Presentation of the course Community Development and Public Policy in the Transforming Societies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Presentation of the course Community Development and Public Policy in the Transforming Societies

Description:

... lectures, seminars, discussions, small group exercises and move screening. ... Assessment of the quantity and quality of children and youth clubs, centers, etc. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Unic151
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Presentation of the course Community Development and Public Policy in the Transforming Societies


1
Presentation of the course Community Development
and Public Policy in the Transforming Societies
  • by Gohar Shahnazaryan, PHD,
  • Yerevan State University

2
  • Department of Political Science, the Yerevan
    State University.
  • Class designed for the first year MA students.
  • The total number of academic hours 74

3
1. Course Overview
  • The aim of the course is to introduce students
    with the main concepts and theoretical
    perspectives on social capital and the role
    social capital could play in the development of
    communities.
  • The concept of social capital was first
    identified by Bourdieu (1986) and given a clear
    theoretical framework by Coleman (1988, 1990).
    According to Coleman, social capital can take on
    three forms firstly obligations and expectations
    which depend on the trustworthiness of the social
    environment, secondly the capacity of information
    to flow through the social structure in order to
    provide a basis for action and thirdly the
    presence of norms accompanied by effective
    sanctions.
  • However the contemporary theory of social capital
    is most commonly associated with Putnam (1993,
    1995, 2000) who successfully exported the concept
    out of academia and into a wider media. Putnam
    considers social capital not as an attribute of
    the individual, but as an attribute of
    communities. Putnam defines social capital as
    networks, norms, and trust that enable
    participants to act together more effectively to
    pursue shared objective.

4
  • The World Bank and the Organization for Economic
    Co-operation and Development (OECD) have also
    considered the definition of social capital. The
    OECD defines social capital as networks together
    with shared norms, values and understandings that
    facilitate co-operation within or among groups.
    The World Bank suggests social capital refers
    to the institutions, relationships, and norms
    that shape the quality and quantity of a
    societys social interactions. Social capital is
    not just the sum of the institutions which
    underpin a society- it is glue that holds them
    together.
  • During the course the methodological problems of
    social capital measurement will be discussed as
    well. Course will emphasize the problem of
    conceptualization of social capital and community
    management in the developing countries.
  • The main part of course will be addressed to the
    issue of building and enhancing of social capital
    as key to improving the quality of life in
    low-income neighborhoods. In this context public
    policy will be presented as a new paradigmatic
    approach to solving economical, social and
    psychological problems of the community.

5
2. Locating the Course within the University
Curriculum
  • The course Community Development and Public
    Policy in the Transforming Societies is designed
    for students of political sciences enrolled in
    master programs at the Yerevan State University.
    Course is delivered during the second semester,
    the total number of academic hours- 74.
  • Course serves as basis for classes and the field
    practice.

6
3. Objectives of the Course
  • To introduce students to the theory of social
    capital.
  • To define and explore different types of social
    capital.
  • To introduce students to the concept of community
    development.
  • To explore the methodological framework of
    community needs assessment.
  • To identify the main factors and technologies of
    community development.
  • To study the peculiarities of community
    development and social capitals building in the
    transitional societies with special emphasis on
    post-soviet countries.

7
4.Teaching Methodology
  • Class sessions will combine lectures, seminars,
    discussions, small group exercises and move
    screening. At the end of each lecture students
    will be encouraged to ask questions and express
    their opinion on certain topic. For the
    participation in the discussions beforehand
    students will be asked to read all required books
    and articles, as well as to watch required video
    material.

8
5. Students involvment techniques
  • Literature Review- (students will chose one book
    on social capital, civil society and community
    development and present detailed review of this
    book-10-15 pages).
  • Conduction of Community Survey and Group Project
    Presentation
  • Students are asked to divide into small groups
    (4-5 people), chose one Armenian urban or rural
    community, conduct small survey using qualitative
    and quantitative methods of research. Based on
    the community needs assessment each group will
    present the possibilities and perspectives of the
    development of this particular community.

9
5.Students involvment techniques- cont.
  • The main research topics
  • ?ultural background of the community
  • Functioning of local government,
  • Economic situation,
  • Demographic characteristics,
  • Natural, financial, human and social capitals.

10
Guideline for community survey developed by the
students
  • 1. Community infrastructures
  • Assessment of the social-economic situation of
    the community.
  • Assessment of the quantity and quality of medical
    services.
  • Assessment of the quantity and quality of
    educational services.
  • Assessment of the quantity and quality of
    children and youth clubs, centers, etc.
  • Accessibility of communication tools and
    transport.

11
  • 2.Social Networks and Support Structures
  • Frequency of contact with family and friends
    (outside of the household).
  • Whether someone can be called on in times of
    sickness.
  • Frequency of visiting neighbours.
  • Degree to which individuals know other people in
    their neighbourhood.
  • Frequency of doing favours for neighbours.
  • Whether an individual's workmates are also their
    friends.
  • Quality of relationships between employees and
    employers.

12
  • 3.Social and Community Participation
  • Active involvement in community projects, groups
    or networks.
  • Participation in local community action in
    response to an emergency or crisis.
  • Degree of local newspaper coverage/readership.

13
  • 4.Civic and Political Involvement and Empowerment
  • Attendance at local community events.
  • Degree of involvement in local, state or national
    issues.
  • Degree of awareness of local people, events and
    politics.
  • Whether contacted local Member of Parliament
    either by phone, mail or face-to-face

14
  • 5.Trust in People and Social Institutions
  • Whether feels that most people can generally be
    trusted.
  • The extent to which people in the neighbourhood
    can be trusted.
  • Experiences of crime
  • Beliefs about personal safety when walking alone
    in local area after dark.
  • Beliefs about the potential for becoming a victim
    of crime.
  • Level of trust in political parties, politicians,
    police public servants to act for the public
    good.

15
  • 6.Tolerance of Diversity
  • Whether multiculturalism makes life in local area
    better or worse.
  • Degree of tolerance for diversity.
  • Level of disagreements or tension between ethnic
    groups.
  • Level of cooperation displayed between groups.

16
  • 7.Altruism, Philanthropy and Voluntary Work
  • Whether gives up time freely to help others an
    work for community.
  • Whether monetary donations are made to charitable
    or non-profit organisations.
  • Level of support for refugees.

17
Results and outputs of students survey
  • Some results from the focus-groups survey
    conducted in the different marzes (regions) of
    Armenia
  • Frankly speaking we do not respect and trust
    each other, nor consider ourselves as residents
    of the same community. While our village-mates
    are more or less united, the refugees and
    Armenian internally displaced people are united
    only on the basis of former location, those who
    come from the same areas. One can understand this
    because people from more than 40 places are now
    living here (participant of focus-group, man
    42).
  • I have become stubborn and will see how long they
    can stand it (Director of an NGO).
  • Maybe its life but our people are not amicable
    and they are jealous. I suggested to my
    neighbours that we improve the road in front of
    our houses, but nobody cares (participant of
    focus-group woman of middle age)

18
  • At all levels human interrelations have
    deteriorated. Everybody thinks only of
    himself.This is not the village that we used to
    know, there is no consolidation, trust and belief
    in each other has declined (An elderly poor
    man, participant of focus group).

19
Recommendations
  • There are several options which must be included
    in the public policy of transforming societies.
  • 1. To increase the level of social capital in
    those areas where its possible. Especially,
    social capital must be developed in the poor
    communities and used as a one of the main tool of
    poverty reduction.
  • 2. Taking into consideration that the structure
    of Armenian society is totally ethno-genetic,
    its necessary to increase the role and functions
    of government as a mediator between large
    families (clans).
  • 3. To define and set up the new norms, system of
    value, patterns of behavior, codes of ethic etc
    based on the one hand, on the cultural and
    national characteristics, on the other, aim to
    the development of the society. This is the most
    difficult and at the same time the most effective
    objective, which needs the development and
    implementation of a number of social technologies
    and concepts in the contemporary social sciences.

20
  • It also must be mentioned that cultural
    characteristics vary from community to community,
    since there are a lot of differences between
    communities with old traditions and norms and
    newly established communities, where people are
    not very much familiar with each other.

21
Difficulties/Challenges
  • How to assess the contribution of each group
    member in the group process?
  • Students involved in the survey have to be
    familiar with some skills of interviewing,
    creating of data base, designing of sampling,
    etc.
  • Difficulties with methodology in the are of
    community needs surveys (ongoing debates on
    methods, techniques, research topics, etc .)

22
  • THANK YOU!!!
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com