Non-occupational Postexposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) in New York State Emergency Departments - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 28
About This Presentation
Title:

Non-occupational Postexposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) in New York State Emergency Departments

Description:

Non-occupational Postexposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) in New York State Emergency Departments Alexander Ende Bruce D. Agins June 6th, 2006 Who is nPEP for? – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:176
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 29
Provided by: are62
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Non-occupational Postexposure Prophylaxis (nPEP) in New York State Emergency Departments


1
Non-occupational Postexposure Prophylaxis (nPEP)
in New York State Emergency Departments
  • Alexander Ende
  • Bruce D. Agins
  • June 6th, 2006

2
Who is nPEP for?
  • People who have been exposed to HIV outside of a
    healthcare setting through
  • voluntary sexual exposure
  • sexual assault
  • injection drug use
  • human bites
  • All of these exposures typically present in the
  • Emergency Department

3
Background
  • The AIDS Institute's HIV Guidelines Steering
    Committee raised concerns that non-occupational
    postexposure prophylaxis (nPEP) guidelines have
    not been widely implemented.
  • Subcommittee formed to elaborate issues and
    identify strategies to address them.

4
Guidelines
  • In December 2004, NY State recommended nPEP for
    voluntary sexual exposure as well as sexual
    assault.
  • nPEP should never replace adopting and
    maintaining preventive behaviors and is not
    routinely recommended in situations in which
    high-risk behavior is habitually practiced.

5
Guidelines Summary - 1
  • nPEP is recommended only if
  • -a sexual, percutaneous or other exposure that
    carries significant risk of HIV transmission
    occurs
  • AND
  • -the patient presents within 36 hours of
    exposure AND
  • -the source, if available, is HIV infected
    as
  • determined by rapid HIV testing

6
Guidelines Summary - 2
  • Arrangements should be made to ensure that the
    patient receives a continued supply of medication
    and is referred to an HIV Specialist.
  • Behavioral intervention for risk reduction should
    occur regardless of whether nPEP is initiated or
    not.
  • As of July 2005, physicians with questions have
    been encouraged to call the 24-hour PEP lines
    through their local CEI sites.

7
nPEP Survey
  • A survey was developed to better understand how
    nPEP is handled in NYS EDs with the long term
    goal of improving PEP services.

8
Survey Methods
  • Distributed surveys to every ED in NY State (207
    total) through the Health Emergency Response Data
    System (HERDS), a system used for emergency
    incidents and surveys in NY State.
  • HERDS is a feature of HPN, a web-based
    information network maintained by NYSDOH.

9
Examples of Hospital Roles who can use HERDS
  • BT Coordinator
  • Chair of the Disaster/Emergency Preparedness
    Committee
  • Chief Executive Officer
  • Chief Operating Officer
  • Chief of Service
  • Designated Pharmacist
  • Director, Bio-medical Services
  • HRSA Grant Manager
  • Infection Control Practitioner
  • Organizational Security Coordinator
  • Governing Body, Member
  • Director, Emergency Department
  • Director, Food and Nutritional Services
  • Director, Information Technology
  • Director, Nursing
  • Director, Pharmacy
  • Director, Risk Management
  • Director, Safety/Security
  • Emergency Response Coordinator
  • Governing Body, Chairman/President

10
Background Study
  • A 2003 survey comparing NYS ED practitioners with
    US ED practitioners found
  • -NYS practitioners were more likely to offer
    HIV PEP for exposures to unknown and low-HIV-risk
    sources (Plt.05)
  • -In terms of self-reported prescribing of HIV
    PEP, NYS practitioners prescribed HIV PEP after
    sexual assaultmuch more often than did other
    practitioners (Plt.001)
  • -All practitioners offered HIV PEP less often
    after consensual sexual encounters than after
    sexual assault and needle-stick injuries
  • Merchant RC, Keshavarz R. Emergency prophylaxis
    following needle-stick injuries and sexual
    exposures results from a survey comparing New
    York Emergency Department practitioners with
    their national colleagues. Mt Sinai J Med
    200370(5)338-43

11
Results
  • 186/207 EDs responded (90)
  • -47/60 NYC (78)
  • -139/147 Upstate (95)
  • Of these, 177 (95) have a protocol for providing
    nPEP after sexual assault
  • New York City 46/47 (98)
  • Upstate 131/139 (94)
  • 110 (58) have a protocol for providing nPEP
    after voluntary sexual exposure
  • New York City 32/47 (68)
  • Upstate 78/139 (56)
  • 107 (57) have a Sexual Assault Forensic
    Examiner (SAFE) program

12
Exposures to HIV and PEP Initiation in NYS EDs,
2005
13
Percentage of Exposures in which PEP was
initiated in NYS EDs, 2005 Plt .001
14

2005 NYS PEP Exposure Data, NYC vs. Upstate
15
of 2005 Exposures in which PEP was Initiated,
City vs. Upstate
16
Treatment Practices (n186), sexual assault vs.
voluntary sexual exposureplt.001
  • After Potential Sexual Assault Exposure
  • 87 start nPEP and provide Rx for remaining
    supply
  • 11 refer patient elsewhere with no nPEP
  • 3 write a Rx but provide no nPEP
  • In total, 14 do not intitiate nPEP in the ED
    after Sexual Assault
  • After Potential Voluntary Exposure
  • 70 start nPEP and provide Rx for remaining
    supply
  • 24 refer patient elsewhere with no nPEP
  • 6 write a Rx but provide no nPEP
  • In total, 30 do not initiiate nPEP in the ED
    after Voluntary Sexual Exposure

17
Sexual Assault Exposure Treatment Practices City
vs. Upstate
  • City (n47)
  • 98 start nPEP and provide Rx for remaining
    supply
  • 0 refer patient elsewhere with no nPEP
  • 2 write a Rx but provide no nPEP
  • In total, 2 do not initiate nPEP in the ED
  • Upstate (n139)
  • 83 start nPEP and provide Rx for remaining
    supply
  • 14 refer patient elsewhere with no nPEP
  • 3 write a Rx but provide no nPEP
  • In total, 17 do not initiate nPEP in the ED

18
Voluntary Sexual Exposure Treatment Practices
City vs. Upstate
  • City (n47)
  • 74 start nPEP and provide Rx for remaining
    supply
  • 19 refer patient elsewhere with no nPEP
  • 6 write a Rx but provide no nPEP
  • In total, 25 do not initiate nPEP in the ED
  • Upstate (n139)
  • 69 start nPEP and provide Rx for remaining
    supply
  • 25 refer patient elsewhere with no nPEP
  • 6 write a Rx but provide no nPEP
  • In total, 31 do not initiate nPEP in the ED

19
Drug Regimen Choice
  • Only 80/186 (43) EDs use the ARV regimen
    recommended by NYS nPEP Guidelines
  • Recommended regimen
  • ZDV 300 mg po bid 3TC 150 mg po bid (or
    Combivir 1 bid)
  • PLUS
  • Tenofovir 300 mg po qd
  • - still analyzing other acceptable regimens

20
Which staff take responsibility for nPEP
follow-up?
  • After Voluntary Exposure
  • Primary Care 81
  • ED 34
  • Infectious Disease 19
  • OB/GYN 4
  • Local DOH 3
  • After Sexual Assault
  • Primary Care 86
  • ED 36
  • Infectious Disease 31
  • SAFE or SANE Team 12
  • OB/GYN 5
  • Local DOH 4

21
Are we really following up?
  • Only 62 (33) EDs responded that they have a
    mechanism to determine whether ED-recommended
    follow-up occurred for sexual assault or
    voluntary sexual exposure.
  • Only 42 (23) review seroconversion rates in
    cases where nPEP is recommended after sexual
    assault or voluntary sexual exposure.

22
Barriers to Providing nPEP Identified by EDs
  • Lack of dedicated staff 85 (47)
  • Lack of information about nPEP 28 (15)
  • Keeping supply of nPEP 23 (13)

23
Additional Barriers Identified by Subcommittee
  • Staff turnover
  • Time constraints for training
  • Setting for sexual history taking
  • Lab problems
  • Lack of experience
  • Difficult to retrieve useful data to monitor
    practices
  • Clinician discomfort with sexual history-taking

24
Conclusions -1
  • Voluntary exposures are seen more frequently in
    the ED than are occupational or sexual assault
    exposures.
  • Voluntary exposures are more than twice as common
    in New York City than in Upstate New York, though
    nPEP is initiated with almost the same frequency
    in both regions.

25
Conclusions - 2
  • Whereas 65 of sexual assault exposures are
    treated with nPEP, only 43 of voluntary
    exposures are treated with nPEP
  • ED physicians are less likely to initiate nPEP in
    the ED for voluntary exposures, perhaps because
    they are less comfortable or less willing to
    treat voluntary exposures.

26
Recommendations
  • nPEP responsibilities should be delegated to
    certain ED staff, who should receive extra
    training on handling all types of HIV exposures.
  • Mechanisms for tracking seroconversion and
    ED-recommended follow-up should be developed.

27
Recommendations
  • Pursue additional data sources to better
    understand practices
  • Work with professional societies to increase
    implementation of nPEP guidelines
  • Promote better coordination between HIV
    professionals and ED staff

28
For more HIV-related resources, please visit
www.hivguidelines.org
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com