The Behavioural Phenotype of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 31
About This Presentation
Title:

The Behavioural Phenotype of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder

Description:

81 steals from home #82 steals outside. Analyses of Data. Frequency Counts ... Does your child steal from outside the home? Does your child steal from home? ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:45
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 32
Provided by: HSC148
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Behavioural Phenotype of Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder


1
The Behavioural Phenotype of Fetal Alcohol
Spectrum Disorder
  • The births of all things are weak and tender,
    and therefore, our eyes should be intent on
    beginnings." -Michel Eyquem Montaigne
  • Inaugural Ivey Symposium
  • June 6, 2006

2
What is Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder (FASD)?
  • FASD is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by
    exposure to alcohol in utero
  • Has effects on both brain and behaviour

3
Diagnostic Criteria
  • Pre and postnatal growth retardation
  • CNS damage
  • Characteristic facial dysmorphology

4
  • Only a minority of children meet criteria for the
    full blown syndrome
  • How do we diagnose without visible signs?

5
The Motherisk Follow-up Clinic
  • Began in 1996
  • Provides a specialized diagnosis in a
    central location
  • Many obstacles exist
  • Not every child has physical symptoms
  • ADHD with comorbid FASD 70 of children
    with FASD are diagnosed with ADHD
  • Long wait lists

6
The Issue of ADHD
  • Children with FASD present with a unique and
    specific behavioural profile compared to children
    with ADHD (Greenbaum (2004) Fantus et al.,
    (2004))

7
The Issue of Access
  • The majority of children with FASD reside in
    communities with limited access to a specialized
    diagnosis
  • How do we address this issue?

8
Aims of the current research
  • To identify whether the diagnosis of FASD can be
    predicted by individual items from a validated
    questionnaire
  • To compare children with FASD to children with
    ADHD and controls on this questionnaire
  • To develop an empirically derived screening tool
    (Streissguth, 1998)

9
Methods
  • Participants children between the ages of 6-16
    years.
  • FASD (dx n30)
  • ADHD (dx n30) No exposure history
  • Controls (n 30) No exposure history, LD, ADHD
  • Exposure History (FASD) Confirmed by
  • Verbal report of biological parent or relative
  • Knowledge that the child suffered alcohol
    withdrawal at birth
  • The child having been place in care because of
    maternal alcohol abuse

10
The Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL Achenbach,
1991)
  • 113 item parent questionnaire
  • T-scores yield
  • Competence Scales
  • 3 Broadband scales
  • 8 Narrowband scales
  • DSM Oriented Scales

11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
Item selection
  • Selected only 12 based on the work of Greenbaum
    (2000)

14
CBCL 12 Items
  • 1 acts too young for his/her age
  • 3 argues
  • 8 cant concentrate/poor attention
  • 10 cant sit still/restless/hyperactive
  • 16 cruelty/bullying/meanness to others
  • 22 disobedient at home
  • 26 no guilt after misbehaving
  • 41 impulsive/acts without thinking
  • 43 lying or cheating
  • 74 showing off/clowning
  • 81 steals from home
  • 82 steals outside

15
Analyses of Data
  • Frequency Counts
  • Proportions endorsed per group (chi square)
  • Endorsement totals per item/group Discriminant
    Function Analysis (DFA)
  • Sensitivity and Specificity Receiver Operating
    Curves (ROC)

16
Receiver Operating Curves
17
CBCL items involving significant group
differences(Controls FASD)
18
Seven items most strongly differentiating FASD
from control
  • 1 acts too young for his/her age
  • 8 cant concentrate/poor attention
  • 9 cant sit still/restless/hyperactive
  • 22 disobedient at home
  • 26 no guilt after misbehaving
  • 41 impulsive/acts without thinking
  • 43 lying or cheating

19
ROC AnalysisFASD and Controls
20
CBCL items involving significant group
differences(FASD and ADHD)
21
Six items most strongly differentiating FASD from
ADHD
  • 1 Acts too young for his/her age
  • 16 cruelty/bullying/meanness to others
  • 26 no guilt after misbehaving
  • 43 lying or cheating
  • 81 steals from home
  • 82 steals outside

22
ROC AnalysisFASD and ADHD
23
Screening checklist for FASD
  • Step 1 Identifying behaviour suggestive of FASD
  • The following questions should be asked of the
    childs parent/guardian to determine whether the
    childs behaviour is suggestive of FASD

24
Screening Checklist Continued
  • Does your child act too young for his/her age?
  • Does your child have difficulty concentrating and
    cant pay attention for long?
  • Is your child disobedient at home?
  • Does your child lie or cheat?
  • Does your child lack guilt after misbehaving?
  • Does your child act impulsively and without
    thinking?
  • Does your child have difficulty sitting still/is
    restless/hyperactive?

25
  • If the parent answers YES to at least 6 out of 7
    items this is suggestive of FASD with comorbid
    ADHD
  • If the child does NOT exhibit behaviour
    consistent with ADHD then they must receive a
    score of 3 out of 4 on the conduct related items

26
Step 2 Differentiating FASD from ADHD
  • i). The child needs to exhibit 2 of the following
    3
  • Does your child lack guilt after misbehaving?
  • Does your child act cruel, bully or is mean to
    others?
  • Does your child act young for his/her age?

27
Step 2Continued
  • OR
  • ii). 3 of the following 6
  • Does your child lack guilt after misbehaving?
  • Does you child act cruel, bully or is mean to
    others?
  • Does your child act young for his/her age?
  • Does your child steal from outside the home?
  • Does your child steal from home?
  • Does your child lie and cheat?

28
Clinical Implications
  • Address the issue of access
  • Spare the long wait times for a diagnosis
  • Misdiagnosis of ADHD as the primary diagnosis

29
Limitations
  • Dose and timing of alcohol exposure
  • Confounders
  • Small sample size
  • Clinic referred

30
Future Directions
  • Compare to children diagnosed with conduct
    disorder
  • Replicate and empirically validate
  • Neuroimaging and mapping

31
Acknowledgments
  • Rovet Lab Meagan Williamson, Dina Lafoyannis,
    Sarah Borokowski, Erin Sheard, Dr. Mary Desrocher
  • Canadian Institute of Health Research (CIHR)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com