Title: The Contribution of Social and Political Factors to Good Health GOOD HEALTH AT LOW COST (The Rockefeller Foundation)
1The Contribution of Social and Political Factors
to Good HealthGOOD HEALTH AT LOW COST(The
Rockefeller Foundation)
- Patrica L.Rosenfield,
- WHO-Special Programme for Research and Training
in Tropical Diseases - By R Muralikrishnan Keerti Pradhan
- keerti_at_aravind.org
2Introduction
- There is no general agreement to what constitutes
good health - There is a pre-conceived notion that higher the
national average income(GNP GDP), better the
health status - But some countries like China, Costa Rica,
Srilanka and Kerala(a small state in a big
country) have health status on par with developed
countries. - Their experiences have shown that good health is
more than the two statisticsLong Life Expectancy
and Low Infant Mortality Rate. - Mortality and Morbidity reductions are only a
part of the process of achieving good health
which includes psychological, social and economic
well-being also
3Methods
- In the mid 80s, the Rockefeller Foundation tried
to study and document the social and political
contribution to good health in these countries - People who are active participants in the health
development policies of their own countries
(Eg.Dr.P.G.K.Panikar, Ex-Director,CDS) - Followed by a conference where they consolidated
the experiences and commonalities
4CHINA
CUBA
KERALA
SRILANKA
COSTA RICA
5Economic and Political Status
- All the four countries had shown dramatic
improvements in mortality-related statistics of
Low IMR and High Life Expectancy, under severe
Economic Constraints - Population ranged from 2.3 million(Costa Rica)
to 1008.2 million(China)-1980-82 - GNP Per capita US 1430(Costa Rica) to
US150(Kerala) - Monarchy, colonization and subsequent democracy
of government were features of their political
development - China, Kerala and Sri Lanka-British Rule
- Three of them had Western style democracies
- Kerala Sri Lanka-Democracy since independence
- Costa Rica was a republic for 150 years
6Comparison of Kerala All India
Kerala All-India
Death Rate/1000 (1998) 6.4 9.0
Rural Birth Rate(1998) 18.3 28.0
IMR(1998) 16 72
Life Expectancy (1993) 66.5 61.5
Literacy Rate (1991) 90.59 52.11
Female Literacy Rate(1991) 86.17 19.43
Mean age at marriage(F) 22.3 19.3
Per capita Income(1995-96) 8324 11649
Doctor-Population Ratio 17213 12148
7Political and Economic Orientations
- Political economic orientations vary between
countries and over time within the same country - Kerala- Communist government since 1956, although
a coalition government was in the centre - Sri Lanka- Socialism and Capitalism have
prevailed at various times over the past 35 years - Costa Rica- Power shared by the Social
Democracy, Christian Democracy and coalition of
left parties - China- Marxist-Leninist economic system since
1949 but now moving on to new economic
orientations - Hence, no single political or economic approach
can claim credits
8Common Social and Political Factors
- Historical commitment to health as a social goal
- Social welfare orientation to development
- Wide spread political participation
- Equality of health services coverage for all
social groups(equity) - Intersectoral linkages for health
9Historical Commitment
- Legislation
- Organized government policy for access to health
care - Implemented at early stages of policy development
- Establishment of hospitals and health centres
- Kerala-Immunization , Sanitary Reforms and Modern
Style Hospitals from 1860. Ayurveda (Historical
Importance) - Srilanka- Ayurveda. Western Medicine
- China-Chinese Medicine mainstay till 1949.
Western Medicine(1917) - Costa Rica- Health actions( mid 19th cent)
village doctors - Missionary Influences
- Spanish colonists in 16th century- Roman Catholic
- Missionaries in 19th Century-Kerala, Srilanka
China
10Social Welfare Orientation
- Continuity in government expenditure for Social
Sector - Preventive health measures(Hygiene Sanitation)
- Food subsidies
- Educational programs-Historic formal programs
- Land Reforms-ensuring redistribution of income
- Srilanka and Costa Rica have the lowest defense
expenditures - India's defense budget around 20-25 but is not
reflected in Kerala state budget - In China, the large military sector has played an
important role in health and health-related
improvements
11Wide Spread Political Participation
- Participation in the electoral process
- Combined with education
- Awareness about the need for health programs
- Extent of Decentralization
- NGO involvement in Planning
- Community Involvement
12Equality of Health Services Coverage
- Measured as health, educational and nutritional
status of the underserved (women,children,ethnic
and minorities, etc) - The Nayar society of Kerala was interested in
womens education and the first girls school was
established in 1819 - In addition accessibility, utilization and
urban-rural distribution were also considered - Rural co-operative medical centres in China.
- Tea planters health programmes in Srilanka
- Reorganization of ministry of health on reaching
underserved areas
13Inter Sectoral Linkages
- Health, Education and Agriculture
- Mechanisms to finance health
- Inter agency committee
- Incorporation of economics into health training
programmes - Closer ties between social security and health
systems - Srilanka had established a national health
development network - Costa Rica drew social security and health
together through legal mechanisms - Kerala is using District Councils to develop
inter sectoral systems for health - China has closely linked political,
administrative and economic organizations
14Conclusion
- Four studies reveal important common factors
influencing good health - The highest level of political commitment has
been complemented by local conditions and
flexibility at policy making and implementation
levels
15Discussion
- Is there any other factor(s)?For.eg.Prof.Abel
Smith demonstrates health seeking behaviour as
another reason for good health in Kerala - Do these commonalities constitute a basis for
universal health policy application? - Does more work need to be done to develop a
conceptual framework for assessment?
16Thank You