Title: Electromagnetic waves: Reflection, Refraction and Interference
1Electromagnetic waves Reflection, Refraction and
Interference
2Optical cooling
Photons
v
k
m
Because of its motion, the atoms see an
incoming photon with a frequency Doppler-shifted
upward by,
Laser frequency (fL) chosen to be just below the
resonance frequency of the atom (fo) fo
fL(1v/c)
3Optical Cooling
Photons of the right frequency will be absorbed
by the atom, whose speed is reduced because of
the transfer of the momentum of the
photon, Emission occurs when the atom falls
back to its ground state. However, the emission
is randomly directed An atom moving in the
opposite direction, away from the light source,
sees photons with a frequency, fL(1-v/c), far
enough from fo that there can be little or no
absorption, and therefore no momentum
gain. Radiation pressure force As v decreases,
there must be a corresponding change in the laser
frequency.. One must have three mutually
perpendicular laser beams in order to reduce the
speed of the atoms in all directions.
4Reflection, Transmission and Interference of EM
waves
5Reflection and Transmission at an interface
Normal Incidence Two media characterized by v1,
v2
incident
transmitted
reflected
1
2
6Reflection and Transmission at an interface
- Require continuity of amplitude at interface
- f1 g1 f2
- Require continuity of slope at interface
- f1 g1 f2
- Recall u x vt
7Reflection and Transmission at an interface
Continuity of slope requires,
or,
8Reflection and Transmission at an interface
- Integrating from t -? to t t
- Assuming f1(t -? ) 0
- Then,
9Amplitude transmission co-efficient (?)
Medium 1 to 2
Medium 2 to 1
10Amplitude reflection co-efficient (?)
At a dielectric interface
11Phase changes on reflection from a dielectric
interface
n2 gt n1
n2ltn1
Less dense to more dense e.g. air to glass
More dense to less dense e.g. glass to air
? phase change on reflection
No phase change on reflection
12Phase changes on transmission through a
dielectric interface
Thus there is no phase change on transmission
13Amplitude Transmission Reflection
For normal incidence
Amplitude reflection
Amplitude transmission
Suppose these are plane waves
14Intensity reflection
Amplitude reflection co-efficient
and intensity reflection
15Intensity transmission
Intensity transmission
and in general
R T 1
(conservation of energy)
16Two-source interference
What is the nature of the superposition of
radiation from two coherent sources. The classic
example of this phenomenon is Youngs Double Slit
Experiment
Plane wave (?)
P
S1
y
?
x
a
S2
L
17Youngs Double slit experiment
Assumptions
- Monochromatic, plane wave
- Incident on slits (or pin hole), S1, S2
- separated by distance a (centre to centre)
- Observed on screen L gtgt a (L- meters, a mm)
- Two sources (S1 and S2) are coherent and in phase
(since same wave front produces both as all
times) - Assume slits are very narrow (width b ?)
- so radiation from each slit alone produces
uniform illumination across the screen
18Youngs double slit experiment
- slits at x 0
- The fields at S1 and S2 are
Assume that the slits might have different width
and therefore Eo1 ? Eo2
19Youngs double slit experiment
What are the corresponding E-fields at P?
Since L gtgt a (? small) we can put r r1
r2 We can also put k1 k2 2?/?
(monochromatic source)
20Youngs Double slit experiment
The total amplitude at P
Intensity at P
21Interference Effects
- Are represented by the last two terms
- If the fields are perpendicular
- then,
- and,
In the absence of interference, the total
intensity is a simple sum
22Interference effects
- Interference requires at least parallel
components of E1P and E2P - We will assume the two sources are polarized
parallel to one another (i.e.
23Interference terms
where,
24Intensity Youngs double slit diffraction
Phase difference of beams occurs because of a
path difference!
25Youngs Double slit diffraction
- I1P intensity of source 1 (S1) alone
- I2P intensity of source 2 (S2) alone
- Thus IP can be greater or less than I1I2
depending on the values of ?2 - ?1 - In Youngs experiment r1 r2 k
- Hence
- Thus r2 r1 a sin ?
r1
r2
a
r2-r1