Discussion Draft Olmstead Planning Committee Website Presentation to the MN Olmstead Planning Committee Wendy Weden MN Department of Human Services Compliance Office

1
Discussion DraftOlmstead Planning Committee
WebsitePresentation to the MN Olmstead Planning
CommitteeWendy WedenMN Department of Human
ServicesCompliance Office Management and
Policy DivisionApril 12, 2012
2
Other states Olmstead-related sites

• Some sites the States Olmstead Plan
• Some sites are sub-sites of a state agency site
• Some sites link to other initiatives
• Similarities
• Access to the final reports
• Access to meetings, agendas, minutes
• Hard to assess if website used for dialogue or
  comment

Olmstead Planning Committee Draft Website
presentation 4-12-12
3
Vermont
Virginia
4
California
Iowa
Discussion draft -Minnesota
5
Discussion Draft Principles

• People
• Choices
• User controls experience
• High accessibility best practices and testing
• Participation
• Written for non-experts
• Glossary
• Place for engagement
• Transparency

6
Placeholder pending branding the Planning
Committee chooses.
7
Page is modular three basic parts. Left New
placeholder, Body Text and Quick links. Easy to
alter and remove parts.
8
Opportunities

• Engagement
• Education
• Alignment
• Major questions
• Committee structure
• Outreach, comment requested
• Report structure

Olmstead Planning Committee Draft Website
presentation 4-12-12
9
Questions

• Purpose
• public record, notices, level of engagement
• what should be included.
• Look and feel
• Content main categories
• Publishing process
• Approvals
• Content norms
• Statements about site content

Olmstead Planning Committee Draft Website
presentation 4-12-12