Management 8e. - Robbins and Coulter - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 43
About This Presentation
Title:

Management 8e. - Robbins and Coulter

Description:

Title: Management 8e. - Robbins and Coulter Subject: Chapter 9 - Organizational Structure & Design Author: Edited by BobN Last modified by: IBM Created Date – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:193
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 44
Provided by: Edited1
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Management 8e. - Robbins and Coulter


1
(No Transcript)
2
Defining Organizational Structure
  • Organizational Structure
  • The formal (conforming to standards) arrangement
    of jobs within an organization.
  • Organizational Design
  • Developing or changing an organizations
    structure a process that involves decisions
    about six key elements
  • Work specialization
  • Departmentalization
  • Chain of command
  • Span of control
  • Centralization and decentralization
  • Formalization

3
Some Purposes of Organizing
  • Divides work to be done into specific jobs and
    departments.
  • Assigns tasks and responsibilities associated
    with individual jobs.
  • Coordinates diverse organizational tasks.
  • Clusters jobs into units.
  • Establishes relationships among individuals,
    groups, and departments.
  • Establishes formal lines of authority.
  • Allocates and deploys organizational resources.

Exhibit 91
4
Organizational Structure
  • Work Specialization
  • The degree to which activities in an organization
    are divided into separate jobs also known as
    division of labor.
  • An entire job is broken down into steps that are
    completed by different people with each one
    specializing in doing part of the job.
  • Today, managers see work specialization as an
    important mechanism but recognize that it can
    result in boredom, fatigue, stress, poor quality,
    increased absenteeism and higher turnover.
  • Some organizations have broadened
    the scope of jobs and reduced
    work specialization.

5
Five Common Forms of Departmentalization
  • Functional
  • Groups jobs by functions performed.
  • Product
  • Groups jobs by product line.
  • Geographical
  • Groups jobs on the basis of territory or
    geography.
  • Process
  • Groups jobs on the basis of product or customer
    flow.
  • Customer
  • Groups jobs by type of customers and needs.

6
Functional Departmentalization
  • Advantages
  • Efficiencies from putting together similar
    specialties and people with common skills,
    knowledge, and orientations
  • Coordination within functional area
  • In-depth specialization
  • Disadvantages
  • Poor communication across functional areas
  • Limited view of organizational goals

Exhibit 92a
7
Geographical Departmentalization
  • Advantages
  • More effective and efficient handling of specific
    regional issues that arise
  • Serve needs of unique geographic markets better
  • Disadvantages
  • Duplication of functions
  • Can feel isolated from other organizational areas

Exhibit 92b
8
Product Departmentalization
Allows specialization in particular products
and services Managers can become experts in
their industry Closer to customers Duplication
of functions Limited view of organizational
goals
Exhibit 92c
Source Bombardier Annual Report.
9
Process Departmentalization
More efficient flow of work activities Can
only be used with certain types of products
Exhibit 92d
10
Customer Departmentalization
Customers needs and problems can be met by
specialists - Duplication of functions - Limited
view of organizational goals
Exhibit 92e
11
Trends in Departmentalization
  • Two popular trends (new styles practices) in
    departmentalization are the increasing use of
    customer departmentalization and the use of
    cross-functional teams. This structure allows
    the company to better understand its customers
    and to respond faster to their needs.
  • Cross-functional teams
  • Groups of individuals who are experts in various
    specialties and who work together as a team.
  • E.g. Employees from finance, purchasing,
    engineering, quality control, representatives
    from outside suppliers, etc, etc

12
Chain of Command
  • Chain of Command
  • The continuous line of authority that extends
    from upper organizational levels to the lowest
    levels and clarifies who reports to whom.
  • It helps employees answer the
    questions Who do I go to
    if I have a problem
    and To whom am
    I responsible?

13
Chain of Command
  • Authority
  • The rights inherent (existing) in a managerial
    position to tell people what to do and to expect
    them to do it.
  • Managers are part of the chain of command and are
    granted (given) authority to facilitate decision
    making and coordination in meeting their
    responsibilities

14
Chain of Command
  • Responsibility
  • The obligation or expectation to perform any
    assigned duties.
  • As managers coordinate and integrate the work of
    employees, those employees assume an obligation
    to act in accordance with instructions.

15
Chain of Command
  • Unity of Command
  • The management principle that a person should
    report to only one manager.
  • The unity of command principle helps preserve the
    concept of a continuous line of authority.
    Without it, conflicting demands and priorities
    from multiple bosses can create problems.

16
Chain of Command
  • Traditional and contemporary views
  • Today, because of information technology and the
    use of computers, new organizational designs are
    implemented and the concepts of chain of command
    have become less relevant.
  • With computers, employees can access information
    that used to be available only to top managers
    and communicate with anyone in the organization
    without going through the formal channels the
    chain of command.

17
Span of Control
  • The number of employees a manager can efficiently
    and effectively manage.
  • It determines the number of managers in an
    organization.
  • Wider spans are more efficient in terms of cost.
  • A managers span of control is affected by
  • Skills and abilities of the manager and the
    employees.
  • Characteristics of the work being done.
  • Standardization of tasks or their complexity.
  • The organizations culture.
  • The managers own style of supervision.

18
Span of Control
  • Traditional and contemporary views
  • The wider or larger the span of control, the more
    efficient the organization.
  • However, when the span becomes too large,
    performance decreases because managers no longer
    have the time to provide the necessary leadership
    and support.
  • Today, the trend is toward wider spans while
    investing heavily in employee training.
  • Managers recognize that they can handle a wider
    span when employees know their jobs well or can
    turn to co-workers if they have questions.

19
Contrasting Spans of Control
Exhibit 93
20
Organizational Structure
  • Centralization
  • The degree to which decision-making is
    concentrated at a single point in the
    organizations.
  • If top managers make the organizations key
    decisions with little or no input from below,
    then the organization is centralized.
  • Decentralization
  • The degree to which lower-level employees provide
    input or actually make decisions.
  • As organizations become more flexible and
    responsive, there is a trend toward
    decentralizing decision making. The organization
    is decentralized.

21
Factors that Influence the Amount of
Centralization
  • More Centralization
  • Environment is stable.
  • Lower-level managers are not as capable or
    experienced at making decisions as upper-level
    managers.
  • Lower-level managers do not want to have a say in
    decisions.
  • Decisions are significant.
  • Organization is facing a crisis or the risk of
    company failure.
  • Company is large.
  • Effective implementation of company strategies
    depends on managers retaining say over what
    happens.

Exhibit 94a
22
Factors that Influence the Amount of
Decentralization
  • More Decentralization
  • Environment is complex, uncertain.
  • Lower-level managers are capable and experienced
    at making decisions.
  • Lower-level managers want a voice in decisions.
  • Decisions are relatively minor.
  • Corporate culture is open to allowing managers to
    have a say in what happens.
  • Company is geographically dispersed.
  • Effective implementation of company strategies
    depends on managers having involvement and
    flexibility to make decisions.

Exhibit 94b
23
Organizational Structure
  • Formalization
  • The degree to which jobs within the organization
    are standardized and the extent to which employee
    behavior is guided by rules and procedures.
  • In organizations with high formalization
  • Job descriptions are explicit.
  • Organizational rules are numerous.
  • Procedures covering work processes are clearly
    defined.
  • In organizations with low formalization
  • Job behaviors are relatively unstructured (not
    regulated).
  • Employees have freedom in how they do their work.

24
Organizational Design Decisions
  • Mechanistic Organization
  • A rigid and tightly controlled structure
  • High specialization.
  • Rigid departmentalization.
  • Narrow spans of control.
  • High formalization.
  • Limited information network (downward).
  • Little decision participation by lower-level
    employees.
  • Organic Organization
  • A Highly flexible and adaptive structure
  • Non-standardized jobs.
  • Fluid team-based structure.
  • Little direct supervision.
  • Minimal formal rules.
  • Open communication network.
  • Empowered lower-level employees.

25
Mechanistic versus Organic Organization
Exhibit 95
26
Structural Contingency Factors
  • Strategy and Structure
  • The organizational structure must support and
    facilitate achievement of strategic goals.
  • Because goals are influenced by the
    organizations strategies, structure should
    follow strategy.
  • If managers change the organizations strategy,
    they need to modify the structure to accommodate
    and support the change.

27
Structural Contingency Factors
  • Size and Structure
  • An organizations size significantly affects its
    structure.
  • As an organization grows larger, its structure
    tends to change from organic to mechanistic.
  • Large organizations have more specialization,
    departmentalization, centralization, and rules
    and regulations than do small organizations.

28
Structural Contingency Factors
  • Technology and Structure
  • Woodwards studies demonstrate that organizations
    adapt their structures to their technology.
  • Technologies differ by their degree of
    routineness (same procedures) or standardization.
  • The more routine the technology, the more
    mechanistic the structure can be.
  • The more non-routine the technology, the more
    organic the structure can be.

29
Woodwards Findings on Technology, Structure, and
Effectiveness
Exhibit 96
30
Structural Contingency Factors
  • Environmental Uncertainty and Structure
  • Mechanistic, rigid structures tend to be most
    effective in stable and simple environments.
  • Organic, flexible structures tend to be most
    effective in dynamic and uncertain environments.
  • Examples of dynamic environmental forces Global
    competition, product innovation by competitors,
    increased demands from customers for high quality
    and faster deliveries.

31
Common Organizational Designs
  • Traditional Designs
  • Simple structure found in small businesses.
  • Low departmentalization, wide spans of control,
    centralized authority, little formalization.
  • Functional structure.
  • Departmentalization by function.
  • Groups similar occupational specialties together.
  • Operations, finance, human resources, research
    and development.
  • Divisional structure found in large
    corporations.
  • Composed of separate business units or divisions
    with limited autonomy under the coordination and
    control of the parent corporation.

32
Strengths and Weaknesses of Common Traditional
Organizational Designs
Exhibit 97
33
Organizational Designs
  • Contemporary Organizational Designs
  • Team structures
  • The entire organization is made up of work groups
    or self-managed teams of empowered employees.
  • Matrix structures
  • Specialists from different functional departments
    are assigned to work on projects led by a project
    manager.
  • Matrix participants have two managers.
  • Project structures
  • Employees work continuously on projects as one
    project is completed, they move on to the next
    project.

34
A Matrix Organization in an Aerospace Firm
Exhibit 99
35
Organizational Designs
  • Contemporary Organizational Designs
  • Boundaryless Organization
  • A flexible and unstructured organizational design
    that is intended to eliminate boundaries (limits)
    imposed by a predefined structure.
  • Removes internal boundaries
  • Eliminates the chain of command
  • Has limitless spans of control
  • Uses empowered teams rather than departments
  • Eliminates external boundaries
  • Uses virtual, network, and modular (varied and
    flexible) organizational structures to get closer
    to stakeholders.

36
Removing Boundaries
  • Virtual Organization
  • An organization that consists of a small core of
    full-time employees and that temporarily hires
    specialists to work on opportunities that arise.
  • The company enjoys a network of talents
    (expertise) without the overhead (cost) and
    structural complexity.

37
Removing Boundaries
  • Network Organization
  • A small core (central) organization that
    outsource (obtain services from outside
    suppliers) its major business functions (e.g.,
    manufacturing).
  • This approach allows organizations to concentrate
    on what they do best and obtain services from
    outside companies that can do those services
    better (e.g. Nike, Reebok).

38
Removing Boundaries
  • Modular Organization
  • A manufacturing organization that uses outside
    suppliers to provide product components or
    modules (parts) that are then assembled into
    final products.
  • A modular organization can quickly be redesigned
    as needed.
  • Automobile manufacturers use outside suppliers to
    provide sections of the cars which are put
    together into finished automobiles by a small
    number of employees (e.g. GM, Ford).

39
Organizational Designs
  • The Learning Organization
  • An organization that has developed the capacity
    to continuously learn, adapt, and change through
    the practice of knowledge management by
    employees.
  • Characteristics of a learning organization
  • An open team-based organization design that
    empowers employees.
  • Extensive and open information sharing.
  • Leadership that provides a shared vision of the
    organizations future, support and encouragement.
  • A strong culture of shared values, trust,
    openness, and a sense of community.

40
Characteristics of a Learning Organization
Exhibit 910
41
C H A P T E R R E V I E W 1/3
  • Defining Organizational Structure (slides
    4,5,1116,18)
  • Discuss the traditional and contemporary view of
    work specialization.
  • Describe each of the five forms of
    departmentalization.
  • Explain cross-functional teams.
  • Differentiate chain of command, authority,
    responsibility, and unity of command.
  • Discuss the traditional and contemporary views of
    chain of command.
  • Discuss the traditional and contemporary views of
    span of control.

42
C H A P T E R R E V I E W 2/3
  • Defining Organizational Structure (Slides 20,23)
  • Tell what factors influence the amount of
    centralization and decentralization.
  • Explain how formalization is used in
    organizational design.
  • Organizational Design Decisions (slides 2428,30)
  • Contrast mechanistic and organic organizations.
  • Explain the relationship between strategy and
    structure.
  • Tell how organizational size affects
    organizational design.
  • Discuss Woodwards findings on the relationship
    of technology and structure.
  • Explain how environmental uncertainty affects
    organizational design.

43
C H A P T E R R E V I E W 3/3
  • Common Organizational Designs (slides
    31,33,3639)
  • Contrast the three traditional organizational
    designs.
  • Explain team-based, matrix, and project
    structures.
  • Discuss the design of virtual, network, and
    modular organizations.
  • Describe the characteristics of a learning
    organization.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com