Comparison of the SCS Curve Number Method to the Baseflow Separation Method for Determining Runoff o - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Comparison of the SCS Curve Number Method to the Baseflow Separation Method for Determining Runoff o

Description:

Runoff/CN overestimated using land cover and soil group. Large variation from month to month ... CN table used might overestimate ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1188
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: laurensc
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Comparison of the SCS Curve Number Method to the Baseflow Separation Method for Determining Runoff o


1
Comparison of the SCS Curve Number Method to the
Baseflow Separation Method for Determining Runoff
over the San Marcos Basin
My Rainfall Runoff Project
  • Lauren Schneider
  • CE394K.2 Surface Water Hydrology
  • Dr. Maidment
  • 4/28/05

2
Overview
  • Purpose and Goals
  • Background What are Curve Numbers?
  • Data Gathered
  • Methodology
  • Curve Number Calculation
  • Base Flow Separation
  • Derivation of CN from real data
  • Results
  • Conclusions and Future Work

3
Purpose and Goals
  • Purpose to compare the SCS CN method for
    calculating runoff to runoff data
  • Goals
  • Determine CNs for each watershed from land cover
    and hydrologic soil group data
  • Separate base flow for stream gage data to get
    runoff data
  • Derive CNs from runoff data
  • Compare CNs

4
What are Curve Numbers?
  • A curve number is an indicator of land
    impermeability
  • Uses Land Use and hydrologic soil data
  • Used to relate rainfall (in.) to runoff (in.)
  • CN can be weighted for a watershed
  • Generally used for small areas

5
Data Collection San Marcos Basin
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
Goal 1 Determine Watershed CN
Blanco River at Wimberley
10
Goal 1 Determine Watershed CN
11
Goal 2 Base Flow Separation
  • Volume of runoff must be separated from stream
    gage data
  • Base flow is the discharge NOT associated with a
    rainfall event
  • Used BFI program

12
BFI Software
  • A program for determining base flow
  • Input comes directly from USGS stream gage data
  • BFI (base flow)/(total flow) for the period
  • Only significant parameter is N

13
BFI results
  • The following graphs show the results of
    separating base flow
  • Stream gage data from 1995
  • Monthly runoff data was calculated from the BFI
    results for the purpose of deriving the
    watersheds CN

14
Base Flow Blanco at Wimberley
15
Base Flow Blanco Near Kyle
16
(No Transcript)
17
Base Flow SM at SM
18
Base Flow SM at Luling
19
Precipitation Data
  • Monthly precipitation data was interpolated over
    the watersheds

20
Goal 3 Derive CN from Data
  • Monthly runoff and precipitation was used to find
    CNs for each watershed

21
Results
  • Base flow separation provided runoff/CN
  • Runoff/CN overestimated using land cover and soil
    group
  • Large variation from month to month

22
Conclusions
  • Using CN to predict runoff for a large watershed
    might give significant error
  • CN table used might overestimate
  • Runoff data from base flow separation not
    dependable for losing streams

23
Future Work
  • Research other CN tables
  • Use raster calculation instead of weighted CN
  • Use larger N for base flow separation
  • Determine a way to account for recharge from
    stream
  • Analyze more years of data so that a statistical
    analysis can be performed
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com