Due Process Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Due Process Review

Description:

Interpreted by the Supreme Court to have both procedural and substantive components. ... insure that parents have access to information about the curriculum ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:627
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: tdem
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Due Process Review


1
Due Process Review
  • Due Process Clause of 14th Amendment
  • Interpreted by the Supreme Court to have both
    procedural and substantive components.
  • Procedural Due Process
  • State has to use sufficiently fair and just legal
    procedures whenever it is going to lawfully take
    away a persons life, liberty or property.
  • Substantive Due Process
  • Guarantees that a persons life, liberty or
    property cannot be taken without appropriate
    governmental justification, regardless of the
    procedures used to do the taking.

2
Due Process Review
  • Substantive Due Process
  • Judicial Review
  • Court balances government interest being served
    and method of implementation against infringement
    on individual rights.
  • If govt action infringes on fundamental right -gt
    Strict Scrutiny
  • Narrowly tailored to serve compelling state
    interest
  • Fundamental Right e.g. marriage, procreation,
    sexual privacy
  • If no infringement on a fundamental right -gt
    Rational Basis Test
  • Rationally related to legitimate govt interest
  • A law is more likely to survive constitutional
    challenges under rational basis test than under
    strict scrutiny.

3
Attendance
  • Does child have constitutional right to attend
    public schools?
  • When state provides public education, it must be
    open and available to all.
  • Plyler v. Doe, page 292
  • Undocumented children of alien parents can not be
    denied admission to public school
  • Restriction fails rational basis test
  • Martinez v. Bynum, page 296
  • Residency requirement upheld
  • Court rules against student because residency was
    for the primary purpose of attending the public
    free schools.

4
Compulsory Attendance
  • Can a child be compelled to attend public
    schools?
  • Parens Patriae
  • Prince. V. Massachusetts (1944) pg.304
  • Pierce v. Society of Sisters
  • Not required to attend Public School
  • Parent has right to direct the education of
    children
  • Wisconsin v. Yoder - Amish Exception
  • 1st Amendment Free Exercise Challenge
  • need substantial burden on religious beliefs and
    practices (not inconvenience)
  • Johnson v. Charles City pg. 316
  • state cannot demonstrate a compelling interest to
    require continued schooling
  • Health and Safety Exceptions
  • Protection from grave risk of harm
  • Burden of proof on parent to show sufficiently
    grave and school cant or wont protect

5
Compulsory Attendance
  • PA School Code
  • Title 24
  • residents may attend public school in district
  • resident where custodial parent/guardian resides
  • can also attend licensed non-public, home school,
    private tutoring
  • may attend before 8 yrs. old must attend until
    17
  • Parents and child may be held responsible for
    noncompliance
  • Parents must take reasonable steps to ensure
    attendance to avoid prosecution

6
Home Instruction
  • 3 categories PA
  • Private tutoring
  • properly qualified tutor teaching
    certification
  • regular daily instruction
  • Home Schooling
  • Instruction supervised by parent/guardian
  • Maintain detailed portfolio demonstrating
    appropriate education
  • Portfolio evaluated by teacher approved by
    superintendent
  • Students must take standardized tests included
    as part of portfolio test not administered by
    parent.
  • Homebound Instruction
  • Temporary excusal for mental, physical or other
    urgent reason
  • Home instruction by teacher
  • Public school students only

7
Extracurricular Activities
  • Extracurricular Activities
  • Considered integral part of total school program
  • Schools may establish reasonable rules to govern
    activities
  • Participation is a privilege, not a right
  • Courts give school officials great discretion in
    decisions related to extracurricular activities
  • reasonable vs. abuse of discretion
  • O.K. to exclude from activities as disciplinary
    sanction set grade criteria
  • Can extend to off-campus activity (drinking)

8
Student Fees
  • Randolph County v. Adams (1995) pg. 59
  • Hartzell v. Connell (1984) pg. 62
  • Case Studies

9
Transportation
  • Transporting students not mandatory
  • PA School Code
  • If district decides to transport, must transport
    all residents, including private school students,
    within 10 miles of district
  • Transfer status, time variance and exposure to
    older students can vary for private school
    students
  • Transportation expands liability issues

10
Grooming and Dress Codes
  • Personal Appearance
  • 14th Amendment Challenges
  • Circuits are split
  • No Sup. Ct. case on point
  • Kelley v. Johnson (U.S. Supreme Court)
  • Non-School Case (Police)
  • Appearance not as protected as marriage,
    procreation, family life (fundamental rights),
    but a
  • Liberty interest not infringed without a
    rational basis in relation to a legitimate
    government interest
  • Government has wide latitude to regulate such
    behavior
  • Dress Codes
  • 14th Amendment challenges
  • 6th Circuit parent challenge right to control
    the dress of their children denied
  • Reasonable regulations are generally upheld

11
Confidentiality
  • Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA)
  • protects the privacy of student written education
    records.
  • applies to all schools that receive funds under
    an applicable program of the U.S. Department of
    Education.

12
Confidentiality- FERPA
  • FERPA
  • What is written educational record?
  • All documents (or the personally identifiable
    information contained therein) housed and
    maintained by the school directly related to a
    student
  • Includes documents from outside agencies
  • Once documents comes to rest in a school, it is
    an educational record
  • Oswasso v. Falvo (2002) pg 722

13
Confidentiality-FERPA
  • FERPA
  • gives parents certain rights with respect to
    their children's education records.
  • rights transfer to the student when
  • he or she reaches the age of 18 or
  • attends a school beyond the high school level.
  • students to whom the rights have transferred are
    "eligible students."

14
Confidentiality-FERPA
  • Parents or eligible students
  • have right to inspect and review the student's
    education records maintained by the school.
  • Schools are not required to provide copies of
    records
  • Unless impossible for parents or eligible
    students to review the records (great distance).
  • Schools may charge a fee for copies.

15
Confidentiality-FERPA
  • Parents or eligible students
  • Right to request that a school correct records
    which they believe to be inaccurate or
    misleading.
  • If the school says no to changes
  • then right to a formal hearing.
  • After the hearing, if school still says no to
    changes
  • right to place a statement with the record
    setting forth his or her view about the contested
    information

16
Confidentiality-FERPA
  • Generally, schools must have written permission
    to release information in record
  • FERPA allows schools to disclose records, without
    consent, to the following parties or under the
    following conditions
  • School officials with legitimate educational
    interest
  • Other schools to which a student is transferring
  • Specified officials for audit or evaluation
    purposes
  • Appropriate parties in connection with financial
    aid to a student
  • Organizations conducting certain studies for or
    on behalf of the school
  • Accrediting organizations
  • To comply with a judicial order or lawfully
    issued subpoena
  • Appropriate officials in cases of health and
    safety emergencies and
  • State and local authorities, within a juvenile
    justice system, pursuant to specific State law.

17
Confidentiality-FERPA
  • Schools may disclose, without consent,
    "directory" information
  • i.e. student's name, address, telephone number,
    date and place of birth, honors and awards, and
    dates of attendance.
  • Schools must tell parents and eligible students
    about directory information and allow them
    reasonable time to request that the school not
    disclose directory information
  • Schools must notify parents and eligible students
    annually of their rights under FERPA.
  • means of notification (special letter, inclusion
    in a PTA bulletin, student handbook, or newspaper
    article) is left to the discretion of each school.

18
Confidentiality-FERPA
  • Areas of concern
  • Failure to inform parents, guardians, or eligible
    students of their rights under the Act.
  • Failure to provide an opportunity for parents,
    guardians, or eligible students to inspect and
    challenge the accuracy of information contained
    in the student's file.
  • Confidential student files are viewed even though
    there is no legitimate educational interest
    involved.
  • Careless talk or gossip.
  • Confidential files are not properly secured and
    safeguarded.
  • Records are not disposed of properly.

19
Confidentiality
  • FERPA Violations
  • Individuals do not have standing to sue schools
    for violations
  • Complaint with Federal Department of Education

20
Course Content
  • State laws mandate curriculum while local boards
    determine the methodology
  • Determine course content based on district needs
  • Must insure that parents have access to
    information about the curriculum and a process to
    review instructional material.
  • Courts give local school boards broad discretion
    to oversee non-mandated curriculum
  • Kitzmiller v. Dover Area School District
  • Intelligent Design

21
Instructional Materials
  • Textbooks
  • PA School Code establishes procedures for
    textbook adoption
  • Most challenges to textbooks are base on 1st
    Amendment religious grounds
  • Library books
  • Board of Education v. Pico

22
Withholding a Diploma
  • Case Study
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com