Title: Earthquake Sensation: integrating GPS and inertial sensors
1Earthquake Sensationintegrating GPS and
inertial sensors
CENS - UCLA July 25, 2003
- Kenneth W. Hudnut, Ph.D.
- Chief, So. Calif. Earthquake Hazard Assessment
Project - Earthquake Hazards Team
- U. S. Geological Survey
2Southern California is the nations most
dangerous place for earthquakes - why?
Silver linings State-of-the-art earthquake
monitoring arrays Many of the worlds best
researchers work within this natural laboratory
3San Andreas fault
- 35 mm/yr slip rate
- gt70 of total plate boundary motion
- 1685, 1812, 1857 eqs
- Big Bend compression
- 1971 Sylmar (M 6.7)
- 1994 Northridge (M 6.7)
- SoCal is now heavily wired (much like Japan
Taiwan) - 150 BB CISN stations
- 250 SCIGN stations
- Catalog SCEC CMM3
4Improving hazard assessment
- Temporal variations do occur
- Clustering (e.g., Basin Range, ECSZ, Asia)
- Discrepant geological and geodetic rates
- Sequences involving fault interaction (e.g.,
Joshua Tree - Landers - Big Bear - Hector Mine
Anatolian system, etc.) - Implement robust research findings into hazard
assessment - Variability does not mean predictability
Courtesy Anke Friedrich
5GPS
6SCIGN Data Products
- 1st Year
- Combined time
- series (1996-2002)
- 3rd Year
- Real-time earth-
- quake response
- 5th Year
- Resolve rates on
- primary LA basin
- faults (and others)
7(No Transcript)
8New methods and data integration
- Precise topographic mapping of surface ruptures
and active fault scarps - slip models for prehistoric events
- rapid assessment of surface slip and damage
patterns after large events - Requires precise integration of GPS INS for
flight navigation
1957 Gobi-Altai earthquake surface rupture
9High resolution topography along surface rupture
of the October 16, 1999 Hector Mine, California
Earthquake (Mw7.1) from Airborne Laser Swath
Mapping
- Hudnut, K. W. (USGS), A. Borsa (UCSD),
- C. Glennie (Aerotec, LLC) and J.-B. Minster (UCSD)
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of
America Special Issue on the Hector Mine
earthquake (2002) http//pasadena.wr.usgs.gov/off
ice/hudnut/docs/
10Airborne laser swath mapping (ALSM)
- precise topographic mapping of surface ruptures
and active fault scarps
Airborne platform navigation must be highly
precise and requires high-rate GPS data
- representation of actual fault ruptures recorded
and preserved in unprecedented detail
11Geolocation Vectors and Error Sources
Vector from CMearth to GPS phase center Magnitude
directional errors both are stochastic, time
and location variant.
Vector from GPS phase center to laser Magnitude
error is constant if no airframe flexing.
Directional error due to constant and
time-varying biases in INS.
Vector from laser to ground footprint Magnitude
error due to timing, instrument and atmospheric
delays. Directional error from constant mirror
mounting offsets and time-varying biases in
reporting of scan angles (both pitch and roll).
Note additional errors due to imperfect synchroni
zation of GPS, INS, mirror scan and laser firing
times must be modeled and removed as well.
12Exploded ordnance (crater)
Lavic Lake Roll Pitch Maneuvers
pitch maneuvers
13Maximum slip section of the 1999 Hector Mine
eq. surface rupture
Photo by Keith Stark (SCIGN)
14Estimating slip on max. slip segment ofthe
fault
15(No Transcript)
16(No Transcript)
17(No Transcript)
18(No Transcript)
19Laser Scanof the San Andreas
Proposal to the NSF EarthScope Science RFP Prof.
Mike Bevis, PI (OSU)
Requires high-rate (1 Hz) GPS data from
SCIGN sites along fhe fault special care with
IMU-INS
20GPS Fault Slip Sensor
- K. Hudnut, G. Anderson, A. Aspiotes,
- N. King, R. Moffitt, K. Stark
- (all at USGS-SCIGN, Pasadena CA)
APEC symposium Proc. Paper, Fall AGU poster, and
paper in preparation for Bulletin of the
Seismological Society of America http//pasadena.
wr.usgs.gov/office/hudnut/slipsensor/
21Early Warning
The speed of light gtgt the speed of sound
EmergencyResponse
Seismic and GPS Stations
Utilities
Transport- ation
(e.g Wu Teng, BSSA, 2002 Allen Kanamori,
Science, 2003)
22(No Transcript)
23Real-Time GPS Network - Enhancing SCIGN
- On 15 November 2002, first-ever GPS fault slip
sensor deployed across San Andreas fault at
Gorman, Calif. - Augments seismic early warning system - resolves
the observational deficiency inherent with
inertial sensors that cannot discern tilt from
acceleration - Upgrade SCIGN telemetry
- DSL, frame relay
- Radio repeaters, WiGate and dedicated links
- Data buffering
- Augment SCIGN real-time acquisition and
processing system - Implemented sub-daily processing (4 hr) for 100
SCIGN stations (down from 24 hr) - Implementing multiple real-time streaming GPS
processors (commercial software)
24Lone Juniper Ranch and Frazier Park High School
First prototype GPS fault slip sensor
Spans the San Andreas fault near Gorman,
California
25Cleaned-up test results
Why is real-time GPS processing noisy and less
robust than post-processing? Ambiguity
resolution, multipath, atmosphere and clock
errors - what can be done?
26Upgrading SCIGN telemetry
Low cost options such as frequent FTS dial-up,
radio nets, and DSL Development testing of near
real-time GPS precise processing, etc.
27Conclusions
- GPS and inertial sensor integration for
high-accuracy applications is practical in SoCal
because SCIGN can be readily upgraded to support
centimeter-level accuracy in real-time
- Earthquake applications of GPS/INS integration
are - societally relevant - significant economic impact
and consequences would result from technological
innovations - scientifically exciting for the very dynamic SCEC
research community - major breakthroughs in
earthquake source physics are likely to result
from collaborations