QRM to set Control
Strategy - What and when to monitor / measure / test
- Based on critical product quality attributes and
critical process parameters to deliver them - Reduce and control variation to appropriate
levels - Confirm and maintain a state of control
- Feed-back and Feed-forward loops
- Drive continual improvement
- Continual verification
24CAPA System
- Investigation of non-conformances
- Reactive ? deviations, rejections, complaints,
recalls, observations from audits and inspections - Proactive ? feedback from trends
- Structured investigations to seek root cause
- Use QRM to ensure degree and formality is
commensurate with level of risk - Should result in enhanced knowledge and
improvement - Not just reacting to non-conformances
- Focus on preventative actions
- Need effective tracking / follow up processes
25Change Management System
- Change can be good!
- Proactively driven by outputs from monitoring /
trending / improvement / innovation - Not just by reacting to problems
- Use expert teams and knowledge to evaluate and
set success criteria - Use QRM commensurate with level of risk
- Consider impact on regulatory filings
- Undertake in timely and effective way and tracked
- Assure no unintended consequences
26Management Review
- Process Performance and Product Quality
- Results from inspections and assessments
- Periodic quality reviews
- Customer satisfaction complaints, recalls
- Conclusions of process performance and product
quality monitoring - Effectiveness of process and product changes
- Appropriate actions
- Improvements to manufacturing processes
- Training and/or realignment of resources
- Capture and share knowledge
27Continual Improvement of the Quality System
- Assessment of the Quality System against
- Internal factors (audits, CAPAs, complaints,
recalls, etc.) - External factors (regulatory inspectional
findings) - Emerging regulations
- New technology
- Change in business strategies
- Outcomes of the Assessment
- Improvements communicated throughout a business
- Resource reallocation
- Changes in policies, practices
28An Effective Quality System
- GMPs
- Management Responsibility
- Elements - Continual Improvement
- Enablers Knowledge and Risk Management
- Lifecycle approach
29Knowledge Management
- Systematic and lifecycle approach to acquiring,
analyzing, storing and disseminating knowledge on
products, processes, components - Provides the basis for science and risk-based
approaches in the Quality System - Product and process development
- Manufacturing
- Change management
- Continual improvement
30Quality Risk Management (Q9)
- Essential, integrated part of Quality System
- The evaluation of the risk to quality should be
based on scientific knowledge and ultimately link
to the protection of the patient and - The level of effort, formality and documentation
of the quality risk management process should be
commensurate with the level of risk - Proactive use to identify and control risk
- Support decision through lifecycle
- Integrate into key parts of Quality System
- e.g., change management, CAPA, GMPs Validation,
etc. - Help set meaningful specification / control
parameters to ensure product quality
control requirements are met
31Key to an Effective Quality System
- GMPs
- Management Responsibility
- Continual Improvement
- Knowledge Management
- Quality Risk Management
- Lifecycle approach
32Lifecycle Approach
- Holistic and cover the product lifecycle
- Design and Development
- Manufacturing
- Withdrawal
- Challenges and removes some traditional
organizational silos - Within industry
- Within Regulatory Agencies
- With outsourcing partners
- Application of Quality System Elements at
each stage of the Product Lifecycle
33Pharmaceutical Quality System
34Pharmaceutical Development Stage
- Design a product and its manufacturing process to
consistently deliver the intended performance and
meet the needs of patients, health-care
professionals, and regulatory authorities - Develop knowledge of product and processes
- Utilize Quality Risk Management
principles to identify and
control risk to
product quality
35Technology Transfer Stage
- Transfer product and process knowledge between
development and manufacturing or between
manufacturing units. - Develop further knowledge
- Refine Quality Risk Management
and control strategies
36Commercial Manufacturing Stage
- Provide product with appropriate quality
attributes consistently in a state of control and
facilitating continual improvement. - Continually expand product and process knowledge
- Adjust the Quality Risk
Management and control
strategy as
needed.
37Product Discontinuation Stage
- Manage the terminal stage of the product
lifecycle using a pre-defined approach - product complaint management
- stability studies documentation
38GMPs over the Product Lifecycle
- Compliance with applicable GMPs is the foundation
of the quality system - The intended use and market of any material
produced during the lifecycle must be understood
and the appropriate GMPs must be met - Applicable GMPs must be incorporated into the
quality system for each stage of the lifecycle - Documentation
- Quality Unit Responsibilities
- Facilities and Equipment
39Management Controls - Product Lifecycle
- Essential over all stages of Product Lifecycle
- Includes Management Commitment, Policy and
Planning, Resource Management, Review and
Communication - Extends to management controls of outsourced
operations
40- Monitoring
- Use to provide data and knowledge
- CAPA
- Use methodology to identify and implement
improvements - Change Management
- Change is inherent part of this phase
- Change must be documented
- Increase formality as development progresses
- Management Review
- Use to ensure the adequacy of product and process
design
41- Monitoring
- Use to provide indication of how process performs
in manufacturing - CAPA
- Used to make improvements to development and to
commercial manufacturing - Change Management
- Proactively manage change and thoroughly
- Management Review
- Use to ensure the developed process can be
manufactured at scale
42- Monitoring
- Well-defined monitoring of process performance
product quality to assure performance within a
state of control - CAPA
- CAPA methodology must be used and the
effectiveness evaluated - Change Management
- Formal change management must be used
- Must have oversight by the quality unit
- Management Review
- A structured review which identifies and
supports continual improvement
43- Monitoring
- Relevant monitoring should continue (e.g.,
completion of stability studies, and product
compliant analysis) - CAPA
- Should be used to determine and address any
impact on product remaining on the market and on
any other products - Change Management
- Should continue for any appropriate changes
- Oversight by quality unit
- Management Review
- Continue reviews and include such activities as
stability and complaints
44Enablers Over the Product Lifecycle
- Knowledge increases throughout the product
lifecycle and must be captured, transferred and
used systematically - Quality Risk Management provides proactive
approach to identifying and controlling risks
throughout the lifecycle
45Framework of a Quality System
- Achieve Product Realization
- From the start of an idea for a product, to the
culmination of the product available for the
patients. - Manufacturing and release of finished goods so
that prodcut is available for patients - Establish and Maintain a State of Control
- Effective monitoring control systems are in
place which assure continued process performance
and prodcut quality - A confidence when scheduling production, product
will be available according to planned dates. - Facilitate Continual Improvement
- Reducing project and process variability
- Looking for areas of improvement not
- self-evident but important
46Summary
- The Quality System defines our Quality Culture
- Defines the responsibilities and authorities
- Defines communication models to all levels in the
organization - Provides a clear governance model defining how
quality decisions are made - Monitors to assure necessary resources are
available for completion of quality plans - Assures alignment of the quality
objectives with the business strategy - Makes life easier
47Pfizer Quality System Model
48References
- International Conference on Harmonization,
Harmonized Tripartite Guideline, Pharmaceutical
Quality System, ICH Q10, Step 4, 04June2008 - Kaufman, Zena G., Divisional VP, Quality Center
of Excellence, Abbott, Considerations for
Designing a Pharmaceutical Quality System, Nov
2008 - Allen, Barbara, Director, Global Quality Systems,
Eli Lilly and Company, Quality Systems over the
Product Lifecycle, Nov 2008 - Wilkinson, Neil, David Begg Associates, The
Elements of a Modern Effective Pharmaceutical
Quality System, Nov 2008