EMS Field Cervical Spine Assessment Protocol - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

EMS Field Cervical Spine Assessment Protocol

Description:

EMS Field Cervical Spine Assessment Protocol VVEMS Todd Lang, MD EMS Medical Director Why do this? Current practice it totally variable Clear, reproducible local ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:207
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 57
Provided by: Robins190
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: EMS Field Cervical Spine Assessment Protocol


1
EMS Field CervicalSpine Assessment Protocol
  • VVEMS
  • Todd Lang, MD
  • EMS Medical Director

2
Why do this?
  • Current practice it totally variable
  • Clear, reproducible local standard
  • Easy tool to measure compliance
  • Formal training in cspine evaluation
  • Can modify in future to incorporate new data

3
Objectives
  • Discuss Risk Benefit of C Spine Immobilization
  • Identify ways to safely lower use of C Spine
    Immobilization
  • Review structure and function of the nervous
    system

4
Objectives
  • Identify situations in which full immobilization
    is indicated
  • Identify situations in which full spinal
    immobilization is not indicated
  • Review VVEMS spinal assessment protocol
  • Maintain appropriate level of suspicion for this
    dangerous but rare condition

5
Terminology
We use the words Spinal Assessment to indicate
that we are evaluating the spine for risk of
injury. We are not Clearing it or
guaranteeing that there are no injuries. We are
using medical evidence to formulate a policy to
balance the risks and benefits of immobilization
for the bulk of our patients.
6
Who can use this protocol?
  • Only those EMS providers who have successfully
    completed the training for the VVEMS Spinal
    Assessment.
  • This be the didactic portion
  • Then, pass the test
  • Then use it!

7
What is NEXUS?
  • National Emergency X-radiography Utilization
    Study
  • Prospective study with 34,069 patients
  • Evaluated decision rule to identify patients with
    cervical injury by clinical exam who did not need
    radiography

8
How do we decide in the ED?
  • Two main studies
  • NEXUS
  • Canadian C-Spine Rule

9
NEXUS
  • Out of 34,069 patients, the decision rule
    identified 810 of 818 patients with injury
  • 2 of blunt trauma patients had cervical injury
  • Two patients classified as unlikely to have
    injury actually had a cervical injury.
  • One of the two one missed patients required
    surgery.

10
NEXUS
  • Did not include MOI
  • Did include altered LOC/intoxication, Midline
    tenderness, distracting injury, neuro exam,
  • Up to age 60

11
Stable, GCS 15 pts. A dangerous mechanism is
considered to be a fall from an elevation of gt3
feet or 5 stairs an axial load to the head
(e.g., diving) a motor vehicle collision at high
speed (gt100 km per hour) or with rollover or
ejection a collision involving a motorized
recreational vehicle or a bicycle collision. A
simple rear-end motor vehicle collision excludes
being pushed into oncoming traffic, being hit by
a bus or a large truck, a rollover, and being hit
by a high-speed vehicle.
Canadian C Spine Rule
12
Does C-Spine Immobiliztion Work?
  • No one really knows.

13
Hauswald Study
  • Compared Malaysian patients to New Mexico
    patients.
  • Worse outcomes from New Mexico spinal cord
    injuries more likely to have disability
  • Not definitive, but very provocative
  • No evidence to the contrary, either, yet

14
Benefits of Immobilization
  • Standard of Care
  • May prevent injury worsening
  • Thought to prevent liability
  • Not so convincing, are they?

15
Harms of C-spine Immobilzation
  • Pain
  • Anxiety
  • More radiographs and CT scans
  • Money
  • Pressure sores
  • Harder to manage airway
  • Change in lung function

16
Why immobilize anyone?
  • Unstable cervical injury is rare.
  • Any protocol needs to
  • emphasize safety (sensitivity) over efficiency
    (specificity)
  • balance the small benefit of avoiding spinal
    immobilization in the many patients without
    injury against the possibly catastrophic harm
    associated with failing to immobilize the rare
    patient with significant spinal injury

17
The Skull
  • Made up of bones that form immovable joints
  • Know the helmet bones of the skull
  • Frontal, parietal, temporal, and occipital
  • Important in describing injury location
  • Mandible
  • the lower jaw bone
  • Maxilla
  • the upper jaw bone

18
Skull
  • Temporal bone (Basilar) skull fractures often
    diagnosed by exam
  • Raccoon eyes
  • Battles sign
  • The middle meningeal artery runs within the
    temporal and parietal bones
  • Fractures associated with epidural bleeding

19
Skull Exam
  • Lumps, dents, wounds describe by location and
    size and structures seen
  • Ears blood or not, TM normal or not
  • GCS dont say in out. Use a number.
  • Pupils/CN exam
  • Jaw function, voice, airway

20
CSF (cerebrospinal fluid) bathes brain and spinal
cord
  • Patient with closed head injury who has a runny
    nose is leaking CSF (basilar skull fracture)
  • Can also come out of ears

21
The Spine
  • Cervical (7)
  • Thoracic (12)
  • Lumbar (5)
  • Sacral 5 (1 fused)
  • Coccyx 4(1 fused)

22
The Vertebrae
  • The spinal cord rests between the bony processes
    and body of the vertebrae.
  • The spine of the vertebra is superficial and can
    be palpated when performing a physical exam.

23
Spinal Cord
  • Part of the central nervous system (CNS)
  • Nerves leaving each vertebra have a specific
    function.
  • Bathed in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).
  • Protected by bony vertebrae.

24
Cervical nervesC3,4,5 keeps the diaphragm
alive!
  • C1
  • C2 neck rotation and sensation
  • C3 spontaneous breathing
  • C4 spontaneous breathing
  • C5 diaphragm, shrugging shoulders
  • C6 flexion of elbow
  • C7 extension of elbow

25
Cases Requiring Full Immobilization
Patients meeting any of the following criteria
must be fully immobilized.
  1. Higher Risk or unknown mechanism of injury
  2. Altered LOC (GCSlt15, or changed)
  3. Presence of other distracting painful injury
  4. Subjective spine pain
  5. Subjective neurological deficit
  6. Objective neurological deficit
  7. Objective midline spine tenderness
  8. Any pain with unassisted neck motion

26
MOI with some risk
  • Fall
  • MVA
  • High energy injury
  • Even minor MOI in right (wrong!) patient

27
Higher Risk MOI
  • Violent impact to the head, neck, torso, or
    pelvis.
  • Sudden acceleration, deceleration, or lateral
    bending forces to the neck or torso.
  • Falls from greater than 3 feet. Elderly patients
    (gt65) falling out of bed or from standing height.
  • Ejection or fall from motorized or human powered
    transportation device.
  • Axial load (diving).
  • Unwitnessed loss of consciousness/syncope with
    head trauma

28
Mechanism of Injury
  • A relatively weak tool, but one which is easy and
    free.
  • One which has been used more in the past than in
    the present and future
  • No really good data to tell us what MOI can give
    you a spinal injury?
  • We will use this as a part of our first revision
    of spinal immobilization protocol

29
Altered Level of Alertness
  • Clearance of the cervical spine requires that the
    patient be calm, cooperative, clinically sober,
    and alert.
  • Includes patients that are poor historians.
  • Children and toddlers
  • Some elderly are they altered from usual?
  • Generally, GCS must be 15 to clear spine

30
Reliable Physical Exam
  • Language
  • GCS/Capacity/reproducibility
  • Hearing
  • Ability to sense pain

31
LOC/Intox
  • What about 2 beers?
  • Chronic drunks?
  • Chronic narcotics?
  • Other drugs like meth?
  • Just anxious?
  • No clear answer from literature
  • Probably more to lose than to gain in this group
    by not immobilizing

32
Distracting Injury
  • Of variable use
  • Some injuries are more distracting than others
  • Not part of Canadian C-S rule
  • Is part of NEXUS, but was left up to the
    attending physician to define it
  • Part of EMS criteria for now
  • Less used in ED assessment now

33
Presence of Distracting Injury
  • Any injury that produces pain that impairs the
    patients ability to appreciate other injuries
  • Head injury
  • Long bone fractures
  • Large lacerations
  • Abdominal or pelvic pain
  • Large burns
  • Medical conditions cardiac pain or difficulty
    breathing
  • This is an equivocal and poorly defined concept
  • Will remain a part of our EMS algorithm.

34
Subjective Neurological Deficit
  • Patient complains of numbness, tingling, pins and
    needles, shooting arm pain, etc.
  • Patient complains of decreased strength or
    decreased ability to move limbs
  • Any patient who describes transient numbness and
    tingling should be fully immobilized even if
    symptoms have resolved

35
Subjective Spine Pain
  • Patient complains of cervical or thoracic spine
    pain.
  • Do you have any neck or back pain?
  • If yes, immobilize.

36
Objective Neurological Deficit
  • Patient cannot move an extremity
  • Patients extremities are flaccid
  • (Patient has abnormal motor reflexes)
  • Generally grips, push pull, flex/extend feet,
    intact gross sensory in all 4.

37
Objective Spine Tenderness
  • Patient has tenderness upon palpation of the
    cervical or thoracic spine.
  • You must palpate each cervical and thoracic
    vertebra
  • Continue down spine
  • Apply an axial load to top of head

38
Practice exam!
  • Demo up front 2 people
  • Same every time you do it
  • You wont forget a step that way.
  • Stop at first positive sign and immobilize.
  • Dont do ROM if they have pain, n/t, or other
    sign!

39
Other Exam Abnormality
  • Your physical exam reveals
  • Swelling
  • Bruising or redness
  • Abrasions
  • Deformity

40
Abnormal Motor or Sensory
  • This has room for error and was source of error
    in the studies of C-S
  • Pain down arm/leg, numb/tingle, even transient sx
  • Bony Tenderness (midline, on the spine)
  • Pain with ROM

41
Beware the Stinger
  • Transient shooting pain down the arm
  • Common in football
  • This is a subjective neuro sign and is grounds
    for concern and immobilization
  • You cant get this without injury to a nerve

42
Pain with Unassisted Neck Motion
  • If ALL of the previous criteria have been
    satisfied, the final step is to ask the patient
    to move their neck without your assistance.
  • If the patient has any subjective pain, they need
    to be fully immobilized.
  • Look to the left and right. Now touch your chin
    to your chest. Now look back over your head.

43
Bottom Line
  • Can they reliably, reproducibly, and convincingly
    understand you, cooperate, and pay attention for
    the exam and have a MOI that should not have
    broken their neck?
  • If not, immobilize.

44
Guiding Principles
  • The VVEMS Spinal Assessment Protocol is designed
    to allow EMS providers to assess and transport
    those few blunt trauma patients for whom
    significant injury is unlikely without full
    immobilization.
  • Once one criterion for immobilization is
    positive, immobilize and transport the patient.

45
Guiding Principles
  • Patients who satisfy all of the criteria in the
    Protocol and who request EMS transport may be
    transported without full spinal immobilization.
  • All Protocol criteria must be carefully evaluated
    and documented for all patients transported
    without full spinal immobilization.

46
VVEMS C-Spine Assessment Tool
Higher risk MOI?
Yes
No
Yes
Altered level of alertness?
No
Yes
Distracting injury?
Full Spinal Immobilization
No
Yes
Objective or subjective neurological deficit?
Yes
No
Neck pain or tenderness?
Yes
No
Pain with unassisted neck motion?
No
Transport without full spinal immobilization
47
Sample Documentation
  • MVC low speed
  • GCS15, clear speech
  • No numb/tingle/pain down arms, moves all 4
  • No sig injuries
  • No spine tenderness
  • Normal ROM w/o pain
  • Immob not indicated

48
Maine 2002 C-spine
49
(No Transcript)
50
Guiding Principles
  • EMS providers should involve online medical
    direction for any difficult cases, including
    patients who meet criteria for spinal
    immobilization, request EMS transport, and refuse
    immobilization.
  • If a patient requests transport with full
    immobilization, EMS providers should comply with
    their wishes independent of significant injury
    risk.

51
Guiding Principles
  • The default management of any blunt trauma
    patient in the field is full immobilization.
  • EMS providers must use full c-spine
    immobilization for cases that are vague.
  • Let us err on the side of caution because a
    single bad outcome will cause endless suffering

52
Conclusion
  • Always use full immobilization for patients with
    an unknown or significant MOI.
  • Elderly patients are more prone to orthopedic
    injuries and may not present with obvious signs
    and symptoms of injury.
  • Contact online Medical Direction for questions in
    the field.

53
Conclusion
  • A patient with blunt trauma should be fully
    immobilized unless ALL criteria of the VVEMS
    Spinal Assessment Protocol are met.

54
Dont fall asleep at the wheel just because spine
injuries are rare! Assess each patient
carefully!
55
Sources
  • Maine 2002 Spinal Assessment Protocolhttp//www.m
    aine.gov/dps/ems/docs/assessment20book.pdf
  • Hauswald M, et al. Out-of-hospital spinal
    immobilization its effect on neurologic injury
    http//www.aemj.org/cgi/content/abstract/5/3/214
  • EAST Practice Management Guidelines for
    Identifying Cervical Spine Injuries Following
    Trauma http//www.east.org/tpg/chap3.pdf
  • Canadian C-Spine rule
  • NEXUS paper

56
Questions?
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com