Modelling aquaculture impacts - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Modelling aquaculture impacts

Description:

Modelling aquaculture impacts MOM (Modelling - Ongrowing fish farms - Monitoring) This model developed in Norway is a three component model for modelling organic impacts. – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:155
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Patr401
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Modelling aquaculture impacts


1
Modelling aquaculture impacts
2
MOM (Modelling - Ongrowing fish farms -
Monitoring)
  • This model developed in Norway is a three
    component model for modelling organic impacts.
  • The fish sub-model simulates the release of
    particulate material from the farm based on
    information on the feeding rate and composition
    of food. Uptake, retention and excretion are all
    calculated in relation to the temperature and
    size of the fish.
  • The output from this sub-model provides the
    initial conditions for the dispersion sub-model
    which simulates dispersion and sedimentation
    rates of excess feed and faecal pellets.
  • The sediment sub-model calculates the maximum
    decomposition at the seabed for a particular
    scenario and oxygen concentration in the benthic
    boundary layer is also calculated.
  • The combination of these sub-models allows the
    calculation of maximum fish production that a
    site can sustain without adverse benthic effects.

3
AWATS - Aquaculture Waste Transport Simulator
  • The AWATS model is a mathematical model to
    simulate tidal and wind-driven currents, waves,
    and the resulting dispersion of fish food and
    faecal matter in coastal areas.
  • This model was one of the first aquaculture
    organic impact models to include complex models
    of the descriptions of spatially varying current
    around the study area.
  • In addition, wind driven flow and waves are also
    included as processes having an effect on the
    subsequent dispersal of discharged particulate
    material.
  • This model originally lacked resuspension which
    causes deposited particles to be re-entrained
    into near bed flows and advected away from the
    initial footprint area.

4
DEPOMOD
  • This model is a lagrangian particle tracking
    model which predicts the dispersion of
    particulate wastes arising from aquaculture
    activities and associated benthic impacts.
  • It was developed from a sewage dispersion model
    also developed by SAMS, but required extensive
    modification to data input requirements and
    validation for the fish farming environment.
  • There are three main modules
  • particle tracking,
  • resuspension
  • benthic response.
  • Predictions of solids accumulation (g m-2 yr-1)
    determine the benthic response using a
    relationship between solids accumulation and
    benthic indices validated for Scottish fish
    farms.

5
  • Current profiles in stratified waters are
    complex. Particles settling at different rates
    are subject to current shear and turbulence

6
MERAMOD
  • Is a conversion of Depomod from cols water areas
    to temperate areas
  • There is an addition of wild fish component to
    take into account the utilisation of waste feed
    by wild fish under the cages
  • It also takes into account the different species
    and behaviour of faecal pellets in the water
    column.
  • It is validated for cage farms in the
    Mediterranean

7
  • MERAMOD modules (I)

8
  • MERAMOD modules (II)

9
Crucial input data for modelling
  • There are a number of key input data issues which
    need to be addressed when developing an existing
    model for application in a different environment.
    Although the principal physical processes can be
    applied to different areas, the input data used
    to drive these components need to be critically
    assessed.

10
(No Transcript)
11
(No Transcript)
12
(No Transcript)
13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Sediment trap experiments (model validation)
Water column (WC)
Upper (U)
Lower (L)
x6
x6
x6 or x12
1. Deploy 2. Retrieve, filter, dry 3. Calculate
observed flux (total waste particulate material
g solids m-2 yr-1) 4. Check calculation
75 cm HD 51 ratio
16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
Typical impact footprints
Dispersive sites Strong currents Impact over a
larger area (up to 100 m) but less
intense Typical of fish farms in
Scotland Depositional sites Weaker
currents Impact over a limited area (up to 30
m) But more intense Typical of farms in Greece
19
Model validation
Species Abundance
Use benthic data to establish relationships
between benthic indices and flux predictions
Shannon Weiner
Modelled flux (g m-2 yr-1)
20
Use of models in knowledge transfer
Closely spaced cages Largely spaced
21
Sedimentation 4 cages weak current
Sensitive habitats
22
Sedimentation 4 cages strong current
Sensitive habitats
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com