Generational Accounting in Open Economies - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 20
About This Presentation
Title:

Generational Accounting in Open Economies

Description:

What do these symbols mean? Tax rate. t. The diacritical dot means change through time ... These deficits increased the stock of debt and crowded out real investment ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:41
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 21
Provided by: eric290
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Generational Accounting in Open Economies


1
Generational Accounting in Open Economies
  • Eric Fisher, UCSB
  • Kenneth Kasa, SFU

2
Introduction
  • Budget Deficit and External Deficit are Cash-flow
    Measures
  • Generational Accounts are based upon Accrual
    Accounting Methods
  • Theory and Measurement Go Hand in Hand

3
What is a Cash Flow Measure?
  • Say the government of California owes some
    contractor 1,000,000
  • They want the books for 2005 to look good.
  • So they delay the payment for one month
  • They make the payment in January 2006
  • To make the contractor whole, they actually pay
    1,000,000(1i)(1/12)
  • Nothing changes, but the books are cooked

4
Does this sort of thing really matter?
  • Unfunded liabilities matter quite a bit
  • It is especially important for a government to
    state clearly its future liabilities
  • Consider a country that has no national debt and
    no current government deficit
  • It could be in bad financial shape if demographic
    changes are going to have a big impact

5
Contributions of our Paper
  • Calibrate Weils (1989) Model to Data from U.S.
    and Japan for 1981-95
  • General Equilibrium Effects
  • Cross-country Effects
  • Go Beyond Auerbach, Gokhale, and Kotlikoffs
    Equal Treatment of Unborn Generations

6
Population Growth and the Deficit
  • The federal government gives 1,000,000 to people
    alive today
  • The interest rate is 5, and the population
    growth rate is 1
  • The interest burden on this debt is 50,000
  • Since there are new people in the future, the
    current generation only needs to pay 40,000.
    Hence, the tax burden is diluted.

7
Summary of the Findings
  • Crowding-out is Small (2 basis points)
  • Most Effects are Intergenerational Rather than
    International
  • Calibrated Present Value of a Cohorts Human
    Capital is 336,700
  • Reagan Deficits Helped Americans alive in 1981
  • Future Americans and Japanese are hurt by these
    policies.

8
The Model
9
What do these symbols mean?
10
Understanding these Equations
  • The first one says that consumption will rise if
    real interest rates are high, and if the rate of
    capital thinning is small
  • The second one says the national debt rise is
    interest rates are high or taxes are small
  • The third one says investment equals savings in
    the national economy

11
Solution Technique
  • Forecast Debt Paths for the U.S. and Japan
  • Integrated World Equilibrium
  • Calibrate the model to 1981 U. S. Data
  • Judds (1985) Laplace Transforms Give the
    Transitional Dynamics

12
Figure 1 Government Debt as a Percent of GDP
13
Understanding this Graph
  • The US was running deficits in the Reagan years.
    These deficits increased the stock of debt and
    crowded out real investment
  • Japan was running surpluses
  • What was the overall effect on the world economy?
  • The world here is a model economy that consist of
    2/3 USA and 1/3 Japan

14
Figure 2 Current Accounts as a Percent of GDP
15
Figure 5 The World Real Interest Rate
16
Understanding this graph
  • There was not much crowding out
  • The slight increase in interest rates will lower
    the present value of all human wealth, in Japan
    and the USA

17
Figure 6 Generational Accounts
18
Understanding this Graph
  • Before the change in government policy in the USA
    and in Japan, the present value of human wealth
    was 337k
  • The US gave a few generations some buying power.
    The all future generations will lose about 5k in
    wealth
  • Japan accommodated the US deficit to some extent.
    Future generations in Japan are hurt to a slight
    extent. They end up owing some wealth in the US.
    The typical Japanese will own around 3k of US
    assets in the long run

19
Figure 8 Generational Pattern of Net Foreign
Assets
20
Conclusion
  • Auerbach, Gokhale, and Kotlikoff are not Wrong to
    Take Real Interest Rates as Given
  • Weils Model is Flexible and Realistic
  • Judds Technique is Apt for Generational
    Accounting
  • Fishers Criticisms of the Conventional Current
    Account Matter to Some Extent
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com