Wellbeing at school and school as a way to increase wellbeing Overview of a set of already available - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 44
About This Presentation
Title:

Wellbeing at school and school as a way to increase wellbeing Overview of a set of already available

Description:

Chypre. Interpretations ... Chypre. Malte. Interpretations. Walzer : ... Chypre. Malte. Interpreting the indicators using EGREES framework. Four main questions ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:39
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 45
Provided by: marcde6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Wellbeing at school and school as a way to increase wellbeing Overview of a set of already available


1
Well-being at school and school as a way to
increase well-being Overview of a set of
already available indicators
  • Marc DEMEUSE
  • (University of Mons-Hainaut, B.)
  • Ariane BAYE (University of Liège, B.)
  • marc.demeuse_at_umh.ac.be
  • Groupe européen de Recherche sur lEquité des
    Systèmes éducatifs (GERESE)
  • European Group of Research on Equity of the
    Education systems (EGREES)

2
Socrates SO2-61OBGE
  • University of Liège, SPE, coordinator, Belgium
  • University of Burgondy, IREDU, France
  • University of Roma I, Italy
  • University of York, United Kingdom
  • Distance University of Madrid, Spain
  • Catholic University of Louvain, GIRSEF, Belgium
    (1st project)
  • Experts W. Hutmacher N. Bottani

3
The story
  • OECD Ines working group
  • Hutmacher, Cochrane, Bottani (Eds) (2001). In
    pursuit of Equity in Education. Kluwer Academic
    Publishers.
  • European Group of Research on Equity of
    Educational Systems, Socrates Project
  • First report, 2003
  • Fr/Eng, UE15
  • http//europa.eu.int/comm/education/programmes/so
    crates/observation/equality_fr.pdf
  • Validation of the work, June 2004
  • UE25 and scientific experts

4
The story
  • Second report, 2005
  • Fr/Eng, UE15
  • Informal Council of European Ministers of
    Education (Brussels, February 2005)
  • Third report, 2006
  • Fr/Eng, UE25
  • http//www.ulg.ac.be/pedaexpe/equite/
  • (all available documents)

Report
Report
5
The story is going on
  • Survey on feelings of justice, 2005 2007
  • Web site and pedagogical tools (pending)
  • June, 8-9 workshop on Equity country profiles

6
What was new ?
  • Theoritical framework on Equity
  • Framework of Equity indicators
  • Data to compare Equity of the European Education
    Systems

7
Why not speaking about Equality ?
  • Equality equivalence between two or more terms
    (Hutmacher)
  • Equality of what ? (Sen)

8
Different principles of equality
  • No interest in equality
  •  natural  or  libertarian  positions
  • Equality of access or opportunity
  • Equality of treatment
  • Equality of achievement or academic success
  • Equality of actualization (social output)

9
From Equality to Equity
  • Equity which inequalities are fair ?
  • Equity is a matter of justice

10
Theories of justice
  • Nozick formal equality freedom
  • Utilitarianism Effectiveness (inequalities have
    to promote effectiveness)
  • Walzer spheres of justice
  • Roemer, Fleurbaey Responsibility (talent,
    effort and resources)
  • Sen equality of capabilities
  • Rawls democratic equality

11
How to work on Equity at the international level
?
  • Different Membre States different principles
    of justice.
  • Our objective was to open the discussion, not to
    adopt a normative point of view.
  • But to have an open discussion, we need common
    words and interesting data.
  • gt a common framework of indicators

12
Eight principles
  • How to build a coherent set of indicators on
    Equity in Education ?

13
Principle 1
  • The indicators must enable to discuss in the
    context of various existing principles of
    justice.

14
Principle 2
  • Relevant inequalities are of three kinds
  • Inequalities between individuals must not hinder
    social cooperation on an equal basis
  • Inequalities between social groups must be
    compatible with equality of opportunity
  • Nobody should leave education without a minimum
    set of skills

15
Principle 3
  • The more relevant social categories are those
    from which the individual cannot escape
  • social origin
  • national origin
  • gender
  • Other possible categories rural vs. urban areas,
    regions

16
Principle 4
  • Among the assets distributed by the educational
    systems, we need to concentrate on those of which
    fair distribution is more important for
    individuals or for the society

17
Principle 5
  • Since we intend to evaluate the equity of
    educational systems and not only to measure
    educational inequality, we have to measure also
    inequalities upstream the educational system and
    those that affect the teaching process itself.

18
Principle 6
  • Educational systems do not only deliver knowledge
    and skills, they are also an important part of
    the students life. Therefore equity means not
    only that educational assets have to be
    distributed in an equitable way, but also that
    students have to be treated in an equitable way
    by the system,its employees and by their
    classmates.

Quick Survey
19
Principle 7
  • Because a just educational system is also a
    system that favours social equity, indicators
    must relate not only to educational inequalities,
    but also to the social and political effects of
    those inequalities

20
Principle 8
  • The system of indicators must measure
    inequalities, but it must also identify the
    judgment of citizens and of the systems users
    about the equity of the current education system
    and the criteria underlying that judgement

21
1st axis
school is not alone
school is not alone
Internal outputs
External outputs
Context
Process
SCHOOL
22
2nd axis
23
2nd axis
1st axis
?
?
24
2nd axis
1st axis
?
?
25
Data sources (EU-25)
  • Labour Force Survey (EUROSTAT)
  • Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC)
    (EUROSTAT)
  • UOE (UNESCO, OCDE, EUROSTAT)
  • PISA 2000 PISA 2003 (OCDE)
  • European Social Survey (ESS) (Norwegian Social
    Science Data Services)
  • Public Funding and Private Return to Education
    (PURE)
  • IALS (International Adult Lifeskills Survey)
    (OCDE Statistic Canada)

Quick Survey (5  countries )
26
Availability of information for Equity 2006
(Total number of data/variables 92)
lt30
60-85
90-99
100
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
(No Transcript)
30
(No Transcript)
31
Interpreting the indicators using theories of
justice
32
Interpretations
  • Rawls inequalities of education must be turned
    to the benefit of the most disadvantaged
  • Skills of the weakest students
  • Contribution of education to economical growth
  • Social transfers
  • Living together
  • Values and practices of the most educated

33
Contribution envers les défavorisés Benefits for
desavantaged
34
Interpretations
  • Walzer independence of the spheres of justice gt
    lower social and professional return on the
    diploma (acc.to Meuret)
  • Importance of the benefits associated to more
    education
  • Employment, occupational status, reading level,
    continuous training, cultural practices,
    communication with children, reading and
    mathematics skills of the children

35
Bénéfices de léducation Benefits of education
Chypre
Malte
36
Bénéfices de léducation Benefits of education
37
Interpretations
  • Walzer independence of the spheres of justice
  • Importance of the differences between groups in
    societies and in the different education systems
  • Differences in social, economical and cultural
    context by socio-economical status, place of
    birth, gender compared to differences in reading
    and mathematics by socio-economical status, place
    of birth, gender

38
Contexte social Social context
39
Résultats internes Internal outputs
40
Interpreting the indicators using EGREES framework
41
Four main questions
  • How important are the inequalities within each
    education system?
  • What are the benefits linked to education in the
    various countries?
  • Do the different educational systems have a
    developing role or a reducing role of the
    background inequalities?
  • In which extent do the educational inequalities
    benefit to the disadvantaged and favour the
    social mobility?

42
(No Transcript)
43
Interpreting the indicators using national
principles of equality
44
Interpreting the indicators using national
principles of equality
  • To identify the model of justice which matches
    the best with the national criteria of justice
  • To identify, in the Equity indicators, which best
    matches with the national model of justice
  • To analyse the country position on the Equity
    indicators
  • To identify national or international data which
    could be added to the Equity indicators systems
    to best illustrate the national situation
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com