Upgrading Minnesota - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 27
About This Presentation
Title:

Upgrading Minnesota

Description:

'In my 32 years with the Minneapolis Police Department I only saw one traffic accident. Lighting hit a tree and the tree hit a car; that was an accident. ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:29
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 28
Provided by: nancyfran
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Upgrading Minnesota


1
Upgrading Minnesotas Seat Belt Law
  • Nancy Franke Wilson
  • Community Health Liaison
  • Minnesota Department of Public Safetys
  • Office of Traffic Safety

2
Minnesota Traffic Crashes
  • In my 32 years with the Minneapolis Police
    Department I only saw one traffic accident.
    Lighting hit a tree and the tree hit a car that
    was an accident. Bob OBrien, Law Enforcement
    Liaison, MN DPS
  • (Random House, Accident Chance, Luck or Fortune)

3
By the End of the Calendar Year 2005
  • The population of Minnesota approached 5.2
    million.
  • There were almost 3.9 million licensed drivers.
  • Over 4.6 million motor vehicles were registered.
  • Almost 57 billion miles were driven.

4
The Problem In 2005
  • 87,813 traffic crashes occurred
  • 221,835 people were involved
  • 161,683 motor vehicles were involved
  • 97,686 people were injured
  • 559 people died
  • Nearly 1.7 estimated economic cost to Minnesota
  • Nationally, traffic crashes cost 7,000 a second

5
Who Was Involved?
  • Traffic crashes are the leading cause of death to
    people age 1 to 34.
  • 210 people (38) under age 30 died in Minnesota
    in 2005.
  • 47 of people injured were under age 30.
  • Senior citizen drivers were involved in 7 of
    crashes but accounted for 15 of fatalities.

6
Where Do Crashes Happen?
  • Rural roads permit high speeds and no
    interstate-type safety designs.
  • 70 of all fatal crashes occurred in rural areas.
  • 69 on trunk or county state aid highways.
  • Over two-third occur in areas with under 5,000
    population.

7
On an Average Day in 2005
  • 241 crashes
  • 1.6 deaths
  • 103 people injured
  • 4,565,139 average daily cost

8
Why is belt use a public health concern?
  • Crashes are the leading cause of death for
    Minnesotans ages 1 through 34 years. (Center for
    Disease Control) Each year, the majority of those
    killed are unrestrained. (MN Dept. of Public
    Safety)
  • Crashes are the leading cause of traumatic brain
    injury (TBI). Victims of TBI require some of the
    most costly acute and long-term care in the
    state. Sixty-two percent of TBI/crash victims did
    not use seatbelts or child restraints. (Brain
    Injury Association)

9
Why is belt use a public health concern?
  • From 1998-2002, crashes killed more teens age 15
    to 17 than the next four leading causes of death
    combined. On average, 75 of those teens were not
    restrained. (MN Dept. of Public Safety)
  • More children die in crashes than from all
    childhood diseases combined. (Center for Disease
    Control).

10
Why is belt use an economic concern?
  • Between 1998 and 2002, 34,000 unbelted vehicle
    occupants were injured or killed in Minnesota
    crashes. The estimated cost to society from those
    injuries was 1.9 billion so 13 of total crash
    costs are for medical treatment. (Based on
    National Safety Council cost estimates)
  • Traffic crashes are the leading cause of
    workplace fatalities. (MN Dept. of Labor and
    Industry)
  • Crash victims who are not wearing seat belts have
    medical bills that are 50 higher than those
    victims who wore a belt. Society bears 74 of
    those costs through increased insurance premiums,
    taxes and health care and insurance costs.
    (NHTSA)

11
Occupant Protection
  • Seat belts are the most effective safety devices
    in vehicles.
  • In potentially fatal crashes they increase your
    chance of survival by 45 in a car and 60 in a
    light truck.

12
Occupant Protection
  • Without wearing a seat belt, a 35 m.p.h. crash is
    the equivalent of falling from a third-story
    window.
  • If you are in the back seat and not belted in a
    crash, your body becomes a lethal object moving
    forward with enough force to break the back of
    someone riding in the front or to cause brain
    injury.

13
Minnesotas Safety Belt Laws
  • Requires all front seat passengers and all
    passengers under the age of eleven to wear safety
    belts.
  • Became effective in Minnesota on August 1, 1986.
  • Fine for not wearing a safety belt is 25.
  • Amended in 1988 and 1991.

14
What is Standard Universal?
  • Primary means standard the same status as
    every other state law. Minnesotas current
    secondary seat belt law cannot be enforced
    directly. Upgrading to primary will allow
    enforcement of this important law like every
    other traffic law.

15
(No Transcript)
16
Why Upgrade the Law?
  • Its a no-cost and big-savings law.
  • It will save lives (more than 40) and serious
    injuries (more than 400) every year in Minnesota.
  • It will save on health care costs. According to
    NHTSA, unbelted crash victims have medical bills
    50 higher than belted victims.

17
Why Upgrade the Law?
  • Studies have found that states that pass a
    primary seat belt law increase average seat belt
    usage by nine to 14 percentage points.
  • This, in turn, decreases crash fatalities by an
    average of eight percent and decreases the
    severity of injuries in crashes.

18
(No Transcript)
19
Why Upgrade the Law?
  • Minnesota will receive over 15 million in
    federal incentive funds.
  • Most Minnesotans want a primary seat belt law.
    (71 according to the 2005 Minnesota State
    Survey.)
  • It is straightforward law enforcement. Law
    enforcement officers can see violation and take
    direct action.

20
Why Upgrade the Law?
  • Adults who do not buckle up are sending a message
    to children that it is all right not to use seat
    beltsthe probability of a fatally injured child
    being unrestrained is more than twice as likely
    when the adult driving was unrestrained.
    (Starnes, 2003)

21
Why Upgrade the Law?
  • If Minnesota increased its seat belt use rate by
    10 percentage points from the current rate of 84
    percent to 94 percent, the cumulative charge
    savings to all government payer (taxpayer-funded)
    sources is projected to be 85.2 million by 2015,
    and the cumulative charge savings to all payer
    sources would be nearly 190 million.

22
Arguments Against
  • Seat belt use is a personal choice and should not
    be legislated. It affects no one but me.
  • If Minnesota enacts a universal standard
    enforcement seat belt law, it will open the door
    for "differential enforcement" or racial
    profiling, making traffic stops based only on
    ethnicity.

23
Arguments Against
  • Ill take my risksafter all, its my neck, and
    my health care expenses.
  • Safety belts are uncomfortable and wrinkle my
    clothes.
  • People who dont wear them now wont be more
    inclined to wear a safety belt if the law is
    upgraded.

24
Why Upgrade the Law?
  • Its a no-cost and big-savings law.
  • It will save lives (more than 40) and serious
    injuries (more than 400) every year in Minnesota.
  • It will save on health care costs. According to
    NHTSA, unbelted crash victims have medical bills
    50 higher than belted victims.

25
Why Upgrade the Law?
  • Studies have found that states that pass a
    primary seat belt law increase average seat belt
    usage by nine to 14 percentage points.
  • This, in turn, decreases crash fatalities by an
    average of eight percent and decreases the
    severity of injuries in crashes.

26
What Can I Do?
  • Join the Minnesota Safety Belt Coalition
  • Share this information.
  • http//www.mnsafetycouncil.org/sbcoalition/action.
    pdf

27
Contact information
  • Nancy Franke Wilson, MS
  • 4190 Vinewood Lane N
  • Suite 111-416
  • Plymouth, MN 55442
  • 763-545-2684 office
  • 763-360-3875 cell
  • nancyfranke_at_comcast.net
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com