Computer Access Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative www.wati.org This PowerPoint was made possible by funding from IDEA grant number 9906-23. Its content may be reprinted in whole or in part, with credit given to the Wisconsin Assistive - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 45
About This Presentation
Title:

Computer Access Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative www.wati.org This PowerPoint was made possible by funding from IDEA grant number 9906-23. Its content may be reprinted in whole or in part, with credit given to the Wisconsin Assistive

Description:

ASNAT Assessing Student s Needs for Assistive Technology Computer Access Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative www.wati.org This PowerPoint was made possible by ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:176
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 46
Provided by: PattiDr3
Learn more at: https://sped.dpi.wi.gov
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Computer Access Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative www.wati.org This PowerPoint was made possible by funding from IDEA grant number 9906-23. Its content may be reprinted in whole or in part, with credit given to the Wisconsin Assistive


1
Computer AccessWisconsin Assistive Technology
Initiativewww.wati.orgThis PowerPoint was made
possible by funding from IDEA grant number
9906-23. Its content may be reprinted in whole or
in part, with credit given to the Wisconsin
Assistive Technology Initiative (WATI) and the
Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (DPI)
acknowledged. Reproduction of this PowerPoint in
whole or in part for resale is not permitted.
ASNAT Assessing Students Needs for Assistive
Technology
2
Objectives
  • Participants will understand the SETT process as
    it relates to identifying appropriate AT for
    students who need to access the computer.
  • Participants will have basic knowledge of the AT
    continuum for Computer Access as identified in
    the ASNAT Computer Access Chapter.
  • Participants will be able to access resources and
    tools for trial with students who need AT
    computer access supports.

3
Introduction
  • 2009 ASNAT revision(Assessing Students Need for
    Assistive Technology)
  • Uses the SETT framework for AT assessments
  • Student Environment
  • Tasks Tools
  • Framework developed by Joy Zabala 2002
  • http//sweb.uky.edu/jszaba0/SETTUPDATE.PDF
  • Implementation Plan Follow-up added by WATI
  • Revised version has added Sensory Considerations

4
Using the SETT framework
  • Traditional SETT
  • The Student
  • Identify the functional area(s) of concern?
  • Special needs (related to area of concern)
  • Current abilities (related to area of concern)
  • What does the student need to communicate that is
    difficult or impossible to do independently at
    this time?

5
Using the SETT framework
  • The Environment(s)
  • Arrangement (instructional, physical)
  • Support (available to both the student and the
    staff)
  • Materials and Equipment (commonly used by others
    in the environments)
  • Access Issues (technological, physical,
    instructional)
  • Attitudes and Expectations (staff, family,
    others)

6
Using the SETT framework
  • The Tasks
  • What SPECIFIC tasks occur in the students
    natural environments that enable progress toward
    mastery of IEP goals and objectives?
  • What SPECIFIC tasks are required for active
    involvement in identified environments? (related
    to communication, instruction, participation,
    productivity, environmental control)

7
Using the SETT framework
  • The Tools
  • Tools include devices, services and strategies
    everything that is needed to help the student
    succeed.
  • Describe what a useful system of assistive
    technology devices and services for the student
    would be like.
  • Brainstorm Tools that could be included in a
    system that addresses student needs.
  • Select the most promising Tools for trials in the
    natural environments.
  • Plan the specifics of the trial (expected
    changes, when/how tools will be used, cues, etc.)
  • Collect data on effectiveness. (Zabala 2002)

8
Using the SETT process Decision Making Guide
  • WATIs version
  • of the SETT
  • Framework for Computer Access.
  • Guide will be
  • Different for
  • every area of
  • AT assessment

9
Using the Student Information Guide in the SETT
Process
  • The Guide is intended to help the team discuss
    key issues when assessing the need for AT for a
    specific student.
  • It helps teams consider whole child environment
    not jump to a device!
  • It is a group (sped, reg. ed, support staff,
    admin., parent, student) process in which
    everyone contributes.
  • Important to write on a large format so that
    everyone can see, edit, remember (shared group
    memory), stay focused, and be informed!
  • Team members take roles of Facilitator,
    Recorder, Time Keeper

10
The Student
Assistive Technology for Computer Access
11
Student
  • List the functional areas of concern
  • What are the students special needs related to
    the area of concern.
  • What are the students abilities.
  • What motivates the student?
  • Other questions you might ask?

12
The Environment
Assistive Technology for Computer Access
13
Environmental Considerations
  • What specific environmental considerations need
    to be addressed?
  • Obstacles?
  • Supports?
  • Attitudes of others?
  • What are other the environments that need to be
    taken into account?

14
Sensory Considerations (new)
  • New section as a subset of Student Environment
  • Does this student have sensory deficits or
    sensitivities that will impact his/her ability to
    access the computer?
  • Do the learning environment(s) impact the sensory
    issues of the student?

15
Sensory Considerations
  • Visual clutter
  • Fluorescent lighting versus full spectrum
    lighting
  • Classroom and background noise
  • Tactile stimulation
  • Awareness of physical space
  • Other individual specific sensitivities

16
The Task
Assistive Technology for Computer Access
17
Tasks to Consider
  • What does the student need to do to achieve
    educational goals from their IEP and be an active
    participant in their environment?
  • What are other students doing in the same
    environments?

18
Narrowing the Focus
  • As a team, identify by circling or other means
    those few tasks the student needs to do that will
    have the most impact.

19
Solution Generation Tools/Strategies
  • As a team, brainstorm and write on chart paper
    any assistive technologies /or strategies you
    think will assist the student in successfully
    completing those tasks you identified.
  • Brainstorm possible AT
  • Dont evaluate (yet)!
  • Remember to include AT that the student already
    uses
  • Use all resources including people

20
The Tools
Assistive Technology for Computer Access
21
AT Continuum
  • Follow the progression of low tech, through mid
    tech to high tech when selecting assistive
    technology tools

22
Assistive Technology past and present
  • Part of the Students past current environment

23
AT for Computer Access
  • Positioning of student and equipment
  • Adjustable table/chair
  • Position of keyboard
  • Wrist rest/support

24
AT for Computer Access
  • Operating System Built in Accessibility Features
  • StickyKeys
  • FilterKeys
  • MouseKeys
  • Visual Display Options

25
AT for Computer Access
  • Standard Keyboard Adaptations
  • Repeat Rate
  • Keyguards
  • Labels
  • Moisture Guard
  • Pointing Tools
  • Keyboard Mask

26
AT for Computer Access
  • Standard Mouse Adaptations
  • Customizable Mouse Options
  • Button Reassignment

27
AT for Computer Access
  • Rate Enhancement
  • Abbreviation Expansion
  • Word Prediction/Completion
  • Macros
  • Auto Correction

28
AT for Computer Access
  • Alternative Keyboard
  • ABC
  • Dvorak
  • Ergonomic
  • One Handed
  • Wireless
  • Miniature/Compact
  • Programmable
  • OnScreen

29
AT for Computer Access
  • Mouse Alternatives
  • Keyboard Shortcuts
  • Mouse Keys
  • Left Handed/Ergonomic
  • Wireless
  • One Button
  • Touchpad/trackpad
  • Trackball
  • Joystick

30
AT for Computer Access
  • Mouse Alternatives (cont.)
  • Touchscreen
  • Foot-controlled
  • Head Controlled
  • Dwell Selection

31
AT for Computer Access
  • Speech Recognition
  • Considerations
  • Speech
  • Cognitive abilities
  • Dictation skills
  • Literacy/Editing
  • Motivation
  • Support

32
AT for Computer Access
  • Speech Recognition (cont.)
  • Built into PC and Mac Operating Systems
  • Dragon NaturallySpeaking (www.nuance.com)
  • SpeakQ (www.wordq.com)

33
AT for Computer Access
  • Eye Gaze
  • Morse Code

34
AT for Computer Access
  • Switch Access
  • Last alternative
  • Determine switch site
  • Use motivating activity

35
AT for Computer Access
  • Modes of Scanning
  • Automatic
  • Single Switch Step
  • Two Switch Step
  • Inverse

36
AT for Computer Access
  • Characteristics of Switches
  • Size
  • Sensitivity
  • Texture
  • Pressure
  • Feedback
  • Mounting

37
AT for Computer Access
  • Types of Switches
  • Mechanical
  • Push
  • Light Touch Switch
  • Lever
  • Motoric-Specific Movement
  • Pneumatic
  • Dual
  • Wireless

38
AT for Computer Access
  • Types of Switches (cont.)
  • Electrical
  • Proximity
  • Fiber Optic
  • Infrared
  • Sensor
  • Wheelchair Integration

39
AT for Computer Access
  • Switch Interface
  • Mounting
  • Switch Accessible Software

40
Solution Selection Tools Strategies
  • Review the list of potential tools
  • Now is the time to evaluate for a match with
  • Student (abilities, difficulties, likes/dislikes)
  • Environment (supports, obstacles)
  • Tasks (what 1-2 things do you want the student
  • to do?)
  • Prioritize selections

41
Implementation Plan
  • Very Important! This is often where it breaks
    down!
  • Write down on the group chart (for top
    priorities)
  • Who is going to do (get specific)
  • What (ditto)
  • When (do I need to say it again?)
  • For how long?
  • Write down your expectations (objectives) so you
    know if the AT is working or not!
  • Give everyone a job

42
Follow-up Plan
  • Before the meeting is over, plan the follow-up
  • For accountability
  • We are all busy, so plan it now!
  • Bring list from original meeting so group can
    review who, what, when, expectations

43
Tools Resources
  • Vendors for Computer Access Tools
  • AbleNet www.ablenetinc.com
  • Enabling Devices www.enablingdevices.com
  • Don Johnston, Inc. www.donjohnston.com
  • Infogrip www.infogrip.com
  • IntelliTools www.intellitools.com
  • RJ Cooper www.rjcooper.com
  • Madentec www.madentec.com
  • Nuance www.nuance.com

44
Conclusion
  • Its not about the technology/device- its about
    matching the Student, the Environment and the
    Task with the best Tool
  • Finally some research about using technology.
  • using technology for compensatory intervention
    actually also provides remedial benefits
    (Silver-Pacuilla, H., Ruedel K. Mistrett, S. p.
    8).

45
References Resources
  • Silver-Pascuilla, H., Ruedel, K. Mistrett, S.
    (2004). A review of technology based approaches
    for reading instruction Tools for researchers
    and vendors. In National Center for Technology
    Integration Reading Matrix. Retrieved March 30,
    2007 from http//www.nationaltechcenter.org/matrix
    /default.asp
  • WATI (2009). Assessing Students Needs for
    Assistive Technology Chapter 4 Computer Access.
    Wisconsin Assistive Technology Initiative.
    http//www.wati.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com