The Economic Environment of Business - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 12
About This Presentation
Title:

The Economic Environment of Business

Description:

The Economic Environment of Business Lecture 5 Competition Policy Why do we need competition policy? To avoid exploitation of customers by large companies To ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 13
Provided by: jnb6
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The Economic Environment of Business


1
The Economic Environment of Business Lecture 5
  • Competition Policy

2
Why do we need competition policy?
  • To avoid exploitation of customers by large
    companies
  • To promote economic efficiency through
    competition
  • To ensure that markets are contestable

3
The Case for a Competition Policy
  • The Structure-Conduct-Performance Model
  • The structure of an industry influences
  • the conduct of firms in that industry.
  • This in turn determines the performance
  • of firms.
  • With little competition, a firm can be
  • inefficient yet still make high profits, and
  • vice-versa for the competitive firm.

4
The UK Policy
  • Focuses on the areas of
  • Market share
  • Mergers
  • Restrictive practices

5
Monopoly and MergersCases are to be
investigated if
  • Share of supply is 25 of a market or more
  • Assets are 70million world-wide (asset test)
  • This does NOT mean that such mergers are illegal
    but do need to be investigated for possible
    anti-competitive effects

6
RESTRICTIVE TRADE PRACTICES
  • Strategies designed deliberately to limit the
    degree of competition in a market. Some
    examples-
  • Predatory pricing
  • often financed through cross-subsidization,
    refers to policy of undercutting rivals prices
    with sole aim of eliminating them, then raising
    price to original level.
  • Refusal to supply
  • Manufacturer refuses to supply goods if
    retailer discounts price below recommended
    level..
  • Collusive practices
  • including market sharing, price fixing and
    agreements on types of goods to be produced

7
UK COMPETITION POLICY-INSTITUTIONS
  • The Secretary for Trade and Industry
  • has overall responsibility for competition
    policy, but other important roles are played by
  • The Director-General of Fair Trading at the
    Office of Fair Trading whose aims are-
  • To identify and put right trading practices which
    are against the consumer's interests
  • To investigate anti-competitive practices and
    abuses of market power
  • The Competition Commission
  • which carries out inquiries into matters referred
    to it by the other UK competition authorities
    concerning monopolies, mergers and the economic
    regulation of utility companies

8
  • COMPETITION ACT 1998
  • New Act took effect in March 2000 and grants
    similar powers as enjoyed by European Commission
    i.e.
  • Substantial power of investigation no need for
    written evidence prior to investigation
  • Fines of up to 10 of UK annual turnover
  • Monopolies and Mergers Commission and
    Restrictive Practices Court now reformed as The
    Competition Commission

9
EU Policy
  • A common policy based on a tradition of
    government intervention, embodied in a number of
    Treaty Articles such as
  • Articles 81/82 cover trade between states and
    price fixing
  • Articles 85/86- trade restriction within states
    and abuse of dominant power
  • Articles 87/88 against protectionism and
    subsidies

10
Cross-Border Merger Regulations
  • World turnover combined of 5b ECU
  • At least 2 of the companies must have a
    community-wide turnover of at least 250m ECU each
  • If both parties have 2/3 business in one/same
    member state, the merger was to be the subject of
    national and not community controls

11
US Approach
US competition policy can be traced back to the
Sherman Anti-Trust Act (1890). Monopoly was made
illegal from the outset. Based on the
anti-competitive activities of John Rockefeller
12
Concentration and market power Problems with
the US approach
A 70 111 73 of market in hands of
top four players.   B 20202020
80 of market in hands of top
four players. i.e. 4 firm concentration
ratio higher in B than A using this method Yet,
B is clearly more competitive than A!
Numbers represent the market share of each of
the top four firms in markets A and B
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com