States of Consciousness HYPNOSIS - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 36
About This Presentation
Title:

States of Consciousness HYPNOSIS

Description:

States of Consciousness HYPNOSIS – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:223
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 37
Provided by: DavidP269
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: States of Consciousness HYPNOSIS


1
States of ConsciousnessHYPNOSIS
2
Discuss
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?vprMvP9ustN0
  • What different states of consciousness do you
    think there are?
  • Of the time that you are awake , how much time do
    you think you are consciously thinking about the
    world around you?
  • What do you think Hypnosis is ?
  • What do you think happens to people who are
    hypnotised?

3
Controversial Question
  • When someone is hypnotised, do they enter a
    different state of consciousness or is there
    another explanation for their behaviour.

4
State versus Non-state
  • State Theory Hypnosis is a different state from
    waking or sleeping
  • Non-state Hypnosis promotes relaxation,
    imagination and compliance. So hypnotised people
    are not in a different state, the just behave
    differently

5
Hypnosis is a state of heightened suggestibility
in which people experience imagined situations as
if they were real.
6
Franz Anton Mesmer (1734-1815)
Mesmer developed a technique called animal
magnetism (later renamed mesmerism). Mesmer
noticed that patients would often enter a
trance-like state. Apparent miracle cures also
resulted. Eventually Mesmer realised the magnets
were unnecessary .
7
Hypnosis
  • In 1841 Scottish surgeon James Braid witnessed a
    demonstration of mesmerism and began to develop
    his own technique.
  • Braid held a bright object in front of patients
    eyes while also making verbal suggestions.
  • He argued mesmerism was a state of nervous
    sleep produced by concentrated attention.
  • He renamed it hypnosis after Hypnos, the Greek
    god of sleep.

8
Hypnotic Induction Procedures
  • Hypnotic induction is the process by which one
    person leads another into hypnosis.
  • It is not necessary to swing a watch in front of
    the eyes or say you are feeling sleepy!
  • Moss (1965) reported being able to sometimes
    induce a trance simply by saying Please sit in
    that chair and go into hypnosis!

9
Sample test items from the Stanford Hypnotic
Susceptibility Scale, Form C
Item Suggested Behaviour Criterion for Passing
Arm lowering Right arm will become heavy Arm lowered by at least 6 inches
Moving hands apart Force is pushing hands apart Hands are 6 or more inches apart
Mosquito hallucination Mosquito is buzzing nearby Any grimace or acknowledgement
Posthypnotic amnesia Will not remember suggestions Three or fewer items recalled
10
Hypnotic Susceptibility
  • According to Hilgard (1977), in an average
    testing session 10 of subjects will be
    completely nonresponsive, 10 will pass all or
    nearly all items, and the rest will fall in
    between. This is a stable characteristic when
    tested 25 years later people scored the same !
  • However susceptibility can be enhanced by
    increasing peoples expectations (Spanos et al.,
    1991 Vickery Kirsch, 1991).

11
Behaviour under Hypnosis
  • http//www.youtube.com/watch?v9djiWIWMaOA
  • Hypnotised people are very suggestible and their
    behaviour will conform with what the hypnotist
    tells them. Typical behaviour that can be induced
    include
  • Acting out imaginary scenes.
  • Pretending to be an animal.
  • Believing a limb cannot move or is insensitive to
    pain.
  • Positive and negative hallucinations seeing
    things that are not really there, or not seeing
    objects that really are present.
  • Enhanced memory or posthypnotic amnesia

12
Plenary
  • What is hypnosis?
  • How can we be sure that hypnosis is real?
  • What is a key argument against hypnosis being a
    real phenomenon?
  • Why do you think people vary in their
    susceptibility to hypnosis?
  • Why is hypnosis useful?

13
Test
  • Define Hypnosis
  • What is the only essential ingredient for
    hypnotic induction?
  • What is a key argument against hypnosis being a
    specific state of consciousness?
  • According to Hilgard what percentage of people
    are not susceptible to hypnosis?
  • What can increase susceptibility?

14
Why does hypnosis work?
  • There are two main competing explanations for how
    hypnosis works
  • Dissociation (state hypothesis) theories.
  • Social Cognitive (non-state hypothesis) theories.

15
Dissociation theories of hypnosis
  • Dissociation theories view hypnosis as an altered
    state of consciousness.
  • Best known example is the neo-dissociation theory
    proposed by Ernst Hilgard (1978, 1991).
  • Hilgard argued that cognition involves multiple
    systems of control which are not all conscious at
    the same time.
  • These systems are controlled and motivated by a
    central executive ego.

16
Neo-dissociation Theory
 
  • Executive ego distributes cognitive resources to
    different tasks e.g driving and using a mobile
    phone !!! Multi-tasking divides attention.

17
  • Hilgard argued that during hypnosis the hypnotist
    gains control of the executive ego, and therefore
    has access to the various subsidiary control
    systems.
  • Hypnosis creates a division of awareness in which
    a person simultaneously experiences two streams
    of consciousness (primary consciousness and a
    hidden observer)that are cut off from one
    another.
  • The primary consciousness responds to the
    hypnotists suggestions, while the hidden
    observer is stuck behind an amnesiac barrier,
    aware of everything going on but unable to
    communicate, until the hypnotist asks it to.

18
Hidden Observer Phenomenon
  • In one study Hilgard (1977) hypnotised subjects
    and suggested that they would not feel pain.
  • Then placed arm in ice-cold water for 45 seconds
    and reported level of pain experienced.
  • For another group Hilgard said Perhaps there is
    another part of you that is more aware than your
    hypnotised part. If so, would that part of you
    report the amount of pain.

19
Hidden Observer Study (Hilgard, 1977)
20
Hypnosis and Involuntary Control
  • When under hypnosis people subjectively
    experience their actions to be involuntary.
  • Can people be made to perform acts that are
    harmful to themselves or others?
  • Evans Orne (1965) told hypnotized subjects that
    a cup of foaming liquid was acid. They were
    told to throw it a persons face (to see if they
    would follow the instructions despite it being
    harmful)

21
Evaluation
  • However, a control group who were asked to simply
    pretend that they were hypnotised behaved in the
    same way.
  • This behaviour can be explained in terms of
    destructive obedience i.e., psychological
    compliance with an authority figure (Milgram,
    1974).

22
Evidence in favour of hypnosis being a separate
state of consciousness
  • For some time now hypnosis has been successful
    when anaesthetics cannot be used and in the
    treatment of chronic pain (Hilgard and Le Baron
    1984).
  • People can imitate clinical depression
    successfully but that is not to say clinical
    depression does not exist. The crucial point is
    that the hypnotised person believes they are in a
    different state, whilst the imitator does not.
    (McIlveen 1995).
  • An important feature of the Hilgard model is the
    hidden observer. Hilgard (1973) induced
    hypnotic deafness in a participant but also
    suggested that he should raise a finger when
    asked if there was any part of him that could
    still hear. Deafness was convincingly established
    but a finger was still raised when the question
    was asked. In Hilgards view this is the hidden
    observer monitoring the situation and replying to
    the question without the participants awareness.
  • Some researchers feel that hypnosis is associated
    with specific changes in brain electrical
    activity (Crawford and Gruzlier 1992)
  • It is possible we are looking at the wrong
    measures or the wrong part of the brain for
    hypnotic phenomena.
  • Although Kosslyn et al (2000) found that when pps
    were asked to visualise adding colour to a grey
    image there was increased brain activity in the
    left hemisphere when they were hypnotised but not
    when they werent.

23
Plenary
  • Can you describe Hilgards theory?
  • What is the hidden observer?
  • Use handout to identify criticisms of State
    theories of hypnosis.
  • Discuss

24
Test
  • What is the proper name of Hilgards theory of
    hypnosis?
  • Briefly describe Hilgards evidence for the
    hidden observer.
  • What is Hilgards name for the part of
    consciousness which is in control of the multiple
    cognitive control structures?
  • Why does hypnosis appear to produce involuntary
    actions?

25
Social Cognitive theories of hypnosis
  • Social cognitive theories deny that hypnosis
    produces an altered state of consciousness.
  • Instead argue that hypnotic experiences result
    from expectations of people motivated to take on
    the role of being hypnotised.
  • Subjects develop a perceptual set a readiness
    to respond to suggestions and to perceive
    hypnotic experiences as real and involuntary.

26
(No Transcript)
27
(No Transcript)
28
(No Transcript)
29
Stanley Milgram (1933-1984)Do we need to be
hypnotised to do things against our will?
30
I observed a mature and initially poised
businessman enter the laboratory smiling and
confident. Within 20 minutes he was reduced to a
twitching, stuttering wreck, who was rapidly
approaching nervous collapse. He constantly
pulled on his ear lobe, and twisted his hands. At
one point he pushed his fist into his forehead
and muttered Oh God lets stop it. And yet he
continued to respond to every word of the
experimenter, and obeyed to the end. Milgram,
Behavioral Study of Obedience
31
  • In a study by Orne (1959) subjects were told
    prior to being hypnotised that a common feature
    of a trance is stiffening of the muscles in the
    dominant hand.
  • This information was fictitious.
  • When the subjects were hypnotised, 55
    spontaneously displayed hand stiffening.
  • No subjects in a control group showed this
    behaviour.
  • Social Cognitive theories do not claim that
    hypnotised people are pretending. Expectations
    can influence behaviour without conscious
    awareness (e.g., placebo effects etc.)

32
Alternative explanations of hypnosis Non-state
theories
  • Barber (1969) suggests that hypnosis is simply
    the result of experimental demand
    characteristics i.e. the participant pleases the
    experimenter and tries not to ruin the show.
  • All hypnotic phenomena can be imitated by non
    hypnotised people, indistinguishably from the
    hypnotised (Barber 1979)
  • In a study by Orne (1959) subjects were told
    prior to being hypnotised that a common feature
    of a trance is stiffening of the muscles in the
    dominant hand.
  • This information was fictitious.
  • When the subjects were hypnotised, 55
    spontaneously displayed hand stiffening.
  • No subjects in a control group showed this
    behaviour.
  • No measure of brain activity successfully
    distinguishes between hypnotised and non
    hypnotised states consistently. (Sarbin and
    Slagle 1972).
  • Council and Kenny (1992) showed that expert
    ratings also failed to distinguish between self
    reports of subjects experiencing hypnotic
    induction from those experiencing relaxation
    training and they conclude that the state of
    consciousness produced by the two procedures is
    indistinguishable.
  • Wagstaff (1995) indicates that research and
    debate in hypnosis flourishes but we do not seem
    to be any further forward in deciding whether
    there is an altered state of consciousness we can
    call hypnosis.

33
Summary
  • Hypnosis produces an increased receptiveness to
    suggestions.
  • Hypnotised people subjectively experience their
    actions to be involuntary.
  • Dissociation theories attribute this to divided
    streams of consciousness.
  • Social Cognitive theories attribute this to
    subjects expectation as to what effect hypnosis
    will have on them.

34
Test
  • What did Spanos et al find about susceptability
    in hypnosis?
  • What were the specific findings of Ornes study
    with the hand stiffening?
  • What is a major weakness of state theories?
  • Explain a problem with the argument that hypnosis
    can be faked.

35
Evaluation and Analysis
  • Evaluation However, Although, On the other hand
  • Look for alternative explanations for findings of
    research or theoretical conclusions
  • Criticise the research methods and validity of
    findings
  • Analysis
  • This suggests
  • This implies that..
  • This shows us that.

36
Essay plan
  • Describe what hypnosis is and how it affects
    behaviour. Controversial question is whether it
    produces an altered state of consciousness or
    not.
  • Outline and evaluate state theory including 3
    pieces of research evidence
  • Outline and evaluate non-state theory including 3
    pieces of research evidence
  • Conclusion should discuss the usefulness of
    hypnosis despite the inability of science to
    explain the phenomenon completely.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com