DECENTRALIZATION AND POVERTY REDUCTION India and Indonesia Democratic Decentralization Relative Grad - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 29
About This Presentation
Title:

DECENTRALIZATION AND POVERTY REDUCTION India and Indonesia Democratic Decentralization Relative Grad

Description:

Election of the head of region, and the annual accountability speech. ... regulations but local government might take day to day management responsibility. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:726
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 30
Provided by: OECD4
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: DECENTRALIZATION AND POVERTY REDUCTION India and Indonesia Democratic Decentralization Relative Grad


1
DECENTRALIZATION AND POVERTY REDUCTIONIndia and
Indonesia Democratic DecentralizationRelative
Gradualism versus Big Bang OECD Paris
29/09/2004
  • William McCarten
  • World Bank
  • with inputs from Kai Kaiser,Bert Hofman,
    Vikram Chand

2
OECD Questions
  • Present empirical findings from case studies
    focusing on the impact of decentralization on (i)
    participation,(ii) empowerment,(iii) access to
    services and (iv) local governance -control of
    corruption.Theme levels versus ?s
  • Identify common patterns and determinants
    (political, institutional, fiscal formulas)
    under which decentralization policies are most
    likely to be pro-poor. Political rules for
    decision making
  • Explore in which regulatory areas of public
    service delivery are the potential benefits of
    decentralization for the poor most likely to
    occur.
  • Propose policy measures to improve existing donor
    policies promoting decentralization and local
    governance.

3
A conceptual framework
  • A simple, but highly focused, framework for
    examining decentralization through three
    challenges
  • (1) moving government closer to the people with
    increased accountability to local preferences
  • (2) establishing a sustainable, higher level
    fiscal framework for local government and
  • (3) improving local service delivery and better
    access for poor (ergo avoid elite capture)

4
A little decentralization political theory
  • Timothy Besley (1997) argues that
    decentralization enhances the prospects for
    poverty reduction only when it leads to
    fundamentally (i) new institutions, (ii) changes
    political structures, (iii) improved governance,
    or (iv) changed attitudes towards the poor.
  • James Manor (2004) advises that poor become more
    powerful politically
  • (i) when the ruling party in the political system
    is pro-poor or follows redistributive policies
    (e.g. West Bengal since 1970s ) ,
  • (ii) when rival parties and elites in the
    political system and at lower levels, compete to
    appeal to poor voters (e.g. Last Indian general
    election- produced a government committed in its
    Common Program to being more inclusive and to
    make decentralization work for rural poor.)
  • (iii) when pro-poor coalitions have strength
    within civil society. Hence organizational
    training for marginalized groups is used as a
    tactic.
  • v) when poor people are given exclusive or
    predominant influence within decentralized
    bodies. (West Bengal and parts of Kerala ) ,
  • (v) when poor and excluded groups gain sufficient
    seats on decentralized bodies to make it
    necessary for leaders to build alliances with
    their representatives. (Power-sharing
    arrangements to ensure stability in heterogeneous
    societies)

5
Social Capital Glue for Effective
Decentralization
  • Paul Seabright (1997) suggested that when local
    community activities involving wide coordination
    and co-operation, are successfully implemented
    there is an increased likelihood of future
    co-operation and a cumulative process of
    augmenting social capital.
  • Note Kerala started the process of
    decentralization with high social capital
  • Indonesia may still be starved of non government
    institutions that cut across religious and ethnic
    boundaries (See Andrew Rosser IDS Working paper,
    Indonesia the Politics of Inclusion (2004))
  • What are potential bridging social capital
    /glue creating strategies?

6
Indonesia
  • Decentralization is response to heavy handed
    centralist ways of New Order Suharto Government.
  • Some hierarchical relationships disappears
  • Hence Big Bang in 1999-2001 (administrative,
    political and fiscal )
  • Transfer responsibilities, 2 million of 3.4
    million central civil servants transferred
  • 400 local Government 30 provinces
  • 16,000 facilities handed over to the regions.
  • Brand new intergovernmental fiscal system
  • New political system, new accountability
    arrangements
  • No harm clause resulted in less equalization
    in transition
  • DAU , General Transfer Political Bargaining
    historical legacy
  • Law 22/1999 of Regional Governance shifted the
    balance from a largely top-down form of
    accountability to local political accountability.
  • Election of the head of region, and the annual
    accountability speech.
  • The head is elected by and accountable to the
    local parliaments (DPRD). Law 22/1999 Article
    16(2) stipulates that the regional head of the
    executive (bupati/walikota) and legislative act
    in partnership (kemitraan).

7
Development spending increased
Central and regional development spending,
percent of GDP
8
Unequal transfers
9
Indonesia Challenges
  • Wage bill to formula element major service
    disruption, but wage setting is done nationally
  • Minimum standards are vital, but might be a
    Trojan horse for recentralization without
    transparent definitions and feasible timetables
  • Provinces intentionally forgotten, but came
    back from dead in final design
  • DAU to regions and districts
  • Development framework for budgetary on leading
    and coordinate donors in decentralization
  • Local government highly fiscal dependence and
    this works against accountability and own tax
    effort
  • Indonesia pre-Big Bang had an overstaffed,
    unresponsive civil service.
  • Yogyakarta, a province with too many civil
    servants, began to experiment in 2002 with
    civil service reform by reviewing functions,
    organization an staffing. It has offered
    flexible severance packages

10
Peoples Perception of Services after One Year
11
Corruptionretail or speed money
12
Indonesia Unfinished Agenda
  • Incentive for regions to improve finances
  • Lump sum components of transfers
  • Capacity building
  • Natural resource components of revenue sharing
    with revenue assignments leads to inequality in
    own revenue
  • Enhancing accountability
  • Incomplete definitions of assignments and
    political responsibilities

13
Directions for Indonesia reforms
  • The center should devolve more resources
  • Preferably in the form of tax base
  • The DAU should become more equalizing
  • And governance should improve
  • Through more clarity in local functions
  • .better rules on financial management and
    procurement.
  • ..better rules for local politics..
  • And DAKs (program grants ) with incentives to
    perform such as minimum service standards

14
India 3rd Tier Decentralization
  • The impacts of varying a few institutional
    components in one state can be compared to
    conditions in other states
  • Indian rural decentralization process has led to
    both successes and failures.
  • The success stories, including qualified
    successes, of which I argue Madhya Pradesh is
    one, are often misunderstood

15
Implementation of Indian decentralization by
states
  • Great variations among states
  • Regular, competitive, elections with high
    participation but (differing approaches to
    permitting political party affiliation.)
  • Lagging fiscal decentralization
  • Lagging administrative decentralization
  • Limited accountability downwards (MP continuing
    experimentation,Kerala 33 capital budget
    devolution)
  • Problems of inclusion (SC/ST, OBC )
  • In most states insufficient information,little
    transparency, little monitoring, risk of
    corruption

16
Design of decentralization
  • Constitutional Amendments (73d, 74th and
    ESA-tribal)
  • Political Decentralization and Accountability
    Self-government 3 tier system
  • Gram Sabha ? town call meeting with quorum
  • State Acts
  • Administrative Decentralization functions
    (potential 29 functions ) and roles
  • State Finance Commissions
  • Fiscal decentralization transfers and own
    revenues
  • Neglected

17
Plot of Road Access Children in School (NFHS
Sample ) Circa 1992
18
Awareness Political Incentives
  • In 1994 Madhya Pradesh Government mobilised
    newly PRIs energies by organising a massive
    survey on education access .
  • Canvassed PRI member in their constituencies.
    Who was not attending school? From the results,
    local elected representatives were encouraged
    to prepare a Village Education Register. This
    became the basis for further planning in the
    field of education .
  • A Human Development Report published in1995
    showed how far the state had to travel in social
    indicators indicators. The Chief Minister
    regarded it as a record of the state's failures
    that had to be set right.
  • Subsequent HDRs then serve as a useful monitoring
    tools. Opposition parties too have used it to put
    pressure on the government. The HDR has been an
    important element in development debates in MP
  • European Union donor funding for DPEP and ADB
    program loan sequenced after political
    decentralization and back-stopped flexible wage
    policy .

19
Rajiv Gandhi missions Parallel agencies and
competitor to main departments Innovative
substitute for civil service reform
  • While the PRIs were created to articulate local
    demands,government resources and second track
    was brought under special Rajiv Gandhi missions
    led by especially selected and committed
    officers.
  • These missions were given a degree of autonomy in
    decision making and they reported almost
    directly to the CM.
  • Once local PRI were articulated and the needs
    verified the mission released funds to the
    panchayat. The teacher is paid by the sarpanch .
    This is an attempt to create local
    accountability. 

20
A little more decentralization theory
  • Without strong accountability mechanism and
    accessible networks to draw upon expert know
    how from state gov. decentralization may lead
    to efficiency and effective losses.
  • Richard Bird notes that decentralization must
    find ways of coping with the challenge and
    opportunities of double information asymmetry
    when managing knowledge-based services.
  • Higher-level governments may not know what is
    needed, while the local government may not know
    how to do it.
  • Madhya Pradesh established the Rajiv Gandhi
    missions partly to cope with this double
    information asymmetry problem.

21
MP Education expansion strategy
  • Reducing physical distance to schools has been
    the objective of EGS
  • Creation of about 28,000 schools consisting of
    (usually) one or (at most) two teachers and at
    least 25 pupils in tribal areas, 40 elsewhere.
    The creation of an EGS school is conditional on
    the reception by the government of a request made
    by parents of prospective pupils through the gram
    panchayat, thus making the reach of the school
    supply responsive to parents or local
    sarpanches demands
  • Participation in DPEP and the experimentation of
    new teaching methods in alternative schools (now
    merged with EGS ones) have also contributed to
    the extension of the public sector schooling .
  • Dalit hamlets did not have easy access to
    existing schools social obstacles compounding
    physical ones.

22
Absenteeism Teachers2003 Survey Reported in
2004 WDR
23
Absenteeism Medical Staff
24
Literacy rate outcomes by state
25
Madhya Pradesh Implication
  • A success given the initial conditions and great
    risk of caste, tribal and gender exclusion by
    local elites
  • Madhya Pradersh tried to use direct democracy
    forum ( gram sabha ) to hold corruption in check
    and ensure accountability of the heads (sarpanch)
    of gram panchayat. Results not very successful.
  • A continuous process of innovation which has yet
    to achieve an equilibrium
  • Madhya Pradesh model is likely more
    appropriate for north Indian state than more
    heavily praised Kerala or West Bengal models
  • (Many experts believe that West Bengal story
    cant be replicated) Crook, R. C. Sverrisson,
    A.S. (2001) Decentralization and Poverty
    Alleviation in Developing Countries A
    Comparative Analysis or, is West Bengal Unique?,
    IDS Working Paper 130 (June) 1-60 .

26
Shared patterns in India and Indonesia
  • Civil service was corrupt or unresponsive
  • Civil service was not accountable but
    decentralization may have an impacts.
  • Lack of clarity on assignments of function in
    both countries
  • Allocations for efficiency gains yet to be
    achieved
  • Monitor performance of service delivery and
    publicize this to permit yardstick competition
    and decentralized inter-jurisdictional
    demonstration effect (Pierre Salmon concept )
  • Donors have important role to play in design of
    monitoring systems. UNDP Report/ PRSP strategies
    / MDG international experience

27
When is Decentralization Pro Poor?
  • Benefits of decentralization for the poor most
    likely to occur-
  • Answer Primary education and primary health
    access and quality can be improved for
    disadvantages groups. Kerala, India has
    emphasized community development and self help
    projects for poor but sustainability requires
    good governance
  • Few benefits or difficult benefits in
    participatory natural resource management
    (Example Central Government should design
    forestry management regulations but local
    government might take day to day management
    responsibility. )
  • Corruption, including speed money, might be
    squeezed if accountability to people is
    developed However too much was expected from
    the direct democracy experiment in MP and
    people campaign for decentralization in Kerala
  • Delegate democracy mechanism accountability need
    to be build up as well as participatory
    democracy and donors can play vital role in
    capacity building. Seat reservation,
    supermajority or decision making rules
    requiring accommodation
  • Monopoly of traditional centralized civil service
    is contested

28
Accountability and Resource Efficiency Issues
  • Community participation can be enhanced by
    contribution of buildings, teacher-parent
    committees, and accountability to local councils.
  • Clarify well defined minimum standards
    monitoring in Indonesia
  • Concentrate on observable, easy-to-monitor
    targets
  • More local revenue needed to build accountability
  • Soedjito and Kerstan paper advocate create an
    incentive system for local governments, but
    incentive that can be manipulated should be
    avoided as should formulas that lend themselves
    to creating moral hazard opportunities
  • Decentralized civil service reform can play a
    vital role in accountability and poverty
    reduction, if Central Governments devolves
    discretionary freedom over civil service reform.
    Yogyakarta has taken initiative, but Indonesian
    Government has not approved. With lower wage bill
    there are more resources for non wage services.
    Use parallel small agencies with esprit , such as
    Gandhi Missions of MP , to solve knowledge
    problem and expand service delivery to the poor
    .
  • Potential scope for better coordinating between
    multilaterals and bilateral donors, based on
    comparative advantage. Some "pass through" of on
    lending terms might reflect social goals, such
    as reaching MDG targets.

29
Policy measures to improve existing donor policies
  • Training for disadvantaged groups who win
    elections to local governments
  • Encourage monitoring and public dissemination
    of results Requiring the government to state its
    policy and spending intentions clearly is a vital
    precondition to holding it accountable
  • In identifying remedies, delivering credible
    policies that are sustained, effective, and
    adequately financed goes to the heart of the
    political process
  • Does the cabinet have clearly articulated policy
    priorities?
  • Are the domestic stakeholderscivil society,
    business community, public interest groups, labor
    unions, farmers associations, and other interest
    groupsconsulted on policy?
  • Benchmark access to services stratified by groups
    income levels.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com