A Multiscale Numerical Study of Hurricane Andrew 1992' Part I: Explicit Simulation and Verificantion - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 24
About This Presentation
Title:

A Multiscale Numerical Study of Hurricane Andrew 1992' Part I: Explicit Simulation and Verificantion

Description:

A Multiscale Numerical Study of Hurricane Andrew (1992) ... It is found that Hurricane Andrew is characterized by a shallow layer of intense ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:81
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 25
Provided by: sli2
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Multiscale Numerical Study of Hurricane Andrew 1992' Part I: Explicit Simulation and Verificantion


1
A Multiscale Numerical Study of Hurricane Andrew
(1992). Part I Explicit Simulation and
Verificantion
  • Liu, Y., D.-L. Zhang, and M. K. Yau, 1997, Mon.
    Wea. Rev., 125, 3073-3093

??? 2004/03/08
2
Introduction
  • The hurricane is a violent atmospheric vortex
    characterized by strong multiscale interactions.
  • Previous studies have shown that the tropical
    synoptic conditions and the sea surface
    temperature (SST) tend to control the general
    development of a hurricane(Gray 1979.) .
  • Its track and intensity can be affected by its
    internal dynamics and thermodynamics, the
    formation and distribution of clouds and
    precipitation, and the interaction between the
    hurricane and its larger-scale environment
    (Holland and Merrill 1984.)
  • Observations reveal many interesting phenomena
    and structures of mature hurricanes.

3
Overview of Hurricane Andrew
  • Hurricane Andrew cost a total of 25 billion in
    damages.
  • The storm originated from a tropical disturbance
    near the west coast of Africa on 1992/08/14, and
    deep convection began to organize into a narrow,
    spiral cloud band an 08/17.

4
http//www.nhc.noaa.gov/1992andrew.html
5
(No Transcript)
6
(No Transcript)
7
(No Transcript)
8
(No Transcript)
9
  • Model integration is initialized at 08/21/1200
    UTC (began to intensify) 08/24/1200 UTC(about
    move out Florida)
  • Its rapid deepening stage, the mature stage, the
    maximum intensity stage near Bahamas, and its
    landfall stage over Florida.

10
Model description and initial conditions
  • An improved version of the PSU-NCAR
    nonhydrostatic, movable, triply nested grid, 3D
    mesoscale model (MM5).
  • 23 s layers, a two-way interaction, movable,
    triply nested grid.
  • The Betts-Miller parameterization for shallow
    convection is applied over mesh C to treat
    reasonably shallow convective clouds at the outer
    edge of the hurricane.
  • The SST is held constant, and use the NCEP
    data(2o).
  • The NCEP analysis is always too dry, particularly
    in the lower troposphere, as compared with the
    Omega dropwindsondes (ODWs) observation that were
    taken during Andrews development stage.

11
(No Transcript)
12
Model verification
C5(gt68)
parameterized deep convection over the mesh B
domain
C4(gt57)
C3(gt48)
The storm translates at a speed of 6-8 ms-1, the
deviation in track less than 100 km at the time
of landfall.
C2(gt41)
C1(gt33)
922 hPa
919 hPa
13
08/23/0000 UTC
CTL compared with 49 ODWs (released at 400 hPa
level).
14
Miami WSR-57 radar at 08/24/0830 UTC
CTL at08/24/0800 UTC
15
Andrew moves over land(1) the eye begins to
fill,(2) the eyewall expands in size, and(3)
the radar reflectivities or the rainfall rates
weaken rapidly.
16
From Powell and Houston(1996)
The strong-wind zone near the coastline to the
north results from the intensified deep
convection, which is in turn attributable to the
rapid increase in surface friction and the
enhanced low-level convergence of mass and
moisture.
17
(No Transcript)
18
Vertical structures
08/23/2000 UTC
08/23/2000 UTC
08/24/0800 UTC
19
08/23/2000 UTC
cloud water(0.8-2.0 g kg-1)/ice (0.8-1.2 g kg-1)
rain water (4-6 g kg-1) /snow (0.5-0.8 g kg-1)
graupel (2-4 g kg-1)
20
08/23/2000 UTC
21
08/23/2000 UTC
22
08/23/2000 UTC at the center (eye)
08/23/2000 UTC at the eyewall
23
08/23/2000 UTC
24
Summary and conclusions
  • The model captures successfully the track,
    propagation, and rapid deepening of the storm
    during the 3-day period, as verified against the
    best track analysis.
  • The model simulates well the larger-scale
    environment in which Andrew is embedded.
  • The model reproduces the visible cloud structures
    in terms of their size, shape, and intensity, as
    compared to the satellite and radar imagery.
  • It is found that Hurricane Andrew is
    characterized by a shallow layer of intense
    cyclonic inflows in the PBL and intense outflows
    above 300 hPa, with much weaker and less
    organized radial flows in between.
  • The streamlines in the central core tend to
    rotate cyclonically outward and converge in the
    eyewall with the cyclonic inflows from the far
    distance.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com