r?o3u wkw5 vgpctQ5 cspnvi3iz5 r[ZF4u4 rao34Xu4 x?toEi3j5 ttC4ymizi4 (FEIS) Kivalliq Inuit Association Review of Kiggavik Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)

1
r?o3u wkw5 vgpctQ5 cspnvi3iz5 rZF4u4 rao34Xu4
x?toEi3j5 ttC4ymizi4 (FEIS)Kivalliq Inuit
Association Review of Kiggavik Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
Nw4oQx34ymJ34 cspnvi3iz F2DxE 25, 2015
2
Kiggavik FEIS grz

• KIA is a Designated Inuit Organization (DIO)
  which represents the interests of all Inuit
  living in the Kivalliq Region. It acts as a
  lobbying group, administers and monitors certain
  provisions of the NLCA in the Kivalliq Region.

• r?o3u wkw5 vgpctQ5 tfx34bsymJ34 wkw5 tudtz5
  r?o3usb5 wkw5 whmQ/q5 WoExE/sd2lQ5. Nui3l xsMlA
  gzFf5 xqDtz xml vmQlA r?os2 wlxi.

3
Kiggavik FEIS Introduction - grz

• The KIA mission is to represent, in a fair and
  democratic manner, Inuit of the Kivalliq Region
  in the development, protection, administration
  and advancement of their rights and benefits as
  an aboriginal people, as well as to promote their
  economic, social, political and cultural well
  being through succeeding generations.

r?o3u wkw5 vgpctQ5 r?o3usi4 wki4 x4hDtc34g5
WJm/qi4, usiElQ5l xsMlQ5l WJNstq5, kNccmb xml
W?oxi34 wky34 v?mc3i34, xml wodyq5 x4hDtQlQ5,
yKj5 wkJ5 vJyix3mb Nm4gu4.
4
Kiggavik FEIS Introduction grz

• ?????? ???? ???????????????? ????????
  ???????????? ?????????? ???????????????? ????
  ????????? ?????????????????? ???????? ??????
• ???? ????????????
• ?????????? - ?????????????
• ????????? ?????????????, ????
• ?????????????? ?????????

• The purpose of the Kiggavik FEIS review was to
  ensure that the potential impacts and benefits
  were comprehensively assessed through best
  practices in the areas of
• Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit
• Socio-economic
• Scientific and
• Impact assessment

5
Kiggavik FEIS Introduction grz

• The original review of the Draft EIS (DEIS) and
  the current review of the FEIS outlined a total
  of two hundred and seven (207) potential issues.
  Of these a total of forty-three (43) issues
  remain which are potential Terms Conditions for
  inclusion in the NIRB Project Certificate.
• The overall objective of the review was to
  identify gaps in the FEIS information and in
  regulatory oversight.

• yKo34 cspnZsif x?toEi3j5 xml cspnZsJ34, rao34Xj5
  cspnZsizk5 xbJ5, ttC4ymiqi _at_) WoExE/s/Exc34g5
  ttC4ymJ5.
• ryxi aJ5 xbJ5 Mwnsix34gj5, b7N Mwn5 xebsh3m5
  kNK5 x?toEp5 vtmpqi5.
• cspnZsJu WoExE/slx34g5 wobElQ5, hN x?toE3ji5
  s?li5 Mwnsix34gj5 xbiq5.

6
Kiggavik FEIS Project Issues (KIA-018)s/C4bEs2
WoExzb xeQxc3iq5

• Issue The risk of uranium escaping to the
  tailings storage facility (TSF) from the Resin In
  Pulp milling process.
• Concern The size and number of safety screens to
  control the escape of resin fragments that break
  down during the Resin in Pulp milling process.
• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1) The proponent must be able to show that the
  escape of resin fragments to the TSF has been
  minimized and meets all existing regulations
  prior to commercial production on the Kiggavik
  Project.

• whmosDbs/Exc34g34 kahwg2 slExN3iz, kahwg34
  cuo3i34X5 vt34hFzi5 wQbsFzi5 kNu, xml s/eEFzi5
  kahwgoEtlQ5
• slExN3i34 xqiz xml xuhiq5 nlmwgi4 m5ybsbs/34g34
  vt34h3F4, Nmqiz, s/eEF4u.
• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 !H s/C4bEx5 Nm4gu4
  xeyym/Exc34g5, bmfx xqJ5 slExN34g5 wqC/Excqmb,
  xgDi34gi4 slExN34gi4 vt34hwF4j5, rZF4u.

7
wkw5 cspm/gcq5 Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit (IQ)

• The methods and content of the IQ in the FEIS is
  improved from the DEIS.
• Better integration of IQ was done in relation to
  caribou and marine mammals, which resulted in
  clarity on community-predicted effects.
• Limited Integration of IQ was done in relation to
  water, freshwater fisheries, aquatic species,
  climate change and health risk.
• Additional clarity is needed on who how the
  Proponent intends to including IQ/TK in
  monitoring.

• wkw5 cspm/gcq5 xgZsi34nso34g5, rao3u x?toEi3j5
  ttczi, xg3iql ttC4ymiq5l.
• wkw5 cspm/gcq5 xgZsiq5 WQx3icMs34g5, g4g5l
  wm3usb5l i3Jt5 cspnZsiqk5, bmN gry/si34nso34Li
  kNo4i5 cspn3i3j5.
• ryxio by3k5, bEsaqgu wcloEi3j5, wm3usbk5l, yNs2l
  xMa34Xoxizk5, xgZsiclxqg5, wkw5 cspm/gcq5.
• s/C4bEx5 gryN5yxExo5 ck34 wkw5 cspm/gcq5,
  cspm/sJgcw5l wki5, ck34 xgZsix3mzb cspn3i3j5.

8
wkw5 cspm/gcq5 Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit Caribou
g4g5

• Issue Disturbance of caribou and caribou habitat
  (KIA-003).
• Concern IQ indicates caribou will be affected by
  the project in the local study area by noise,
  dust, loss of habitat (forages) and human
  activity.
• Proposed Terms and Conditions
• Minimize disturbance on caribou habitat.
• Ensure that traffic and activity in the local
  study area is limited or stopped during periods
  of caribou migration.
• Monitor and manage the effects of road
  disturbance on harvesting and the effect of
  harvesting on caribou on transportation corridors.

• whmQ/Exo4 g4g5 xml g4gc3F5 xMaDN3iq5
  s/C4bEx3i3j5 Gr?o3u wkw5 vgpctQ5 ))H.
• wLwJbsJ4N34g34 wkw5 cspm/gcqi gryN34g34 g4g5
  x4gZsic3ix34g5, s/C4bEx5 iWgizk5, SJ34t5yizk5,
  s/C4bEx5l wiQoZ5 wiQ/sqo3li g4gi5 xml W?oxi34
  Wjbsli.
• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoExE/sJ4n5
• !H g4gc3F5 ckgwN34 x4gZsiz5 urQx3lA.
• _at_H cspnZsJ2 WoEFsJ2l x?bi nixil, g4gw5 wqCoCzb
  kcMs34b3lt4.
• H cspn3lQ5l xsM5yx3lAl x2d5 xg3iz, g4goEF5 nixi
  x?bil, g4gw5 ni?dNQ5, x2dtc3Ffl4b3l, sx/3Fs?4g5l
  x?bi.

9
wkw5 cspm/gcq5 Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit Caribou
g4gw5

• Issue Population of the Beverly and Qamanirjuaq
  herds (003).
• Concern IQ (as well as western science) indicate
  low caribou population levels for the Beverly and
  Qamanirjuaq and other herds. There is a great
  deal of concern and uncertainty about how the
  project might affect these herds.
• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1) Monitor the condition and use of known caribou
  calving ground areas and mitigate any effects of
  the project on the caribou calving grounds.

• whmQ/s/Exo4 t2/os2 xml cmi3Jx2 g4gq5 xuhiq5
  cspm5yx3lQ5 G))H.
• wLwJbsJ4N34g34 wkw5 cspm/gcq5 xml cspmJt5
  NigwN34 grymb, ggclxDi3m5 cmi3Jx2 xml g2/os2
  g4gq5 xuhlxDi3mb. rZF4 s/C4bExF4 sfwi3X5
  NlN34g34 cspm/sqLil g4g5 ckwix3mzb, xml ck34
  x4gZsic3ix3mzb.
• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoExq5
• !H g4g5 kEFq5 g4gc3i5l cspnzwN3lQ5 xml wLwJbsJ5
  g4gk5 xeQx34b3lQ5.

10
wkw5 cspm/gcq5 Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit Caribou
g4gw5

• Issue Impact of the project on caribou movements
  and implications for harvesting (KIA-003 and
  004).
• Concern IQ holders predict seeing less caribou
  due to the road being built on traditional
  trails. This will limit access and use of the
  area for harvesting. In addition, due to the risk
  perception of potential contamination the harvest
  and consumption of country food may decline due
  to the risk perception of effects on human
  health.
• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1) The Proponent should work with the
  responsible agencies and groups to balance and
  manage the risk perception to the environmental
  and human health.

• whmQ/s/Exo4 g4gw5 wqCiq5l xml xaNh4bs?4iq5
  whmQ/s/Exo5, ck34 x4gZsic3ix3mzb rZF4u5. G)),
  ))H.
• wLwJbsJ4N34g34 wkw5 cspm/gcqi4 xg34X4g5 whmJ5
  yKi3u g4gw5 xuhJ4i3ix34g5, x2d5 nN/sX5, g4g5
  x2dtzim5 rZF4. bmN mcwFsbDi34Dm34g34 g4gwDt4X5.
  xml s/C4bExbsJ34 slExN3izk5 wkw5 ieq5
  slExNoC/34g5, slExN3i34 wqCoDu. bmNl slExN3i34
  s/C4bExZsJu5 slExN34g34 wk4k5 bmwk5.
• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoExn5
• !H s/C4bEx5 WoEctcExc34g5 xtQqgi4 tusJi4, bmN
  slExN3i34 WoExE/sd2lA rgl4bi5. smJl4b5 wkw5l
  xixdNQ5 slExN34gi4 s/C4bEx3F4u5.

11
wkw5 cspm/gcq5 Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit Caribou
g4gw5

• Issue Trans-boundary effects of the project on
  caribou populations.
• Concern The effects of the project on caribou
  extends beyond the regional study area and may
  have implications for other Inuit and Dene
  communities.
• Proposed Term Condition
• The Proponent should work collaboratively with
  the Baker Lake and other HTOs, KIA, GN, NWMB,
  BQCMB and other responsible authorities to
  develop a cumulative effects monitoring program
  that addresses the regional and trans-boundary
  implications of the project for caribou.

• whmQ/sJ34 slExN3i34 wqCJ4N34g34 Njl4b34 rocqli.
• wLwJb34 rZFs2 x4g3iz sz?k5 x4g3ic34g34,
  cspnZsJ2 rozb cq34LA. wkw5l weo5l kNz5
  x4gZsix34g34, kNoql, bmN slExN3i34 wqCix3m5
  sz?k5.
• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoExn5
• s/C4bEx5 WoEctcExc34g5 cmigx3usi4, xaNh4t5
  vtmpq5, r?o3u wkw5 vgpctQ5, kNK5 v?mfq5, kNKu
  wmoEi3j5 vtmpq5, t/os2 cmi3Jx2l g4gqi4 vtmpq5l
  xml xyq5 tusJ5. WoExE/sli cspnZslil bmN
  s/C4bExis2 x4g3iz xkEu4 kNu4l, bmN slExN3i34
  wqCix3m5 sz?k5.

12
wkw5 cspm/gcq5 by5 bEsaqg5 wmc3i5lInuit
Qaujimajatuqangit Freshwater Ecosystems

• Issue Lack of IQ in the baseline on freshwater
  ecosystems and analysis of potential projects
  effects (KIA-006).
• Concern There is limited IQ in the FEIS on fresh
  water ecosystems including fishing and aquatic
  species harvesting.
• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1)The Proponent update the baseline on freshwater
  ecosystems to better include IQ on fresh water
  ecosystems particularly for Qikiqqtarjualik
  Tugliq, Qamaniq Tugliq, Qamanaarjuk Tugliq.
• 2) the Proponent effectively mitigates effects on
  fishing locations at these and other culturally
  and economically important fishing locations.

• wkw5 cspm/gcq5 xgZsbquqj5 cspn3i3j5 bmN
  WxiqJbsb34g34 hNgwN3i4 WoExE/sJi4 cspnZsJi4l xml
  by3i4 bEsaqgi4 cspnZsiqk5 Gr?o34 wkw5 ))H.
• wLwJb34 wkw5 cspm/gcq5 xgZslxqg5, ttC4ymJu rao3u
  x?toEi3j5 ttCsyzi, WJto4u4 wclw5 xml wm3usb5.
• W3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoExE/s/Exo5
• !H s/C4bEx5 Nm4gu4 ttC4ym5yx34gu4 xeb3lQ5
  WoExE/sJ5 ttC4b3lQ5, wkw5 cspm/gcq5 xg3lQ5. by5
  er34b3Jx34 go34, cmi34 go34, cmN3J34 go34, bfx
  xeQxo5 X3N4ymiq5.
• _at_H s/C4bEx5 xeQxb34bq5 W?oxis2 x4g3iq5,
  wcox3Fs?4gk5 xml W?oxi3j5 xgZs?4g5 by5, xyq5l.

13
wkw5 cspm/gcq5 Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit Marine
bEsoEi34

• Issue Effects of marine traffic on marine
  ecosystems and harvesting9 KIA-008).
• Concern Lack of IQ in the baseline on marine
  traffic corridors and effects of marine traffic
  on seal, whale, walrus habitat and harvesting
• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1) The Proponent commit to working with DFO to
  undertake additional IQ studies on the effects of
  marine traffic on marine habitat, species and
  harvesting prior to construction.
• 2) The Proponent work with DFO, Environment
  Canada and GN to develop a comprehensive marine
  monitoring program that is inclusive of IQ.
• 3) DFO updates regulations for monitoring and
  managing marine traffic in Chesterfield Inlet
  north to Hudson Strait (south to Corbett Inlet)
  inclusive of IQ.

• whmQ/sJ5 bEsusb5k5 x4g3iq5 xml bEsu xaNhF5
  x4g3iz W?oxi3j5 G))H
• wLwJb5 wkw5 cspm/gcq5 xgZsbqg5 bExoEi34 bEsusb5l
  WoExE/stlQ5, bEsul i3Jt5, N5y5, eNlZ5, xwF5 wiq5
  WoExE/symqg5 xml bEsu xaNhF5.
• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H s/C4bEx5 WoEctc3ix3iC4g5 v?mgcfi bEsoEoi4, xml
  wkw5 cspm/gcq5 xg3lQ5, bmfx W?oxi3j5 bEsu
  wqCFs?4g5, ck34 x4gZsic3ix3mzb.
• _at_H s/C4bEx5 WoEctcExc34g5 v?mgcfi bExoEp5,
  x?toEp5 xml kNK5 v?mfqi4.
• H v?mgcfi bEsoEp5 moZi4 xehw?4g5, cspn3i3j5 xml
  bEsusb5 i3Jt5 sx/3iqi4, cmigx2l woZ3J2l xfizil.

14
wkw5 cspm/gcq5 Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit Health
xix34bwoi34

• Issue Socio-Economic effects of the project on
  human health and well-being.
• Concern Mining developments in other regions
  have been accompanied by increases in
  drug/alcohol use and related social challenges
  which increase pressure on community and
  government services.
• Proposed Term Condition
• The Proponent should work with the KIA, GN,
  Health Canada and other responsible authorities
  to ensure social programs and supports for those
  made vulnerable or marginalized by the
  socio-economic effects of the project.

• whmQ/sJ34 wky3j5 x4g3isJ5 whmQ/s/Exc34g5 rZF4
  WoExE/stlA.
• wLwJb5 s/C4bEx5 W?oxtlQ5 xyqi xz/3N34g5 wuxlw5l
  xgZslxo34b34g5 bmNl rgl4bk5 kNo4k5l
  x4hDbslxo34Li.
• W3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• sC4bEx5 WoEctcExo5 r?o3u wkw5 vgpctQi4, kNK5
  v?mfi4, xix34bwoi3j5l WoEpq5 v?mgcfi xml xyq5
  tusJ5i4. s/C4bEx5 W?oxtlQ5 bmN wky34
  x4gZsic3ix3m5 rgl4bk5.

15
wkw5 cspm/gcq5 xtQqg5 gnDt5Inuit
Qaujimajatuqangit Information Updates

• Issue Information from environmental monitoring
  should be reviewed by third parties and be
  accessible to communities.
• Concern According to some TK/IQ holders, there
  is not enough balanced information about the
  risks and effects of the project.
• Proposed Term Condition The Proponent should
  develop an online and/or publically accessible
  database of environmental monitoring information
  including science and IQ that ensures access by
  Kivalliq communities and all interested parties
  to transparent, culturally appropriate and
  accessible information about the environmental
  conditions in the local and regional study areas.

• whmQ/sJ34 x?toEi3j5 cspnZsJ5 WoExE/sJ5l
  vmQ/s/Exo5 x/C4bEx5 yMbi4 tusJi5, gnZsb3lt4l
  kNo4i.
• wLwJb34 bmfx wkw5 cspm/gcqi4 xg34b34g5 gryymJ5,
  bmfx slExN34g5 s/C4bExi3j5 gnZsbqmb.
• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5 s/C4bEx5 rZF4u
  net5y/Exo5 gryJti4 WoExE/sJl4bi4, bmfx
  bf/sJ4N3lt4 cEbs/f5, bf/sJmAu4. bf/sJ4N3lt4
  x?toEi3j5 WoExE/sJ5 xml xyq5 WoExE/sJ5,
  vt34h3lQ5l cEbs/f5, bf/sJ4N3lt4 WoExE/sJl4b5.
  bmfx bf/sJmAu4 kNo4i5 bf/sbC/34g5 xml r?o3u.
  cspnZsJl4b5l x?tu4 bf/sJ4N3lt4 Nil4b34.

16
yMusb5 xkE ckwiz, iWdgJ5, nJ4WMi34Atmospheric
Air Quality, Noise and Vibration

• The impact assessment demonstrates that the mine
  CAN be operated with no significant adverse
  effects.
• It will be important to ensure that the mine is
  built and operated to ensure effects are
  minimized.
• The following key areas must be addressed and all
  comments are related to KIA-022, 039, 054 and 057.

• s/C4bExi3j5 x4gi5 cspn3iz bsg4lA gryN3m5
  s/C4bExF4 xg3iclx3ixqm5 slExN34gi4.
• rZF4 nN/siz NlNw3lA bmN slExN3i34 wqClx3ixqm5.
• sfxl scsyElQ5 WoExElQ5l, whmQ/sJ5l xbJ5 ttC4ymJi
  sfNi, )_at__at_, )(, ) xml )u.

17
Air Quality Emissions MitigationxkEs2 ckwiz,
SJ5l xebExizAir Quality Emissions Mitigation

• Issue Very specific design, operational and air
  quality modelling assumptions were used in the
  assessment to provide emission reductions or
  enhance dispersion.
• Concern These must be met to ensure predicted
  effects are met.
• Potential Terms and Conditions
• 1) Provide a more comprehensive and detailed list
  of explicit mitigation and commitments as used in
  the air quality impact assessment.

• whmQ/sJ34 bmN xkEs2 wqCiz ttCsystlA x?toEi3u,
  whmQ/sJu4 NMs5n34gu4 ttCsysyc3mb, bwmo NlNqgu4
  xeymJu4 xkEoEi3u4 SJoEi3u4l WoExE/s/Exo4.
• wLwJb34 bfx WJoEi3j5 xkEoEi3j5 xeQxo5.
• X3MZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H WoExE/s5yx34ymJu4 xeymJu4 gryN34gu4 xkEoEi3j5
  xml ck34 SJ3is2 wqCoz, ttC3lA WoExE/six3izl xelQ5.

18
yMu xkEs2 ckwizi4 cspn3i34Atmospheric Air
Quality Monitoring

• Issue The proposed source testing needs to be
  expanded.
• Concern Other key sources and compounds should
  also be tested.
• Proposed Terms and Conditions
• 1) Test the generator exhausts and the
  underground mine ventilation system exhaust.
• 2) Add other key parameters to the incinerating
  test program, such as hydrogen chloride, metals,
  "Nitrogen Oxides" NOx and particulates.

• whmQ/s/Exo4 ttCsysymJi SJ3i3u4 WJto4, gryNExo4
  Nr5 SJ3mz5.
• wLwJt5 xyq5 SJ3b34g5 cspn2lQ5 gryN3lQ5 xehExo5,
  cspn3lQ5l.
• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H svcst5 SJ3iq5 cspn3lQ5 xml kNs2 wlxkx34g5
  h2lo5 xkEysj5 xg34g5 cspn3lQ5 xeh3lQ5 grou4.
• _at_H cspn3lQ5l ttCsyElQ5l gro4u4, SJ34X4g5
  WQxiq5, xml SJ5 slExN34g5 cspn5yx3lQ5 mfx nF4lw5,
  nF5 bsg4Nqg5l slExN34g5.

19
yMu xkEs2 ckwizb cspn3izAtmospheric Air
Quality Monitoring

• Issue The background air quality program does
  not extent in all directions around the mine
  sites or near some of the largest emission
  sources.
• Concern The program needs to be extended to
  other locations near these sources.
• Proposed Terms and Conditions
• 1) Add sampling stations to the north-east of the
  Kiggavik site near the ore stockpile and to the
  north-west of the Sisson mine site.
• 2) Develop and undertake a backgrund monitoring
  program to characterize key emissions from
  blasting.

• whmQ/sJ34 SJ3is2 wqCiz cspnZsymqg34 s/C4bExFs2
  x?bi xml SJ34X4g5 WQx3Fzi. bmN xeQxo4
  WoExE/s5yx3li.
• wLwJb34 SJ34 Njl4b34 wqCh3m5, bmN cspn3lAl xelAl
  gryN34gu4 WoExE/sJ4N34gu4 hoJu4 xeQxo4.
• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H SJ3i34 Nj5 wqCic3mz5 cspn3F5 NlNw34bslt4 kNu
  xeQxo4. cspn3F5 NlNw3lt4 rZFs2 x?bi, nixil
  xmls/Cl4i4 vt34hwFs2 x?bi, xml szyi34nug34
  s/C4bExFsix34g2 Sisson nixil.
• _at_H c34bsFsix34g2l nixi x?bil cspn3iz gro4u4
  ttClA WoExE/six3izl.

20
whmQ/sJ34 kb34 wi4nz Proposed New Locations
21
yMu xkEs2 ckwizi4 cspn3i34Atmospheric Air
Quality Monitoring

• Issue The air quality program monitors various
  compounds that do not have standards.
• Concern There are no criteria for assessing the
  significance of monitored results.
• Proposed Terms and Conditions
• 1) Develop appropriate criteria to define what
  mitigation should be required for and report
  annually on the measured air quality versus the
  predicted air quality in the FEIS
• deposition of uranium, metals and radionuclides
  in dustfall,
• concentrations of uranium, metals and
  radionuclides in snow and caribou fecal pellets.

• whmQ/sJ34 xkEs2 cspn3izi, bmfx xkEub34g5 ck34
  vmQ/s/Exc3mzb moZcqg5.
• wLwJb34 moZ34bcqg34 xkEub34g5 cspn3iqi4
  moZsJ4nu4.
• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H moZ4ni4 cspn3i3j5 xkEu4 xehwlt4 xml xeQxo45
  SJ3i3j5 molQ5 xml bmN vtmJbsb3li srsbm5
  gry/six3m5 xkEs2 cspn3iz, bmfxl ttClQ5 rao3u
  x?toEi3j5 ttC4ymiqk5, sfxl WoExE/siq5 xelQ5
  kahwg34, nF4lw5 xml SJ5,
• kahwg2 xqiz, nF4lw5 xml sb34N34g5 xStug5 xml g4g5
  xNq5 cspn3lQ5 slExN34gcqmzb.

22
yMusb5 xkE ckwizb cspn3izAtmospheric
Air Quality Monitoring

• Issue The emissions of uranium and radionuclides
  from dust that may come from road travel and the
  exposed ore piles continues to be a major
  concern.
• Concern Further detailed assessment and review
  for these key compounds is warranted to provide a
  better understanding of their potential impacts.
  
• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1) Develop a program to better assess the
  emissions of ore being transported from the
  Sisson mine and material stored in the ore stock
  piles.
• Dominant sources are underground mine ventilation
  and the open pits (70). The ore stockpiles about
  contribute about 12 of the emissions.
• These are sources with the greatest uncertainty
  in emission estimates.

• whmQ/sJ34 kahwg2 xml sb34N34g2 SJq5 slExN34g5,
  SJ3iq5 whmQ/slx34g5 slExN3izk5, ck3l
  WoExE/six3mzb NlN34Li.
• wLwJb34 kahwg2 xml sb3N34g2 SJq5 Nl/smb ck3l
  WoExE/six3mzb whmQ/symJ34, NlN34Li ck34
  x4g3ic3ix3mzb hNl4bi4.
• X3NAbsymJ34 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H s/Cw5 s/C4bEx34bsJ5 er34b3Jxos2 nixi5, ck34
  x/34g34bsb3ixmzb grc3lA ttCsyso, bmN kahwgo4
  s/Cw5 s/34g34bs/Czu4 SJ3ic3m5, xml kahwgo5 s/Cw5
  vt34hZsJ5 SJ3ic3mb.

23
yMu xkEs2 ckwizb cspn3izAtmospheric Air
Quality Monitoring

• Issue The results of the air quality dispersion
  modelling clearly indicate that concentrations of
  nitrogen oxides and fine particulate levels near
  the mine, could exceed the health based standards
  and criteria developed by AREVA.
• Concern The concentrations, as modelled, could
  cause an adverse effect on sensitive people using
  the areas immediately surrounding the mining
  operations.

• whmQ/sJ34 rZF4 X3NZstlA bmN SJ3i34 slExN3ic3iz
  ttCsysymJ34 x?toEi3u ryxi smJl4bk5 tuj5l slExNiz
  xqlx3ix34g34. bfx xE? s/C4bEx5 ttC4bqig5.
• slExN34g34 x?toEi3u ttCsysymJ5 bsg4lQ5, bmN
  SJ3i34 vWxN3ix34g34 WoEpk5 xi34n5yxDNqgk5 s?li5
  w4WQMJk5 tuui, bmN SJ34 bsgNqg34 s/C4b3F4uix3mv5
  x?bil.

24
sN kNax34 s4gDbsJ34 SJ34 bsgNqg34 wqCiz, ryxi
SJ34 bsg4Nqg34 sz?k5 wqCix34g34. SJ34 vq3ix34g34
xE? s/C4bEx5 kNu4 xg3izb rozb s/bk5. Sample air
quality plot Showing potential air quality
exceedances extending beyond immediate active
mining areas to the edge of the leased land.
25
yM xkEs2 ckwizb cspn3izAtmospheric Air
Quality Monitoring

• Term and Condition
• 1) Post appropriate safety signage an all three
  official languages that outlines the proximity to
  the mining operations and access roads.

• X3NZsymJ34 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H x2dtlb5 ttC4ymJi4 sp34gDt4ni4 NlNwfb3i4l
  ttC4ymlQ5 wk4g5, FFg5, xml c2lNg5, x2dtl4b5l
  ttC4ymJi4 NlNwfy3lQ5 bsg4N34gi4. NlNw3lQ5
  w/C4b3Fs2 roz xml xE? kN xg34bz roz NlNw3lA.

26
yM s/C4bExi3j5 gnN3i5, kNs2l sxizAtmospheric
Noise and Vibration

• Issue A noise baseline level of 35 decibels was
  established for the project, and used in the
  assessment of construction, operational and blast
  overpressure noise.
• Concern This was done by a literature review of
  mining sites, and may not be representative of
  the regional project area. Confirmation of 35
  decibels required to ensure noise impact is
  appropriate for the project.
• Terms Conditions Conduct a noise baseline
  survey of the project area to confirm the 35
  decibel baseline noise level.

• whmQ/sJ34 Xgos34g34gi gnN34gi4 cspnstNi,
  NlNwfbqi db. ttC4ymJi NlNwfbsymJ34 iWdgiz.
  bmN NlNw34ymJ34 s/C4bExFs2 nN/sizk5, s/C4bExF4ul
  xml c34b34t5yo34Xb s/C4bExF4u.
• slExNiz whmQ/symJ34 bmN WoExE/sMs34g34
  ttC4ymJgc3i5 xyqi5 s/C4bExF4i5, ryxi rZF4u
  xg3icqQNExc34g34. bmN iWdgi4 cspnsti NlNw34ymJ34
  db. cspnlxF4lA xeZs/Exo4 NMs5nux34g/3m5.
• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5 bmN iWdgi34
  gry/s5yx3ix3m5, cspnZs5yx3o NlN34ymiz iWgis2
  db-aJ34, homz5.

27
yM gnN3i34 xml kNs2 sxizAtmospheric Noise
and Vibration

• Issue Helicopter noise and aircraft noise
  impacts.
• Concern These noise impacts have not been
  addressed independently of other project noise.
  
• Proposed Term Condition
• 1) Prepare a helicopter/aircraft noise impact
  assessment.

• whmQ/sJ34 douAo5l t1uh5l iWdgiq5 cspnZs/Exo5,
  hNk5l x4g3ic3ixiq5 gryN3li.
• Nmqiz bmfx douAo5l t1uh5l iWdtiq5 cspnZsymqg5,
  ck34 hNgwN3k5 i3Jtk5l x4g3ic3ixmzb.
• X3MZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H xelQ5 ttClQ5l gro4u4, bmfx douAo5 xml t1uh5
  iWd34giq5, NlNw34lQ5l.

28
yM iWdgi34 xml kNs2 sxizAtmospheric Noise
and Vibration

• Issue There is some confusion about what is
  being monitored, and how exceedances will be
  addressed in the prosed Noise Monitoring program.
  
• Concern This should be clarified and one set of
  noise limits proposed to be monitored for the
  operational noise from the project.
• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1) Prepare a Blast Mitigation Plan to address
  noise and vibration.
• 2) Prepare a noise monitoring plan that separates
  occupational noise monitoring from environmental
  noise monitoring.

• whmQ/sJ34 NlN34g34 hN cspnZsmz5 xml iWdti5 ck34
  cspnZsix3mzb NlN34g34, ck3l iWdgi4 hNgwN3i4
  cspn3iz NlN34g34 ttCZsymqmb.
• wLwg34 bmN iWdgi3j5 cspn3i34 x3Qxo4 gro4u4
  ttClAl, xml s/C4bExF rF4 wqCo34X5 bmN iWdgi34
  ck34 cspnZsmz5 xelA grou4.
• X3NAbsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H c34b34t5yis2 iWdtiz ck34 cspn34bsb3ix3mz5
  NlNw3lA ttClAl xml kNs2 nJ4WMiz.
• _at_H xeymJu4 ttC4ymJu4 iWdgi3u4 cspn3izi4 xelA
  grc3lAl ttCsyxo gry/six3m5 bmN.

29
yM ho cspnZsJ5Atmospheric Ongoing Review

• Issue Given the importance of the potential
  impacts of the emissions of uranium and
  radionuclides from dust that may be generated by
  the Kiggavik Project activities it will be
  important to ensure that the mine is built and
  operated to ensure effects are minimized.
• Concern No mechanism is currently proposed to
  involve the KIA directly with the review and
  comment on more detailed design and the potential
  changes in air quality or noise effects.

• whmQ/sJ5 bmfx slExN34g5 SJ5 kahwgu5 xml
  sb3N34gu5, ck34 cspnZsix3mzb, rZFs2 nN/s?oxiz
  X3NZs5yxExo4. bmfx slExN34g5 kahwg5 xml sb3N34g5
  SJq5 bsg4Nqmb, ck34 slExN3lxDiC/3mzb WoExElA.
• wLwi34 bfx r?o3u wkw5 vgpctQ5 WoEctQ/six3mzb
  gryNqg34, rZF4 X3NAbstlA xml x?toEi3j5
  WoExE/stlQ5. rZFs2 nN/siz, xeymiz, xml
  x4gZsisix34g5 slExNgk5, iWgJ5l, xkEs2l cspnZsiz
  ttCsys5yx3li X3NAbs5yx3li, xeQxo4. r?o3u wkw5
  vgpctQ5 wMscbsiz xeymqm5 X3NAbsJk5.

30
yM ho cspnZsJ5Atmospheric Ongoing Reveiw

• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1) KIA to be involved for review and comment of
  the detailed design, development of best
  management plans and refinement of monitoring
  plans.
• 2) KIA to be involved in the review and comment
  of all future monitoring reports.
• 3) KIA to receive notification of any exceedances
  of air quality, noise and vibration criteria,
  both regulatory and site specific.

• X3N4ymJ5 xml WoExE/sJmJ5
• !H r?o3u wkw5 vgpctQ5 wMs/Exc34g5 cspn3i3j5 xml
  whmQ/sJ5 vmQ/siq5 WoExE/slt4, xml rZFs2 W?oxiz
  nN/s?oxiz xehZso34X5 wMscbslt4, xml WoEx5 xsMiqk5
  wMscbslt4.
• _at_H r?o3u wkw5 vgpctQ5 wMs/Exc34g5 cspni3u4 xml
  whmQ/sJ5 WoExE/s/Exc3iq5 vmQlQ5bs34.
• H r?o3u wkw5 vgpctQ5 gn34tbsb3lt4 iWdglx34gi4,
  xkEul slExN34g5 wqClxo34Xb xml kN nJ4WM4blxo34X5
  s/C4bExi3j5, moZw5l xehZsoDu4 wMscbslt4.

31
wm3usb5 wm3usb5 bsg4Nqg5 cspn3iq5Aquatic
Zooplankton Monitoring

• Issue Areva has predicted that cadmium and
  sulphate in Judge Sissons Lake may impair the
  zooplankton community but do not propose to
  monitor the response of zooplankton in the lake
  (KIA-075).
• Concern Without monitoring there is no way to
  follow up on a specific FEIS prediction regarding
  impacts and significance.
• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1) Areva to develop a program to monitor
  zooplankton in Judge Sissons Lake as part of the
  CNSC or Water License process and that the
  program be reviewed by KIA.

• whmQ/sJ5 xE? s/C4bEx5 NMs5n34ymJ5 bmfx nF4lw5
  gdN34g5 slExN34g5l, er34b3Jxos2 byzi, gdtEix3mb
  bsg4Nqgi4 smJi4 wm3u. xml xE? bwvi er34bJxos2
  byzi smJ5 cspnZsixqmb.
• wLwJbsJ34 bmfx gdN34g5 nF4lw5 er34bJxos2 byzi
  cspnZsixqmb, ck3o bmN WoExE/sN/34X.
• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H xE? xehwli xelAl wm3usb5 bsg4Nqg5 cspniz5
  er4bJxos2 byzi, xml bmN cspn3iz Mwnj5 wolQ5, bmNl
  cspn3iz cspnZs5yx3li r?o3u wkw5 vgpctQfi5.

32
wm3usb5 wm3usb5 bsg4Nqg5 cspn3izAquatic
Zooplankton Monitoring
33
wm3usb5 - Baseline Water Quality Effects
Predictions

• Issue Baseline water quality data for lakes and
  rivers in the study area were grouped together,
  and used to calculate a single set of regional
  summary statistics for the effects assessment and
  modelling (KIA-098).
• Concern Use of the regional baseline provides
  an inadequate assessment of the potential water
  quality impacts to Judge Sissons Lake.

• cspnZsymJ5 wmoEi3j5 xg34LQ5, by3i fZ3il, cspn3i5
  ct34hZsux34ymJ5, bmN gryJbsJ34 cspnZsymJi4. bmNl
  cspn3if5 xgZso34Li ttCsysymJ34 G)(uH.
• wLwJbsJ34 bmfx cspnZsif5 xgCzu4 s4gbstlQ5l,
  gryJbsbqmb cspnZs/Exoi4. er34bJxos2 byz
  cspnZsixDu kbu4 cspn3lt4 cspnZsi5 xgqlt4, ryxio
  cspnlxF4lt4 gryN5yxC/34g34.

34
wm3usb5- cspnZsymJ5 wmoEi3j5 cspn3izk5
NMs5n3i34Aquatic Baseline Water Quality
Effects Predictions

• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1. complete a lake specific assessment for Judge
  Sissons Lake and
• 2. Compare results to 95th percentile baseline
  values and guideline value to confirm the
  conclusions of the EIS and to guide any water
  licence application

• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H er4b3Jxos2 byz cspnZsli xml
• _at_H cspnZsJ5 NMs5yx3lr5 (-j5, xml moZw5
  cspn3i3j5 xelQ5 xgZsJ4n5, bmfxl cspn3if5 wolQ5
  x?t cspn3izk5, bmfx Nwnb3i3j5 xbic3mb.

35
wm3usb5 cui3ug5 cspnZsiq5 NlNg5Aquatic
Uncertainy in Effluent Quality Modelled

• Issue The FEIS is not clear what statistics
  (geomean, min or max) were used for effluent
  input parameters for the water quality model for
  Judge Sissons Lake (KIA-NEW-01).
• Concern The KIA cannot properly assess the
  results of the lake model or impact predictions.
  
• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1) If only the geometric mean was used for the
  modeling an enriched effluent scenario (e.g. 75th
  percentile concentrations) should also be
  modelled as a conservative assessment of impact.

• whmQ/sJ34 x?toEi3j5 rao34X34 Wxi4ymJ34 ttC4ymJu,
  gryNqg34 bmfx cspnZsi5 hNj5 gzic3mzb, bfNi
  x?toEi3j5 Wxi4ymJu, er4bJxos2 byxi cspnZsix3iz
  gry/sqm5 bmNl ttC4ymJ34 s?i G)!,uH.
• Nmqiz r?o3u wkw5 vgpctQ5 cspn2i3u4
  whmos5yxDNqg5, er4b3Jxos2 byz cspnZs5yxixqtlA.
• X3MZsymJ5 moZw xml WoEx5
• !H cspnZsix34g5, cspnZsi5 xg3iq5 bwm NmQ/siz
  , s4gtQlA xgExc34g5, bmN grc3i34nsm5.

36
wm3usb5 gzFs2 xqDtzi Nnsto4 _at_),
xgZsqg34Aquatic Inconsistency with Article 20
of the NLCA

• Issue AREVA states Significance of these
  changes in surface hydrology baseline
  conditions is ultimately determined in the
  context of environmental effects to water quality
  and fish(KIA-NEW-02).
• Concern Article 20 of the NLCA which protects
  IOL from "the adverse effects of the change in
  quality, quantity or flow of water" (NLCA 20.3.3)
  should require assessment of this VEC in its own
  right.
• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1) KIA points out the need to assess significance
  for all VECs in their own right as a disconnect
  between NIRB Guidelines and Article 20

• whmQ/sJ34 xE? sc34g34 gryNlx34g34 kNs2 czi
  wmoEis2 ckwiz, cspNC/34g34 xg3ic5yx3lil, wms2
  ckwizl, wclw5l cspnZstlQ5 G)_at_H.
• Nmqi34 gzFf5 xqDtqi Nnsto4 _at_), scm5 wkw5 kNw5
  Nuiz5 uxiE/s/Exo4 W?oxi3u5, bmN x4g3i34
  xMa34tyJ4N3m5 G_at_)..H. xml x?t5 smJi5 NJZsJ5
  cspnZslt4.
• X3N4ymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H r?o3u wkw5 vgpctQ5 gryt5yJ5 cspnZs/Exoi4
  i3Jti4 wm3usbi4l wiqi4, kNKu x?toEp5 xqDtq5 xml
  gzFf5 xqDtq5 Nnsto4 _at_) xtQqmb.

37
wm3usb5 yMu4 sN34y?oxJbs?4g5 xsMizAquatic
Greenhouse Gas Management

• IssueThe Areva project will emit 181 kilotonnes
  of CO2 equivalent annually which represents a 44
  increase in Nunavut emissions in a region with
  documented and accelerating warming (KIA-NEW-04).
  
• Concern Generic Best Management Plans are
  presented to reduce GHG emissions, with no
  estimate of percentage reductions resulting or
  recommendations for innovative approaches to
  reductions.
• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1) The KIA request that an annual Greenhouse Gas
  Monitoring and Reduction Report be completed as
  part of AREVAs ISO 14000 reporting.

• whmQ/sJ34 xE? s/C4bEx5 SJ3u4 sdmwtQJu4 !!
  Kilotonnes, WJ34t5yix3mb yMj5, b7N xqtQJ34 kNK5
  SJ3izi4 uri34ns2c34g34 u4 xqio4. kNKu bmN
  yMs2 w4WNlx34tlA bmN rZFs2 SJ3iz Nmqg34.
• xE? SJ3i3u4 NmQ/sJN34gu4 xeymJu4 xg34g5
  ttCsyE2lQ5l gn3i3ix3m5, ryxi Nm4gu4 xgExc34g5
  xgZsymqgu4 NMsgu4. bmN SJ3i34 cspnZsiz
  xeQxc34g34 hoqm5.
• X3NZbsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H r?o3u wkw5 vgpctQ5 xWEix34g5, xE?f5 srsbm5
  gryt5yi3u4 WoExqi4 vtmt5yb34tlQ5, bmN SJi34
  scsysb3li, xE?f5 scsyEb3ix3iqi Nnsto4 ISO 14000u.

38
wm3usb5 wm3u s/C4bExi3u5 nlmwi5 xqCizb
cspn3izAquatic spatial Assessment of Changes
in Water Quality Cumulative Effects Assessment

• Issue Areva has not provided prediction of water
  quality downstream of Judge Sissons Lake
  (KIA-NEW-05).
• Concern This does not allow assessment of
  spatial changes or reassurance that water quality
  in Baker Lake will remain unaltered.
• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1) There should be a requirement for spatial
  modelling of water quality changes and impacts to
  support significance determinations made in the
  FEIS.

• whmQ/sJ34 xE? gryNqg34 cspn3ix3mzb er34bJxou5
  f5g5, wqCic3ixmb slExN3gi4. G)H.
• wLwg34 sE? cspn3ix3mzb gryNqtlA slExN34g5
  wqCizi4 er34b3Jxos2 byzi, bwm cmigx2 byz
  x4g34bsix3mz5 gryNqg34.
• moZw5 xml ckwiq5
• !H gryNExc34g34 bmN s/C4bExi3j5 nlmwi34 ck34
  szy4tQJj5 wqCix3mz5, bmNl wolA Wxi4ymJj5
  x?toEi3j5 ttC4ymizk5.

39
(CEA)smJ5 kNusb5 xqo34XoxJ5 vt34h34Xoxiq5
cspn3izTerrestrial Cumulative Effects
Assessment

• Issue Lack of clarity in the cumulative Effects
  Assessment (CEA). (KIA-091)
• Concern Clarity on the following aspects of the
  CEA
• 1) Terminology is confusing and contradictory
• 2) Significance based on whether the effect
  influences the long-term viability of a
  population does this equal sustainability?
• 3) Integrity of a population is not defined.
• 4) Is survival of the herd(s) the only concern?
• 5) Are caribou harvesters interests considered?

• whmQ/sJ34 gryNqg34 xE?f5 ck34 cspn3ix3mzb
  ct34h34XoxJi4.
• wLwg34 grcExo5 sfx ct34h34Xoxi3j5 !H ttC4ymJi
  bwJy5 gryNqg5
• _at_H xg3iz gryNqg34 bmN s/C4bExis2 x4gXoxiz
  xqi34Xoxizl ck34 cspnZsix3mz5.
• H WoEp5li5, kNo4i xuhiq5 gryNqg34.
• H i3Jt5 xuhiq5 ryu whmQ/s? V
• H xaNh4t5 whmQ/s?6 V

40
i3Jt5 kNusb5- xqo34XoxJ5 vt34h34Xoxiq5
cspn3izTerrestial Cumulative Effects Assessment

• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1) Clarify thresholds and definitions for
  significance determination, and ensure that
  community perspectives are incorporated in future
  CEA monitoring.

• X3N4ymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H kNo5 whmQ/q5 vmQ/s/Exc34g5 xml s/C4bExi3u5
  vt34h34XoxJ5 x4g3i5 ck34 WQx3ic3mzb gryN3lA xml
  vt34h34XoxJ5 cspn3iz xelA.

41
kNusb5 x2dtos3i3j5 X3N4ymJ5 xml
xaNh4i34Terrestrial Road Options and Harvesting

• Issue Uncertainty in road options and the
  impacts on harvesting (KIA-092).
• Concern Clarity on the following aspects of the
  road options.
• 1) Two different road options add uncertainty.
• 2) Can AREVA control access?
• 3) Uncertainty how the Ahiak herd harvest will be
  affected does not carry through the assessment
  which equals too conservative an approach.
• 4) Untested assumption that winter road option
  will not increase harvest , however, roads enable
  faster movement and increase knowledge.

• whmQ/sJ34 x2d5 nN/six3iz gryNqg34 xml xaNh4i3j5
  G)(_at_H.
• wLwg34 grcExo4 x2d5 nN/six3iz.
• !H mD4 x2dtosFsJ4N34g4 gryNqg34 Nox4 xg3ix3mz5.
• _at_H xE? x2du4 xgDx34gi4 whmosDN34XV
• H gryNqg34 xBwx34 g5gq5 xaNh4bs?4iq5
  ckwix3mzb. cspn3izl xgZsymJ/34g34.
• H srsu xg34bs?4g34 x2d5 WxMN34gZlx34 wqCJi,
  rxi xaNh4blxiEix34bz cspmNqg34.

42
kNusb5 x2dtos3i3j5 X3NymJ5 xaNh4i3lTerrestrial
Road Options and Harvesting

• Proposed Term Condition
• 1) The proponent needs a clear plan to mitigate
  all-season road, assess harvest on Ahiak herd and
  assume that winter road could cause change in
  harvest.

• X3N4ymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H xE? grou4 xey/Exo5 srsu x2d5 xg34bizi4, xml
  x2d5 xaNh4i3j5 xg34bsizi4, bmN xaNh4i3j5
  xMaDbsJ4N3m5.

43
kNusb5 i3Jti4 cspn3i34 X3N4ymiz Terrestrial
Wildlife Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (WMMP)

• Issue lack of clear measures in the WMMP to
  minimize potential impacts to caribou (KIA-093).
• Concern Lack of clarity in the WMMP.
• 1) Lack of clear measures in the WMMP to minimize
  potential impacts to caribou.
• 2) Lack of input from IQ holders.
• 3) Little use of tiered decisions to address
  differing seasons, group size and composition.
• 4) Poor linkage of monitoring to mitigation.

• whmQ/symJ34 gryNqg34 i3Jti4 cspn3i34, xml ck34
  g4g5 cspnZsb3ix3mzb G)(H.
• wLxqJbsJ34 gryNqg34 i3JyEi34.
• !H gryNqg34 g4g5 ck34 vmQ/six3mzb xml
  X3NAbsymmzb.
• _at_H wkw5 cspm/gcqi4 xg34X4g5 wMscbsqmb.
• H whmos3i34 X3N4i3l xgZslxqg5, whmos34X4g5l
  wMscbsqLt4 xml rgix3mzb X3N4g5.
• cspn3i3l xml i3JyEi34 xeymqg5.

44
i3Jti4 cspn3i34 X3N4ymiz Wildlife Mitigation and
Monitoring Plan (WMMP)

• Proposed Terms Conditions
• Prior to project approval, further develop the
  WMMP
• 1) Provide details of mitigation and monitoring
  programs.
• 2) Define triggers that will result in further
  management actions.
• 3) Provide a tiered (hierarchical) mitigation and
  management process.
• 4) Provide greater detail on monitoring to detect
  approaching migrating caribou.
• 5) Provide greater detail on monitoring methods.

• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• rZF4 xqZsctNA, i3Jt5 vmiq5 X3NZsym/Exc34g5
  xelQ5l
• !H xelQ5 i3Jt5 g4gw5 cspnZsix3iq5 xml cspn3i5
  xyq5.
• _at_H xMaDbsJ4N34g5 wobElQ5 xml xsMJbsJ4N34g5
  xsMbsix34g5l.
• H cspn3ix34gl4b5 xsM5yix34gl4b5 grclQ5 xelQ5l.
• H cspnZsi5 g4gi4 xe5yx3lQ5 xml X3N5yx3lQ5, g4gk5
  x4g3isix34g5.
• H gros3lQ5 cspnDt5, cspn3i5l.

45
i3Jti4 cspn3i34 X3N4ymiz Wildlife Mitigation and
Monitoring Plan (WMMP)

• Issue No thresholds for carnivore mortality in
  the WMMP (KIA039).
• Concern Thresholds or triggers for carnivore
  mortality are not specific.
• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1) Define triggers that will result in further
  management actions and measures of carnivore
  mortality.

• whmQ/sJ34 i3Jt5 xyqi4 iEh34g5, xuhqo34Xoxiq5
  scsysqg5 G)(H.
• i3Jt5 xyqi4 iEh34g5 gd?oxJ5, hNu4 WJtc3mzb
  scsysqg5.
• X3N4ymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H i3Jt5 xyqi4 iEh34g5, xuhqi34Xoxiq5 gryN3lA,
  gryNo34Xb xeAbsix3mb bmfiz.

46
kNusb5 i3Jt5 g4gc3F5 gros3lQ5, g4g5l eusti4
wosc34b3iqi4vt34hbsiq5 Terrestrial Caribou
herd delineation access to collar data

• Issue Large changes in caribou herd delineation
  between the DEIS and FEIS increases uncertainty
  (KIA-094).
• Concern Confusion in caribou herds and
  restricted access to GN collar data
• Herd delineations changed dramatically from DEIS
  to FEIS which equals added uncertainty to
  movement, distribution and potential impacts on
  caribou.
• Lack of free access to GN collar data may affect
  assessment conclusions.

• whmQ/sJ34 g4g5 xuhiq5 ttC4ymJ5, yKo3ul rao3ul
  x?toEi3j5 ttCsyqi xtQqg5 G)(H.
• wLwJb34 g4gc3F5 Nl/sJ5 xml g4g5 eus/34g3iq5
  xuhiq, kNK5 v?mfi NlN34g5
• !H g4gc3F5 xuhmb xMa34X4Lt4l, bmfx xuhiq5 xtQqg5,
  yKo3ul rao3ul x?toei3j5 ttCsysymJi. g4g5 wqCiq,
  xuhiq5 xml x4g34bsiq5, gryNqg5.
• _at_H kNK5 v?mfqi, g4gi4 eusp34gwis2 xuhiq,
  bf/sNqg5, ck3l cspQx34gi NlN34g34. cspmqgi
  bmfiz, cspn3i3u4 wvJ3icqg34.

47
kNusb5 i3Jt5 -g4gc3F5 gryN3lQ5 xml g4g5
eus/34g3iq5 Terrestrial Caribou herd
delineation access to collar data

• Proposed Terms Conditions
• 1) Clarify how change in herd assessment and lack
  of access to GN collar data affect assessment
  conclusions.
• 2) GN to make collar data available for
  monitoring programs.

• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H gryNExo4 g4gc3F5, cspn34b3iq5l xml kNK5
  v?mfi gryQx3F4 g4gi4 NlNw3lA.
• _at_H kNK5 v?mfqi ggi4 eusJgwi34 gryQx3F4,
  cspnZsif5l NlNw3lA.

48
bEsoEi34 cspnDt5 WQxDtq5Marine - Baseline

• Issue Marine and freshwater baselines are not
  adequate for making informed impact predictions
  or for effective monitoring, timely mitigation,
  or adaptive management (KIA-MAR-01).
• Concern Critical information is missing from the
  baseline (e.g., habitat use by birds mammals).
• Terms and Conditions
• 1) Update baseline to reduce uncertainty and
  improve monitoring and mitigation with the best
  available scientific and traditional information.

• whmQ/sJ34 bEusb5l, by3usb5l cspn3iq5 WQx3Fz
  NlN34g34, bmN X3NAbs/Exo4, cspn34bsJ5 gry/six3mb
  xml xeQxcDu4 xeZsb3ix3mb, xsMizl. G)!H.
• wLwJb34 xtQqg5 cspn3i5 Nr5 WJ4N3mzb gryNqg34
  GbEsu i3Jtc3F5, t1uxc3F5lH.
• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H cspn3if5 kb5 Nr5 W/sJ4N3mzb NlNw3li, cspn3if5l
  xml i3Jt5 xMa34Xoxiq5 Nr5 WJN3mzb cspmN3li, bmN
  xeQxo4. bmfx cspn3i5 wvJDbsmb i3Jti4 vmJi.

49
bEs34 bEsusb5 i3Jt5Marine Marine mamal
species

• Issue The range of species in the region is not
  well represented by ringed seal and beluga
  (KIA-MAR-02).
• Concern Missed interactions (e.g., bowhead
  ship-strikes disturbance of walrus haulouts)
• Terms and Conditions 
• 1) Employ observers on all vessels so collision
  likelihood is minimized and interactions with
  marine mammals are reported use established data
  collection and recording protocols that consider
  species at risk.
• 2) Update walrus haulout map for route planning,
  spill modeling, and sensitive area
  identification.

• whmQ/sJ34 bEsusb5 i3Jt5 xuhiq5 gryNqg5, sfx
  whmQ2lQ5 cwDo5 N5y5, xml eNlZ5 G)_at_H.
• wLwJb34 bEsusbi4 i3Jti4 Wm3li34 Gx3Fi4 gl34yi34,
  xwF3i4 mzt5yi34H.
• X3NZsymJ5 moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H sux3Jxi yvsil i3Jti4 cspn34ti4 WoEpc3li, i3Jt5
  bEsu cspnZsix3mb gry/slt4l xml gnZsb3lt4,
  cspnZsJ5l ttC4b3lQ5. xuhqo34XoxXb gry/six3mb.
• _at_H cspnZsif5 kb5 eNlZ3i4 ttC4ymlQ, kNaxk5l
  ttC4b3lQ5, bf/sFql wobElQ5, bmfx xuhqo34Xoxiqi4
  grJbsJ4N3mb.

50
bEsusb5 bEsusb5 i3Jt5Marine Marine mammal
species

• Terms and Conditions
• 3) Consider ways to monitor disturbance to
  walruses at haulout sites (e.g., time-lapse
  photos, community-based monitoring, IQ surveys).
• 4) Provide shipping companies with updated
  information on sensitive habitats establish
  buffer zones around haulouts gather time-stamped
  vessel location data.

• moZw5 xml WoEx5
• H eNlv5 cspnDbsJ4N3iq5 NlNw3lQ5 xml eNlZc3F5
  grylQ5 GxtosZslQ5, kNo4i cspn34bslQ5, wkw5
  cspm/gcq5 cspn3i3j5 xg3lQ5H.
• H sux3Jxi4 Nuio5 grytlQ gilQ5l bEsusb5
  i3Jtc3Fqi4, bmfx wvJDbsix3mz sux3Jx5 wqCtlQ5
  eNlZc3F5 sux3Jxk5 NroDbsb3ix3mb xml sux3Jx5
  Nimzb NlNw34b3lQ5.

51
bEsu sux3Jx5 ckwiq xml wqCiq5Marine Ship
design routing

• Issues Shipping routes and vessel types and
  sizes have not been determined impact
  assessments have not been conducted along all
  routes (KIA-MAR-03).
• Concern Potential impacts are very uncertain so
  the monitoring and mitigation need careful
  consideration to ensure that any negative impacts
  of the Project are not missed due to uncertainty
  in the information used to assess potential
  impacts.
• Terms and Conditions
• 1) If the Proponent decides to consider marine
  shipment of yellowcake at any time during the
  Project lifetime, the FEIS shall be reopened to
  assess potential impacts from marine shipping of
  yellowcake.

• whmQ/sJ34 sux3Jx5 wqCiq5 xml xqiq5 ckwiq5l
  gryNqg5 wqCiq5l cspnZsymqg5 ck34 x4g3ic3ix3mzb
  bEsusbk5 i3Jtk5 G)H.
• wLwg34 bEs3usbl4bk5 ck34 i3Jt5 x4gZsic3ix3mzb,
  sux3Jxk5 gryNqg34, bmfx gryNqtlQ5 i3Jt5 bEx3usb5
  ck34 vmQ/six3mzb NlN34g34. ryxi cspm/sAu4 i3Jt5
  bEsusb5 vmQ/s5yxC/34g5 xml bmfx cspn3ifk5
  ttC4ymJ5 wvJbsN/34g5, xtQqgk5 tusJk5.
• moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H xE?f5 whmos3iDu4 kahwg34 wqCtbsb3ixDu
  sux3Jxf5, rao34 x?toEi3j5 ryxi sfwvi3lA
  WoExE/s/Exo4. x?toEi3u rao3u kahwg34
  wqCtbsb3ix3mz suxJxf5 gryNqg34.

52
bEs34 czbJf5 cspn3i34Marine Aerial Surveys

• Issue The aerial surveys conducted for marine
  mammals have limited value for impact prediction
  due to design and coverage deficiencies(KIA-MAR-05
  ).
• Concern Project impacts on marine mammals may be
  underestimated.
• Terms and Conditions
• 1) Prior to any Project-related shipping, the
  Proponent will work with KIA, regulators, and
  HTOs in impacted communities to design and
  conduct statistically robust marine mammal aerial
  surveys.

• whmQ/sJ34 czbJf5 t1uhf5li5 bEsusbi4 cspn3i34
  xg3iosZlx34 ryxi cspnZsJi4 cspxi4Nqg34. bmN
  xg3iz Nmiqg34 cspn3i3j5 G)H.
• wLwJb34 s/C4bExi3j5 x4g3iz bEsusbi4 gryxiNqg34,
  Nmqg34.
• moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H sux3Jx5 wqCc34tNQ5 s/C4bExi3j5, xE? WoEctcExo4
  r?o3u wkw5 vgpctQi4, s/C4bExk5 NwnoEpi4, xml
  xaNh4t5 vtmpqi4. xE? WoEctcDu4 bmN cspn3i34
  wqC5yx3i34nsix34g34, czbJf5 cspn3i3j5.

53
bEs34 iWd34gJoEi34Marine Noise Modelling

• Issue Gaps in the noise modelling (KIA-MAR-06).
• Concerns Modelling may underestimate noise
  impacts on fishes, marine mammals and marine
  birds. Inuit have observed that vessel activity
  has impacted seals in the Chesterfield Inlet
  area.
• Term and Condition
• 1) Conduct monitoring of articulated tug-barge
  noise emissions in Chesterfield Inlet to verify
  the predicted sound levels under different
  seasonal conditions.

• whmQ/sJ34 iWdgJi4 vmQi34 Nmqiq5 bf4nsJ34 G)H.
• wLwJb34 iWd34gJi4 cspn3i34 xeymqtlA, bEsu wclw5,
  i3Jt5l, t1uh34g5l, ck34 x4gZsic3ix3mzb NlN34g34.
  wkw5 gryymo34g5 bmfx sux3Jx5 bEsusbi4 i3Jti4
  wqCiqi4 xMa34t5y?4mb, cmigx2l wloZ3J2l xfizi.
• moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H sux3Jx5l yvs5l wqCtlQ5 gnNJ4mb, bmN i3Jti4
  x4g3ic3m5. bmfx sux3Jx5l yvs5l gnN3iq5
  cspnZs/Exo5, i3Jt5 gnN3i3j5 xMa34t5ymzb.

54
bEs34 s34hxlw5 fFiq5Marine Fuel Spills

• Issue Fuel spill risks are poorly understood
  (KIA-MAR-07).
• Concern Potential impacts of fuel spills may be
  underestimated response may be inadequate.
• Terms and conditions
• 1) maintain the necessary equipment and trained
  personnel to respond to all sizes of potential
  spills associated with the Project in a
  self-sufficient manner.
• 2) Prior to shipping, conduct fuel spill
  dispersion modeling that considers key habitats,
  the seasonal range of open-water conditions, etc.
• 3) Update mitigation planning, spill response and
  emergency preparedness plans using results.
• .

• whmQ/sJ34 bEsu s34hxl4 fFi34X5 bmN gry/symqg34
  G)H.
• wLwJb34 bEsu s34hxl4 fFi34X5 gry/sqtlA, ck34
  WoExE/sN/34X s34hxl4 fFi34X5, xml ck34
  nlm34nZsN/3mz5 gryNqg34.
• moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H bEsu s34hxl4 fFi34X5 bmN X3N4ymlA xml WoEp5
  woix34ym5yx3lt4 fFJu4 nlm34nwi3u4.
• _at_H sux3Jx5 sx/octNt4 bmN s34hxl2 fFiz X3N4ymi34
  WoExE/s/Exo4, xml bEsusb5 i3Jtc3F5 wobEymlQ5, xml
  xs/soCz5 yfwgoCz5 wms2 ckwiz grylA, xyq5l.
• H s34hxl2 fFbwoiz ck34 xeZ/3mz5 X3NAbsli, xml
  s34hxl4 fFi34X5 ck34 gxF34N34gu4 WoExE/sN/3mz5
  X3NAbsli.

55
bEs34 s34hxl2 fFizMarine Fuel Spills

• Terms and conditions
• 4) Use only Transport Canada certified shippers
  and inform them of pertinent plan requirements.
• 5) Conduct regular water quality monitoring at
  lightering and dock sites to detect spills.
• 6) Use best practices during ship to shore and
  other marine-based fuel transfer events.
• 7) Shipping outside the open water season will
  trigger reassessment of shipping risks.

• moZw5 xml WoEx5
• H sux3Jx5 wqCtbsJ4N34g5, v?mgcfi5 xg3lQ5 xml
  csptlQ5 Nj5 wqCix3mzb.
• H bEsul wm3ul wmw5 cspnzwN3lQ5 nlmwic3mzb
  s34hxlc3mzbli5, gMF4i xml kc3Fqi NigwN34.
  s34hxl2 fFiq5 NlNw3lQ5.
• H y/u sux3Jxi5 s34hxl4 h2lof5 cbs/3Jxk5
  fFscwoCzu4, Nm5yx34gu4 fFscwi3u4 xg3lt4, xyqil
  bmN xg3lA.
• H bEs3li5 by5li5 yfcoCzu4, bmN cspn3iz ho
  X3NAbs/Exo4.

56
bEs34 vt34h34XoxJ5 rocqg5Marine
Cumulative/trans-boundary

• Issue Cumulative and trans-boundary impact
  assessments have been weakened by assessing
  impacts in isolation to one another and by
  underestimating current and future shipping
  levels (KIA-NEW-08).
• Concern High uncertainty with respect to impact
  predictions / monitoring / mitigation.
• Terms and conditions
• 1) Proponent is encouraged to liaise with other
  groups and agencies regarding initiatives to
  improve understanding of cumulative effects.
• 2) Project vessels shall give marine birds and
  mammals the right-of-way, avoid erratic
  behaviour, and mitigate disturbances to marine
  mammals that appear to be trapped/disturbed by
  vessel movements.

• whmQ/sJ34 W?oxi3j5 hNgwNw5 nlmwi5li5 vt34hXoxmz
  NigwN34, bmN X3NAbsli xeQxc34g34. W?oxi3j5
  slExNDN34g5 NigwN34 vt34h34Xoxiq5 gry/s/Exo4
  X3NAtQlA, i3Jt5l smJl4b5l Nm4mzb gryN3ix3mt G)H.
• wLwJb34 bEsu cspn3i34, xeQxc3izl, xml xyq5
  WoExE/s/Exc34g5 xeQxo5.
• moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H xE? wvJ34gZsJ5 WoEctcExc3iqi4 xuhi4 tusJi4,
  bmfx xtQqg5 cspn3i5 X3NAbs5yx3ix3mb, xml nlmwi5
  vt34h34Xoxiq5 NigwN34 gry/six3mb.
• _at_H sux3Jx5 wqCAu4 t1uJi4, bEsul i3Jti4
  x2dugc34X5, bmfx i3Jtl4b5 yKostbs/Exo5. i3Jt5
  Nmd2lQ5 bmN xeQxo4, xml wqCiq5 gry/slt4.

57
wkw5 xix34bwoiz moZw5 xml xsMiq5Human Health
Policy Management Systems

• Issue Reference to mental health and
  safety(KIA-HH-01 and 04).
• Concern The proponent needs to expand the
  references to mental health and safety.
• Terms Conditions
• 1) The AREVA health and safety policy should
  include reference to mental health and safety
• 2) The term safety should, in many cases, read
  health and safety

• whmQ/sJ34 xix34bwoi3j5, whmc5yxi3j5l xml
  xi34bwoi3j5 xgDt5 G)! Xml )H.
• wLwJb34 xE? xe34hw/Exo4 whmc5yxi3j5 xml
  xi34bwoi3j5 vmQ/sJ4ni4.
• moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H xE? xey/Exo4 xix34bwoi3j5 xml xi34bwoi3j5
  vmQ/sJ4ni4 bmfxl wolQ5 x?toEi3j5
• _at_H xi34bwoi34 ttC4ymJi ttC4ym/Exo4
  tuc5yxi34 xml xi34bwoi34

58
wkw5 xix34bwoiz WoEF4u xi34bwoi34 xml
xiDbsJ4N34g5 wobEiq5Human Health Workplace
Health Safety Risk Assessment

• Issue The workplace health and safety risk
  assessment needs to be expanded.
• Concern The proponent needs to add several
  contaminants/constituents of potential concern
  (COPCs).
• Terms Conditions
• 1) Several COPCs need to be not identified as
  having cancer causing potential and are listed by
  the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
  In particular, cadmium, cobalt, lead, nickel, and
  silica (KIA-HH-18 and 21).

• whmQ/sJ34 WoEF4i tuc5yxi34 xml xi34bwoi34
  xehZsviExo4.
• wLwJb34 xE? xehw/Exo4 slExN34goEi3u4 WoEF4il
  NigwN3l, bmfx vmQiq5l gros3lQ5.
• moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H bmfx slExN34g5 tuj5 gdtEic3mzb wobE/slt4
  xeQxo4, wMq5l tuu4 gdtEJNqmb. bmfxl tuj5
  gdtEN34g5 slExN34g5l ttCZsymmb kN3Jx3u cspn34ti4
  v8hb3N34gi4. nF5 tuu4 gdtEJ4N34g5 v8hb3N34g5
  wobElQ5 mfx, v5ux7, fX5, e2o34g5 nF5, xsX/34g5
  nF5 xml woA/o5 nF5 G! xml _at_!H.

59
WoEF4i tuc5yx3i34 xml xi34bwoi34
cspn3izWorkplace Health Safety Risk Assessment

• Terms Conditions
• 2) Hydrogen Sulphide risks need further
  delineation (KAI-HH-22).
• 3) Health and safety risks for ion-exchange
  resins need to be included (KIA-HH-18).

• moZw5 xml WoEx5
• _at_H slExN34g34 nF4l4 Hydrogen Suphide slExN3iz
  gry/s/Exo4 X3NAbsli G_at__at_H.
• H tuc5yx3i34 xml xi34bwoi34 xeQxc3uJ34
  slExN34goEi3u4, ttC4ymJk5l wolQ5 G!H.

60
wkk5 tuc5yx3i34 tuc5yx3i34 xml sb3N34gj5
xi34bwoi34Human Health Health Radiation Risks

• Issue The overall perception of health and
  radiation risks related to food sources.
• Concern Community risk perceptions related to
  radiation must continue to be recognized and
  addressed.
• Terms Conditions
• 1) The ingestion of caribou, and, in particular,
  liver and kidney food sources, could pose a
  health risk depending on the level of
  consumption. There should be an ongoing
  systematic review for Baker Lake area caribou and
  lichens to determine the potential for any
  long-term health issues.

• whmQ/sJ34 sb3N34g34 gdN34g34 slExN3iz iek5
  grCExo4 X3NAbslil.
• wLwJb34 bmN sb3Ng34 gdN34g34 gry/s/Exo4 ho kNoi5
  wobE/slil xml vmQ/slil X3NAbslil.
• moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H g4g5 iE/s/Czu4 xml b34gq5, taq5l cspnZs/Exo5
  bmfx vt34h3Fsmb slExN34gi4 xs4ul nlm34bsmb g4g5
  ieqi4. cmigx2 x?bi g4g5 cspnZs/Exo5 xml s/ci
  WD4ymJ5 cspnZslt4, bmfx slExN34gi4 vt34h3Fsmb.

61
wky3k W?oxi3l kNo5 xeymiq5Socio Economic
Community Infracture

• Issue The potential impact of the Project on
  community infrastructure (KIA-NEW-GK-03).
• Concern More clarification and assessment is
  needed with regard to the potential impact of the
  project on community infrastructure. In
  particular, what will be the effects of future
  net in-migration of population into Baker Lake.

• whmQ/sJ34 xE/ ho xehw/Exo5 bmN s/E4bExi34 ck34
  x4g3ic3ix3mz kNo5 wlJxqk5 xeymiqk5l G)H.
• wLwJb34 kNo5 ck34 x4gZsic3ix3mzb bmN ho grosExo4
  xE?fi5. wMq5 kNo5 s/C4bExi3j5 xqo34Xoxh3mb bmN
  gros3lA X3NAbslAl xeQxo4. cmigx34
  x4g34bsic3ix3m5, xqovi34yNExc34Lil bmN
  X3NAbs/Exo4.

62
wky34 W?oxi3l - kNo5 xeymiq5Socio Economic
Community Infrastructure

• Terms Conditions
• 1) A more complete baseline is required in order
  to understand the potential cumulative pressures
  on the existing health, social and municipal
  services such as water, sewage/waste water,
  power, fuel tanks, solid waste, fire protection,
  search and rescue and community freezers.
• 2) A more complete baseline should also address
  who will pay for any additional community
  infrastructure that might be required.

• moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H cspnDt5 gro5 xeQxo5 kNo5 xeymiqi4 bfx
  xgZsix3mb xqo34Xoxiqi4 xeAbsh3mbl kNo5
  WD4Xoxiqi4. xix34bowoi34, wkyoEi34 xml kNo4i
  xg34X4g5, wmw5, wu34b34Dt5, wmw/wJt5, svkDt5,
  shxli4 s/34gDt5, wfxN4goEp5, xml bm34gi4 eiDt5,
  bmfxl4b34 X3NAbsmb kNo5 xqo34Xoxiqi4.
• _at_H xml gro4 X3NA5 nenExo4 kNos2 WD4Xoxiz bsg4lA,
  kNo4 WD4XoxX5 rg5 xroix34X5 wlJx5
  nN/s/Exco3i34Xb.

63
wky34 W?oxi3l kNo5 wMs/Exo5 X3N4i3j5Socio
Economic Community Involvement Plan

• Issue Improved Community Engagement through a
  Community Involvement Plan (KIA-NEW-GK-6).
• Concern More information is required with regard
  to Community Involvement Plan during
  construction, operations, and decommissioning
  phases.
• Terms Conditions
• 1) The proponent should clarify if there will be
  Project Offices set up and staffed in the other
  six Kivalliq communities.

• whmQ/sJ34 xelQ5 ck34 kNo5 W3NZsJ4N3mzb kNo5
  X3Ncbslt4. GH.
• wLwJb34 gros34bs/Exo4 ck34 kNo5 wMscbsix3mzb
  rZF4 nN/sQx34X5, wqCo34X5, xml sfxExX5.
• moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H xE? grosExo4 ttCFc3ix3mzb i kNo4i r?o3u xml
  ttCF4u WoEp5 gryN3lQ5.

64
rNs/os3i34 xml hNgwNw5 xrg34Xoxiq5Income
Inflation

• Issue The potential impact of the Project on
  local income and inflation (KIA-NEW-GK-25).
• Concern More clarification and assessment is
  needed in relation to the potential impacts that
  the project might have in relation to income and
  inflation in the communities.
• Terms Conditions
• 1) A more complete understanding is required in
  order to understand the potential impacts that
  the project might have in relation to income and
  inflation in the communities.

• whmQ/sJ34 gryNExo4 bmN rNs/os3i34 xml hNgwNw5
  xrg34Xoxiq5 ck34 vmQ/xix3mzb G_at_H.
• wLwJb34 kNo4i bmN rNs/os3i34 xml hNgwNw5
  xrg34Xoxiq5 ck34 x4g3ic3ixmzb, X3NAbslil kNo4i.
• moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H bmN rNs/os3i34 xml hNgwNw5 srg34Xoxiq5
  X3NAbsli, xehZsli, vmQ/s/Exo4. rNs/os34 xml
  hNgwN3i4 srg34Xoxiq5 x4g3ic3m5 kNol4bi4.

65
wky34 W?oxi34 wodygc5Socio Economic
Traditional Culture

• Issue The potential impact of the Project on
  Traditional Culture (KIA-NEW-GK-29).
• Concern If the net impact of the Project on
  Traditional Culture is expected to be negative
  and substantial, how is it that the net impact on
  Individual, Family, and Community Wellbeing is
  expected to be positive and significant?
• Terms Conditions
• 1) More clarification and assessment is needed in
  relation to the potential impact of the Project
  activities on Traditional Culture.

• whmQ/sJ34 wkw5l wodygcz5 ck34 x4gZsic3ix3mz5
  gros34bs/Exo4 xE?fi5 G_at_(H.
• wLwJb34 rZF4 s/C4bExF4 x4g3ic3ix3m5 wkw5
  wodyzk5, ck3o wk4k5, egzEk5 xml kNo4usk5
  x4g3ic3ix34X V x4g3iz wvJ3ic34ix34X s?li5
  xyDwix34X V
• moZw5 xml WoEx5
• !H bmN wkw5 wodygczk5 s/C4bExF4 x4g3ic3ix3m5,
  gros34bExo4 ttCsyslil.

66
Kiggavik FEIS SummaryrZF4 rao34X34 x?toEi3j5
cspn3i34, NwoQx34ymJ34

• Thank You

• d/Nu4