Two ways of establishing parentage in Minnesota: 1through an action under the parentage act 2through - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Two ways of establishing parentage in Minnesota: 1through an action under the parentage act 2through

Description:

Due process: not giving Stanley a hearing and presuming him unfit violates due process. ... custody, each claiming to be a presumed father. Minnesota case law ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:40
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: localL
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Two ways of establishing parentage in Minnesota: 1through an action under the parentage act 2through


1
Two ways of establishing parentage in
Minnesota1) through an action under the
parentage act2) through the voluntary execution
of a recognition of parentage under Minn. Stat.
257.75
2
Problem 1, p. 871
  • Francine and Edward sign an agreement that he
    will impregnate her and she will never make his
    identity known or seek child support.
  • Five years after child born she sues him for
    child support.
  • Does he have a viable defense to this lawsuit?

3
Problem 2, p. 871
  • 18 year old Marie becomes pregnant as result of
    sex with 15 year old Tom.
  • Marie sues Tom for child support.
  • Tom alleges that since Marie is guilty of
    statutory rape Marie should not be able to pursue
    child support claim against him.

4
Stephen v. Commissioner of Social Security386 F.
Supp. 2d 1257 (2005)
  • Under Florida law a child conceived with the
    sperm of a person who died before transfer of
    sperm to a womans body is not eligible for claim
    against the decedents estate unless the decedent
    provided for the child in the decedents will.
  • Therefore, since social security applies state
    law the after death conceived and born child is
    not eligible for social security benefits.

5
Problem 1, p. 877
  • State statute All private group plans must
    cover all legitimate children of male employees
    and all illegitimate children if there is a court
    order establishing paternity.
  • Is this an equal protection issue?

6
Problem 2, p. 877
  • Don and Mary living together and unmarried. Don
    paid half of the rent. They share groceries and
    utilities. Six months ago they learn Mary is
    pregnant. Don buys her gifts of maternity
    clothes.
  • Don has been killed in an auto accident.
  • Under Bennemon?

7
Stanley v. Illinois -1972 Supreme Court
  • Due process not giving Stanley a hearing and
    presuming him unfit violates due process.. Peter
    Stanley had an interest in these children that
    was cognizable and substantial--therefore he
    was entitled to a hearing before losing custody
    of these children. All parents are
    constitutionally entitled to a hearing before
    losing custody of children.

8
  • Quilloin v. Walcott 434 U.S. 246 (1978)
  • Georgia adoption statute Only mothers consent
    to adoption was needed unless father had
    legitimized the child by marriage and
    acknowledgement or by court order.
  • Biological father had never legitimized the
    child, never lived with the child, had made some
    support payments and had some visitation.
  • Court rules No DP violation EP never reached

9
Caban v. Mohammed441 U.S. 380(1979)
  • Putative father lived with mother and children
    for five years. Had fathered the two children.
  • Mother left him and married someone else.
  • Caban continued to see children frequently,
    contribute to their support, at one point he had
    custody of them.
  • She and stepfather petitioned to adopt these
    children.
  • New York statute (like the Georgia statute) said
    only mother had to consent.
  • Court found EP violation, no DP consideration

10
Lehr v. Robertson facts
  • 11-9-76 Jessica M. is born
  • 8 months laterBio mom marries Robertson
  • 12-21-78 Robertsons file adoption petition for
    stepfather adoption-no service on bio dad
  • 1-30-79 Lehr files paternity petition (no
    financial support sporadic visitation)
  • 2-22-79 Serves notice on the mother
  • 3-7-79 Adoption granted.
  • Paternity petition dismissed because adoption is
    final.

11
Minn. Stat. 259.52
  • Subd. 7. When and how to register. A putative
    father may register with the department of health
    before the birth of the child but must register
    no later than 30 days after the birth of the
    child. Registrations must be in writing and
    signed by the putative father. A registration is
    timely if the date the registration is postmarked
    or the date it was delivered by means other than
    mail to the address specified on the registration
    form is not later than 30 days after the birth of
    the child.Subd. 8. Failure to register. Except
    for a putative father who is entitled to notice
    and consent under sections 259.24 and 259.49,
    subdivision 1, paragraph (a) or (b), clauses (1)
    to (7), a putative father who fails to timely
    register with the fathers' adoption registry
    under subdivision 7(1) is barred thereafter
    from bringing or maintaining an action to assert
    any interest in the child during the pending
    adoption proceeding concerning the child(2)
    is considered to have waived and surrendered any
    right to notice of any hearing in any judicial
    proceeding for adoption of the child, and consent
    of that person to the adoption of the child is
    not required and(3) is considered to have
    abandoned the child.

12
Heidbrenner v. Carton645 N.W. 2d 355 (Minn. 2002)
  • Teenage couple in Iowa. She is 18, hes 19
  • She gets pregnant-finds out November 1999 she is
    due in August 2000
  • He says she promises him she will never place the
    child for adoption. They live together during
    her pregnancy for a short period of time.
  • In mid-June she takes off, moves to MN, hides
    from the father,
  • She decides to place child for adoption.
  • He files under MN putative fathers registry on
    day 31

13
Heidbreder
  • No fiduciary duty on her part to disclose her
    location to the bio dad even if she knows he
    wants to make a claim on the baby.
  • Lack of knowledge of either pregnancy or birth
    not an excuse for not filing with registry.
  • No EP violation/No DP violation

14
In re Kelsey S.
  • Kelsey S.(decided while Michael H. case is on
    appeal)
  • California court had decided Kelsey--if unwed
    father promptly comes forward and demonstrates a
    full commitment to his parental responsibilities
    cannot terminate his parental relationship
    without unfitness. Biological father has a
    constitutionally cognizable opportunity interest
    in developing a relationship with his child.

15
Problem 1. p. 888
  • Anita and Martin live together for six years.
    Have two children.
  • Anita and Martin separate eight months ago.
    Anita places children for adoption with Tim and
    Karen. Anita tells agency she doesnt know who
    the father is of the children. Adoption is
    granted after a general notice published.
  • Can Martin vacate this under Lehr?

16
Problem 2, p. 888
  • A, B, and C live in state with UPA.
  • B has a daughter D.
  • Betty and Al divorce, Betty and Donna move in
    with Charles. Betty tells him he is Donnas
    father. Charles treats Donna as his own.
  • Betty dies.
  • Al and Charles sue for custody, each claiming to
    be a presumed father.

17
Minnesota case law
  • The Parentage Act allows for the possibility of
    conflicting presumptions of paternity. The
    presumptions contained in the Parentage Act are
    not conclusive of paternity, but rather create a
    functional set of rules that point to a likely
    father.... If two or more presumptions conflict,
    the presumption which on the facts is founded on
    the weightier considerations of policy and logic
    controls. In another MN case, the court
    stated thateven if the putative father were to
    present the court with blood tests establishing
    his paternity, those tests are given no greater
    weight than the other presumptions listed in the
    Parentage Act. (stating, where competing
    presumptions of paternity exist, the
    determination of paternity is no longer solely an
    issue of biological fact). A child's best
    interests are to be considered in resolving
    conflicting presumptions of paternity. In re
    Paternity of B.J.H., 573 N.W.2d 99, 102
    (Minn.App.1998) C.M.G., 516 N.W.2d at 560. When
    resolving such conflicting presumptions,
    Minnesota recognizes, along with other factors,
    the importance of not impairing blood
    relationships. Kelly v. Cataldo, 488 N.W.2d 822,
    827 (Minn.App.1992), review denied (Minn. Sept.
    15, 1992). The legislature has acknowledged the
    significance of blood relationships. (Concerns
    for marriage and blood relations are seen in the
    legislature's announcement of presumptive
    parental status.).

18
Problem 2, p. 898
  • M and F dating. M places baby for adoption when
    baby 3 days old. F has been disinterested in
    pregnancy, birth, etc.
  • When baby is 7 months old Frank files for
    custody.
  • Adoptive family files for adoption.
  • Under Michael H. is his consent needed for the
    adoption?

19
Problem 3, p. 898
  • Dawn is separated from Frank. She begins living
    with Jerry and becomes pregnant.
  • Three months later she moves back with Frank and
    has a son.
  • Dawn and Frank want nothing to do with Jerry.
  • Jerry files an action for paternity rights.
  • CA statute H is rebuttably presumed to be
    father

20
Experts testimony in Plemel v. Walter
  • 1) not excluded
  • 2) probability of excluding falsely accused
    father is 97.5
  • 3) paternity index is 178
  • 4) chance of paternity is 99.4
  • 5) chance of nonpaternity is .6
  • 6) extremely likely Walter was the father.

21
Problem 1, p. 910
  • Arthur and Guinevere, married couple.
  • Lancelot, bio dad.
  • Both have competing presumptions of parentage as
    to the child Fred.
  • How should the court resolve?

22
Minn. Stat.257.62, subd. 5as amended in 2006
  • (b) If the results of blood or genetic tests
    completed in a laboratory accredited by the
    American Association of Blood Banks indicate that
    likelihood of the alleged father's paternity,
    calculated with a prior probability of no more
    than 0.5 (50 percent), is 99 percent or greater,
    there is an evidentiary presumption that the
    alleged father is presumed to be the biological
    father and the party opposing the establishment
    of the alleged father's paternity has the burden
    of proving by clear and convincing evidence that
    the alleged father is not the father of the
    child.(c) A determination under this subdivision
    that the alleged father is the biological father
    does not preclude the adjudication of another man
    as the legal father under section 257.55,
    subdivision 2, nor does it allow the donor of
    genetic material for assisted reproduction for
    the benefit of a recipient parent, whether sperm
    or ovum (egg), to claim to be the child's
    biological or legal parent.

23
Problem 2, p. 910
  • Mother and Roger, father of mothers other
    children sign a declaration of parentage re
    Christopher.
  • Albert says he had sex with mother and
    Christopher is his child.
  • Court has terminated (or is in process) mother
    and Rogers parental rights to Christopher.
  • Can Albert pursue his paternity claim?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com