Radio-Controlled Duck Decoy - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 33
About This Presentation
Title:

Radio-Controlled Duck Decoy

Description:

... provide sufficient power ... powered with minimal power consumption for long operating ... duck decoys available on the market for hunters and DNR rangers ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:44
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: michae709
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Radio-Controlled Duck Decoy


1
Radio-Controlled Duck Decoy
  • May 03-25
  • April 30th, 2003
  • Team Members Faculty Advisors
  • Jason Freerksen Prof. Robert Weber
  • Kooi-Tjek Lau Prof. Clive Woods
  • Evan Smith
  • Vladimir Stevanovich Client
  • Kyle Wetjen Senior
    Design

2
Presentation Outline
  • Terms Used
  • Acknowledgement
  • Problem Statement
  • Operating Environment
  • Users and Uses
  • Assumptions and Limitations
  • End-Product Description
  • Accomplishments
  • Approaches

3
Presentation Outline (continued)
  • Project Definitions
  • Activities
  • Human and Financial Budget
  • Evaluation of Project Success
  • Commercialization
  • Recommendations for Further Work
  • Lessons Learned
  • Project Risks and Concerns
  • Closing Summary

4
Terms Used and Defined
  • DNR Department of Natural Resources
  • RF Radio Frequency
  • Tx Transmitter of radio signal
  • Rx Receiver of radio signal
  • PIC Programmable Integrated Circuit
  • PWM Pulse Width Modulation

5
Acknowledgement
  • A M
  • Waterfowl, Inc.
  • www.therealdecoy.com

6
Problem Statement
  • General Problem Statement
  • Users desire complete remote control of decoy
  • Decoy must look, act, and sound like a real duck

7
Problem Statement
  • General Solution-Approach Statement
  • Motorized duck decoy
  • RF Tx/Rx system
  • Speed controller
  • Steering control system via servo and rudder
  • Long lasting battery packs
  • Garage door Tx/Rx system for sound activation
  • Programmable sound chip
  • Sound amplification system
  • Compact audio speaker

8
Operating Environment
  • In water such as ponds and small lakes
  • Hunters will hunt in all weather conditions
  • Decoy will likely be dropped or abused

9
Intended Users and Uses
  • Intended Users
  • DNR personnel
  • Duck researchers
  • Duck hunters
  • Intended Uses
  • Studying ducks and their migrating patterns
  • Hunting ducks for sport
  • Attracting ducks for any other reason

10
Assumptions and Limitations
  • Assumptions
  • 2-channel RF Tx/Rx system enough to give
    life-like movement to decoy
  • Noise of motor will be negligible
  • Batteries will provide sufficient power
  • The RF Tx/Rx system will have minimal
    interference from motor

11
Assumptions and Limitations (cont.)
  • Limitations
  • Limited experience with wireless technology
  • Limited time and funding for project
  • Decoy must be the same size as a real duck

12
End-Product Description and Deliverables
  • Decoy that looks, acts, and moves like a real
    duck
  • Easy to control using RF Tx/Rx controllers
  • Moves forward, reverse, and turns
  • Battery powered with minimal power consumption
    for long operating time
  • Sound reproduction implemented external to decoy

13
Present Accomplishments
  • Decoy finished according to specifications
  • Sound reproduction finished according to
    specifications
  • Project completely finished

14
Approaches Considered
  • Decoy
  • Standard vs. Motorized
  • RF Tx/Rx Controls
  • Preassembled vs. Design from scratch
  • Drive System
  • Dual motor vs. Motor/Rudder System

15
Approaches Considered (cont)
  • Speed Controller
  • Design H-Bridge/PIC vs. Speed Controller
  • Sound
  • Pneumatic vs. Electronic
  • Power Supply
  • Rechargeable vs. non-rechargeable

16
Project Definition Activities
  • Decoy that looks, acts, and moves like a real
    duck
  • Easy to control using RF Tx/Rx system
  • External sound implementation due to legality
    issues

17
Research Activities
  • Duck Decoys
  • RF Tx/Rx systems
  • Speed Controllers
  • Power consumption
  • Batteries

18
Design Activities
  • Design Constraints
  • Power consumption
  • Size of duck decoy
  • Testing and operating conditions
  • Buoyancy

19
Design Activities
20
Implementation Activities
  • Problems encountered and how they were overcome
  • Converting PWM from receiver to supply motor
  • Reducing interference from the motor
  • Receiving unusable parts
  • Suggestions for improved implementation
  • Use standard decoy and add motor
  • Use a more compact and/or efficient Tx/Rx system
    for sound reproduction

21
Testing and Modification Activities
  • 2 Channel RF Tx/Rx controller
  • Both channels working properly
  • Duck decoys motor and speed controller
  • Proportional movement, forward and reverse
  • Servo and Rudder
  • Rudder steers in both directions via the servo
  • Sound chip, amplification system, and speaker
  • Plays and amplifies recorded sound
  • Fully assembled decoy
  • Forward and reverse movement along with steering
    capabilities

22
Other Significant Project Activities
  • Significant accomplishments (not covered
    elsewhere)
  • Obtained free motorized duck decoy
  • Researched hearing frequency of waterfowl
  • Final status of major components of the end
    product
  • Motor Control (100 done)
  • Steering Control (100 done)
  • Sound Reproduction (100 done)

23
Personnel Effort
24
Financial Budget
25
Evaluation of Project Success
  • Milestones
  • Finalize design (fully met)
  • Order and receive parts (fully met)
  • Assemble and test steering system (fully met)
  • Assemble and test sound system (fully met)
  • Assemble all functional parts (fully met)
  • Test and finalize complete product (fully met)

26
Commercialization
  • Estimated cost to produce product
  • Single product 125
  • Mass production 50
  • Estimated street selling price
  • Estimated at 90-100
  • Potential market for product
  • DNR employees
  • Duck hunters and researchers

27
Recommendation for Further Work
  • Commercialized version of the product
  • AM Waterfowl could potentially commercialize the
    radio-controlled swimmer duck decoy with only a
    few additional parts

28
Lessons Learned
  • Things that went well
  • Ordered and received parts ahead of schedule
  • Motorized duck decoy donated
  • Things that did not go well
  • Received decoy that was Styrofoam and unusable
  • Project specifications were illegal

29
Lessons Learned
  • Non-Technical Knowledge gained
  • Communication is most important part of a team
    project
  • Research every aspect thoroughly before coming to
    any decisions
  • Technical Knowledge gained
  • Understanding PWM
  • Wireless communication

30
Risk and Risk Management
  • Anticipated Potential Risks
  • Parts breaking inside decoy
  • Duck sinking during testing
  • Electrical parts getting wet
  • Improper assembly of parts
  • Change of project specifications
  • Ordered parts do not arrive on time
  • Loss of team member

31
Risk and Risk Management
  • Anticipated Risks Encountered to Date
  • Project specification was illegal
  • Unanticipated Risks Encountered to Date
  • Received the wrong parts (unusable parts)

32
Closing Summary
  • Problem There currently is a shortage of remote
    controllable duck decoys available on the market
    for hunters and DNR rangers
  • Approach Used Start with a motorized decoy and
    add remote-control functionality
  • Resulting Solution Low cost, high performance
    decoy that definitely has a market in hunting
    retail stores

33
Questions/Comments?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com