Title: Progress Towards: New Sample Standard Bidding Documents for Design-Build-Operate (DBO) for Solid Waste Management
1Progress Towards New Sample Standard Bidding
Documents for Design-Build-Operate (DBO)for
Solid Waste Management
2Context for DBO for SWM in MNA
- Initiated as part of the Solid Waste Management
Strategy for METAP countries - presented at Cairo
conference-May 2000 - METAP is Mediterranean Technical Assistance
Program - Financed by ESSD Norwegian Trust Fund -
multi-year program - Work began on DBO documents in 2001
- Endorsed for pilot testing in 2002
3SWM Strategy for METAP Countries
- Guiding Principles for SWM in MNA
- Tackle immediate problems first
- inadequate collection degradation by dumps
- Treat systemic causes of problems
- public awareness and institutional issues
- Begin to manage waste as a resource
- reduce, reuse, recycle (3Rs), economic incentives
4SWM Strategy for METAP Countries
- Immediate Measures
- close and rehabilitate dumps
- strengthen MSW management
- strategic investments in SWM facilities
- Structural/Systematic Measures
- legal framework, institutional, cot recovery and
sustainable financing, etc. - Continuous/Permanent Activities
- 3Rs, monitor environmental impacts, monitor
performance of public and private sector
5SWM Strategy for METAP Countries
- MNA Region needs approx. 2.5 3.0 billion over
next 10 years - 8 - Correction of Past/Current Problems
- 15 - Strengthen/Rationalise Collection
- 12-Legal/Institutional/IWM Planning/Capacity
Strengthening - 65 - Facilities Investments
6Role of Private Sector in SWM
- Improve efficiency and lower costs
- well-focused performance objectives
- financial and managerial autonomy
- hard budget constraint
- Transfer new ideas, technologies, skills
- Take-on technical risks
- Maybe? - mobilize investment funds
7Role of Public Sector in SWM
- Make clear separation between service (i.e.
operational) and regulatory functions - Strengthen capacity for technical supervision
- Set clear client service and quality levels
- Strengthen management capacity
- Improve regulation of private operators
- Reduce environmental and health impacts
(externalities) - Establish cost-recovery and financial
sustainability framework
8Public Sector Institutions in SWM
- Urban areas should manage wastes better to become
good environmental citizens - decentralize collection services
- centralize disposal operations where possible
- focus on cost recovery and self financing
- enlist support of private sector
- adopt landfill as backbone of integrated systems
- Central governments should assist urban areas
- develop national policy and regulatory framework
- provide technical support and access to financing
- consider matching grants for disposal
externalities
9Why We Started on DBO in SWM ?
- Experience in Bank financed SWM projects
- Difficult to construct a SWM facility in 5 yrs
- Multiple procurements cause slow implementation
- Feasibility contract
- Environmental and Social Safeguards Assessment
- Detailed engineering design contract
- Civil works contract
- Supervision of construction contract
- Operations contract
10Other Reasons for DBO in SWM
- Overlaps lead to messy handovers
- Private sector likes DBOs
- Can bundle with other activities (e.g. dump
closure, transfer stations, access roads) - Uses the strong technical and project management
skills of private sector - Allows municipalities to focus their limited
human resources on systemic SWM issues
11More Reasons for DBO in SWM
- Incentives for cost effectiveness PSD adapted to
local conditions - One private operator is responsible for design,
construction and environmental impacts (does not
own or lease land) - Prevents good landfills reverting to open dumps
- Can include other optional features
- performance incentives (e.g. carbon finance,
recycling rates) - Equipment purchase
- Transfer of employees
12Characteristics of the DBO
- Intermediate step in PSD
- Public sector financing and financial risks
- Private sector technical skills and technical
risks - Typical duration is 8 years
- 1 year detailed design phase
- 2 years construction phase
- 5 years operations phase
- Can bundle with other SWM priorities
- Examples dump closure, training and outreach
- Transitional step to operational costs assumed by
municipality
13Again More Reasons for DBO
- After the DBO a municipality / utility still has
options - Operate itself as public sector
- Continue with same private sector operator (e.g.
annual contract renewals) - Bid a new contract to the private sector
14Key Features in the DBO
- Flexible pre-qualification to attract local and
international companies (e.g. joint-ventures) - Follows Bank procurement guidelines
- base is Standard Bidding Document Supply and
Installation of Plant and Equipment (Nov 1997) - Designed for use in Bank loans by Borrowers
15Prerequisites to DBO for SWM
- 1. Social and Environmental Safeguards Assessment
- 2. Land acquisition completed
- 3. Financing secured
- e.g. Bank loan for 5 yrs and central/municipal
financing for 3 yrs - 4. Feasibility level site layout drawings
- 5. Transaction advisors
- (legal and technical) for first few transactions
for sample documents
16Key Features in the DBO
- Two Part Process (not two stage)
- Part 1 Pre-qualification
- Sub-contractors SWM technical and financial
experience is eligible - Part 2 Bidding
- One Envelope Bid Submittal-both technical and
financial - Unified Bid Evaluation Process
- Technical Evaluation Pass or fail evaluation
based on substantially responsive - Financial Evaluation Pass or fail based on
substantially responsive - WINNER - Lowest evaluated price of technically
responsive bids wins
17Key Features in the DBO
- NOT A DESIGN COMPETITON
- BASIC CONCEPTUAL DESIGN SET OUT IN BID
- Important role for Technical Evaluation Committee
- 1. Design-build criteria
- 2. Operations criteria
- 3. Staffing plan criteria
- DO NOT quantify above criteria (lesson learned)
- Assistance by transaction advisors and/or
supervision consultant (lesson learned)
18Key Features in the DBO
- Bid Price Structure
- Design-Build services flat monthly fee vs.
progress payments - (lesson learned - no unit prices and quantities)
- Operations services - monthly fee
- Bottom line total lump sum price
- Role of Supervising Consultant
- technical evaluation advisor
- acceptance of final design
- progress payments
- change orders
19Key Success and Lessons Learned in Pilot DBO
-
- Successes
- Testing private sector reaction to DBO concept
and document structure (San Fernando City
Philippines) - Working across sectors and regions at Bank
- Procurement can be innovative and flexible
- Lessons
- For capacity building in the sector
- When to use the DBO tool
- Procurement process and contents of the bidding
documents
20DBO Generic Documents
- Tab I Pre-qualification Documents
- Tab II Bidding Documents
- Annex A - Draft Contract
- General Conditions
- Appendices 1 to 11 to the General Conditions
-
- Annex B - Various Bidding Documents and Forms
- (Bid Form, Bidders Price Form and Price
Schedule, Bid Security Form, Performance
Security Form, Bank Guarantee Form-Advance
Payment and Form of Curriculum Vitae)
21DBO Generic Documents
- Appendices to the General Conditions
- Appendix 1 -Special Conditions of Contract
- Appendix 2 -Terms and Procedures of Payment
- Appendix 3 - Technical Specifications
- - Appendix 3A -Design-Build Services
- - Appendix 3B - Operations Services
- - Appendix 3C - Technical Standards
22DBO Generic Documents
- Appendices to the General Conditions (continued)
- Appendix 4 - Site
- Appendix 5 - Service Area
- Appendix 6 - Contract Price Adjustment
- Appendix 7 - Incentive Compensation
- Appendix 8 - Liquidated Damages
- Appendix 9 - Existing Staff
- Appendix 10 - Operators Personnel
- Appendix 11 - Operators Bid
23Key Sector Lessons Learned
-
- Hard to insert DBO in existing Bank loans
- Need to be very pro-active with clients
(beneficiary level and implementing agencies) - Use DBO cost savings for early transaction
advisors (legal, procurement and technical) - DBO process builds technical and management
capacity
24Key Procurement Lessons Learned
-
- Start early with transaction advisors (legal,
procurement and technical) - Front-load the capacity building effort with all
in-country stakeholders - DO NOT quantify technical evaluation criteria
follow ITB 5.5 and not performance criteria in
3A, 3B and 3C - Clearly define when design-build ends (DO NOT
use unit prices and quantities) - Clearly define when operations begin
25Next Steps
- Post DBO Bid Documents on Bank Procurement
(OPCPR) web page as a Sample Edition - Comments by e-mail to OPCPR
- Considering technical guidance note on
performance specifications (Appendixes 3a, 3b,
3c) - Considering advisory committee to regional
RPA/RPM and task teams