A Note on Fiscal Federalism, Service Delivery and Capacity Building: The Case of Ethiopia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 37
About This Presentation
Title:

A Note on Fiscal Federalism, Service Delivery and Capacity Building: The Case of Ethiopia

Description:

A Note on Fiscal Federalism, Service Delivery and Capacity Building: The Case of ... Integrated Budget and Expenditure Management System (IBEX) introduced ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:587
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 38
Provided by: Solo151
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: A Note on Fiscal Federalism, Service Delivery and Capacity Building: The Case of Ethiopia


1
A Note on Fiscal Federalism, Service Delivery and
Capacity Building The Case of Ethiopia
  • Berhanu WB,07/05/09

2
The theme of the Paper
  • Describe the major feature of Fiscal Federalism
    in Ethiopia,
  • The link between Decentralization and public
    service delivery,
  • Capacity building approach for and under
    decentralization, and
  • Concluding points as a lesson of experience.

3
Country Context
  • Ethiopia is the second largest (populace) country
    in Africa with a population of more than 74
    Million,
  • The Gross National Product of 144 percapita
    makes the country one of Africas poorest
    countries.
  • an average GDP growth rate of around 11 in the
    past five years (2003/04- 2007/08),
  • but growing macroeconomic imbalances that include
    high inflation (particularly in the last year)
    and low foreign exchange reserves,

4
Country Context Contd
  • never systematically colonized and had been
    exercising a very centralized qusi-feudal
    monarchy followed by a totalitarian
    Marxist-Leninist government system until 1993/94,
  • After 1993/94 Federal system of Government with 9
    autonomous Regional States and 770 Rural
    Districts (Weredas) as well as city
    administrations,
  • Disparity in socio-economic bases across Regions,
  • With an overall umbrella of -ADLI strategy, two
    period of PRSs (SDPRP- 2002/03-2004/05 , PASDEP-
    2005/06-2009/10 )

5
Fiscal Federalism
  • Fiscal decentralization, with the objectives of
    economic efficiency, political efficiency, macro
    economic stability, and redistribution requires
    the following instruments
  • Allocation of responsibilities to levels of
    government
  • Allocation of taxes
  • Transfer systems
  • Central/Federal Government controls for
    overseeing sub-national governments
  • Existence of local government election rules

6
Fiscal Federalism Contd
  • Ethiopias fiscal federalism has the following
    special features
  • Fiscal federalism is accompanied with devolution
    of power /electoral rules/ to Regional States,
    districts/urban administrations
  • general purpose untied grant is the dominant
    transfer system from Federal Government to
    Regional States and from Regional States to
    districts and urban centers
  • credible and transparent formula has been
    developed for transfer of resources

7
Fiscal Federalism Contd
  • Transfers are made along with capacity building
    at sub national levels. This is done across a
    large number of sub-national governments
  • Large share of expenditure especially for social
    infrastructure is devolved to local governments
    up to district level.
  • budgeting and financial management system is
    deployed at a capacity required before
    entitlement and transfer of resources
  • Resource allocation and utilization decisions are
    made by elected constituents and cabinet

8
Fiscal Federalism Contd
  • In Ethiopia, the legal and institutional
    framework for decentralization as well as the
    principles and the need for fiscal
    decentralization emanates from Federal and
    Regional States Constitutions.
  • The objectives of the respective constitutions
    include the need to devolve fiscal
    decision-making power to lower tiers of
    government to enable Regional States and Woreda
    governments/administrations provide standard
    services and to narrow the vertical fiscal gap
    and ensure horizontal equalization.

9
Fiscal Federalism Contd
  • Accordingly the following Expenditure
    responsibilities are assigned to the Federal
    Government (Article 51)
  • General functions include Defense, public
    security, federal police, foreign affairs,
    formulating overall economic and social policies,
    to control and manage the countrys fiscal,
    monetary and foreign investment policies,
    commerce
  • The sector specific functions include
  • building the capacities,
  • Insuring food security,
  • enacting laws for the utilization of natural
    resources,
  • establishing and administering air, rail, water
    transport,
  • regulate inter-regional trade,
  • establishing national standard and basic criteria
    for public health, education, science and
    technology

10
Fiscal Federalism Contd
  • Regional States expenditure responsibilities
    (Article 52)
  • General functions include socio-economic
    development policies implementation, elaboration
    of strategies and plans, and administration of
    police, maintain peace and order
  • The sector specific functions include
  • regional water resource development and
    protection policy,
  • human capital development,
  • inter-woreda and intra-regional roads,
  • vocational and technical training, TTI, medium
    level colleges,
  • hospitals and referral hospitals, and
  • regional health service standard setting

11
Fiscal Federalism Contd
  • The different State constitutions delineate the
    following Expenditure responsibilities to the
    Weredas /Districts
  • General functions such as
  • implement various types of policies and laws
    issued by their respective Regional Governments,
  • prepare and approve district development plans,
    programs and budgets,
  • administer and manage of the civil servants in
    the districts,
  • maintain peace and security using the police and
    militia in the districts

12
Fiscal Federalism Contd
  • Sector Specific functions include
  • primary schools (1st and 2nd cycles),
  • coordinating primary health care preventive and
    curative activities (i.e., the functions of
    health posts and health centres),
  • managing and maintaining rural roads,
  • coordinating agricultural development activities,
  • making access to drinking water supply

13
Fiscal Federalism Contd
  • The Federal Government revenue assignment
    (Article 96)
  • includes tax types that are highly progressive,
    have redistribute nature, and important for
    economic stabilization
  • The types of tax include customs duties,
    personal income tax of Federal employees and
    international bodies, income on profit, sales and
    excise duties of Federal enterprises income
    taxes on air, rail and sea transport as well as
    on national lotteries and other games of chance

14
Fiscal Federalism Contd
  • The Sub-Nationals tax responsibilities includes
    (Article 97)
  • taxes that are more local in nature and levied on
    relatively immobile assets,
  • the type of taxes include personal income taxes
    on State and Wereda employees, agricultural
    income tax, rural land use fees, rental income
    tax, licenses and services fees, Taxes on income
    from mining operations, royalties and land
    rentals Taxes on profit, sales and excise of
    enterprises owned by the Regional States.

15
Fiscal Federalism Contd
  • Joint Federal-regional revenue arrangements are
    placed along with assignments of tax
    responsibilities (Article 98) for taxes such as
  • Profit, excise and personal income taxes, on
    enterprises jointly established by the Federal
    Government and Regional States,
  • Profits of companies and on dividends due to
    shareholders, and
  • On incomes derived from large scale mining and
    all petroleum and gas operations as well as
    royalties on such operation

16
Fiscal Federalism Contd
  • The expenditure and revenue assignment and the
    nature of the tax structure in the country
    results in a mismatch in aggregate revenue
    capacity and expenditure (vertical fiscal
    imbalance)
  • As a result the need for intergovernmental
    transfer
  • Two types of Federal to State transfer
  • General-purpose grant ,
  • Specific - purpose grant

17
Fiscal Federalism Contd
  • General-purpose grant (GPG)
  • A formulaic approach in allocating the transfer
    has been started in 1994/95,
  • The House of Federation approves it,
  • The determination of the transfer pool is based
    on the MEFF,
  • Considering its skewed distribution and public
    finance management, external funded projects are
    considered in the grant allocation,
  • own revenue is additional to grant provided for
    Federal- State but not for State-Wereda

18
Fiscal Federalism Contd
  • Specific-purpose grant (SPG)
  • The objectives of providing SPG is to fulfil the
    goals of national priorities and also encourage
    performance improvement,
  • SPG in the Ethiopian context is provided for
    expenditure assignments that are under the
    Federal Government or for implementation of
    Federal program at sub -national level
  • PSCAP- as building and ensuring minimum capacity
    of sub-national level is federal mandate,
  • Food Security- It is a national goal,
  • PSNP- is a complementary to ensuring food
    security
  • LIG Pilot Capital investments for local level,
  • ULGDP Capital investment for Urban local
    governments

19
Fiscal Federalism Contd
  • Regional State - Wereda Grant System
  • the objective and principle of Regional transfer
    is to empower weredas to decide on the use of
    financial resource,
  • The type of transfer is a general-purpose,
  • The formula is designed by Bureau of Finance and
    Economic Development and approved by the Regional
    cabinet and then by Regional Council.
  • The fiscal federalism in Ethiopia shows notable
    results in
  • The existence of predictable resource flow to
    sub-national governments
  • Devolving of financial autonomy for sub-national
    governments ,
  • Financing of pro-poor sectors as a result of
    local level decision making

20
Fiscal Federalism Contd
  • The Fiscal challenges can be summarized
  • Lack of adequate expenditure for undertaking
    capital projects at local level,
  • Federal Government Dominance of
    Inter-governmental Expenditure,
  • Lack of reliable and up-to-date data for the
    Grant Formula,
  • Weak Revenue Base of Regional States and local
    governments and lack of incentives to raise
    revenue for local governments,
  • Inadequate borrowing authority by Regional
    States, and
  • Inequality of Regional States and growing demand
    for financial resources by relatively less
    developed Regional States and nationalities

21
Service Delivery Results and Challenges
  • The decentralized model of service delivery
    contributed significantly to the improvements in
    outcomes
  • Expansion in basic services has especially
    benefited the poor
  • Ethiopia drives to reach the MDGs through
    expanded basic services
  • However, progress is not always even, disparities
    persist across gender, income groups, and
    Regions, and differential performance exists in
    different sectors

22
Service Delivery Results and Challenges
23
Service Delivery Results and Challenges
  • The following summarizes the Service delivery
    challenges
  • access to services, equity in the provision of
    service
  • quality provision of services
  • citizen solidification in the delivery system
  • participation of the grassroots, the poor, on
    prioritization and decision making
  • ensuring accountability and responsiveness to
    service delivery
  • Lack of manpower
  • effectiveness and efficiency of operations of
    institutions

24
Service Delivery Results and Challenges
  • Service delivery challenges Contd
  • sustainability and implementation capacities of
    institutions dealing with capacity building
  • Absence of up-to-date systems, problems related
    to change of attitudes
  • Disparity in the efficiency and implementation of
    capacity building within institutions and spatial
    units
  • Disparity in pastoral/boarder areas

25
Capacity Building for Decentralized Service
Delivery
  • Noting the constraints of service delivery, the
    Ethiopian government introduced a national
    capacity building strategy (FY 2001)
  • The nature of capacity building in Ethiopia
    includes
  • Capacity building is linked to macro economic and
    sector development strategies.
  • Capacity building is coordinated by an umbrella
    institution (Ministry of Capacity Building).
  • Capacity building follows a comprehensive and an
    all round integrated approach.
  • Based on the capacity building strategy, the
    government design 14 programs of which 6 of them
    latter on constitutes the Public Sector Capacity
    Building Program (PSCAP)

26
Capacity Building Design
Public Sector Capacity Building Program
27
Capacity Building for Decentralized Service
Delivery
  • Civil Service Reform Sub-program
  • to promote the development of an efficient,
    effective, transparent, accountable, ethical, and
    performance-oriented civil service
  • Civil service proclamation revised
  • Business Process Reengineering (BPR) advanced
  • Civil Service Reform Offices established in all
    Ministries
  • Ethics policy developed and anti-corruption
    commission established
  • Service delivery policy and complaint handling
    manual issued

28
Capacity Building for Decentralized Service
Delivery
  • Expenditure Management and Control Sub-program
  • to strengthen Ethiopias public sector fiduciary
    framework and to improve the efficiency and
    effectiveness of public expenditure management
  • Comprehensive legal framework for public sector
    financial administration established
  • New budget classification system adopted
    nationwide
  • Accounts backlog cleared and double-entry
    accounting introduced
  • BIS BDA accounting systems implemented in All
    regions except two
  • Integrated Budget and Expenditure Management
    System (IBEX) introduced

29
Capacity Building for Decentralized Service
Delivery
  • District Level Decentralization Sub-program
  • to deepen the devolution of power to the lower
    tiers of regional government and the grassroots
    level, thereby strengthening participatory
    decision-making, good governance, and
    decentralized service delivery
  • Woreda planning and budgeting procedures and
    woreda fiscal transfer formula Study drafted.
  • Community participation guidelines developed and
    implemented
  • Woreda organizational structure and office
    requirements studied
  • Woreda legal framework adopted
  • Woreda SPM developed and implemented
  • Good governance package developed and started
    implementing

30
Capacity Building for Decentralized Service
Delivery
  • Urban Management Capacity Building sub-program
  • to enhance the capacity of municipalities in the
    delivery of services that meet basic human needs,
    reduce poverty and improve the environment and
    enable urban centers to play a more effective
    role in social and economic development
  • Good governance advanced in cities and towns
    through restructuring necessary rules,
    regulations and manuals developed to manage
    cities
  • Jobs created through micro and small enterprise
    (MSE), deepening capacity for participation
  • Enabling environment created for medium and large
    enterprises

31
Capacity Building for Decentralized Service
Delivery
  • Tax System Reform Sub-program
  • to encourage capital investment and development,
    to increase tax revenues, and to ensure equity
    and fairness in the tax system
  • Tax proclamations and regulations adopted and
    implemented at Federal and Regional levels
  • Revenue potential study being implemented at
    federal and regional levels
  • Tax Identification Number (TIN) and Value Added
    Tax (VAT) introduced, with a steady rise in
    registrants
  • SIGTAS (tax administration) and ASYCUDA
    (customs) information systems implemented
  • Organization restructured to support strong
    enforcement, taxpayer education, and to leverage
    information and communication technologies
  • Assessment, collection, audit and VAT operational
    manuals implemented. Tax officers trained

32
Capacity Building for Decentralized Service
Delivery
  • Justice System Reform Sub-program
  • to promote the rule of law as well as the
    efficient and effective functions of the justice
    system
  • Court Reform Sub-program
  • to enhance access to justice by strengthening the
    capacity of judges and court clerks, reforming
    court administration, and implementing a modern
    case load management system
  • Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
    sub-program
  • to harness information and communication
    technologies for the development of human
    resources, democratization, service delivery, and
    good governance

33
Capacity Building for Decentralized Service
Delivery
  • In Summary, initial results of public sector
    reform on service delivery indicates that
  • The link of capacity building to deepen
    decentralization to districts has tremendously
    helped for increased access of services in
    education, health, agricultural extension, water
    supply coverage,
  • major success in the efficiency of government
    operations at 14 federal ministries, in most
    Regional States and districts, on licensing,
    court case handling, tax administration, revenue
    collection, expenditure management etc.
  • The use of IT in service delivery (court,
    expenditure management, tax and school education)
    have increased,
  • Systems have been placed for community
    involvement in planning and prioritization and
    other affairs,
  • Increase in revenue performance.

34
Capacity Building for Decentralized Service
Delivery
  • Considering the approach and scope of capacity
    building activities in Ethiopia compared to other
    African countries four points can be sited
  • An independent Ministry is responsible for
    coordinating a large number of reform programs at
    federal, Regional States and local levels.
  • the design and executions of capacity building in
    Ethiopia follows multiple and large integrated
    sub-programs.
  • Political economy factors drives the approach.
  • it is implemented under federal setting and
    decentralized environment.
  • Interest on the transfer of knowhow from
    countries doing well through twining arrangement
    and consultancy.
  • Learning by doing on a wider scale approach.

35
Concluding Points from Ethiopias Experience
  • Efficient decentralized service delivery requires
    among other things strong ownership, political
    commitment and leadership,
  • For successful local level service delivery
    linking it with capacity building is very
    important,
  • Local level decision on service delivery requires
    a sustainable/predictable autonomy in financial
    resources, planning, and implementation
  • Incentive mechanism has a very important role to
    play in improving service delivery.

36
Questions
  • .

?
37
I Thank You
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com