Baron Cohen et al (1997) Reading Minds The eye task - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 25
About This Presentation
Title:

Baron Cohen et al (1997) Reading Minds The eye task

Description:

Baron Cohen et al (1997) Reading Minds The eye task Baron Cohen et al (1997) Reading Minds The eye task Baron Cohen et al (1997) Advanced test for theory of mind in ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:471
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 26
Provided by: Corpor160
Category:
Tags: baron | cohen | eye | minds | reading | task | tourette

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Baron Cohen et al (1997) Reading Minds The eye task


1
Baron Cohen et al (1997)Reading MindsThe eye
task
2
Baron Cohen et al (1997)Reading MindsThe eye
task
Which word best describes what this person is
thinking or feeling CONCERNED or UNCONCERNED
3
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
  • Advanced test for theory of mind in adults with
    Autism
  • Discussion
  • Why minds can only ever be a theory!

Are these two people happy or sad?
4
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
  • Research Question WHY do adults with autistic
    spectrum disorders have problems with social
    relationships
  • The hypothesis
  • That adults with Asperger Syndrome (Autism) cant
    interpret states of mind from reading eyes

5
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
  • Ist order Theory of Mind task
  • Reasoning what another person is thinking
    (example Sally Ann test)
  • Normal children develop this ability by the age
    of 6 BUT the Sally Ann test is not appropriate
    for adults

6
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
  • Method Natural experiment
  • 3 groups of participants
  • IV Normal, Autistic, Tourettes syndrome
  • DV performance on eye task (maximum score 25)

7
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
  • Participants
  • 16 autistic (Asperger) 13 male 3 female
  • 50 normal, 25 male, 25 female
  • 10 Tourettes patients, 8 male, 2 female
  • matched on age normal intelligence

Note The 2 clinical groups had passed 1st order
TOM tests at 6 year old level
8
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
  • The eyes task procedure
  • 25 photos of eyes
  • each 15 x 10cm black and white
  • each photo shown for 3 seconds
  • forced choice question
  • tested individually in quiet room

9
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
Which word best describes what this person is
thinking or feeling serious or playful
10
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
Which word best describes what this person is
thinking or feeling reflective or unreflective
11
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
  • Forced choice eye task questions
  • examples
  • TARGET FOIL
  • attraction worried
  • friendly hostile
  • calm anxious
  • The TARGET is the correct answer presented
    randomised both left and right

12
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
  • How was the eye task created
  • Magazine photos selected
  • 4 judges generated the target words
  • TARGET FOIL
  • calm anxious
  • The TARGET is the correct answer the FOIL is the
    opposite

13
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
  • CONTROL in generating targets foils
  • (increases eye task VALIDITY)
  • eye photos shown to panel of 8 adults who did not
    know there was a right or wrong answer there
    was 100 agreement with TARGET

14
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
  • CONTROL tasks
  • (1) Gender Identification all participants asked
    to identify the GENDER of each of the 25 eye
    photos
  • (2) Basic emotion task all participants asked to
    identify the emotion in full face photos, happy,
    sad, angry, afraid, surprise, disgust (Ekman
    categories)

15
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
  • Findings

16
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
  • Are females better at reading minds from eyes
    than males ?

17
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
  • Were these differences significant (above the
    level of chance) ?
  • At a significance level of p lt 0.0001
    Normal and Tourettes better than Autistic
  • At a significance level of p lt 0.0001 Normal
    females better than males

18
Baron Cohen et al (1997)
  • Conclusion
  • Evidence for subtle mindreading deficits in
    intelligent adults on the Autistic spectrum
  • The eye task is a pure theory of mind test
    because there is NO context

19
Baron Cohen et al (1997) Ecological Validity?
  • Is the way the experiment measures the DV (Theory
    of Mind)
  • and the experimental setting
  • and the sample of participants realistic in a
    real life setting? Would the same Ps behave in
    the same way in real life?
  • Discuss why or why not?

20
Baron Cohen et al (1997)Types of datadiscuss
strengths limitations
  • Quantitative matters of fact objective,
    scientific replicable
  • useful for analysis comparison
  • or
  • Qualitative matters of opinion
  • subjective, rich in detail, can be hard to
    analyse, may be misinterpreted

21
Baron Cohen et al (1997) The experimental
methodology
  • Was the method appropriate for the aim?
  • Are the experimental conditions realistic
    (mundane realism real world realism)
  • How was the DV operationalised and was this a
    valid measure of the behaviour being studied?

22
Baron Cohen et al (1997)The experimental
procedure
  • How were the participants allocated to the
    conditions and were controls used to remove
    extra variables ?
  • Were there any cues that might have generated
    demand characteristics ?
  • RELIABILITY Could the study be replicated to
    find the same results? Why or why not?

23
Baron Cohen et al (1997) The sample
  • Who were the participants
  • Was the sample biased in any way?
  • Was the sample large enough to mask the effect of
    individual differences?
  • To which population can we safely generalise the
    findings?

24
Baron Cohen et al (1997)Reading minds from eyes!

Which word best describes what this person is
thinking or feeling sympathetic or unsympathetic
25
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com