Template de prsentation Powerpoint - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Template de prsentation Powerpoint

Description:

European Commission's programme existing since 1999 ... agreement with distributor for theatrical release, broadcaster, sales agent, DVD ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:205
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: slad1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Template de prsentation Powerpoint


1

Development Funding How Europe can support your
project
2
WHATS MEDIA PROGRAMME?
  • European Commissions programme existing since
    1999
  • The aim is to support the audiovisual industry by
    completing national funding
  • Up-stream Training, Development, Tv Broadcasting
  • Down-stream Distribution, Festival, market and
    financing access
  • Budget 2007-2013 755 M

3
MEDIA Programme partners
  • The European Commission holds the political role
    is responsible for the definition, implementation
    and analysis of the MEDIA Programme
  • The Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive
    Agency EACEA manages the MEDIA Programme on
    behalf and under the control of the European
    Commission
  • MEDIA Desk and Antennae act locally as
    information network answer enquiries and explain
    the various funding strands and eligibility
    criteria

4
KEY ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT
  • Development Support SUBSIDY
  • ! Free money
  • ! The only obligation is to provide the Final
    Financial Report with final certified accounts
  • - First payment is 70 of the support paid
    automatically after signature of the agreement

5
THE AIM OF DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT
  • To promote, by providing financial support, the
    development of production projects intended for
    European and international markets presented by
    independent European production companies in the
    following categories drama (min. 50), creative
    documentary (min. 25), animation (min. 24) and
    interactive works

6
TYPES OF SUPPORT AMOUNTS
  • From 2008
  • Interactive Works support 10.000 -60.000
    (100.000 for prototypes of video computer
    games)
  • Single project (animation, drama and creative
    documentary) support 10.000 -60.000
  • Slate Funding and Slate Funding 2nd stage for a
    slate composed of 3 to 6 projects (animation
    drama and creative documentary) 70.000 -190.000

7
AVAILABLE BUDGET FOR 2009
  • Available budget for Single Projects Slate
    Funding 13M, which is evenly divided between
    the first and the second deadline
  • Slate Funding 2nd stage 4 Million evenly
    divided between the first and the second deadline

8
WHEN TO APPLY?
  • Call 24/2008 25/2008 are currently open
  • First phase started 02/09/08 with deadline on
    17/11/08 results during April 2009 (payments in
    May/June)
  • Second phase starts 18/11/08 with deadline on
    17/04/09 results during September 2009
  • (payments October/November)

9
WHICH KIND OF PROJECTS ARE SUPPORTED
  •  The counterfeiter  Best 2008 Foreign Oscar
    award supported in 2005
  •  The class  2008 Palme dOr supported in 2005
  •  Fighter  Scanorama 2008 supported in 2005
  •  The Bug Trailer  Scanorama 2008 supported in
    2004
  •  Lisbon zero two  supported in 2005

10
2008 Facts and Figures
  • Single Projects 786 submitted/189 selected
    selection rate 24 for a total of 7.670.678
  • Slate Funding 184 submitted/ 56 selected
    selection rate 30,4 for a total of 8.125.486
  • Slate Funding 2nd stage 39 submitted/20
    selected selection rate 51,28 for a total of
    3.109.572

11
TARGET WHO CAN APPLY?
  • SUPPORT ADDRESSED TO INDEPENDENT EUROPEAN
    PRODUCTION COMPANY
  • How is this checked?
  • Company status
  • Certificate of Company Registration
  • VAT registration
  • European shareholding
  • Main activity production
  • Registration date registered at least 1 year
    Single Project
  • 3 years for Slate Funding

12
TARGET WHO CAN APPLY?
  • ONLY COMPANIES WITH A MINIMUM OF EXPERIENCE
  • What does this mean?
  • FOR SP prove the completion of a previous work
    as major producer that has
  • been distributed during the period between 1
    January 2006 and the date of
  • submission
  • FOR SF prove the completion of at least one
    previous work (two if
  • DE/ES/FR/IT/UK) as major producer that has/have
    been
  • INTERNATIONALLY distributed and produced within 5
    years before the date
  • of submission
  • FOR SF 2ND STAGE -gt No need because they have
    been already selected
  • for Slate Funding

13
WHEN AM I CONSIDERED A MAJOR PRODUCER?
  • The applicant is the sole production company
  • In the case of a co-production with another
    production company, the applicant company is the
    major co-producer in the financing plan or was
    the delegate producer
  • The Chief Executive or one of the shareholders of
    the applicant company has a personal credit as
    producer or delegate producer

14
BUT IF I DONT HAVE AN EXPERIENCE AS MAJOR
PRODUCER?
  • A previous work produced by a company other than
    the applicant company may be accepted, if the
    applicants Chief Executive, one of its
    shareholders or one of its employees of at least
    twelve months standing as a producer, has a
    personal credit in the role of PRODUCER, DELEGATE
    PRODUCER or EXECUTIVE PRODUCER
  • ONLY ON-SCREEN CREDITS CAN BE ACCEPTED

15
BE CAREFUL ON THE EXPERIENCE REQUIREMENT
  • Check length of previous work
  • Drama 50
  • Documentaries 25, if series 25 per episode
  • Animation 24
  • Check proof of distribution and its date
  • - agreement with distributor for theatrical
    release, broadcaster, sales agent, DVD publishing
    or on-line distribution
  • - proof of release/ broadcast (screening
    programme, tv programme) or sales report
  • Check proof demonstrating the completed
    production (DVD)

16
TARGET WHO CAN APPLY?
  • COMPANIES THAT HOLD THE MAJORITY OF THE
  • RIGHTS TO THE PROJECT(S)
  • A contract duly signed and dated by the author
    (s) covering the
  • rights to the artistic material must be provided.
    This must cover
  • at least the ownership situation to the concept,
    subject,
  • treatment, script or bible ( submitted artistic
    material).
  • The following contracts are accepted
  • option agreement concerning the transfer of
    rights between the author and the applicant
    company
  • a contract transferring the rights from the
    author to the applicant company.

17
BE CAREFUL ON THE RIGHTS REQUIREMENT
  • An agreement must ALWAYS be provided, the option
    agreement or transfer of rights contract can be
    replaced by
  • - a unilateral declaration of the transfer of
    rights to the applicant company where the author
    is the producer, shareholder or employee of the
    company
  • - a co-production or co-development agreement
    duly dated and signed by the parties and clearly
    showing that the applicant company holds the
    majority of the rights at the date of the
    application.
  • If the project is an ADAPTATION of an existing
    work (novel, biography etc.), the applicant
    company must also prove that it holds the
    majority of the rights relating to the rights of
    adaptation to this work with an option agreement
    or transfer of rights contract.

18
AFTER ELIGIBILITY CHECKS
  • Eligible
  • your application is sent to 2 experts for the
    award criteria assessment
  • Ineligible
  • a pre-information e-mail is sent, you are
    excluded from the selection procedure

19
HOW TO BE SELECTED FOR SINGLE PROJECT SUPPORT?
  • YOU NEED GOOD SCORES CONCERNING THE AWARD
    CRITERIA

20
QUALITY OF THE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
  • Information requested
  • A description of the foreseen activities during
    the development of the project as well as the
    development schedule until the start of
    production (including  scriptwriting, script
    editing, research work, choice of the director,
    casting, scheduled start of filming)
  • Optional supporting document a statement of
    intent of the producer
  • Key Aspects
  • The Adequacy to the needs of the project
  • The Sufficiency of detail
  • The Potential of creative team
  • Some advises
  • Be clear and structure the information
  • - By type of action research, scouting, script,
    partners etc.
  • - By chronological order what has been done
    before submission month by month until
    production
  • Be detailed (include all necessary steps)
  • Identify projects needs (each project is unique)
  • Be realistic (foresee enough time)
  • Show a careful thought

21
CONSISTENCY OF THE DEVELOPMENT BUDGET
  • Development Budget
  • Media Contribution is limited to 50 of the
    development budget (60 if cultural diversity
    enhancement for Single Project)
  • Costs must be incurred by the applicant company
    and have to correspond to real costs supported by
    invoices
  • Costs must be eligible (related to the
    development of the project and from the date of
    submission except rights that are eligible 12
    months before)
  • Evaluation and score are based on
  • - how the budget reflects the development
    strategy and the needs of the project
  • - the appropriateness of the estimated costs
  • Key aspects
  • Costs should be proportional, balanced and
    covering the development steps foreseen

22
QUALITY OF THE FINANCING STRATEGY
  • Information to be provided
  • A description of the envisaged strategy to
    finance the production of the submitted project
    including the main options, the initial financial
    elements in place or to be confirmed and explain
    which countries are considered important in terms
    of a possible co-production.
  • Letters of interest for co-development/co-producti
    on/pre-sale/distribution and/or respective
    agreements
  • Key Aspects
  • Adequacy to the estimated production costs
  • Awareness of the potential partners and
    territories
  • Sufficiency and realism of detail
  • Co-financing capacity of the company
  • Some advises
  • Structure the information and show awareness of
    possible sources
  • - By phases development and production
  • By sources regional, national, European,
    international
  • By type public/private, pitching forums,
    co-producers, broadcasters
  • Be concrete avoid vague/unspecific/generic
    sentences
  • Be realistic, reasonable, consistent in terms of
    feasability, according to your experience
  • Quality relevance of mentioned partners is
    assessed
  • Foresee different options /alternatives

23
QUALITY OF THE DISTRIBUTION STRATEGY
  • Information to be provided
  • A description of the planned distribution
    strategy at national and European level, the
    marketing potential (national and international)
    and the envisaged target audience. An explanation
    concerning countries considered important for the
    distribution of the project and detail if first
    distribution agreements have been already signed
  • Letters of interest for co-development/co-producti
    on/pre-sale/distribution and/or respective
    agreements
  • Key Aspects
  • Knowledge/awareness of the markets
  • European / International vision
  • Identified target audience (sufficiency of info)
  • Choice of territories (relevance)
  • Some advises
  • Describe well sufficiently (structure, be
    specific)
  • Dont be too nationally oriented
  • Show awareness identifying clear markets and
    audience groups
  • Demonstrate established contacts with both sales
    and distribution companies or at least relevant
    knowledge

24
QUALITY OF THE PROJECT
  • Evaluation and score are based on
  • - originality, premise and strength of idea
  • - quality of the writing, the character
    development and the world of the story
  • - creative potential of the project taking into
    consideration the specific approach suggested,
    the creative team and the likelihood to succeed
    due to artistic qualities
  • - drama quality of the dramatic potential and
    narrative choices
  • - creative doc strength of subject matter,
    purpose and quality of the project focus, quality
    of the visual approach, the research work, the
    expressed point of view
  • - animation quality of the visual approach and
    art work

25
QUALITY OF THE PROJECT
  • Some advises
  • Main grounds for rejection
  • - A lack of information
  • A lack of focus
  • A lack of appeal (a too local/specific topic)
  • Quality of project is often over estimated
  • Quality of translation
  • Access to persons and/or locations crucial in
    some projects and should be addressed in the
    application

26
OTHER CORRESPONDING AWARD CRITERIA
  • Production potential and feasibility of the
    project
  • - the experience of the company
  • - the estimated production cost
  • - the potential of the team members for the
    development of the project
  • Potential for European and International
    distribution
  • - the transnational appeal
  • - the potential to cross-border

27
Examples of Bad Strategies
  • Generic/unspecific sentences
  • We are aiming at international audience
  • Thanks to our important experience in producing
    first films, we are convinced that we can use the
    right persons to structure and develop the
    scenario the best way
  • The step is to find strong relation with
    distributor
  • We would like to establish strong relation with
    UK
  • We will dedicate a particular attention to
    international festivals
  • Letters of interest following the same model
  • We have a good script but it is not included in
    the application
  • Our usual way describe it!
  • If strategies are not in place yet Too early
    submission
  • Lazy/sloppy/Too in a hurry applications with thin
    material

28
Success elements
  • A complete and accurate file
  • A project whose quality and potential you really
    believe in
  • A clear presentation of the strategies
  • realism and credibility ambitions in line with
    the companys experience
  • specificity think specifically to the needs of
    the project, according to its budget, typology
    and stage of art
  • exhaustive and concrete information (like
    identify and describe the various stages to reach
    the optimal development of the project)
  • European vision but non necessarily a European
    content
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com