The After-Action Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

The After-Action Review

Description:

The After-Action Review SPC Gabriel Sarmiento United States Southern Command References FM 25-100, Training the Force, NOV 88 FM 25-101, Battle Focused Training, SEP ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:319
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: CPT47
Category:
Tags: action | review

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: The After-Action Review


1
The After-Action Review
  • SPC Gabriel SarmientoUnited States
  • Southern Command

2
References
  • FM 25-100, Training the Force, NOV 88
  • FM 25-101, Battle Focused Training, SEP 90
  • TC 25-20, A Leader's Guide to After-Action
    Reviews, SEP 93
  • http//call.army.mil/

3
AAR versus AAR
  • After-Action Review ? After-Action Report
  • Review Verbal
  • Report Written
  • The report should use information from the review

4
What is an AAR?
  • The AAR is a structured review process that
    allows training participants to discover for
    themselves what happened, why it happened, and
    how it can be done better.

5
What is an AAR NOT?
  • Place to determine blame
  • Method to determine success or failure
  • Grandstand
  • Soapbox
  • Whine session
  • even though aspects of each will be present in
    a good AAR

6
Formal AAR
  • Have external observers and controllers (OCs)
  • Take more time
  • Use complex training aids
  • Are scheduled beforehand
  • Are conducted where best supported

7
Informal AAR
  • Conducted by internal chain of command
  • Take less time
  • Use simple training aids
  • Are conducted when needed
  • Are held at the training site

8
Aspects of an AAR
  • Focus on the training objectives (was the mission
    accomplished?)
  • Emphasize meeting Army standards (do not
    determine winners or losers)
  • Encourage soldiers to discover important lessons
    from the training event
  • Allow a large number of soldiers and leaders to
    participate so that lessons learned can be shared

9
When to Conduct an AAR
  • After each significant training event
  • At the conclusion of a large training event
  • After each training event emphasized by the chain
    of command (may be iterative)

10
Four Parts of an AAR
  • 1. Review what was supposed to happen (training
    plan)
  • 2. Establish what happened (to include OPFOR
    point of view)
  • 3. Determine what was right or wrong with what
    happened
  • 4. Determine how the task should be done
    differently next time

11
The AAR Process
  • Step 1. Planning
  • Step 2. Preparing
  • Step 3. Conducting
  • Step 4. Following up (using AAR results)

12
Step 1 Planning
  • Select and train qualified OCs
  • Review the training and evaluation plan, ARTEP,
    MTPs, and (STPs)
  • Identify when AARs will occur
  • Determine who will attend AARs
  • Select potential AAR sites
  • Choose training aids
  • Review the AAR plan

13
Step 2 Preparation
  • Review training objectives, orders, METL, and
    doctrine
  • Identify key events OCs are to observe
  • Observe the training and take notes
  • Collect observations from other OCs
  • Organize observations (identify key discussion or
    teaching points)
  • Recon prepare the selected AAR site

14
Step 3 Conduct
  • Seek maximum participation
  • Maintain focus on training objectives
  • Constantly review teaching points
  • Record key points (assign recorder)

15
Step 4 Follow-Up
  • Identify tasks requiring retraining
  • Fix the problem retrain immediately, revise
    standing operating procedures (SOPs), integrate
    into tutors training plans
  • Use to assist in making commander's assessment

16
Actions After an AAR
  • Commanders update unit METL (T, P, U)
  • NCOs make notes in leader books to assess
    individual and crew performance
  • Commanders may wish to use an assessment
    worksheet to capture additional information or
    ideas

17
Example of a Training Assessment Worksheet
18
Steps to Conduct an AAR
  • 1. Gather all the players
  • 2. Review events leading to the activity
  • 3. Give a brief statement of the specific
    activity
  • 3. Summarize the key events
  • 4. Encourage participation
  • 5. Have junior leaders restate portions of their
    part of the activity

19
6. Dont make this a critique or lecture!
  • Ask why certain actions were taken
  • Ask how they reacted to certain situations
  • Ask when actions were initiated
  • Ask leading thought-provoking questions
  • Exchange war stories (lessons learned)
  • What happened in your own point of view?
  • Relate events to subsequent results
  • Explore alternative courses of actions
  • Maintain positive focus

20
Steps to Conduct an AAR (contd)
  • 7. Summarize
  • 8. Allow junior leaders to discuss the events
    with their people in private
  • 9. Follow up on needed actions

21
Detail Conduct of AAR
  • 1. Introduction and rules
  • 2. Review of objectives and intent
  • 3. Summary of recent events (what happened)
  • 4. Discussion of optional issues
  • 5. Discussion of force protection (safety)
  • 6. Closing comments (summary)

22
AAR Techniques
  • Site selection
  • Near the event
  • Comfortable, but not too comfortable
  • Training aids
  • Must be appropriate
  • Be judicious it either helps or hurts
  • Organize site

23
Conclusion
  • An AAR, when done right, can make a tremendous
    impact on your unit. The AAR process, as well as
    its lessons learned, makes a powerful
    demonstration to soldiers and subordinate leaders
    about the value the commander places on meeting
    Army standards. The non-judgmental quality of the
    AAR allows us to identify and learn from our
    mistakes, and let junior leaders take initiative
    without fear of a zero-defect mentality.
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com