What are the roles of the Urban Forest and Urban Citizen Foresters in the recovery of communities following disasters in cities? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 10
About This Presentation
Title:

What are the roles of the Urban Forest and Urban Citizen Foresters in the recovery of communities following disasters in cities?

Description:

Trees and Rebirth: Urban Community Forestry in Post-Katrina Resilience What are the roles of the Urban Forest and Urban Citizen Foresters in the recovery of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:162
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 11
Provided by: KeithT94
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: What are the roles of the Urban Forest and Urban Citizen Foresters in the recovery of communities following disasters in cities?


1
Trees and Rebirth Urban Community Forestry in
Post-Katrina Resilience
  • What are the roles of the Urban Forest and Urban
    Citizen Foresters in the recovery of communities
    following disasters in cities? 

Jean Fahr, Parkway Partners, NOLA Keith G.
Tidball, Cornell University
2
Community Partner-Parkway Partners
  • NUCFAC Video
  • Organizational background- Jeans story
  • Description of the tree people, the tree scene
    and players (community of practice)
  • What has been the communitys experience in
    working with the research fellow? What have been
    the benefits, challenges, problems and/or
    opportunities of having a fellow in your
    community

3
Research Question
  • How do trees shape resilience before and
    following disaster in cities?
  • In what ways does active engagement of people
    with trees through involvement in an Urban
    Forestry Community of Practice contribute to
    social-ecological system resilience to disasters
    in cities?

4
Site
What defines the community for my study is not a
particular neighborhood or political boundary
such as the 9th Ward, but rather a
practice---i.e., the planting of and caring for
trees. This practice has emerged through the
work of my community partner organizations and of
a diverse group of volunteers who have taken the
initiative to go into City Park, their own
neighborhoods, and other sites throughout the
city to prune damaged trees, plant street trees,
document losses of important symbolic trees and
forests, and provide trees and information for
residents, all to actively participate in the
rebirth of themselves, their neighborhoods, and
their city after Katrina.
  • Parkway Partners, Hike for KaTREEna and Replant
    New Orleans discovered during pre-dis work.
  • Volunteer replanting and tree care efforts
    occurring in neighborhoods city-wide.
  • Volunteers not defined by a particular race,
    class, neighborhood, or other traditional
    category.
  • Volunteer community foresters in NOLA are
    dispersed geographically and are diverse in terms
    of ethnicity and other factors

5
Participatory Research-Of New Orleans, for New
Orleans
  • Project emerges from within this community of
    practice.
  •  Establishing and maintaining relationships of
    trust and reciprocity, and meaningful
    participation of community members crucial to
    success in post-Katrina environment
  • Flexibility to be in maximum participatory
    research mode when the community of practice is
    assembled, which is seasonal and determined by
    availability of trees and other resources.

6
Participatory Methods
  • Community of practice helping to identify study
    questions, carrying out surveys and interpreting
    the results of these efforts
  • Qualitative participatory research methods inform
    the sample population, survey implementation, and
    development of measures for quantitative surveys.
  • Elaborate, enhance, illustrate, and clarify the
    results from the quantitative aspects of the
    study.

7
Thank you
  • Parkway Partners/NOLA Tree Troopers
  • Hike for KaTREEna
  • Replant New Orleans
  • Community Forestry Research Fellows Program
  • Cornell New Orleans Planning Initiative
  • Dr. Marianne Krasny

8
Communities of Practice
A community of practice defines itself along
three dimensions (Wenger 1998) What it is about
its joint enterprise as understood and
continually renegotiated by its members. How it
functions - mutual engagement that bind members
together into a social entity. What capability it
has produced the shared repertoire of communal
resources that members have developed over time.
(see, also Wenger 1999 73-84)  
9
COP Characteristics
  • (1) The domain A community of practice is not
    merely a club of friends or a network of
    connections between people. It has an identity
    defined by a shared domain of interest, in my
    case urban community forestry to recover from
    Hurricane Katrina. Membership therefore implies a
    commitment to the domain, and therefore a shared
    competence that distinguishes members from other
    people.
  • (2) The community In pursuing their interest in
    their domain, members engage in joint activities
    and discussions, help each other, and share
    information. They build relationships that enable
    them to learn from each other. Members of a
    community of practice do not necessarily work or
    live together on a daily basis. The
    Impressionists, for instance, used to meet in
    cafes and studios to discuss the style of
    painting they were inventing together. These
    interactions were essential to making them a
    community of practice even though they often
    painted alone. In my case, the community
    foresters in Post-Katrina New Orleans as a
    community of practice are/is distributed
    throughout New Orleans, therefore my site is as
    well.
  • (3) The practice A community of practice is not
    merely a community of interest--people who like
    certain kinds of movies, for instance. Members of
    a community of practice are practitioners. They
    develop a shared repertoire of resources
    experiences, stories, tools, ways of addressing
    recurring problemsin short a shared practice.
    This takes time and sustained interaction.

10
RQ1 Institutional analysis focusing on innovations (organizations) RQ2 Residents, trees recovery (general public) RQ3 Urban forestry community of practice and recovery (forestry volunteers)  
Phase 1 Tasks 1-Interviews of org staffs 2- Collect organizational documents 3- Strategize and plan with partners re interview groups and locations Tasks 1- Conduct 30 short (5-10 min), exploratory interviews 2- Transcribe code data 3- Analyze generate themes Tasks 1- Conduct 30 short (5-10 min) exploratory interviews 2- Transcribe code data 3- Analyze generate themes  
Timing Fall 2008 Timing Winter 2008-09 Timing Winter 2009-09  
Phase 2 Tasks GIS Mapping- 1- Collect and assemble maps, other data 2- Assemble data and produce maps Tasks 1- Conduct 5 in-depth interviews 2- Facilitate photo elicitation 3- Transcribe code interviews Tasks 1- Conduct 5 in-depth interviews 2- Facilitate photo elicitation 3- Conduct applied ethnographic research rapid assessment 4- Transcribe code interviews  
Phase 2 Timing Spring 2009 Timing Winter 2008-09 Timing Winter 2008-09  
Phase 3 N/A Tasks 1- Develop survey from Phases 12 2- Conduct surveys, 200 residents 3-Tabulate and analyze data Tasks 1- Develop survey from Phases 12 2- Conduct surveys, 20 volunteer foresters 3-Tabulate and analyze data  
Phase 3 N/A Timing Summer 2009 Timing Summer 2009  
Phase 4 N/A N/A Tasks Focus group 1- Recruit assemble focus group members 2- Conduct focus group 3- Interpret results of focus group REVISIT ANY PHASE RESOLVE DATA ISSUES
Phase 4 N/A N/A Timing Fall 2009 Timing Fall 2009
Phase 5 N/A N/A Tasks 1- Develop quantitative survey from phases 1-4 2- Conduct surveys, 200 volunteer foresters 3- Tabulate and analyze data  
Phase 5 N/A N/A Timing Winter 2009-2010  
Phase 6 Interpret and write-up 2010 Interpret and write-up 2010 Interpret write-up 2010  
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com