WJTC 02 Dueouts

1
Joint Staff J-7
Worldwide Joint Training Conference 2004 Open
Issues and Dueout Deliverables 30 September
2004
CAPT Jeffrey Miller, USN Chief, Joint Training
Division
2
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04JT-19 (BOGrp 3) CoComs lack understanding of
  JS J3 role as Global Force Manager JFCOMs role
  as Primary Joint Force Provider and impact of
  this mission on CoComs
• Discussion JFCOM was recently assigned mission
  as Primary Joint Force Provider as part of Global
  Force Management. JFCOM will make
  recommendations to JS on global sourcing. CJCS
  is the Global Force Manager and will make all
  decisions on force providing. JFCOM is still
  developing the procedures and resources required
  to execute this mission. CoComs require
  education and applicable training on procedures
  associated with GFM, particularly as it might
  impact CoCom-assigned forces.
• Impact CoComs unclear on their role in GFM
• Submitted By EUCOM, TRANSCOM
• Endstate CoComs fully educated on role in GFM
  mission
• Plan of Action JS J3 ICW JFCOM lead effort to
  educate CoComs as required. CoComs leverage
  appropriate rep on newly established GFM FCB to
  educate CoCom staff on process
• OPR JS J3 OCR JFCOM J3

3
04JT-19 (BOGrp 3) POAM

• PRIORITY 1 OPRJ3 OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• ?????????????????
• ??????????

4
Due Outs and Deliverables

• OPR JS, J7

5
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04JT-01 (BOGrp 1) Resource COCOMs to plan and
  execute their joint training programs.
• Discussion Align resources with statutory joint
  training responsibilities. Operational, C2,
  Theater, and Training Transformation change
  training effort and costs. COCOMs are not staffed
  to fully implement the Joint Training System nor
  to adequately participate in the transformation
  processes. Training Program Assessment and
  Lessons Learned Programs are under resourced.
  Resources are needed to enable interagency and
  other non-DoD participation in joint training and
  to exploit JNTC. Components cannot accurately
  program JFHQ training funding.
• Impact Critical joint training may not be
  accomplished to standard. JFHQ (COCOM JFHQ, JTF
  HQ, Functional Component HQ) and joint forces are
  less prepared for integrated global operations.
  T2 and C2 Transformation cannot be properly
  executed.
• Submitted By HQ USEUCOM, EPOC-JTRE, Col Dave
  Beydler
• Endstate COCOMs have access to adequate
  resources to plan and execute their joint
  training programs, including programming funding
  for JFHQ training funding. COCOM training funding
  is competed outside of Executive Agent POM and
  fenced within Executive Agent budget.
• Plan of Action COCOMs identify resource
  shortfalls to JS. JS work with OSD to identify
  resource realignment options.
• OPR JS J7 OCR OSD (RT)

6
04JT-01 (BOGrp 1) POAM

• Priority 1 OPR J7,JTPB OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• Establish JS,J7 JTD funding line for COCOM
  training FEB 05
• Establish fund site rules and processes that
  COCOMs
• must follow to get funding
  JAN 05
• Get COCOM FY06 funding requirements for
  training FEB 05
• Have OSD (RT) identify FY06 funds for JS, J7
  line FEB 05

7
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04JT-02 (BOGrp 1) Independently developed
  automated support tools need management and
  oversight to ensure they are complementary and
  will collectively meet DoD requirements
• Discussion Automated support tools (JTIMS,
  JDRAT,...) are JMETL/AMETL based, yet current
  configurations use different task terminology and
  different methodologies for addressing UJTL
  deviations. JS J7 developing an effective
  approach to include automated procedures for UJTL
  updates. Policy needed on information and
  intelligence data sharing across military and
  civilian organizations (TIM2 community).
• Impact Training and readiness community needs
  an integrated suite of automated support tools
  that support collaborative planning and effective
  knowledge management. Integrated tool suite must
  use consistent terminology and system interfaces
  should provide data exchange that support single
  data entry for use in multiple applications. T2
  objectives will be difficult to meet if these
  issues are not addressed as JTIMS, ESORTS, and
  UJTL development efforts continue.
• Submitted By USSTRATCOM / OP70, MAJ Coughlin.
• Endstate Automated support tools that are
  independently developed to meet specific
  requirements will have coordinated management and
  oversight to ensure these tools will collectively
  meet the T2 objectives and training / readiness
  requirements.
• Plan of Action Continue with due outs
  identified by the JTIMS CMB. Recommend CRD sent
  for initial staffing include a broader
  perspective that addresses the overall utility of
  this integrated suite of automated tools.
• OPR JS J7 OCRs OSD PR, Joint Staff J8,
  JFCOM, USPACOM

8
WJTC 04 Issue (COMBINE W/04JT-02 BOG1)

• 04SOUTHCOM05 Transfer of data (import/export)
  from TSCMIS to JTIMS
• Discussion SOUTHCOMs training deployments are
  entered into TSCMIS. Need exists to transfer
  data fields from TSCMIS to JTIMS for those
  training deployments that will form part of
  SOUTHCOMs exercise program.
• Impact Lack of import/export capability
  requires double entry of data requiring excessive
  man hours.
• Submitted By SCJ34, Ms. Karen Castleton,
  305-437-3588, Castlek_at_hq.southcom.mil.
• Endstate Operational JTIMS import/export
  capability that provides the capability to
  transfer data fields from TSCMIS to JTIMS.
• OPR JS, J7

9
04JT-02 (BOGrp 1) POAM

• PRIORITY 2 OPR J7, JTPB OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• Develop CDD (CONOPS) for JTIMS after next
  (AN) OCT 04
• Staff new JTIMS CDD with COCOMs/CSAs for
  approval FEB 05
• Collect list of automated support tools for
  JTIMS AN FEB 05
• Develop JTIMS AN acquisition plan
  FEB 05
• Receive COCOM/CSA approval for acquisition plan
  MAY 05
• Begin JTIMS AN development
  JUN 05

10
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04JT-05 (BOGrp 1) Accelerate the development of
  doctrine and TTP to support emergent capabilities
  used in real-world operations.
• Discussion Per Joint Training Policy, joint
  training is to be conducted to agreed joint
  doctrine. Current rapid transformations are
  establishing new constructs, e.g., SJFHQ, JIACG,
  Intergovernmental Operations, Homeland Defense,
  etc., with no doctrine and minimal TTP,
  inhibiting effective training,
• Impact Training events are transformed into
  experimentation events that inform the concept
  development but do little to improve training
  audience readiness.
• Submitted by HQ USEUCOM, EPOC-JTRE, Col Dave
  Beydler.
• Endstate JS and JFCOM have implemented rapid
  doctrine and TTP development and approval
  processes that provide and update useable interim
  doctrine and TTP for emergent transformational
  concepts as baseline for operational employment
  and associated training.
• Plan of Action CJCSI 5120.02 is addressing
  acceleration of doctrine and TTP development.
• OPR JS J7 OCR JFCOM JWFC, OSD, Services

11
04JT-05 (BOGrp 1) POAM

• PRIORITY 3 OPR J7,JEDD OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• Publish new CJCSI 5120.02
  NOV 04
• Request feed back from COCOMs/CSAs on
  effectiveness/
• results of new doctrine policy CJCSI. Is new
  joint doctrine/
• TTP getting to the field faster
  JUN 05

12
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04JT-08 (BOGrp 1) Define the entry requirements
  for each T2 enabling capability make the
  definition a part of new enablers as they are
  developed
• Discussion Active joint customer (COCOM, CSA)
  participation in the processes of enabling
  capabilities (JNTC,JKDDC,JAEC,TIM2, TC AoA,
  JTFCB, etc.) requires easy portal access to
  working group process. Entry requirements need
  to be clearly described by the T2 capability lead
  and understood by the Joint customer in order to
  enable effective joint training. Communication
  among OSD, JS and the COCOMs\CSAs does not
  adequately inform the COCOMs\CSAs of process
  schedules associated with building and
  maintaining critical enablers. In addition,
  where COCOMs\CSAs do have visibility, they are
  not adequately resourced to insert informed input
  into each of the processes.
• Impact T2 implementation is sub-optimized by
  inadequate input from the user.
• Submitted By USTRANSCOM, Major Jim Stanford
• Endstate T2 enablers can be accessed through
  straight forward presentation of joint customer
  need to the T2 capability leadership. T2
  enablers have clearly described on/off ramps
  for joint customers to easily access T2 benefits
  in development of their joint training programs.
  T2 FOC is fully optimized
• Plan of Action Existing and new T2 enablers
  should make all entry requirements clearly
  understood in order to facilitate their benefit
  to the joint community. Review and assess access
  portals to all T2 capability venues. Determine
  customer ability to access, participate and
  manage issues within T2 venues. Establish
  procedures for customers to access all T2 tools
  through a single portal. COCOMs\CSAs identify
  and report resource requirements to adequately
  participate in the T2 process.
• OPR JS J7 OCRs OSD RT, OSD Policy, COCOMs,
  CSAs, Services, JFCOM

13
04JT-08 (BOGrp 1) POAM

• PRIORITY 4 OPR J7, JTPB OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• For existing T2 enabling capabilities,
  establish joint community
• approved coordination and decision processes
  for T2 JMOs
• to use so COCOMs/CSAs can shape T2 enabler
  programs DEC 04
• Get COCOM/CSA approval of new JMO
  procedures/processes FEB 05
• Establish procedures for COCOMs/CSAs to access
  all T2 tools APR 05
• through a single portal
• Have COCOMs/CSAs report resource requirements
  needed to
• adequately participate in the T2 process
  APR 05
  

14
WJTC 03 Issues

• 03JT21 Refine the UJTL
• Issue A high quality UJTL is fundamental to
  credible JMETL. Geographic commands are
  concerned that the current UJTL and its revision
  process falls short of its original intent of
  simplicity, universality, doctrinal purity, and
  applicability.
• Impact A growing, diluted UJTL frustrates
  command JMETL build task selection
• Endstate A simple, universal, doctrinally pure,
  and applicable UJTL
• Plan of Action JS and JFCOM co-host a UJTL
  workshop as part of the UJTL 5.0 process attended
  by appropriate subject matter experts. Include
  this requirement in UJTL 5.0 requirements
  document.
• Submitted By WJTC02 Breakout Team-2
• OPR Joint Staff J7 JTPB, LTC Dunn OCR JFCOM,
  COCOMs and CSAs
• Status UJTL is being automated. UJTL 4.3 out in
  FY 05. J-7 is conducting a UJTL after next
  content/taxonomy study.

15
Due Outs COMBINE w/03JT21

• 04T?? Require new UJTL tasks be placed in UJTL
  4.3 by APR 05
• Issue There are 200 new tasks that need to be
  vetted, coordinated and placed in a new UJLT
  version
• Impact The Joint Community cannot develop METL
  with old UJTL list
• Endstate New automated UJTL that is constantly
  being updated with current joint tasks.
• Plan of Action JS and JFCOM vet and approve new
  UJTs and publish UJTL 4.3 by APR 05 .
• Submitted By COCOMS/CSAs
• POC(s) Joint Staff JTB, LTC Brian Dunn (OPR)
  JFCOM (OCR)

16
03JT21 POAM

• PRIORITY 5 OPR J7, JTPB OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• ???????????
• ???????

17
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04JT-17 (BOGrp 3) Integration of lessons learned
  into training
• Discussion Joint Service Lessons Learned
  currently captured by a number of independent
  groups, agencies activities into a variety of
  non-linked databases. Joint Trainers require
  timely access to Lessons Learned analysis,
  specifically tailored to support the requirements
  development process/JTS made available through a
  single access point. CoComs understaffed for
  Lessons Learned support in planning for training
  not staffed for active collection.
• Impact Lessons Learned not incorporated into
  training objective development and event
  planning.
• Submitted By CoComs
• Endstate Easy access to all lessons learned by
  entire training support community.
• Plan of Action JS J7 and JFCOM JCOA are
  developing a lessons learned database with search
  capability. Continue development of common
  database.
• OPR JS J7 OCR JFCOM JCOA

18
04JT-17 (BOGrp 3) POAM

• PRIORITY 6 OPR J7, JLLB OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• JS, J7 collect COCOM lessons learned data base
• requirements
  
  DEC 04
• JS develop lessons learned CDD for system
  MAR 05
• JS obtain COCOM/CSA approval of CDD
  MAY 05
• JS develop acquisition plan for new LL system
  JULY 05
  

19
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04JT-14 (BOGrp 2) Need to standardize
  collaboration tools (IWS vs DCTS)
• Issue JS using one collaboration tool and
  COCOMs using a different tool that are not
  interoperable.
• Impact Collaboration required for T2 cannot be
  effectively executed with tools that are not
  interoperable.
• Endstate Interoperable training collaboration
  tools.
• Plan of Action JS establish standards for
  training collaboration tools .
• Submitted By COCOMS/CSAs
• OPR Joint Staff JTPB, LTC Brian Dunn OCR
  JFCOM

20
04JT-14 (BOGrp 2) POAM

• PRIORITY 7 OPR J7, JTPB OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• ???????????
• ???????

21
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04 TRANSCOM 01 CEP Support Funding Methodology
• Issue COCOM (Joint Staff, USTRANSCOM,
  USSTRATCOM, USNORTHCOM, USJFCOM) support is
  essential to all GEOCOCOM CPX exercises.
• Impact Current funding methodology fails to
  recognize functional COCOM costs in support of
  CPX events.
• Endstate A funded CPX package consisting of
  event and support costs.
• Plan of Action JS, J7 JExD lead working group to
  resolve this issue.
• Submitted By USTRANSCOM
• OPR Joint Staff J7, JExD OCR JFCOM, J7

22
04TRANSCOM01 POAM

• PRIORITY 8 OPR J7, JEXD OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• ???????????
• ???????

23
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04CENTCOM04 The requirement exists for DOD
  personnel to conduct planning, coordination, and
  support of interagency operations, yet military
  personnel are not educated nor trained to
  accomplish doctrinal tasks requiring interagency
  coordination.
• Discussion The National Security Strategy
  requires the development, coordination, and
  application of the elements and instruments of
  national power to achieve national security
  objectives. In order to accomplish this
  requirement, USCENTCOM must have senior
  leadership and staff officers that are educated
  and trained in the coordination and integration
  of regional interagency activities. Despite the
  acknowledged importance of USG agencies and
  departments to the mission success of USCENTCOM,
  command and agency education and training
  programs are not resourced to provide personnel
  that can successfully conduct interagency
  operations.
• Impact Without an interagency education and
  training program, personnel will continue to
  conduct ad hoc interagency coordination of
  doctrinal interagency tasks.
• Submitted By LtCol Brad McAllister, JIACG,
  651-1960, mcallibg_at_centcom.mil
• Endstate DOD provides USCENTCOM with senior
  leadership and staff officers who are educated
  and trained to accomplish ST 8.5 - Coordinate and
  Integrate Regional Interagency Activities.

24
04CENTCOM04 POAM

• PRIORITY 9 OPRJ7, JKDDC, JEDD OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• ???????????
• ???????

25
WJTC 03 Issues

• 03JT01 Joint Training System (JTS)
  Familiarization
• Issue The joint community does not fully
  understand the capability and potential of the
  Joint Training System (JTS) and Joint Training
  Information and Management System (JTIMS) to
  enhance warfighting proficiency. JTS and JTIMS
  familiarization and orientation are not embedded
  in the Professional Military Education (PME)
  Continuum.
• Impact JTS cannot be fully implemented if not
  fully understood.
• Endstate Joint community fully understands JTS
  and JTIMS.
• Plan of Action
• JFCOM serve as sponsor for a JTS and JTIMS
  orientation course as part of the Joint Knowledge
  Development and Distribution Capability Working
  Group Process.
• JFCOM continue to provide JTS and JTIMS
  individual training opportunities.
• Submitted By JFCOM
• OPR Joint Staff J7, LtCol Madison OCR JFCOM
  J7

26
03JT01 POAM

• PRIORITY 10 OPR J7, JKDDC OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• ???????????
• ???????

27
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04SOUTHCOM04 Reduce/streamline the Developing
  Countries Combined Exercise Program (DCCEP)
  process
• Discussion Combatant Commands submit a two-year
  DCCEP plan through JS-J7 to OSD annually NLT 31
  March via msg (forty to fifty pages). OSD
  approval is historically received in Aug/Sep
  timeframe via msg. Approval for Out of Cycle
  (emerging, mission critical) requirements are
  submitted through the same lengthy process and
  many times, approval is not received on time.
• Impact The current process requires extensive
  man hours for USSOUTHCOM, Service Components and
  MILGPs. Additionally, it hinders the commanders
  flexibility and ability to support mission
  critical, short fused, emerging requirements.
• Submitted By SCJ34, Ms. Karen Castleton,
  305-437-3588, castlek_at_hq.southcom.mil.
• OPR JS, J7, JExD OCR JFCOM J7
• Endstate A web based, JTIMS compatible DCCEP
  system which requires less man hours, expedites
  approval process and tracks requirements from
  submission to approval (similar to the
  Humanitarian and Civic (HCA) Assistance Program).

28
04SOUTHCOM04 POAM

• PRIORITY 11 OPR J7, JEXD OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• ???????????
• ???????

29
WJTC 02 Issues

• 02JT01 Joint Training Assessment Data Collection
  and Reporting Tools
• Issue Current training assessment results are
  not being briefed/reported to leadership in a
  usable format. Assessment results may not be
  formatted/structured in a way that reflects
  leaderships priorities/concerns/focus. While no
  universal assessment/ evaluation tools currently
  exist, tools such as those developed at JFCOM and
  PACOM may serve as interim workarounds until
  JTIMS is fully developed. Also, some users
  expressed strong interest in fully independent
  tools, which might then link to JTIMS.
• Impact Assessment results may receive limited
  leadership attention or be misunderstood.
  Increased flexibility in assessing non-JTIMS
  based activities. Current processes and outputs
  may lead to limited leadership attention or be
  misunderstood. Lack of mature tools increases
  staff workload and decreases training assessment
  efficacy.
• Endstate Development of a straightforward,
  relatable, and easily executable training
  assessment reporting product(s). Selection of an
  interim assessment/evaluation support tool for
  joint force use until final JTIMS development and
  implementation.
• Plan of Action Leverage efforts by combatant
  command teams in this area to develop useable
  formats and approaches, to include review and
  selection of existing interim tools (CENTCOM,
  EUCOM). Commands review JWFC JTAD and PACOM
  tools. JTB obtain CENTCOM status briefing.
• Submitted By WJTC02 Breakout Team-2/3
• OPR Joint Staff J7 JTB MAJ Sullins OCR
  COCOMs

30
02JT01 POAM

• PRIORITY 12 OPRJ7, JTPB OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• ???????????
• ???????

31
WJTC 03 Issues

• 03JT16 Joint Training System Specialists for
  Combat Support Agencies
• Issue While some CSAs have Joint Training
  System Specialists in place, most do not and have
  requested such support.
• Impact If available, JTSS provide consistent,
  highly-trained JTS support that is sensitive to
  specific CSA requirements/issues.
• Endstate JTSS support for all CSAs.
• Plan of Action OSD provide funding support.
• Submitted By WJTC02 Breakout Team-4
• OPR Joint Staff, J7, JTB, LTC Brian Dunn
• Status T2 I Plan has provided funding to
  increase CSA support starting FY05-FY09

32
03JT16 POAM

• PRIORITY 13 OPRJ7, JTPB OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• ???????????
• ???????

33
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04JT-12 (BOGrp 2) Joint Education and Training
  Currency
• Issue No process for maintaining currency of
  joint education and training
• Impact Todays staff officer faces an
  unprecedented rate of change across the
  political-military environment. Education and
  training programs must dynamically update to
  maintain currency and relevance. The integration
  of these processes and systems is ad hocleaving
  individual joint staff officer preparation
  trailing the needs of the field.
• Endstate Joint education and training programs
  systematically update their learning objectives
  and courses to keep up with the rapidly changing
  pol-mil environment.
• Plan of Action JS, J7 meet with educators and
  trainers to develop a process to rapidly update
  joint education and training courses.
• Submitted By BOGrp 2
• OPRs Joint Staff JTPB, JEDD OCR JFCOM

34
04JT-12 (BOGrp 2) POAM

• PRIORITY 14 OPRJ7, JTPB, JEDD OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• ???????????
• ???????

35
Due Outs and Deliverables

• OPR JS, J8

36
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04DCMA03 Readiness reporting and evolving AMETL
  Development
• Discussion Agency in early JTS stages how
  evolving AMETL (unapproved) is reported via
  DRRS/JQRR. Concern leadership hesitant to
  report against an in-progress AMETL. Question
  Do we seek right AMETL or report for experience?
• Impact AMETL in flux, not approved by
  leadership, and just getting integrated within
  the agency reporting places leadership/OPRs in
  uncertain position and provides other-than AMETL
  based report (functional?)
• Submitted By John Parker, DCMA Combat Support
  Center, DSN 325-1836, john.h.parker_at_dcma.mil
• Endstate DRRS requires AMETL based readiness,
  agency leadership/OPRs currently working through
  AMETL development
• OPR JS, J8

37
WJTC-04 Issue COMBINE W/04DCMA03

• 04DCMA02 Joint Staff/J-8 feedback from the J-8
  sponsored AMETL Workshops
• Discussion Feedback from J-8 led JMETL-AMETL
  workshops and how that impacts future mission
  planning. Purpose of the workshops is to identify
  command-linked tasks, but will results be used to
  correct CSA resource imbalances? Disconnect JS
  combat requirements, OSD resourcing.
• Impact Task linkage seen as new requirements
  stretching already thin resource, i.e. limited
  active military for deployable CCAS missions how
  to account for wartime requirements in peacetime
  focused resource process
• Submitted By John Parker, DCMA Combat Support
  Center, DSN 325-1836, john.h.parker_at_dcma.mil
• Endstate Contingency Contract Administrative
  Services (CCAS) is agencys deployable combat
  function agency resourcing aligned with OSD

38
WJTC 03 Due Outs and DeliverablesCOMBINE w/
04DCMA03

• 03JT13 Matrix Linking Combat Support Agency
  AMETL and JMETLs
• Issue Currently, no formal process linking
  AMETs to combatant command JMETLs is in place. To
  ensure AMETLs support combatant command
  requirements, CSAs will publish matrix linking
  appropriate AMETs to JMETLs.
• Impact CSA METL may be developed in isolation
  from or may not properly support combatant
  command requirements.
• Endstate Combatant command JMETs are fully
  supported by appropriate CSA METs.
• Plan of Action DTRA, with assistance from other
  CSAs, will develop a model matrix for Joint Staff
  review NLT Mar 03.
• Submitted By WJTC02 Breakout Team-4
• POC(s) DTRA (OPR) CSAs (OCR) Joint Staff J7
  JTB LTC Dunn (OCR)
• Status JS J-8 has conducted AMETL workshops
  with the CSAs and scheduled visits with the
  COCOMs to review CSA command linked tasks.
  Additionally, the JS/J-7 in concert with OSD, and
  the Joint Community is revising UJTL to help
  streamline the process.

39
04DCMA03 POAM

• PRIORITY 1 OPR J8, OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• ???????????
• ???????

40
Due Outs and Deliverables

• OPR JFCOM

41
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04JT-03 (BOGrp 1) JNTC LVC capability to support
  training of new and evolving missions
• Discussion The JNTC must rapidly provide the LVC
  capability to meet the training requirements
  associated with new, evolving, or previously
  unsupported mission essential tasks. Examples
  are USSTRATCOM strategic national-level JMETS
  (e.g., Global Strike, Global ISR, Information
  Operations, Global Ballistic Missile Defense) and
  NORAD USNORTHCOM homeland defense and military
  assistance to civil authorities missions.
• Impact Decreased efficiency and quality of
  training as a result of under-utilization of JNTC
  for these missions
• Submitted By NORAD-USNORTHCOM (Mr Koster, J73),
  USSTRATCOM (Maj Coughlin, OP70).
• Endstate JNTC rapidly responding to and
  eventually fully supporting new LVC requirements
• Plan of Action COCOMs provide operational
  training requirements and support
  development/testing of models, simulations, and
  databases. This requires development of
  appropriate model/database and connectivity to
  subordinate and supporting units.
• OPR JFCOM JWFC OCRs COCOMs, CSAs

42
04JT-03 (BOGrp 1) POAM

• PRIORITY OPR JFCOM OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONE
• ???????????????????

43
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04JT-04 (BOGrp 1) Enable COCOMs and Service
  Components to employ JNTC for training with
  minimal or no JWFC direct support.
• Discussion JNTC should be employed for COCOM and
  Component sponsored training in addition to
  scheduled JNTC events and those events that JWFC
  can support. To accomplish this, the JNTC
  technical solutions must not require JWFC
  support sufficient theater expertise must be
  developed in each COCOM to employ JNTC to design,
  build and execute training and both COCOMs and
  Components must be able to program funding to pay
  for the costs associated with use of JNTC.
• Impact Training not supported by JNTC
  infrastructure and training enablers may be
  sub-optimized and not have requisite joint
  context while JNTC investment is under-utilized.
• Submitted by HQ USEUCOM, EPOC-JTRE, Col Dave
  Beydler.
• Endstate COCOMs and Service Components have
  established the expertise, resources, and
  procedures to routinely employ JNTC to enhance
  joint training and provide requisite joint
  context for service training.
• Plan of Action COMCOMS ID requirements (fielding
  and resource), JFCOM provide incremental
  implementation plan. Pursue Rapid Distributive
  Database Development (RD3) for local event
  design. Program and implement sustainment and
  regional JNTC expertise.
• OPR JFCOM JWFC OCRs COCOMs / Services

44
04JT-04 (BOGrp 1) POAM

• PRIORITY OPR JFCOM OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONE
• ???????????????????

45
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04CENTCOM02 Need baseline JMETL standards for
  COCOMs Service Component Commands.
• Discussion COCOMs Service Components are
  required to follow the processes of the JTS, CRS,
  DRRS. Each process has a reporting
  requirement, i.e. training/readiness assessments,
  JQRR, ESORTS. JMETL is the common reporting
  theme. Among commands should exist commonality
  in standards in terms of DOTMLPF. COCOMs
  Service Components are developing or have
  developed standards for their JMETs. These
  standards are radically different among commands.
  Propose Joint Staff identify the commonality,
  among commands, in standards in terms of DOTMLPF
  create baseline JMET standards to report
  against.
• Impact If not done, training/readiness
  assessments, JQRR, ESORTS could display data
  for CJCS SECDEF that is not comparable, not
  complementary, disjointed.
• Submitted By Mr. Greg Ginter, CCJ3-E, DSN
  651-4079, ginterge_at_centcom.mil.
• Endstate COCOMs Service Components report
  against baseline standards as a common starting
  point to build from.
• OPR JFCOM OCR JS J7, COCOMs,

46
04CENTCOM02 POAM

• PRIORITY OPR JFCOM OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONE
• ???????????????????

47
WJTC 04 Issue (see change OPR)

• 04JT-16 (BOGrp 3) Increased JFCOM support to
  training
• Discussion JFCOM provides operational train-up
  exercise support to COCOMs. Historically, this
  support has been provided to two major COCOM
  events per FY. CoComs typically require JFCOM
  support for more than 2 per year but have to
  compete with other CoComs and JFCOM Components
  for support. CoComs are not resourced to
  provide internal assets for operational train-up
  exercise support are forced to do so out of
  hide to ensure events are executed successfully.
  Current JFCOM resources cannot satisfy CoCom
  requirements. Increases required for
  Observer/Trainers, contractor support and
  deployable MS equipment. Initiatives such as
  Pacific Warfighting Center, EUCOM use of Warrior
  Prep Center and JNTC network decrease reliance on
  JFCOM assets. Additional Observer/Trainers and
  contractor support required to meet CoCom
  requirements.
• Impact COCOM operational train-up events major
  exercises are not as efficient or effective
  would benefit from JWFC support for each event.
  Resources taken out of hide to execute events
  are a training distractor.
• Submitted By CoComs
• Endstate JFCOM support to appropriate number of
  CoCom training events (all forms of training)
• Plan of Action Address as part of JS J7 plan to
  review funding for joint training
• OPR JFCOM, J7 OCR JS J7

48
WJTC 03 Due Outs and DeliverablesCOMBINE w/
04JT-16 BOG3

• 03JT15 Joint Training System Support Team for
  Combat Support Agencies requirements
• Issue CSAs have requested Joint Training System
  Support Team (JTSST) visits to support JTS and T2
  activities. Like combatant commands, CSAs require
  initial training/implementation support provided
  by JTSST. In addition, CSAs would benefit from
  JTSST standardization activities.
• Impact Without JTSST support, CSAs will not
  possess required skills and knowledge to
  implement and support T2 and the JTS.
• Endstate CSAs possess trained personnel and
  supporting policies/programs/tools to execute
  JTS.
• Submitted By WJTC02 Breakout Team-4
• Plan of Action JWFC allocate training support to
  CSAs.
• POC(s) JFCOM (OPR) CSAs (OCR)
• Status JFCOM offers a sidebar on this

49
04JT-16 POAM

• PRIORITY OPR JFCOM
  OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• COCOMs/CSAs provide JFCOM, J7 with their JFCOM
• prioritized training support requirements
  DEC 04
• JFCOM cost out support requirements
  MAR 05
• JFCOM POM for JS approved training support
  funds APR 05

50
WJTC 04 Issues

• 04JT-21 (BOGrp 3) JFCOM CoCom Coordination
  visits must be scheduled at COS level
• Discussion JFCOM is coordinating with CoComs
  for command-wide team to visit each CoCom to
  discuss required support from JFCOM. Intent is
  to minimize the multiple visits from across
  JFCOM. First visit to STRATCOM recently
  completed. JFCOM currently coordinating future
  visits. These visits must be coordinated at the
  COS level in order to get the attention required.
  Agenda needs to be tailored to CoComs needs.
  Follow-on documentation of visit results by JFCOM
  and provided to CoCom also required.
• Impact Outcomes from visits should influence
  WJTC agenda
• Submitted By JFCOM
• Endstate CoCom visits coordinated
• Plan of Action JFCOM continue coordinating
  visit dates and ensure COS JFCOM engages
  counterparts
• OPR JFCOM J7 OCR COCOMs

51
USSTRATCOM Issue (COMBINE W/04JT-21 BOG3)

• 04STRATCOM03 Improve training and exercise
  coordination between USSTRATCOM and JFCOM / JWFC.
  
• Discussion USJFCOM visit in Aug 04 identified
  emerging areas of support across multiple mission
  sets. Follow-up is needed to ensure these
  efforts are effectively coordinated.
• Impact USJFCOM / JWFC expertise and support
  will help USSTRATCOM improve its ability to
  integrate Strategic National Tasks and Global
  Mission Tasks into Joint Force Headquarters
  exercises.
• Submitted By USSTRATCOM / OP70, Mr. Pat McVay,
  [phone], DSN 272-7697, mcvaypa_at_stratcom.mil
  
• Endstate Formalize and establish relationships
  with JFCOM / JWFC on issues relating to
  USSTRATCOM missions and training / exercise
  requirements.

52
04JT-21 (BOGrp 3) POAM

• PRIORITY OPR JFCOM OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• ?????????????????
• ??????????

53
WJTC 04 Issues (CHANGE IN OPR)

• 04JT-22 (BOGrp 3) Lack of common DoD-wide
  process for incorporation of testing and
  experimentation in joint training
• Discussion OSD Training Testing Steering Group
  is seeking to embed test activity in training to
  test with appropriate joint context as tasked
  within SPG 06. JFCOM, as the joint force
  integrator and experimenter, also requires the
  training environment to assess capabilities such
  as DJC2, Blue Force Tracking and SJFHQ. The need
  for joint context and resource limitations
  require some test and prototyping activity in
  training. JFCOM has developed a manual that
  outlines the process the test and experimentation
  community will use for integrating into JFCOM
  sponsored and supported training. JFCOM could
  serve as one stop shop for DOTE and
  experimentation community for integration into
  training.
• Impact DOTE forced to engage multiple CoComs
  to search for venues. Testing experimentation
  short-notice insertions are disruptive to CoCom
  exercise planning.
• Submitted By JFCOM
• Endstate Common policy for incorporating
  test/experimentation activity in training
• Plan of Action JFCOM ICW JS develop policy
  (CJCSI) and integration manual (CJCSM) that
  covers incorporation of joint testing/experimentat
  ion into joint training
• OPR JFCOM, J7 OCR OSD (DOTE, ATL, OFT and
  PR), JS, J7, CoComs, CSAs, Services

54
04JT-22 (BOGrp 3) POAM

• PRIORITY OPR JFCOM OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• JFCOM J7 develop draft policy for incorporating
  test/experimentation
• activity into the JTPG
  SEP 04
• JFCOM, J7 develop draft procedures for
  incorporating test/
• experimentation activity into the Joint
  Training Manual FEB 05

55
WJTC 03 Issues

• 03JT02 Web-Database of Certified Joint Training
  Courses
• Issue No catalog of certified joint training
  courses is readily available. A web-based
  database of certified joint training courses to
  include distance learning located at JFCOM is
  needed.
• Impact The Joint Community is unaware of
  available joint courses.
• Endstate A comprehensive, web-based database of
  certified joint training courses and distance
  learning courses is readily available to the
  joint community.
• Plan of Action JFCOM will fully populate the
  joint training course database in accordance with
  the Joint Training Manual. JFCOM will link the
  database to the DIA Joint Intelligence Virtual
  University. Status to be briefed at WJTC03.
• Submitted By NORAD
• OPR JFCOM, J7 OCR Joint Staff JTB, LTC Brian
  Dunn
• Status Website now has 3 courses listed.

56
03JT02 POAM

• PRIORITY OPR JFCOM OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• ?????????????????
• ??????????

57
Due Outs and Deliverables

• OPR COCOMs

58
WJTC 04 Issues (CHANGE IN OPR)

• 04JT-18 (BOGrp 3) Funding a Joint Training
  Specialist for Service Components of Combatant
  Commands
• Discussion Currently Service Component
  participation in joint planning, execution, and
  training is performed out of hide. This is
  evident in the lack of discipline in the
  operation and management of JTIMS. Some COCOMs
  are not using the Forces TAB to identify new
  requirements. This results in untimely
  processing of RFFs by using DMS to state
  requirements. Additionally, COCOMs continue to
  make changes to exercises (dates, force
  requirements, and locations) late in the planning
  cycle. Changes are not being entered into JTIMS
  and are not discovered until planning
  conferences. These late changes create
  turbulence for participating units. In some
  cases the data for exercises in the out years
  have been cookie cuttered from previous years.
  This repetitive data does not provide adequate
  information for sourcing decisions based on
  training value for participating units. All of
  these situations, plus others, can be directly
  attributed to lack of at least one Joint Training
  Specialist at the Service Component level. As
  the Joint Training System and Training
  Transformation move toward full implementation,
  additional joint training responsibilities will
  be incorporated into Service Component missions.
• Impact Without additional resources to meet
  all of the additional responsibilities required
  by the Joint Training System and Training
  Transformation, Service Components will
  experience difficulty in meeting all joint
  requirements. This situation will put the
  Service Components at risk with respect
  synchronizing joint requirements and service
  requirements.
• Submitted By U.S. Army Forces Command
• Endstate Adequate funding to Service Components
  for staffing a Joint Training Specialist
• Plan of Action Address as part of JS J7 plan to
  review funding for joint training
• OPR COCOMs

59
WJTC 03 Due Outs and Deliverables Combine
w/04JT-18 BOG3

• 03JT17 JTSS support for Combatant Command
  Service components
• Issue JTSS resources at Service component level
  are needed to fully implement DRRS, T2, and the
  JTS.
• Impact Service component linkage to DRRS, T2,
  and JTS activities is inconsistent at best the
  increased linkages required by DRRS and T2 will
  require higher fidelity interaction and
  alignment.
• Endstate Assignment of required JTSS support at
  Service components.
• Plan of Action Services determine JTSS
  requirements. Services brief status of funding
  initiative at WJTC03.
• Submitted By WJTC02 Breakout Team-2
• POC(s) COCOMs (OPR) Services (OCR) Joint
  Staff J7 JTB LTC Brian Dunn (OCR)
• Status JTSS Support for Combatant Command
  Service components is a COCOM responsibility in
  support of their Service Components.

60
04JT-18 (BOGrp 3) POAM

• PRIORITY 1 OPR COCOMs OCR
• TASKS
  MILESTONES
• COCOM send component Joint Training
• Specialist requirements ( of people) to JS
  J7 DEC 04
• JS, J7 cost out funding required
  FEB 05
• JS, J7 include costs per COCOM in funding
  required
• for COCOM joint training programs
  MAY 05

61
Due Outs and Deliverables

• CANCEL

62
WJTC 04 Issues (CXd)

• 04JT-09 (BOGrp 2) Dissimilar organization
  structures and staff process across joint force
  commands
• Discussion

• Many unique COCOM command/staff structures and
  supporting processes exist.
• Dissimilar nature (in format and supporting
  technologies) of this joint environment makes it
  resource intensive to develop and maintain a
  common education/training POI.
• These complexities undermine the ability to
  prepare and certify joint staff officers to
  common standards

63
WJTC 04 Issues CXD JPG OUT

• 04DTRA01 JTS policy describes role of CSAs wrt
  JTS
• Issue Enhance JTS to provide mechanism to
  clearly show support from CSAs to customers
  (COCOMs, Services, others)
• Discussion Current focus for system is internal
  CSAs provide external support
• Impact CSAs support for COCOMs not readily
  visible
• Submitted By DTRA/Linda Qassim, Deputy, Training
  Inspections Division/[phone], DSN
  246-8673/ linda.qassim_at_abq.dtra.mil
• Endstate Agreed upon method to identify CSA
  support to COCOMs and COCOMs requirements for
  support JTS that includes an accurate role of
  the CSAs

64
WJTC-04 Issue CXD w/ 04DTRA01

• 04DCMA01 Lack of policy and doctrine addressing
  CSA support roles/functions in supporting COCOM
  mission training requirements.
• Discussion Existing policy/guidance addresses
  small slice of the CSA mission (combat support)
  and ignores the majority of the CSA's mission
  (i.e. contractor support on the battlefield,
  contractor requirements during contingencies,
  indirect support). If CSAs are expected to
  provide capabilities to the COCOMs appropriate
  doctrine should be in place to justify the
  support requirements.
• Impact How to capture indirect support (i.e.
  in-plant reach back) leadership uncertain of CSA
  expectations slows JTS development
• Submitted By John Parker, DCMA Combat Support
  Center, DSN 325-1836, john.h.parker_at_dcma.mil
• Endstate Considerable learning curve with
  evolving expectations addressing internal
  education but guidance needed from JS OSD

65
WJTC 03 Due Out CXD w/ 04DTRA01

• 03JT12 Combatant Commands and Combat Support
  Agency Capabilities
• Issue JTF HQs and Components knowledge and
  training in the application of CSA capabilities
  require initial and continual training due to
  turnover. Combatant command staffs, notably JTF
  staffs and components, lack sufficient knowledge
  of CSA capabilities. Combatant command
  requirements may not always be effectively linked
  and communicated to CSAs. CSAs are not always
  involved in command deliberate planning and CSA
  AMETLs need to link directly to command JMETLs.
• Impact Lack of staff knowledge may negatively
  impact combat and training planning/execution
  activities. Linkages between combatant command
  JMETL and CSA METL may be weak or non-existent,
  possibly negatively impacting plan efficacy and
  ability of CSAs to provide required support.
• Endstate Staffs possess current and suitable
  knowledge of CSA capabilities. Fully integrate
  combatant command (JMETL) and CSA (AMETL)
  planning and training support linkages.
• Plan of Action Increase CSA LNO focus and
  engagement with respect to combatant command
  staff education. Possibly provide courseware and
  education support. Each CSA report on specific
  actions taken and progress made at WJTC03.
• Submitted By WJTC02 Breakout Team-4
• POC(s) CSAs (CSA Liaison Officers (LNO)) (OPR)
  Joint Staff J7 JTB (OCR)
• Status JS J-8 is addressing through CSART/AMETL
  initiative. The CSAs, working with COCOMS are
  addressing command linked tasks. The commands
  and agencies are continuing to enhance lines of
  communication. The Next Generation UJTL
  initiative will address CSAs essential tasks.

66
WJTC 04 Issues (CXd)

• 04JT-15 (BOGrp 2) Unrealistic expectation that
  DL will solve joint duty assignment prerequisite
  training/education requirements (protected duty
  time needed)

Discussion

• DL provides a valuable resource to reach-out to
  expand the training audiences and training
  opportunities.
• An underlying assumption on the use of DL is that
  training time is available to support the
  expanding DL-based training and education
  requirements.
• In many cases, individuals do not have excess
  time to meet leverage DL opportunities

67
WJTC 04 Issues (DUP SLIDE /CX)

• 04JT-14 (BOGrp 2) Lack of DoD enforcement of
  standard CIE application (IWS vs. DCTS)

Discussion

• DOD specified DCTS as the common CIE.
• Many commands use GCCS-based IWS vs. DCTS for
  CIE.
• Education programs should provide foundation
  education on CIE, however, cannot resource
  instruction of both IWS and DCTS applications.
• There is no DoD enforcement of a standard CIE.

68
WJTC 04 Issues (DUP SLIDE/ CX)

• 04JT-11 (BOGrp 2) Personnel assignment processes
  do not support joint competency proficiency prior
  to joint duty assignment

Discussion

• OSD direction is that individuals, staffs, and
  units will be certified to joint standards prior
  to arrival at joint assignments.
• Most personnel assigned to JMDs do not arrive
  fully prepared to immediately support JMD duty
  requirements.
• The JPME-II (COCOM focus) throughput does not
  support qualification of all 04s and above for
  JMD duty positions.
• Service personnel assignment systems do not
  ensure officers receive requisite JPME prior to
  COCOM assignment.
• For many JMD positions, prerequisite
  functional-specific education and training is not
  provided prior to arrival at the COCOM

69
WJTC 04 Issues (DUP SLIDE/ CXd)

• 04JT-12 (BOGrp 2) No process for maintaining
  currency of joint training and education

Discussion

• Todays joint staff officer faces an
  unprecedented rate of change across the
  political-military environment.
• In many cases, the systems and processes for the
  development of concepts, doctrine, plans, and
  procedures have a half-life of months
• Education and training programs must dynamically
  update to maintain currency and relevancy
• The integration of these processes and systems is
  ad hoc leaving individual joint staff officer
  preparation trailing the needs of the field

70
WJTC 04 Issues (DUP SLIDE CX)

• 04 TRANSCOM01 Revise methodology used to fund
  CEP support
• Issue COCOM (Joint Staff, USTRANSCOM,
  USSTRATCOM, USNORTHCOM, USJFCOM) support is
  essential to all GEOCOCOM CPX exercises
• Current funding methodology fails to recognize
  functional COCOM costs in support of CPX events
• Funding COCOM CPX events without proportional
  funding to their functional support produces
  ineffective training
• Recommendation Fund CPX as a package of event
  and support costs

UNCLASSIFIED