Competition Law Association What do I need to know about Competition Law in Ireland and what can we learn from 20 years of its operation? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Competition Law Association What do I need to know about Competition Law in Ireland and what can we learn from 20 years of its operation?

Description:

Competition Law Association What do I need to know about Competition Law in Ireland and what can we learn from 20 years of its operation? Dr Vincent Power, Partner – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:142
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 31
Provided by: Suza154
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Competition Law Association What do I need to know about Competition Law in Ireland and what can we learn from 20 years of its operation?


1
Competition Law AssociationWhat do I need to
know about Competition Law in Ireland and what
can we learn from 20 years of its operation?
  • Dr Vincent Power, Partner
  • AL Goodbody
  • vpower_at_algoodbody.com
  • 25 February 2010

2
Outline of the Presentation
  • Task is to brief you on competition law in
    Ireland
  • An overview of competition law and practice
  • Irish regime
  • Anti-competitive practices
  • Mergers and acquisitions
  • Case law
  • What have been the interesting cases and lessons
  • from the two decades?

3
Why Ireland?
  • Ireland has been connected with some interesting
    competition cases
  • United Brands
  • Magill
  • HB/Mars
  • Holyhead I and II as well as Roscoff
  • Charleroi
  • Ryanair/Aer Lingus
  • Irish Beef
  • Some pending State Aid decisions in the financial
    services sector
  • 33 convictions, first jury conviction in Europe
    for cartels, first jail sentences and some
    interesting civil cases

4
Introduction
  • Ireland, like England Wales, is a common law
    jurisdiction in the EU
  • Traditional approach to competition law issues
    but changes in the late 1980s/early 1990s
  • First Regime Competition Act 1991 and
    Competition (Amendment) Act 1996
  • Second Regime Competition Act 2002 and
    Competition (Amendment) Act 2006
  • Other legislation already in place and new
    legislation on the way
  • Mixture of successes and failures
  • Ireland is a little different!

5
Introduction
  • Competition Act 1991
  • Establishment of the Competition Authority
  • Privatisation of Enforcement Private Actions
  • Competition Authority was not given the power to
    impose fines but could take civil cases (but no
    dawn raid powers)
  • Competition law breaches were civil but not
    criminal wrongs
  • Merger control was still a Ministerial decision
    but mergers could be supervised under the Mergers
    Acts and the Competition Act
  • Notification regime for arrangements

6
Introduction
  • Competition (Amendment) Act 1996
  • Public Enforcement of Competition Law
  • Criminalisation of Breaches
  • Competition Authority still not given the power
    to dawn raid and impose fines
  • Prosecutions had to be taken in court
  • Evidential and enforcement difficulties

7
Introduction
  • Competition Act 2002
  • The 1991-1996 Acts were not working
  • Abolition of notifications washing clean linen
    in public
  • Criminalisation of breaches of EU competition law
  • Before the 2002 Act, merger control was still a
    Ministerial decision but mergers could be
    supervised under the Mergers Acts and the
    Competition Acts (risk of divergence)
  • Evidential presumptions put in place
  • Competition (Amendment) Act 2006
  • Grocery sector

8
Irish Regime
  • Competition Authority
  • Focused entirely on competition law
  • Does not have the power to impose fines so
    extra rigour required for court cases to succeed
    (not just review of decisions)
  • Anti-competitive arrangements
  • Abuse of dominance
  • Concentration control
  • Studies and advocacy
  • Courts
  • Extremely important
  • Economists
  • Juries
  • No CAT

9
Irish Regime
  • Anti-Competitive Arrangements
  • Civil breaches
  • Criminal breaches
  • A breach of Art.101 TFEU is a criminal offence
    under Irish law
  • Imprisonment for up to five years and/or fines of
    4m/10 of worldwide turnover
  • Focus on cartels
  • Abuse of Dominance
  • Civil and criminal breach
  • A breach of Art.102 TFEU is a criminal offence
    under Irish law
  • Difference in penalties

10
Concentration Control
  • Concentration Control
  • Competition Authority is centre-stage with
    Ministerial involvement limited to media mergers
    and emergency financial mergers
  • Substantial lessening of competition test
  • Notification and publication regime
  • Some interesting cases

11
Concentration Control
  • Concentration
  • two or more previously independent undertakings
    merge or
  • one or more undertakings, who or which control
    one or more undertakings, acquire direct or
    indirect control of the whole or part of one or
    more other undertakings
  • the result of an acquisition by one undertaking
    (the first undertaking) of the assets (including
    goodwill) (or a substantial part of the assets)
    of another undertaking (the second undertaking)
    is to place the first undertaking in a position
    to replace (or substantially replace) the second
    undertaking in the business or, as appropriate,
    the part concerned of the business in which that
    undertaking was engaged immediately before the
    acquisition
  • a full function joint venture is formed (i.e.,
    one which performs, on an indefinite basis, all
    the functions of an autonomous economic entity)

12
Concentration Control
  • Notifiable if
  • The worldwide turnover of each of at least two of
    the undertakings involved in the transaction is
    not less than 40 million and
  • Each of at least two of the undertakings involved
    in the transaction carries on business in any
    part of the island of Ireland (i.e., the Republic
    and Northern Ireland) and
  • The turnover in the Republic of any one of the
    undertakings involved is not less than 40m or it
    is a media merger
  • (Voluntary filing regime possible for other
    transactions)

13
Concentration Control
  • Carries on Business is a critical concept
  • Non-binding notice published by the Authority in
    2006 defines carries on business as meaning
    that the undertakings have either
  • Have a physical presence on the island of Ireland
    and make sales or supply services to customers in
    the island of Ireland or
  • Without having a physical presence on the island,
    have made sales into the island of Ireland of at
    least 2 million in the most recent financial
    year

14
Concentration Control
  • Media Mergers
  • Since 1 May 2007, a media merger is a merger or
    acquisition in which either (1) two or more of
    the undertakings involved carry on a defined
    media business in the State or (2) one or more
    of the undertakings involved carries on a media
    business in the State and one or more of the
    undertakings involved carries on a media business
    elsewhere
  • A media business is defined as (1) publication
    of newspapers or periodicals consisting
    substantially of news or periodicals consisting
    substantially of news or current affairs (2)
    sound and/or audio broadcasting (except over the
    internet) or (3) the provision of a broadcasting
    services platform
  • Thresholds do not apply media mergers are
    automatically notifiable
  • Cumbersome procedure in theory but works in
    practice
  • However, what if a Group (which happens to
    include a media business) buys something which is
    clearly not media-related?

15
Concentration Control
  • Financial Mergers
  • The pre-existing regime and the Credit
    Institutions (Financial Support) Act 2008 regime
    both operate
  • Section 7 of the 2008 Act has a special regime
  • Maintenance of the stability of the financial
    system v. competition law?
  • 2008 Act transactions are notifiable to the
    Minister rather than the Competition Authority
  • Clearance of an otherwise anti-competitive deal
    is possible where it is necessary to maintain the
    stability of the financial system in the State,
    to avoid a serious threat to the stability of
    credit institutions and to remedy a serious
    disturbance in the economy of the State

16
Concentration Control
  • Notification Process under the Competition Act
  • Notification within one month of concluding the
    agreement or the making of the public bid can
    that be circumvented?
  • The one month is calculated by including the
    date after which the month commences so the month
    expires on the day before the corresponding date
    the following month
  • Failure to notify has consequences

17
Concentration Control
  • 8,000 filing fee
  • Calendar days not working day timetable
  • First Phase procedure typically, one month but
    can be 45 days with proposals from the parties
  • Second Phase procedure can be longer up to
    four months normally with conditions imposable by
    the Authority
  • Vast majority of cases are first phase decisions
  • Opening a second phase is not necessarily a
    problem

18
Concentration Control
  • Clearance is a precondition to closing
    concentrations
  • Clearance without approval in Ireland
  • Aviva/CGU/Gresham
  • Radio 2000/Newstalk 106
  • Topaz/Statoil
  • Third party involvement

19
Concentration Control
  • Three deals blocked
  • IBM/Schlumberger (high market share)
  • Kingspan/Xtratherm (competitor evidence)
  • Kerry Foods/Breeo (no credible alternative
    constraining brands)
  • One appeal, successful at High Court level but
    now on appeal to the Supreme Court (Kerry
    Foods/Breeo)
  • Britvic/CC
  • Heineken/Beamish Crawford
  • Johnston Press/Clonnad

20
Criminal Enforcement
  • Criminal Enforcement
  • To date, 33 convictions
  • How? Leniency and transparency of some trade
    association activities
  • Are juries willing to convict?
  • What are the guidelines on sentencing?
  • What are the lessons?
  • Little guys
  • Procedures
  • Leniency
  • Cartels

21
Some Interesting Cases
  • For example
  • West of Ireland Home Heating Cases
  • Competition Authority v Duffy
  • Law Society v Competition Authority
  • Mayo Waste
  • Panda
  • Irish Beef
  • Competition Authority v LVA and VFI

22
Some Interesting Cases
  • Law Society v Competition Authority
  • Legal representation of suspects in cartel
    investigation
  • Competition Authority stated that it could veto
    the choice of lawyer where several suspects chose
    the same lawyer
  • Law Society was concerned from a general policy
    perspective
  • Forced to institute proceedings in the High Court
  • High Court annulled the Competition Authoritys
    notice

23
Some Interesting Cases
  • Irish Beef
  • Rationalisation
  • Government involvement and McKinsey Report
  • Stayers and Goers with compensation
  • Competition Authority
  • High Court not concerned under Article 101(1)
  • Supreme Court appeal by the Authority
  • Article 267 reference to the CJEU
  • Supreme Court decision and reference back to the
    High Court
  • High Court to consider application of Article
    101(3)
  • European Commission intervention

24
Some Interesting Cases
  • Mayo Waste
  • Controversial case
  • Jury
  • Decision-making by the jury
  • Theory of harm issue
  • Farmers blockade of Drogheda port case
  • Concerns by the Competition Authority

25
Some Interesting Cases
  • Competition Authority v LVA and VFI
  • Recession and declining on-trade drink sales
  • Two vintners associations announce a price
    freeze
  • Competition Authority reacts with concern
  • Associations refuse to withdraw it
  • But associations had some years earlier given
    undertakings not to do anything with pricing
  • Competition Authority invoked those undertakings
    and sued the associations
  • Court found the associations were in breach of
    those commitments

26
Some Interesting Cases
  • Panda
  • Application of Competition Acts to the Local
    Authorities
  • Decision by the High Court
  • Competition Authority v Avonmore Waterford
    Group/Athboy Co-operative
  • Ballina Mineral Water v Heineken
  • Irish Dental Association
  • Civil damages actions
  • Donovan v ESB
  • Follow-on actions

27
Differences
  • Key Differences in the Irish System
  • Different law and legal regime
  • Strong written Constitutional protection of human
    rights
  • Competition Authority deals only with competition
    (not consumer matters) but this is scheduled to
    change
  • Historically, strong international team in the
    Authority but constant change
  • Competition Authority does not have power to
    impose fines the court is where the real
    enforcement lays
  • A strong but intermittent US dimension to Irish
    competition law
  • High market shares are not an issue
  • Hold separate/fix-first arrangements are unusual

28
Lessons
  • Do not rely on the private enforcement of
    competition law
  • Streamline merger control
  • Abolition of notifications but community still
    needs guidance
  • Merger of the Competition Authority and Consumer
    Body?
  • Competition enforcement by lower courts is not
    easy
  • Competition enforcement by some juries may not be
    easy
  • High market shares not necessarily a problem in
    concentration control

29
Lessons
  • Be careful of open-ended and wide studies
  • Valuable international experience and expertise
  • But chopping and changing of personnel
  • Trade associations
  • Authority is subject to the vagaries of political
    respect
  • Cartel enforcement has been against the little
    guys
  • BIDS and the State element
  • Public understanding and acceptance or is
    competition something you can have in a boom
    but not in a bust?

30
Competition Law AssociationWhat do I need to
know about Competition Law in Ireland and what
can we learn from 20 years of its operation?
  • Dr Vincent Power, Partner
  • AL Goodbody
  • vpower_at_algoodbody.com
  • 25 February 2010
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com