Hear the Music: Effects of Cardiovascular Fitness on Hearing Sensitivity and Otoacoustic Emissions Among Musicians and Nonmusicians - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

Hear the Music: Effects of Cardiovascular Fitness on Hearing Sensitivity and Otoacoustic Emissions Among Musicians and Nonmusicians

Description:

Hear the Music: Effects of Cardiovascular Fitness on Hearing Sensitivity and Otoacoustic Emissions Among Musicians and Nonmusicians Maribeth DiSalvo, Tricia ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:209
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: unitsMuoh2
Learn more at: https://miamioh.edu
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Hear the Music: Effects of Cardiovascular Fitness on Hearing Sensitivity and Otoacoustic Emissions Among Musicians and Nonmusicians


1
Hear the Music Effects of Cardiovascular
Fitness on Hearing Sensitivity and Otoacoustic
Emissions Among Musicians and Nonmusicians
  • Maribeth DiSalvo, Tricia Deatharidge, Timothy
    Phoenix, K. M. Hutchinson and Helaine Alessio
  • Miami University, Oxford, Ohio

2
Abstract
  • Deafness or hearing impairment resulting from
    prolonged exposure to loud noise is most
    frequently associated with industrial workplaces,
    airports etc. Studies have shown that up to 52
    of classical musicians and up to 30 of rock or
    pop musicians suffer from music-induced hearing
    loss (MIHL). Recent studies, however, have
    revisited some prior ways of thinking about
    sensory changes due to noise, and have uncovered
    variables other than time and duration of
    exposure, that play a significant role in hearing
    changes. In this study, cardiovascular (CV)
    health and hearing acuity were measured in 30
    musicians and 35 nonmusicians, aged 19-24 years.
    Pure tone hearing results showed that the high CV
    fitness had better hearing than low CV subjects.
    Otoacoustic emissions demonstrated similar
    patterns. The fitness-hearing relation appears
    to be specifically related to CV fitness among
    both groups.

3
Introduction
  • It can result from the booming drums or the
    blaring guitar amplifiers of a hard-rock group.
    But it can also result from the violin or the
    piccolo flute of a symphony orchestra. For a
    musician whose livelihood depends on rehearsing
    and playing music 4-8 hours a day, the danger of
    a hearing impairment is always present.
  • It is hardly surprising that music can cause
    damage while on the job. The sound pressure of a
    large concert orchestra may reach 112 dB of
    amplified rock bands even up to 130 dB, far more
    than that accepted in an industrial environment.
    Reasons for reduced hearing acuity over time
    include compromised blood circulation through the
    inner ear. Variations in cochlea blood flow may
    affect the availability of oxygen and glucose,
    which is more rapidly metabolized during sound
    stimulation. If a person has a compromised
    circulation it is possible that blood flow
    through the cochlea may also be reduced.

4
Introduction cont.
  • There is also evidence that chronic exercise
    may have a protective role in hearing
    conservation. Researchers reported improved pure
    tone and temporary threshold shifts in healthy
    but low-average fit young adults who improved
    their VO2 peak following eight weeks of
    twice-weekly aerobic exercise performed at 70 of
    maximum oxygen consumption. On the other hand,
    older adults (gt50 years) who were healthy but
    low-average fitness, did not improve either
    hearing acuity nor VO2 peak following eight weeks
    of twice-weekly aerobic exercise performed at 70
    of maximum oxygen consumption.
  • The purpose of this study was to determine if
    hearing acuity among a group of musicians and
    nonmusicians was influenced by cardiovascular
    health in subjects aged 18-26 years. Repeated
    exposure to high levels of sound can cause
    hearing loss, particularly in the higher
    frequency ranges. Therefore hearing thresholds
    were measured up to 16 kHz.

5
Methods
  • Subjects were 65 volunteers, 29 females and 36
    males (mean age 22 years) with 30 musicians and
    35 nonmusicians. No one reported smoking. None
    reported a history of any significant noise
    exposure, other than their music performances.
    All subjects were found to determine normal
    hearing sensitivity (thresholds 25 dB HL or above
    from 1000 to 6000 Hz).
  • Baseline pure tone frequency thresholds were
    determined on a GSI 33 audiometer using insert
    earphones. Closed dynamic HAD 200 Audiometric
    Headphones, were used to test extended high
    frequency (EHF) hearing levels.
  • Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions (OAE)
    were measured using a Madsen Celeste OAE
    instrument from 2000 to 4000 Hz at a f1/f2 ratio
    of 1.22 and levels of 65/55.

6
Methods cont.
  • VO2 peak was determined using a submaximum
    graded exercise test on a Monark Bicycle
    ergometer or using a questionnaire designed to
    estimate VO2 max. Heart rate and blood pressure
    were measured during the graded exercise tests.
    No test had to be terminated due to subjects
    report of angina, or any other abnormal exercise
    response.
  • Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to
    compare pure tone hearing levels and OAEs between
    and within the two groups. Pure tone hearing
    levels are reported at three frequencies 2 , 3,
    and 4 kHz and at extended high frequencies
    between 10 to16kHz. Post-hoc analysis using
    contrast-comparison tests compared hearing levels
    among the high and low fitness category groups at
    three frequencies to determine whether hearing
    was significantly different on a group by group
    comparison for each test period. The significant
    probability level was plt .05.

7
Descriptive Variables of Two Subject Groups
Age (Mean) Smoking Years of Exposure Tinnitus ( present)
Musician 21.1 18 11 70
Non-Musician 22.2 15 0 52
8
Results
  • No significant difference in the mean DPOAE and
    high frequency pure-tone levels between and
    within musicians and non-musicians
  • No significant difference between VO2 levels of
    musicians and non-musicians
  • Significance at .05 alpha level within musicians
    group concerning signal to noise ratio

9
Discussion
  • Marked trend in EHF thresholds of musicians
    compared to nonmusicians
  • As frequency increased, greater differences in
    thresholds were found between groups in favor of
    the musicians
  • Both groups within normative data ranges
  • No statistically significant differences in
    thresholds between different musicians

10
Discussion
  • Predicted VO2 maximal values were not
    significantly different between the two groups.
  • DPOAE amplitudes across the frequencies were not
    statistically significant.
  • Signal to noise significance noted as a trend due
    to small sample size
  • Results possibly due to effects of everyday
    exposure to leisure noise within the control
    group.

11
Summary
  • Reasons for this cardiovascular health-hearing
    association are unclear, but it has been
    speculated that relative to persons with low
    VO2max, circulation of blood in persons with
    above average VO2max, may be enhanced.
    Circulation of the blood may be improved by less
    resistance to blood flow, higher oxygenation of
    blood, or greater sensitivity and ability of
    tissues to receive blood.

12
References
  • Ahmed, H.O., Dennis, J.H., Badran, O., Ismail,
    M., Ballal, S.G., Ashoor, A., Jerwood, D.
    (2001). High-frequency (10-18kHz) hearing
    thresholds reliability, and effects of age and
    occupational noise exposure. Occup Med, 51, 4,
    245-258.
  • Chasin, Marshall (1996). Musicians and the
    prevention of hearing loss. San Diego Singular
    Publishing.
  • Hall, J.W. Santucci, M. (1995). Protecting the
    professional ear conservation strategies and
    devices. The Hearing Journal, 48, 3, 37-45.
  • Harrell, R.W. (2001). Pure tone evaluation. In
    J.Katz (Ed.), Handbook of Clinical Audiology,
    (pp. 71-87). Baltimore, MD Lippincott, Williams
    Wilkins.
  • Henderson, D., McFadden, S.L., Liu, C.C., Hight,
    N., Zheng, X.Y. (1999). Role of antioxidants
    in protection from impulse noise. In Henderson,
    D., Salvi, R., Quaranta, A., McFadden, S.,
    Burkard, R., (Eds), Ototoxicity Basic Science
    and Clinical Application (pp. 368-380). New
    York New York Academy of Sciences.
  • Hutchinson, K.M., Alessio, H.M., Hoppes, S.,
    Gruner, A., Sanker, A., Ambrose, J. Rudge, S.J.
    (2000). Effects of cardiovascular fitness and
    muscle strength on hearing sensitivity. Journal
    of Strength and Conditioning Research, 14, 3,
    302-309.
  • Manson, J., Alessio, H., Cristell, M.,
    Hutchinson, K.M. (1994). Does cardiovascular
    health mediate hearing ability? Medicine and
    Science in Sports and Exercise, 26, 7, 866-871.
  • Stelmachowicz, P.G., Beauchaine, A.K., Kalberer,
    A. Jesteadt, W. (1989). Normative thresholds
    in the 8-to-20kHz range as a function of age. J.
    Acoust. Soc. Am., 86, 4, 1384-1391.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com