The COMMUNITY OF COMMUNICATORS and the COMMUNICATION of SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT to VISITORS of a NATIONAL PARK - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 13
About This Presentation
Title:

The COMMUNITY OF COMMUNICATORS and the COMMUNICATION of SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT to VISITORS of a NATIONAL PARK

Description:

Part of World Heritage Site Mountain Parks. Area 25% less than Yellowstone National Park, USA ... The Friends of Banff National Park. Arm's length not-for ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:122
Avg rating:3.0/5.0

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The COMMUNITY OF COMMUNICATORS and the COMMUNICATION of SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT to VISITORS of a NATIONAL PARK


1
The COMMUNITY OF COMMUNICATORS and the
COMMUNICATION of SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
MANAGEMENT to VISITORS of a NATIONAL PARK
  • Presented to
  • BESTEN
  • Think Tank VII
  • 2007

G. Keith Henning, PhD Assistant Professor of
Management Adelphi University, NY
2
Issue
  • How does a World Heritage Site move beyond
    debilitating conflict with and among stakeholders
    to a place where everyone works together to
    improve ecological integrity and tourism and
    communicate the importance of ecological
    integrity to visitors?

3
Site
  • Banff National Park, Canada
  • National Icon
  • Leading tourism destination
  • Flashpoint for ecological protection
  • Part of World Heritage Site Mountain Parks
  • Area 25 less than Yellowstone National Park, USA
  • Visitation (2003 BNP 3.4 M YNP 3.1 M)

4
Situation late 1980s/early 1990s
  • BNP part of Parks Canada, Federal government
    department
  • Canadian government
  • Successive deep cuts in funding the Parks system
  • Made tourism an economic priority
  • Political masters not interested in Park

5
Situation late 1980s/early 1990s
  • National Parks Act 1988 (c. 48) enacted
  • First priority visitor use subject to
    maintenance of ecological integrity s. 5(1.2)
  • Some public participation in policy and
    management plan development s. 5(1.4)
  • Should lead to democratization of bureaucracy
    through public opinion (Weber)
  • Conflict with
  • Importance of expert knowledge to organization
    gives rise to organizational culture of secrecy
    (Weber)

6
Situation late 1980s/early 1990s
  • RESULT
  • Public wars among stakeholders and with BNP
  • Conflicting public opinion
  • Immobilized Park management unable to protect the
    environment

7
Solution
  • Community of Communicators
  • Unique to BNP in Canadian Parks System
  • Involve outsiders
  • In management planning
  • Doing science and
  • Interpretation
  • With right comes responsibility
  • Communication of protection of environment
  • Four major elements

8
Solution (contd)
  • Banff-Bow Valley Study - 1994
  • Canadian government initiated
  • Roundtables with all stakeholders
  • Able to voice views
  • Heard for first time
  • Developed Consensus
  • Some 500 recommendations most related to
    communication and collaboration

9
Solution (contd)
  • BNP organization
  • Implemented internal collaborative management
  • Slowly still a work in progress
  • Parks Canada Agency Act 1998 (c. 31)
  • Altered relationship between Federal government
    and Parks Canada
  • Parks Canada now agency not department
  • Weber leads to weakening of bureaucratic
    structure

10
Solution (contd)
  • Canada National Parks Act 2000 (c. 32)
  • Expanded available role of public participation
    in Parks management
  • More clearly defined ecological integrity
  • First priority of Park
  • Maintained and made use of so as to leave
    unimpaired for future generations s. 4(1)
  • A condition determined to be characteristic of
    its natural region and likely to persist,
    including composition rates of change and
    supporting processes s. 2(1)

11
Solution (contd)
  • Everyone involved in Park is a communicator
  • Culture inside BNP
  • Rather than cut back on management of ecosystems
    as per other parks
  • Interpretation by outsiders
  • Formed Mountain Parks Heritage Interpretive
    Association 1997 with outside organization
  • Train outside stakeholders in interpretation
  • Ensure quality and integrity of function

12
Result an Example
  • Vermilion Lakes guided hike
  • Conducted by The Friends of Banff National Park
  • Arms length not-for-profit organization
  • Communication of restoration and maintenance of
    ecological integrity including history
  • Interviews with hikers enjoyed and learned lots

13
Conclusion
  • Conditions and factors for successful innovation
    in public sector sustainable developments where
    communication and education is important
  • Legislation
  • Support by senior management
  • Organization wide culture disseminated outside to
    stakeholders
  • Supportive stakeholders
  • Involvement of stakeholders with controls
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com