IGCC for Power generation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

IGCC for Power generation

Description:

COAL GASIFICATION SELECTION OF GASIFICATION PROCESS The fluidised bed process has many technical and environmental advantages over the moving bed process, ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:152
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: rgpvAcIn6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: IGCC for Power generation


1
IGCC for Power generation
An Environmentally Benign

Energy Efficient Technology
  • By
  • Dr. D.N. Reddy, Director
  • Er. K. Basu, Adviser Dr. V.K. Sethi, Research
    AdviserCentre for Energy Technology,
    University College of Engineering (Autonomous)
    Osmania University, Hyderabad 500 007, India.

2
  • Total installed capacity over 1,00,000 MW
  • Thermal power generation has emerged as the
    principal source of electric power in India
    contributing to about 70
  • Coal fired thermal stations are in predominance
    and share about 84 of the total thermal
    installed capacity.
  • It is prudent and economical to develop methods
    and process for efficient utilization of
    low-grade Indian coals for power generation.

3
  • Gasification of coal is the cleanest way of
    utilization of coal, while combined cycle power
    generation gives the highest efficiency.
  • Integration of these two technologies in IGCC
    power generation offers the benefits of very low
    emissions and efficiencies of the order of
    44-48.
  • The comparative indices show that in case of
    IGCC, emission of particulate, NOx and SOx are
  • 7.1, 20 and 16, respectively, of the
    corresponding emissions from PC plant.

4
  • Environmental performance of IGCC thus far
    exceeds that of conventional and even
    supercritical plants.
  • Three major areas of technology that will
    contribute to improvements in IGCC are
  • hot gas de-sulfurisation
  • hot gas particulate removal
  • advanced turbine systems

5
  • Commercialization of IGCC needs technology
    demonstration at an intermediate scale of about
    100 MW to address the issues such as
  • hot gas clean ups and system optimization and
  • to establish reliability and performance.
  • This would also enable to design an optimum
    module for air blown gasification, which in
    multiples would constitute a commercial size
    plant in the range of 300-600 MW.
  • The present study addresses these issues and
    suggests suitable technologies for Indian Coals.

6
VISION 2020 PROGRAM
In-combustion Clean-up Fluidized bed combustion
(CFBC, PFBC, AFBC)
Gasification using fluidized bed, moving bed or
Entrant bed Gasifiers
Post combustion Clean-up-Desulfurization(FGC
systems) Supercritical
Pre combustion Clean-up beneficiation/washing
CLEAN COAL TECHNOLOGIES
Technologies for utilization of Coal for Power
Generation with minimal pollutants discharged to
the atmosphere (Reduced CO2, Sox, Nox, SPM) at
high conversion efficiency.W.C.I.
7
Schematic Layout of the Integrated Gasification
Combined Cycle
Steam
Flue Gas to Stack
Steam
BFW
HRSG
Steam Turbine
Steam
Coal
Compressed Air
Hot Gas
Fuel gas
Gasifier
Gas Cleanup
Gas turbine
Power
Ash
Sulfur
Air
8
Comparison of various Power Plants
High efficiency coupled with low emission
(SPM 7, Sox16, Nox21 of
corresponding PC Plant) For Indigenous Units
through systematic transfer of Technology
9
Identified RD Areas are
  • Process optimization of selected gasification
    process
  • Improvement of design and reliability of plant
    components Resource Optimization
  • Optimization of overall plant heat integration
    and layout
  • Hot gas cleanup

10
COAL GASIFICATION SELECTION OF GASIFICATION
PROCESS
  • The fluidised bed process has many technical and
    environmental advantages over the moving bed
    process, such as,
  • The fluidised bed can use any amount of fines
    whereas in the moving bed only 10 of fines can
    be used.
  • In the fluidized bed process, hydrocarbon, liquid
    by-products such as tar, oil and gas-liquor are
    not produced and, hence, the pollution is
    reduced.
  • High ash coals can also be successfully gasified
    in the fluidised bed.

11
BENEFITS EXPECTED FROM IGCC
  • India endowed with large coal reserves over 200
    billion tonnes.
  • Environmental benefits due to higher efficiency
    of conversion and reduced SPM, SOx, NOx levels
    can be achieved using coal based IGCC
    technology.
  • Retrofit/Re-power options for gas based CCGT
    plants by installing only coal based gasifiers
    are cost effective (opportunity cost low) and
    are environmentally benign.
  • Adoption of IGCC technology in India has
    Global as well as National benefits.

12
IGCC DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM IN INDIA
  • Pioneering work on IGCC development in India
    taken up by BHEL in early eighties.
  • Major Mile Stones
  • Choice of gasification for high ash coals by
    BHEL
  • 6.2 MW IGCC demonstration plant established
    by BHEL both with moving Bed and Fluidized bed.
  • Coal characterization by BHEL IICT for
    gasification application.
  • Intensive data generated by IICT on oxygen-steam
    gasification in their moving bed gasifier.
  • Task force CEA, CSIR, NTPC BHEL constituted
    to assess technological maturity financial
    requirement for a green field IGCC plant of
    100 MW capacity at Dadri (NTPC).
  • BHEL, CSIR NTPC prepared proposal for
    setting up of this 100 MW IGCC demonstration
    plant.

13
  • Experience on the fluidized bed process is,
    very limited in the country.
  • Internationally, the experience gained so far is
    only for low ash coals.
  • Thus there is a need for taking up extensive
    RD on IGCC Pilot Plant using high ash (40-50
    Ash) Indian Coals.

14
Technology-related issues in IGCC
  • Design of Advanced gasifiers (optimum gas
    composition, optimum scale-up etc.)
  • Hot gas cleaning (de-sulphurisation and
    particulate removal)
  • Advanced gas turbines (blade design to sustain
    ash laden gas)
  • CO2 emission abatement in IGCC Power Plants
  • Operating conditions of IGCC plants in transient
    stage
  • Configuration of an optimized system for IGCC

15
Fuel related issues
  • In a Raw Pet-Coke and refinery residue based
    IGCC Plant
  • System optimization, particularly the balance of
    plant
  • Optimized Heat balance diagrams
  • Scaling up of gasifiers to optimum size
  • In a Coal/Lignite based IGCC Plant
  • Process Plant conceptual design
  • De-sulfurization of syngas of high sulfur coal
    and lignite
  • Optimized Heat balance diagrams
  • Super critical Vs IGCC in Indian context
  • Application of ASME PTC-47 code for IGCC for high
    ash coals and lignite

16
SOME IMPORTANT FINDINGS
  • Reactive solid sorbent de-sulfurization
    combined with hot gas cleaning through ash and
    sorbent particle removal provides for higher
    energy efficiency to an extent of 4-7.
  • The current Capital cost of building an IGCC
    power plant is of the order of Rupees 6 crore/
    MW.
  • Improvements in hot gas cleaning coupled with
    Cycle optimization shall bring down the cost
    drastically to a level of 1000/kW or about
    Rupees 4.5 crore/MW

17
  • The efficiency of refinery bottom based IGCC unit
    will be about 2 higher than that of coal based
    IGCC unit.
  • Refinery based IGCC plants - Advantages
  • Co-generation of steam
  • Co-production of hydrogen gas recovery of
    sulfur element
  • No use of limestone, as required for CFBC
    technology
  • No requirement of extra land for disposal of
    solid waste
  • In the long run the refinery based IGCC
    technology is equally attractive to coal based
    IGCC from economic and environmental
    considerations.

18
SOME FINDINGS RELATED TO COMMERCIALIZATION OF
TECHNOLGOY
  • At present it may be prudent to implement the
    project in phased manner to absorb the risk of
    gasifier in the total project wrap-up
    guarantees fig. 1
  • A Technology Transfer model for determination of
    velocity of Transfer of Technology (TOT) is an
    useful tool for TOT of a frontier technology
    from a developed economy to a developing
    economy fig. 2

19
  • Typical results of the velocity of TOT are -
  • (With year 2000 as base)
  • IGCC (oxygen blown) - Pet coke
  • Normal pace ---- 5 years
  • Accelerated ---- 2 years
  • (Fig 3)
  • IGCC (Air Blown) ---- Coal
  • Normal pace ---- 7 years
  • Accelerated ---- 5 years
  • ( Fig 4)

20
Fig. 1
21
Fig. 2
22
Fig. 3
23
Fig. 4
24
(No Transcript)
25
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com