Evidence Based Practice in VHA Presentation to the Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Evidence Based Practice in VHA Presentation to the Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans

Description:

Title: No Slide Title Author: Directorate of Clinical Ops Last modified by: vacojacksl2 Created Date: 4/21/1998 8:30:10 PM Document presentation format – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:121
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Direct85
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Evidence Based Practice in VHA Presentation to the Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans


1
Evidence Based Practice in VHAPresentation to
the Advisory Committee on Gulf War Veterans
  • Joseph Francis, MD, MPH
  • Deputy Chief Quality Performance Officer
  • September 24, 2008

2
VA/DoD EBP Working Group Charter
  • Vision
  • advise on the use of practice guidelines to
    improve the quality of health and support
    population health management
  • Purposes
  • advise the VA/DoD Executive Council
  • identify areas for guideline adaptation
  • facilitate adaptation process
  • identify maintenance process
  • champion the integration into information systems
  • ensure integration
  • encourage research

3
VA/DoD Evidence-Based Practice Workgroup
Structure
Joint Executive Council Co-Chaired by VA DoD
Health Executive Council Co-Chaired by VA DoD
VA/DoD Evidence-Based Practice Workgroup Co-Chaire
d by VA DoD
Clinical Portfolio Management
Development Co-Chaired by VA DoD
Evidence-Based Knowledge Management
Transfer Co-Chaired by VA DoD
Decision Support Co-Chaired by VA DoD
Review Co-Chaired by
VA DoD
Evaluation Analysis Co-Chaired by VA DoD
4
VA/DoD EBP Workgroup Members
  • VA Members
  • Joseph Francis, MD- Co-Chair
  • Linda Kinsinger, MD Director National Center
    for Prevention
  • Len Pogach MD Chief Consultant, Diabetes
  • Rick Owens, MD - Medical Advisory Panel
  • Carla Cassidy, RN - Director, Evidence-Based
    Practice Guidelines
  • Patricia Rikli, RN - Employee Education System
  • David Atkins MD Quality Enhancement Research
    Initiative
  • Peter Almenoff, MD - VISN 15
  • Doug Owens MD HSRD
  • Seyed Tirmizi, MD - Informatics
  • DoD Members
  • COL Doreen Lounsbery, MD - Co-Chair
  • Army Medical Department
  • Lt Col Patrick Monahan, MD - Air Force
  • CDR Annette Von Thun, MD - Navy
  • Col Joyce Grissom, MD -Tricare
  • COL John Kugler, MD - Tricare
  • LTC Nhan Do, MD - Medical Informatics
  • Mark Hamra MD Medical Informatics
  • COL Ernest Degenhardt, AN Chief, Evidence-Based
    Practice
  • Lt Col James McCrary, RPh Pharmacoeconomics
    Center
  • CAPT Kevin Lee Gallagher, M.D., Region
    Representative

7
5
Features of the VA-DoD EBPWG
  • Allows tailoring to the needs of the current or
    former warrior
  • may assist seamless transition
  • Free of Conflicts of Interest
  • Strong adoption of evidentiary standards
  • Focus on algorithms and other tools to assist
    providers
  • Able to drive clinical policy

6
Current Clinical Practice Guidelines
  • Post Deployment Health Assessment
  • Uncomplicated Pregnancy
  • Major Depressive Disorder
  • PTSD
  • Psychosis
  • Substance abuse disorder
  • Medically Unexplained Symptoms
  • Opioid Use in Chronic Pain
  • Mild TBI
  • Post Operative Pain
  • Bio/Chem/Rad/Blast Injury
  • Tobacco Use Cessation
  • Obesity
  • Amputation
  • Disease Prevention
  • Heart Failure
  • Hypertension
  • Ischemic Heart Disease
  • Dyslipidemia
  • Diabetes Mellitus
  • Pre End Stage Renal Disease
  • COPD
  • Stroke Rehabilitation
  • Acute Stroke
  • Rehabilitation
  • Dysuria
  • Asthma
  • GERD
  • Glaucoma
  • Erectile Dysfunction
  • Low Back Pain

7
Evidence as the Basisfor Clinical Policy
8
Rating the Quality of Evidence (USPTF, 1996)
  • Grade I RCT
  • Grade II-1 nonrandomized trial
  • Grade II-2 cohort or case-control
  • Grade II-3 multiple time-series
  • Grade III opinions of experts

9
Rating System used for MUS Guideline (USPSTF,
1996)
  • Grade A Strong recommendation
  • Grade B Recommended
  • Grade C Recommendation not well established
    (may have value in some)
  • Grade D Considered not useful/effective
  • Grade E Strong evidence NOT to use
    (ineffective or harmful)

10
Issues with Guidelines
  • Patients with multiple problems and conditions
  • most clinical trials exclude
  • recommendations for one condition may contradict
    those for another
  • Conflicts of interest
  • are they evidence or industry based?
  • Special populations (e.g. elderly) not
    specifically studied in clinical trials

11
(No Transcript)
12
You dont need a guideline to cover the basics
  • Professionalism
  • Compassion
  • Communication
  • Continuity and coordination
  • Responsiveness
  • Truth telling
  • Shared decision-making with patients and family
  • Teamwork

13
(No Transcript)
14
(No Transcript)
15
Goals of MUS Guideline
  • Promote effective assessment of patient's
    complaints.
  • Optimally manage symptoms
  • Avoid harm (complications and morbidity)
    including the harm caused by treatment
  • Achieve satisfaction and positive attitudes
    regarding the management of chronic unexplained
    illness

16
(No Transcript)
17
(No Transcript)
18
MUS Sample recommendations
  • Grade A Strongly recommended
  • Validate the patients thoughts, feelings, and
    attitudes, educate, reassure the patient, and
    reinforce the patient-clinician partnership
  • Emphasize non-drug treatments as well as drug
    treatments CBT, graded aerobic exercise,
    tricyclics for FM

19
MUS Sample recommendations
  • Grade B Recommended
  • Early intervention may improve prognosis
  • SSRIs, NSAIDs may have some benefit
  • Acupuncture, biofeedback, stretching possibly of
    benefit

20
MUS Sample recommendations
  • Grade C Consider for some
  • Relaxation response
  • Flexibility programs when combined with aerobic
    exercise
  • Massage
  • SSRI

21
MUS Sample recommendations
  • Recommendations D/E Beware
  • Xanax
  • Antibiotics
  • Prolonged Bed rest
  • Corticosteroids
  • Florinef (alone)

22
Future Vision
  • Through partnerships with other agencies and
    health systems, develop accelerated process for
    evidence synthesis and guideline development
  • Sharpen focus on deployment health issues
  • Incorporate patient preferences
  • Consider newer approaches to assessing evidence
    and strength of recommendations (GRADE)
  • Strengthen links between Clinical Practice
    Guidelines and Performance Metrics
  • Embed the guidelines and the measurement into
    clinical work using the EHR

see Krahn, JAMA 2008300436
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com