Title: The Academic Pediatric Association APA AGP Fellowship Project An Update
1The Academic Pediatric Association (APA) AGP
Fellowship ProjectAn Update
- The AGP Fellowship Project Committee
- PAS Meeting, May 2008
2Committee Members
- Lou Bell (Chair)
- Steve Ludwig (past-chair)
- Connie Baldwin
- Tina Cheng
- Dan Coury
- Paul Darden
- Tom DeWitt
- Benard Dreyer
- Peter Szilagyi
- Marge Degnon
3Question
- Why does a pediatric resident have a more
difficult time choosing a career in general
pediatrics than a career in a pediatric
subspecialty?
4Resident A
- Going into a pediatric subspecialty
- Finds the listing of all the programs
- Knows all programs are accredited by ACGME
- Can easily set up interviews
- Enters an organized match
- Completes his/her fellowship and becomes ABP
Certified
5Resident B
- Wants- Academic General Pediatrics
- Cannot find which programs are available
- Not sure of uniformity and quality of programs
- Has variable timelines for application /
selection - Will receive no certificate for his/her training
6Background-1
- Survey of AGP programs in US (119/199 responded
- 60) - Have AGP fellowship program 28
- Plan to start one 13
- Program duration 3 yrs (32) 2 yrs (64)
-
- Masters degree 76
- Clinical time 31 mean (range 10-90)
-
- Major challenge Funding
Cheng, Markakis, DeWitt, Pediatrics. 2007
7Background-2
- AGP programs typically suffer from
- a lack of a unifying structure
- variability in the level of academics
- lack of any fixed curricular requirements
- uncertain funding
- no methods for advertising and promoting programs
8Background-3
- AGP fellowships include programs that may focus
on - General pediatrics
- Health services research
- Clinical effectiveness
- Quality and safety
- Community pediatric research
- Environmental health
- Hospital medicine
- Health policy research
9Proposal
- APA becomes the accrediting body for Academic
General Pediatric Fellowship programs - APA set standards for programs
- APA provides a consultation service for
developing programs - APA implements a system to support and enrich
existing programs and encourages new programs to
develop
10Key Point
- This is about ACADEMICS
- It is not about the clinical training
- The goal is to improve the academics of
fellowship training programs - A goal is to prepare the next generation of
academic leaders as educators and clinical
researchers to improve child health
11Strengthening the Academic Base of General
Pediatrics Fellowship Programs A National
Program and Curriculum Development Project
Ambulatory Pediatrics. 2007Volume 7 (2
articles) Description of program and pilot
340-347 Curriculum design, goals, objectives
328-339
- Constance Baldwin, PhD Peter Szilagyi, MD, MPH
- Louis M. Bell, MD Bernard Dreyer, MD
- Tina L. Cheng, MD, MPH Dan Coury, MD
- Tom DeWitt, MD Paul Darden, MD
- Stephen Ludwig, MD
12Objectives
- To strengthen academic general pediatrics (AGP)
fellowship programs by
- Developing curriculum guidelines and program
standards - Creating a process for program review and
consultation that might later be used for
accreditation of AGP fellowship programs - Pilot test an accreditation process
- (Funding from DHHS, Bureau of Health Professions)
13Accomplishments to Date - 1
- Developed Curriculum and Educational Goals and
Objectives - (Ambulatory Pediatrics 20077328-339)
14AGP FellowshipFive Core Curriculum Requirements
15Educational Goals Objectivesfor Academic
Competence
16Accomplishments to Date - 2
- Developed program requirements
- Developed a standardized program description form
- Site visited 7 programs and summarized lessons
learned - (Ambulatory Pediatrics 20077340-347)
17Site Visit Pilot Project Selection
- 43 AGP Fellowship programs identified
- 18 programs volunteered
- 8 selected for diversity of content, location
- 1 withdrew
- 7 programs were visited by a pair of
evaluators/consultants
18Site Visit Pilot ProjectProcess
- A pre-visit program description form is completed
- A post-visit assessing report on compliance with
program requirements sent to each program - Site visit team consists of a physician and an
educator
19Site Visit Pilot Project Results - 1
- All programs found process useful
- Core curriculum requirement and education of
goals were useful - Programs liked the increased visibility within
their institutions as a result of the site visit - Preparation for the visit was laborious
20Site Visit Pilot Project Results - 2
- Five of 7 programs would participate in a future
formal accreditation process - 1 felt did not have enough academic resources to
participate - 1 felt that the accreditation process was not
needed given already a strong academic program in
place
21Site Visit Pilot Project Results - 3
- Common areas needing improvement
- AGP Fellowship poorly integrated into Department
- Lack of key research faculty (biostatisticians)
- Failure to adequately evaluate trainees, faculty,
and programs as a whole
22Major Activities in Prior Year
- Drafted policies and procedures
- Developed budget
- Solicited advice
- Communicated with some programs, ACGME, ABP, AAP
- Published 2 manuscripts in Ambulatory Pediatrics
- Reconstituted AGP Fellowship committee (Lou Bell
as chair)
23Key Issues and Next Steps
- APA boards consideration as a core activity
- Formation of The Academic General Pediatric
Accreditation Committee (AGPAC) - Final approval of AGPAC polices and procedures
and review of document with ACGME - Continue to develop relationships/endorsement
with the ABP, the AMPSDC, and the AAP - Proceed with program rollout
24Academic General Pediatric FellowshipAccreditatio
n Committee
- Proposed Budget
- Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
Year 4 - Income 26,000 44,000 61,500
58,000 - Expenses 44,000 52,600 53,218
53,855 - Surplus/(Deficit) (18,000) (8,600)
8,282 4,145 - Assumptions
- 20 Programs enrolling over initial 3 years
- 3,000 Initial application fee
- 2,500 Annual registration fee
- 4 Site visits per year
- 2 Consultation visits per year
25Roll Out Plan For Program If Approved
26Its All About Pipeline