A%20 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

A%20

Description:

A short list of methods we could discuss Agroecosystems Analysis (AEA), Beneficiary Assessment, Development Education Leadership Teams (DELTA), Diagnosis and ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:152
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 70
Provided by: PeterH229
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A%20


1
A short list of methods we could discuss
  • Agroecosystems Analysis (AEA), Beneficiary
    Assessment, Development Education Leadership
    Teams (DELTA), Diagnosis and Design (DD),
    Diagnostico Rural Participativo (DRP), Farmer
    Participatory Research (FPR), Groupe de Recherche
    et dAppui pour lAuto-promotion Paysanne
    (GRAAP), Methode Active de Recherche et de
    Planification Participative (MARP), Participatory
    Analysis and Learning Methods (PALM),
    Participatory Action Research (PAR),
    Participatory Research Methodology (PRM),
    Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA),
    Participatory Rural Appraisal and Planning
    (PRAP), Participatory Technology Development
    (PTD), Participatory Urban Appraisal (PUA),
    Planning for Real, Process Documentation, Rapid
    Appraisal (RA), Rapid Assessment for Agricultural
    Knowledge Systems (RAAKS), Rapid Assessment
    Procedure (RAP), Rapid Assessment Techniques
    (RAT), Rapid Catchment Analysis (RCA), Rapid
    Ethnographic Assessment (REA), Rapid Food
    Security Assessment (RFSA), Rapid
    Multi-perspective Appraisal (RMA), Rapid
    Organisational Assessment (ROA), Rapid Rural
    Appraisal (RRA), Samuhik Brahman (Joint Trek),
    Soft Systems Methodology (SSM), Story Methodology
    (SM), Theatre for Development, Training for
    Transformation, Visualisation in Participatory
    Programmes (VIPP), ZOPP

More is not necessarily better!
2
The Forages and Livestock SystemsProject
(FLSP)LaosProcess of Working with Farmers
3
1. The Conceptual Process
4
Participatory diagnosis
Active Farmer Participation
5
2. The Process in Practice
6
(No Transcript)
7
  • Many projects have had problems
    because they chose villages for
    their convenience rather than
    considering which villages have the best chance
    for success
  • Three questions will help you select villages and
    farmers for doing your research
  • What do I have to offer?
  • What are my social goals?
  • Where am I likely to have most impact?

8
Formal experimentation
Participatory diagnosis
Active Farmer Participation
Expansion (Adaptation Adoption)
9
Once you have selected places
to work you need to confirm that there is real
potential for your research. You need to know if
the farmers have problems that could benefit from
your your research To find out, conduct
Participatory Diagnosis
10
Participatory diagnosis...
  • is usually the entry point for participatory
    research
  • is one or two meetings with the village in which
    farmers and researchers discuss the problems (and
    opportunities) they are facing AND the farmers
    prioritise thoseproblems they would like to try
    to solve now

11
The outputs of participatory diagnosis are...
  • an agreement between the community and the
    development workers on which problems to solve
    (or opportunities to develop) and
  • who in the communitywill be responsible for
    testing promising technology options (selecting
    a focus group)

12
Some tools to use
  • Resource Mapping
  • Calendars (seasonal, historical)
  • Social Equity analysis
  • Prioritise Problems
  • Resource Mapping

13
Resource Mapping
Resource Mapping will help you start to
understand village resources and the broad
problems the farmers are facing
14
Mapping
Mapping helps us start to understand village
resources and the problems the farmers are facing
15
In mapping
  • encourage all the farmers to participate in the
    mapping exercise.
  • ask questions about some of the issues that the
    farmers raise.
  •  

16
In mapping, ask the farmers to draw
  • the boundary of all their land
  • the village features
  • the production areas (agriculture, livestock,
    forestry)
  • any other features important to them
  •  

17
Mapping
  • Can be used to understand resource flows and
    social divisions in the community
  • Will take at least 1 hour
  •  

18
(No Transcript)
19
(No Transcript)
20
(No Transcript)
21
(No Transcript)
22
Some tools to use
  • Resource Mapping
  • Calendars (seasonal, historical)
  • Social Equity analysis
  • Prioritise Problems
  • Calendars (seasonal, historical)

23
Calendars
  • Calendars help us understand
  • when activities and problems (such as high labour
    demand, food shortages and disease) happen
    throughout the year (seasonal) and
  • how the farming systems and problems are changing
    with time (historical)

24
In preparing calendars, ask the farmers to
  • list their main farming activities throughout the
    year
  • list the main problems they have that vary
    throughout the year (you can also add some) 

25
In preparing calendars, ask the farmers to
  • draw on the calendar when each activity occurs
  • describe who is responsible for each activity
    (men or women)
  • to rank or weight when each problem is important
  •  

26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
Some tools to use
  • Resource Mapping
  • Calendars (seasonal, historical)
  • Social Equity analysis
  • Prioritise Problems
  • Social Equity analysis

31
Wealth Analysis
In every community there are differencesbetween
people such as wealth andgender. Some people are
poor and other people are relatively better
off. Different groups have different problems
and opportunities
32
Wealth Analysisis an approach that helps you
  • define these wealth groups in a village
  • understand the main characteristics of each
    group,
  • understand why some people are poor while others
    are relatively better off, and
  • identify who in the community belongs to each
    group.

33
Ask the farmers to
  • describe the different wealth groups
  • describe the main characteristics of each group,
  • discuss why some people are poor while others are
    relatively better off, and
  • identify who in the community belongs to each
    group.

34
  • Enough food (16 farmers)
  • surplus rice every year
  • have both lowland and upland fields
  • raise pigs, chickens, ducks and buffalo or cattle
    for sale
  • can purchase replacement if animals die
  • nice house
  • have money/capital
  • have education
  • know how to utilize resources well
  • settled earlier in the village

35
  • 2. Food shortages sometimes (35 farmers)
  • sufficient/surplus rice in some years
  • less land than the sufficient food group
  • less livestock than the sufficient food group
    (sold only in times of need)
  • can purchase replacement if animals die
  • less nice house than food sufficient group
  • have many different activities for income and
    livelihood
  • weave for sale
  • exchange labor

36
  • 3. Food shortages each year (18 farmers)
  • rice shortage every year
  • no lowland area
  • have only chickens and ducks (not for sale)
  • can not purchase replacement if animals die
  • house not nice
  • lack money to invest
  • no education
  • settled in the village after 1975

37
Gender Analysis
  • You may need to work with women and men
    separately
  • At all stages of your research, you need to keep
    asking yourself who is participating?,
    who is making the decisions?, who is doing the
    work?, who has controls the resources?,
    what are their opportunities, constraints,
    responsibilities, perceptions interests? And
    who is benefiting from your work?

38
Some tools to use
  • Resource Mapping
  • Calendars (seasonal, historical)
  • Social Equity analysis
  • Prioritise Problems
  • Prioritise Problems

39
Prioritise Problems
In this first village meeting you need toknow
how important all their problemsare in
agriculturenot just the ones youthink you can
research. Asking farmers to list and prioritise
all their agricultural problems will help you
understand how important are the problems that
you think you may be able to help solve with your
research.
40
Now that you and the villagers have agreed on
the problems (oropportunities) that you want to
research, you can now work with the focus group
to understand these problems in more detail Once
you have done that you can then discuss the
technologies that could be tested and the farmers
select which ones to test
41
A good tool to use
  • Problem Analysis

42
Problem Analysis
  • helps the focus group to define their problems
    and opportunities in detail
  • helps them identify which are the high priority
    problems for research
  • builds on the understanding you already gained in
    the maps and calendars

43
In Problem Analysis, ask the farmers
  • to identify the causes of their main problems

44
Overworked animals
Few calves Thin calves
Lack of information
Drought
Parasites and disease
Thin animals
Lack of feeds in the dry season
Limited area for grazing
Poor animal nutrition
Perceived problems

45
In Problem Analysis, ask the farmers
  • to identify the causes of their main problems
  • to prioritise these causes

46
(No Transcript)
47
In Problem Analysis, ask the farmers
  • to identify the causes of their main problems
  • to prioritise these causes
  • to identify which causes contribute to other
    problems

48
Lack of feeds in the dry season
49
In Problem Analysis, ask the farmers
4. what have they done to deal with these
problems in the past?
50
Limited area for grazing
Drought
Lack of feeds in the dry season
Reduce the number of animals
Provide feed supplements
Hire labour
Seek veterinary advice
Past strategies

51
In Problem Analysis, ask the farmers
  • 4. what have they done to deal with these
    problems in the past?
  • 5. what would they like to solve now?

52
Limited area for grazing
Drought
Lack of feeds in the dry season
Reduce the number of animals
Provide feed supplements
Try new ways of feeding animals
Hire labour
Seek information and advice
Seek veterinary advice
Future plans

53
Cattle are thin and weak
54
Too many cattle in the village
Expanding area of crop land
Drought
Area of grazing land getting smaller
Diseases and parasites
Lack of feeds in the dry season
No longer allowed to graze in forest
CAUSES
Cattle are thin and weak
55
Too many cattle in the village
Expanding area of crop land
Drought
Area of grazing land getting smaller
Diseases and parasites
Lack of feeds in the dry season
No longer allowed to graze in forest
CAUSES
Cattle are thin and weak
EFFECTS
More disease problems
Ploughing takes longer
Thin calves
Need to hire labour for extra ploughing
Fewer calves
Less income
56
Too many cattle in the village
Expanding area of crop land
Drought
Sold some cattle
Area of grazing land getting smaller
Diseases and parasites
Lack of feeds in the dry season
Used traditional medicines
Provide extra cut feed
No longer allowed to graze in forest
CAUSES
Cattle are thin and weak
EFFECTS
More disease problems
Ploughing takes longer
Thin calves
Need to hire labour for extra ploughing
Fewer calves
Less income
57
Too many cattle in the village
Expanding area of crop land
Drought
Sold some cattle
Area of grazing land getting smaller
Diseases and parasites
Lack of feeds in the dry season
Used traditional medicines
Provide extra cut feed
No longer allowed to graze in forest
Try new ways of feeding animals
Need help with animal diseases
CAUSES
Cattle are thin and weak
EFFECTS
More disease problems
Ploughing takes longer
Thin calves
Need to hire labour for extra ploughing
Fewer calves
Less income
58
  • Once the focus-group farmers and the researchers
    have agreed on which technologies to test and how
    to test them, you are ready to start field
    experiments
  • Three important principles will help you at the
    beginning
  • Start small!
  • Keep the experiments as simple as possible!
  • Encourage farmers to innovate!

59
Testingtechnologies...
  • Farmers will need time to test the technology
    options before they areready to commit their
    opinions.
  • They need to be able to see it working on their
    own fields to be able to assess benefits and
    risks

60
Testingtechnologies...
Controlled experiments or farmer-run
non-replicated trials? It depends on your
goals! Probably BOTH. Controlled experiments
are really the only way to get accurate,
reliable, rigorous data Farmer trials are
really the only way to get good farmer
feedback
61
Testingtechnologies...
  • How to deal withcomplexity in the field?
  • Search for robust technologies
  • Do careful site and farmer selection to
    understandthe niches where your technology works
  • Do evaluations with many farmers across the
    variability

62
  • As you start experiments with farmers, you want
    to understand which options they prefer and why.
  • You can do this through
  • Regular monitoring
  • Technical measurements
  • Measure each farmers preferences and criteria
  • Focus-group meeting
  • Village feedback meeting

63
A good tool to use
  • Preference Analysis

64
Some lessons we have learned
  • This is a learning process. We need regular
    action followed by reflection
  • The key to successful use of the approach is
    active, decision-making involvement of farmers at
    ALL stages
  • At the beginning, try to offer a broad range of
    robust technical options with some entry point
    technologies that give quick benefits

65
Some lessons we have learned
  1. It is an important role of researchers to
    clearly describe the technical limits of the
    options
  2. work with the right farmers
  3. Start small small successes are better than big
    failures
  4. You can rarely photocopy technologies from one
    place to another
  5. If you have good technologies be prepared for
    expansion!

66
Two notes on tools and methods
67
A short list of methods we could discuss
  • Agroecosystems Analysis (AEA), Beneficiary
    Assessment, Development Education Leadership
    Teams (DELTA), Diagnosis and Design (DD),
    Diagnostico Rural Participativo (DRP), Farmer
    Participatory Research (FPR), Groupe de Recherche
    et dAppui pour lAuto-promotion Paysanne
    (GRAAP), Methode Active de Recherche et de
    Planification Participative (MARP), Participatory
    Analysis and Learning Methods (PALM),
    Participatory Action Research (PAR),
    Participatory Research Methodology (PRM),
    Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA),
    Participatory Rural Appraisal and Planning
    (PRAP), Participatory Technology Development
    (PTD), Participatory Urban Appraisal (PUA),
    Planning for Real, Process Documentation, Rapid
    Appraisal (RA), Rapid Assessment for Agricultural
    Knowledge Systems (RAAKS), Rapid Assessment
    Procedure (RAP), Rapid Assessment Techniques
    (RAT), Rapid Catchment Analysis (RCA), Rapid
    Ethnographic Assessment (REA), Rapid Food
    Security Assessment (RFSA), Rapid
    Multi-perspective Appraisal (RMA), Rapid
    Organisational Assessment (ROA), Rapid Rural
    Appraisal (RRA), Samuhik Brahman (Joint Trek),
    Soft Systems Methodology (SSM), Story Methodology
    (SM), Theatre for Development, Training for
    Transformation, Visualisation in Participatory
    Programmes (VIPP), ZOPP

More is not necessarily better!
68
Also, take note that
The tools are NOT the output!
Better understanding of farmers opportunities,
constraints and goals is the output
69
Click the back button on your browser to return
to the main menu
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com