Title: Is Migration Good for Development How Could You Even Ask
1Is Migration Good for Development?How Could You
Even Ask?
- Lant Pritchett
- Harvard Kennedy School
- Presentation at
- Columbia University
- Feb. 13, 2009
2Is Migration Good for Development?
- Ideas and their evolution Marx and Foucault
- Spatial Based versus People Based thinkingwhy
does dirt matter in theories of justice? - The movement of people leads to development gains
orders of magnitude larger than anything else on
the agenda - For some places mobility may be the only
development agenda - Ideas and their evolution Crazy, Crazy, Crazy,
Obvious
3The world that was lost in 1914
- He could secure forthwith, if he wished it, cheap
and comfortable means of transit to any country
or climate without passport or other formality,
could dispatch his servant to the neighboring
office of a bank for such supply of the precious
metals as might seem convenient, and could then
proceed abroad to foreign quarters, without
knowledge of their religion, language, or
customs, bearing coined wealth upon his person,
and would consider himself greatly aggrieved and
much surprised at the least interference. - JM Keynes
4Second Globalization as Farce
- Hegel remarks somewhere that all great
world-historic facts and personages appear, so to
speak, twice. He forgot to add the first time as
tragedy, the second time as farce. Men make
their own history, but they do not make it as
they please they do not make it under
self-selected circumstances, but under
circumstances existing already, given and
transmitted from the past. The tradition of all
dead generations weighs like a nightmare on the
brains of the living. - Karl Marx, remarks somewhere
5Deconstruction, the most powerful idea of your
time
- There is no reason or discourse or truth
there is just power - Power socially constructs reality such that the
agenda is deeply controlled without explicit
repressionsits common sense - Deconstruction is the subversion of the
socially constructions of established discourse - So, where do we look for overwhelming power? Not
to controversy but for silencewhat opposes the
truly powerful is not controversial but just
plain crazy
6has yet to tackle nationalism the most powerful
idea of my time
- God is dead
- All ..isms are mortally wounded (e.g. racism,
sexism, sexualism) - Truth and Reason have retreated into scare
quotes - And the imagined communities that are nations
are all that is left
7Estimated wage gains to low skill workers of
crossing the US borderon average (from 42
countries), conservatively, P10,000
Wages of same workers 10,000 to 15,000 (in
PPP) By crossing the border
8Place based versus People based thinking
- A person moves from Peru to the US, his/her
income increases by 10,000. - Suppose no one else is affected.
- Assume they make above average wages in Peru and
below average wages in the USA. - The traditional, national place based measures
(e.g. GDP per capita, average wages) of
development go down in both places
9Output per natural (or wages per natural or
poverty per natural) is the more natural way to
think
- If person moves from rural to urban the wage
gain counts, of the person moves from state to
state the wage gain countsthe natural global
measure of development has to count the movers
somewhere.
Guyanese
Jamaicans
Guyana
Jamaica
10Labor Mobility is bigger than anything else on
the agenda
- The gain from a lifetime of microcredit is the
same as 8 weeks working in the USA - Total annual gain to Grameen Bank borrowers
(around) 30 million - If I get 3,000 Bangladeshi workers into the US,
do I get a Nobel Peace Prize?
11Debt Relief
- Total foregone payments due to HIPC debt relief
in Africaabout 2.5 billion (in 2005) - About 150,000 Africans to the US--.1 percent of
the labor force, about 1 percent of monthly gross
job growth, about one (good) months net job
growth - If a labor mobility activist accomplishes that do
they get to sing at the Super Bowl?
12From the top of the cliff at the borders that
faces labor you cannot see the gains from goods
or capital
13Stand the question on its head
- Not Is Migration Good for Development? but,
since labor mobility is so good for proper,
people based, measures of development why is
there so much talk about things that have gains
that are so much smaller? - (Hint It has something to do with power)
14But it is worse
- The myth of the current international system, the
world created to win the peace after WWIIthe
Pax Americana is - The world can be divided up spatially into
arbitrary bits - Each of those bits can achieve an adequate
standard of living
15 - Experiments been runits called the USA
- Same institutions,
- Same Policies,
- Free labor mobility
- What happened?
- People got out of Dodge
16Contiguous regions of the USA are a third their
counter-factual size
17There is no theory or evidence to rule out the
possibility of Ghost countries
- Persistent negative shocks to labor demand--the
supportable population at any level of
population - If labor is mobile you get ghostsdeclining
populations (e.g. rural midwest) - If labor is not mobile you get zombiespopulatio
ns trapped in a spiral of declining wages (e.g.
Zambia?)
18Back to ideas
- Pax Romanaspatial integration (or sorts)
- Pax Britannicafull globalization (of
sorts)labor, capital, goods - Pax Americanajust goods and capital
19Globalization of the Pax RomanaNot a single
Roman emperor after 100 A.D. was born in Italy
20Weekly food for a family in Bargteheide, Germany,
525 per person/month
Source Hungry Planet
21Weekly food for a family in Tingo Ecuador, 14.72
per person per month
Source Hungry Planet
22Food for a family in Chad, 86 cents per person
per month
Source Hungry Planet
23Shift in ideas, silly, controversial,
progressive, then obvious
33 increase in approval over 4 years
24Crazy, crazy, crazyhero