Contractualism and justice (1) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 14
About This Presentation
Title:

Contractualism and justice (1)

Description:

Contains individuals (the 'parties') who agree on principles of justice. Requires the parties to have certain aims in coming to agreement ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:147
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 15
Provided by: julius
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Contractualism and justice (1)


1
Contractualism and justice (1)
  • Introduction to Rawlss theory

2
The issue of justice
  • The problem of social justice how do we evaluate
    morally the basic structure of society?
  • Basic structure the fundamental institutions
    that fit together to make society a system of
    social cooperation.

3
Topics for today
  • Why is Rawls a contractualist?
  • Rawlss version of contractualism
  • Rawlss principles of justice

4
Two basic ideas
  • A persons conception of the good contains his
    fundamental
  • values and projects
  • attachments and loyalties
  • religious, philosophical and moral beliefs
  • Social unity shared allegiance of citizens to
    the basic structure of their society

5
Two constraints of democracy
  • Democratic social unity (DSU) Principles of
    justice should provide a basis for social unity
    consistent with the freedom and equality of
    citizens in a democracy
  • Fact of reasonable pluralism (FRP) In a genuine
    democracy there will be a plurality of reasonable
    conceptions of the good.

6
Why is Rawls a contractualist?
  • Because of DSU and FRP, societys conception of
    justice cannot be based on a particular
    conception of the good
  • So we cant start from a comprehensive religious
    or philosophical doctrine
  • Rawls asks instead Which principles would
    citizens themselves agree on in circumstances
    that respected their freedom and equality?

7
Rawlss theory Justice as fairness (JF)
  • Its a contractualist theory with the ideal
    agreement situation specified as the original
    position (OP)
  • The correct principles of justice are those that
    would be adopted in the OP
  • The OP is designed to be fair to free and equal
    citizens

8
The original position (OP)
  • Is a purely hypothetical situation
  • Contains individuals (the parties) who agree on
    principles of justice
  • Requires the parties to have certain aims in
    coming to agreement
  • Imposes constraints on the process of agreement

9
Aims of the parties
  • To secure their ability
  • (1) to pursue their conception of the good
  • (2) to reflect on and revise that conception
  • (3) to understand, apply and live by the
    conception of justice agreed to

10
Constraints
  • Publicity choosing principles for public, basic
    social charter
  • Finality choosing principles for a complete life
  • Veil of ignorance

11
Veil of ignorance
  • Parties dont know
  • place in society
  • natural endowment
  • conception of the good
  • Parties do know
  • general principles of science and common sense
  • fact of reasonable pluralism
  • fact of moderate scarcity

12
Rawlss principles
  • Equal basic civil and political liberties
  • Fair value of political liberties
  • Fair equality of opportunity
  • Difference principle (DP) social and economic
    inequalities should be to everyones advantage
    moreover, they should maximize the prospects of
    the least advantaged

13
Difference principle
DP forbids B but allows C
14
Difference principle (cont.)
DP selects C over B
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com