Chapter 12: School Language and Classroom Programs for Children with Language Impairments: Collaborating with Parents and School Personnel - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Chapter 12: School Language and Classroom Programs for Children with Language Impairments: Collaborating with Parents and School Personnel

Description:

Chapter 12: School Language and Classroom Programs for Children with Language Impairments: Collaborating with Parents and School Personnel * * * * * * * * * I ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:726
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 34
Provided by: CelesteRo
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Chapter 12: School Language and Classroom Programs for Children with Language Impairments: Collaborating with Parents and School Personnel


1
Chapter 12School Language and Classroom
Programs for Children with Language Impairments
Collaborating with Parents and School Personnel
2
I. Introduction
  • No matter what types of disabilities students
    have, they have the right to a free and
    appropriate public education (FAPE) that will
    support their language skills
  • This includes both general and special education

3
(No Transcript)
4
(No Transcript)
5
However, Nelson 2010 cautions that
6
The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act specified
four key principles
  • Stronger accountability for students educational
    performance
  • ? flexibility for states and school districts in
    use of federal funds
  • ? choices for parents of children from
    disadvantaged backgrounds
  • Scientifically-based, effective teaching methods

7
In addition, NCLB
8
Program Types
  • The most common models for inclusion of speech,
    language, and special education instruction to
    students have consisted of
  • Consultation
  • Collaboration
  • Co-teaching

9
For some special education students
  • The LRE is the resource room
  • Itinerant model used for certain types of
    children who require less contact, less specific
    classroom instruction

10
Nippold (2011) Language intervention in the
classroom What it looks like (Language, Speech,
and Hearing Services in Schools, 42, 393-394.
11
II.Collaboration Vs. Consultation
  • Consultation sharing of expertise with others
  • Consultation indirect service delivery model
    consultant (e.g., the SLP or special education
    teacher) does not work directly with students
    with special needs

12
There are various models of collaboration
  • Co-teaching or classroom-based teaching
    classroom teacher and SLP or special educator
    share responsibility for planning and teaching
    lessons, monitoring progress, making decisions
    re needed modifications

13
Other models of collaboration include (p. 446)
  • Classroom-based complementary teaching
  • Supportive teaching
  • Pullout resource management
  • Self-contained programs

14
SLPs who collaborate with other professionals
  • Need good communication skills
  • Effective listening
  • Acceptance of and respect for others
  • Ability to maintain focus

15
  • Good communication between parents, teachers,
    administrators, and special education personnel
    is especially crucial

16
Kaderavek (2011) states that classroom
collaboration should focus on 3 areas
  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3.

17
Successful strategies that can be implemented in
the general education classroom to support ELL
students include
18
Successful strategies that can be implemented in
the general education classroom to support
students with special needs include
  • Time for communication between team members to
    discuss students progress and needed
    modifications
  • Team decisions about what training is needed for
    co-teachers to successfully implement
    instructional plans
  • Professionals designing of a co-teaching plan to
    address students needs

19
It is very important for classroom teachers to
work on listening skills with students
20
Teachers can also use strategies to enhance
students attention skills
  • These strategies can benefit ELL students,
    monolingual or bilingual students with language
    impairments, and others

21
Teachers and those who collaborate with them
22
Turnbull Justice 2012
23
Turnbull Justice 2012 (continued)
24
III. Response to Intervention
25
In the old days we had.
26
Now more schools across the U.S. are implementing
RTI to assess learning progress (Long, 2012)
27
This is partially in response to No Child Left
Behind and IDEA 2004
28
Nelson 2010 suggests that
29
RtI can be very helpful in decreasing special
education caseloads.
  • Good news for us and the students!

30
Diane Blevins, 2011 CSHA Los Angeles
  • Santa Ana had a deluge of at risk preschoolers
    referred for assessment and probable intervention
  • Many were ELLs almost all were low-SES
  • It would have cost 2 million to hire enough SLPs
    to serve all these children

31
She implemented RtI
32
(No Transcript)
33
When successful collaboration between parents and
school teams takes place
  • All students benefitincluding and especially
    those who are English Language Learners and those
    who have special needs
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com