FROM DISINTEGRATION TO REINTEGRATION EASTERN EUROPE AND THE FORMER SOVIET UNION IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 35
About This Presentation
Title:

FROM DISINTEGRATION TO REINTEGRATION EASTERN EUROPE AND THE FORMER SOVIET UNION IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE

Description:

Title: FROM DISINTEGRATION TO REINTEGRATION: EASTERN EUROPE AND CENTRAL ASIA IN THE WORLD MARKETPLACE Author: Harry BroaDM\\]] Last modified by – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:105
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 36
Provided by: HarryB9
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: FROM DISINTEGRATION TO REINTEGRATION EASTERN EUROPE AND THE FORMER SOVIET UNION IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE


1
FROM DISINTEGRATION TO REINTEGRATIONEASTERN
EUROPE AND THE FORMER SOVIET UNION IN
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
  • Harry G. Broadman
  • Economic Advisor
  • The World Bank
  • Washington, DC
  • hbroadman_at_worldbank.org
  • February 2006

2
Coming Full Circle?
  • For many centuries, the Eurasian continent
    participated inindeed at the center
    ofinternational commerce
  • Events of 1917 (and those decades thereafter) an
    interruption in the long history of Eurasian
    international integration
  • Eastern Europe and the Former Soviet Union an
    isolated trade bloc
  • The Regions isolation from the world marketplace
    ended with
  • Fall of the Berlin Wall
  • Dissolution of the Soviet Union
  • Demise of CMEA
  • Breakup of Yugoslavia
  • Today, many of the Regions countries have
    reintegrated internationally and actively trade
    with the rest of the world

3
Main Questions
  • I. Whyand howhave some countries in the Region
    internationally integrated moreand in different
    waysthan others, and what do the current trends
    portend for the medium term future?
  • What are the implications for the Regions
    competitiveness and prospects for growth?

4
Main Questions (contd)
  • II. How does trade performance in todays Region
    compare with that of others of the world?
  • What factors are most important in
    conditioning the relationship between greater
    trade, geography, policy reforms, and
    development?

5
Main Questions (contd)
  • III. Going forward, which policy reforms are
    likely to be most effective in using trade as a
    lever to enhance growth in the Region?
  • What are the priority policy issues that all
    stakeholderspolicy-makers in the countries,
    developed countries and the international
    communityshould focus on?

6
Summary of Main Messages
  • Without international trade, there would not have
    been a transition open trade an engine for
    growth in the Region
  • Two newyet uneventrade blocs emerging a rich
    Euro-centric and a poor Russia-centric,
    latter risks being frozen out of the modern
    international division of labor the blocs
    boundaries are soft
  • A way out? Yes behind-the-border reforms
    critical for trade to leverage and enhance
    development trade policy is necessary, but not
    sufficient
  • Some countries need basic trade reforms most
    need BTB reforms
  • Who needs to do what? Bulk of needed reforms in
    the Regions countries hands actions also
    needed by developed countries and the
    international community (donors and IFIs)

7
Contours of the Regions Reintegration
  • In the last ten years
  • Exports tripled
  • Imports increased two and a half times
  • Since 1995, the Regions trade has grown at a
    faster pace than any other in the world
  • Today
  • Trade comprises two-thirds of the Regions output
  • Open trade now an important characteristic of
    many of the Regions economies sharp contrast to
    post-1917 period

8
Contours of the Regions Reintegration (contd)
9
Two Emerging Trade Blocs
  • Direction of Global Trade Flows
  • While EU8 and SEE global exports to EU15
    increased, CIS global exports to EU15 changed
    little
  • EU8 and SEE global exports to the Region
    decreased but CIS global exports to the Region
    increased
  • Direction of Intra-Regional Trade Flows
  • CIS intra-Regional trade flows are more (sub-)
    regionalized and concentrated most (not all) CIS
    countries trade more with themselves
  • EU8 and SEE intra-Regional trade flows more
    diffused still, most EU8 and SEE countries trade
    more with EU8 SEE and less with CIS

10
Two Emerging Trade Blocs(based on intra-Regional
trade flows)

11
Two Emerging Trade Blocs (contd)
  • Not only do the two blocs coalesce around
    differences in
  • direction of trade flows
  • but also in terms of differences in
  • commodity composition of trade diversified
    manufacturing vs continued concentration in
    natural resources and agriculture
  • factor Intensity capital/skilled labor intensive
    vs unskilled labor intensive
  • domestic inter-enterprise competition sound
    governance
  • trade in services e.g,.,banking telecoms
    business services
  • transport trade facilitation infrastructure
    institutions customs modernization reform IT
    utilization port development

12
Two Emerging Trade Blocs (contd)

13
Two Emerging Trade Blocs (contd)
  • Qualifiers to this stark 2-bloc dichotomy
  • A sizeable difference in scale between the two
    blocs EU8 and SEE trade flows are twice the
    size of CIS trade flows
  • Significant intra-bloc heterogeneity Some CIS
    countries (e.g., Ukraine) are increasing non-CIS
    trade some SEE countries (e.g., SaM) share
    features of CIS trade and some EU8 countries
    exports are unskilled-labor-intensive

14
Two Emerging Trade Blocs (contd)
Qualifiers to this stark 2-bloc dichotomy
15
How Open Are the Regions Economies Compared to
Others in the World?
  • Actual openness 95-03 greatly increased for EU8
    and SEE but declined for CIS
  • but compared to projected openness, CIS not
    under-trading while SEE is.

16
How is this Openness the Result of the Region
Liberalizing its Trade Policies?
  • Much liberalization done unilaterally by the
    countries themselves through lowering tariffs,
    among other reforms
  • Substantial liberalization through global trade
    agreements
  • reorientation of trade to the rest of the world,
    especially toward the EU, through EU accession
    and SAAs
  • increasing participation in the multilateral
    trading system 17 out of the 27 countries are
    WTO members
  • Regional integration through many RTAs
  • CEFTA, BFTA, SEE 29 BTAs, CIS FTA, Eurasia
    Economic Community, Central Asian Cooperation
    Organization
  • manifested in spaghetti bowls

17
How Has the Region Been Liberalizing Trade
Policies?
18
Current Stance of Formal Trade Policies in the
Region Tariffs
  • Today, the Regions tariff rates compare
    favorably with those of LDCs at similar income
    levels

19
Current Stance of Formal Trade Policies in the
Region Non-Tariff Barriers
  • NTBs still
  • a problem in several countries,
  • especially the CIS

20
How Has Trade Been Propelling Growth in the
Region?
  • Early years of transition
  • Liberal import policies, but weak domestic market
    institutions and incentivesespecially
    competition and governanceled to ineffective
    enterprise restructuring
  • Consequently the increased trade flows had
    limited adjustment effects on enhancing
    productivity, growth and reduction of poverty
  • Indeed, distortions in resource allocationlabor
    and capitalwere created and the higher import
    levels exacerbated poverty

21
How Has Trade Been Propelling Growth? (contd)
  • Later years of transition
  • Countries that
  • eliminated disincentives to export
  • established basic market institutions, and
  • facilitated restructuring of non-competitive
    enterprises
  • benefited from
  • increased trade flows
  • supply response where prices of tradeables rose
  • business restructuring and creation of new jobs
  • growth

22
International Integration and Domestic Reform A
Two-Way Street
Source IMF DOT Statistics and EBRD
  • Countries that have integrated the most have made
    more progress implementing market-oriented
    institutional and domestic policy reforms, and
    vice versa..

23
Which Are the Key Behind-the-Border Reform
Challenges?
  • Weak competitive domestic business climate and
    poor governance high barriers to entry/exit
    horizontal vertical market dominance state
    involvement corruption
  • Underdeveloped trade and transport facilitation
    systems and institutions e.g., discretion in
    customs weak regional cooperation
  • Closed and over-regulated domestic services
    sectors especially in network sectors,
    constraining positive externalities
  • Low levels of FDI participation in high value
    added global production sharing EU8 integrated
    in producer-driven network trade (autos/IT)
    CIS/SEEat mostintegrated into buyer-driven
    network trade (clothing, furniture, diamonds)
  • Rigid factor markets labor and capital cannot
    reallocate in response to trade and reduce poverty

24
Key Behind-the-Border Reform Challenges Weak
Competition
  • Import competition induces efficiency but less
    in CIS
  • Region-wide, foreign firms more sensitive to
    import competition
  • Export levels are low where entry barriers are
    high

Importance to Businesses of Competition from
Imports
Percentage of surveyed firms in 2002 indicating
that competition from imports is very or
extremely important. Source BEEPS2
25
Key Behind-the-Border Reform Challenges Weak
Competition
  • Evidence from enterprise-level survey

Softer budget constraints in CIS prevents
value-subtracting firms from exiting the market
and freeing up capital for new investments
26
Key Behind-the-Border Reform Challenges Poor
Governance
27
Key Behind-the-Border Reform Challenges Poor
Governance
Share of Sales Made on a Pre-Paid Basis
Source BEEPS2
In countries where contract enforcement is weak,
firms are adopting risk-averting business
practices.
28
Key Behind-the-Border Reform Challenges
Limited Trade Facilitation Capacity/Institutions
Simulation results raising Regions TTF
development to 50 of EU15 level, largest trade
gains from improving ports and IT applications
29
Key Behind-the-Border Reform ChallengesClosed/
Over-Regulated Services Sectors
Econometric evidence on the Regions services
sector reform leveraging the growth effects of
increases in investment
Note Coefficients and t-values in brackets,
asterisks stand or significance at 10, 5 and 1
level
Number of observations 23 for all equations
30
Key Behind-the-Border Reform Challenges Low
Levels of FDI Restrict Opportunities for Trade
Trade and FDI flows are complements in the
globalized economy, participation in high
value-added network trade is limited if FDI is
low
Source Export data based on UN COMTRADE
Statistics and IMF DOT Statistics GDP at market
prices (current US), DDP World Bank Net FDI
Inflow World Bank, World Development Indicators
through SIMA and UNCTAD World Investment Reports
1995-2003
31
Key Behind-the-Border Reform Challenges Rigid
Factor Markets Can Worsen Poverty
  • Labor mobility constrained where administrative
    mechanisms engender wage uniformity, health and
    pension payroll taxes are high, social safety
    nets are underdeveloped, or employment protection
    is excessive.
  • Consequently, workers will face disincentives
    from moving out of weakening sectors to growing
    ones, potentially increasing poverty.
  • Capital allocation/mobility patterns distorted
    where creditor rights are weakly enforced or
    corporate governance incentives are blunted
  • Undermines investment in higher valued activities
    and job creation

32
Priority Policy RecommendationsI. Trade Policy
Reforms
  • Reduce and simplify structure of tariff rates
    eliminate NTBs
  • Eliminate bias against exports to promote product
    diversification
  • Reform EU CAP and other OECD agriculture
    protections revise Non-Market Economy
    anti-dumping designation
  • Pursue vigorously WTO accession, especially in
    light of Doha Round
  • Rationalize and harmonize existing RTAs make
    WTO-consistent and incorporate new trade
    issues, especially services into RTAs

33
Priority Policy Recommendations II.
Behind-the-Border Reforms
  • NB Detailed policy recommendations are outlined
    in the study
  • Encourage inter-enterprise competition
  • Improve incentives for better governance
  • Modernize trade facilitation infrastructure and
    institutions
  • Liberalize investment in, and regulatory reform
    of services
  • Reform FDI policy regime to attract global
    production sharing participation
  • Foster flexible factor markets to reduce poverty
    impacts from changes in prices/output engendered
    by trade

34
Linkages Between and Sequencing of Reforms
  • Policy reforms can be mutually supportive and
    reinforcing e.g., further tariff reform will
    enhance import competition, which in turn
    improves efficiency and increases export
    penetration
  • Some actions non-controversial and done in the
    short- to medium term e.g., TA for institutional
    capacity-building
  • Other reforms face political economy challenges
    or marshalling resources and done in medium- to
    long-term e.g., exposing vested interests to
    FDI in services sectors modernizing ports
  • Sequencing of reforms can be critical e.g.,
    enhancing labor mobility/strengthening social
    safety nets prior to liberalizing imports
    regulatory reform and strong competition law
    enforcement prior to liberalization of services

35
Action Plan for StakeholdersThe Division of
Labor
  • Developed Countries
  • Change non-market economy designation for AD
    OECD reform of agriculture policy facilitate
    EU/WTO accession
  • International Community (Donors and IFIs)
  • TA and institution capacity-building customs
    reform competition policy governance reform
    WTO and EU application process harmonization of
    RTAs
  • Prevent poor CIS countries from falling through
    the TA cracks
  • Regions Governments Themselves
  • Rest of policy agendalargely behind the border
    reformsin the Regions countries hands
  • Trade policy tariffs NTBs anti-export bias
    WTO RTA reform
  • Implementation of full BTB agenda competition
    governance services liberalization TTF FDI
    factor mobility
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com