Pierre Bonnal and Keith Kershaw on the behalf of the PURESAFE community - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 23
About This Presentation
Title:

Pierre Bonnal and Keith Kershaw on the behalf of the PURESAFE community

Description:

Pierre Bonnal and Keith Kershawon the behalf of the PURESAFE community. Workshop on Remote Manipulations / Diagnostics in Radioactive Areas and Handling of ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:141
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 24
Provided by: cern104
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Pierre Bonnal and Keith Kershaw on the behalf of the PURESAFE community


1
  • Pierre Bonnal and Keith Kershawon the behalf of
    the PURESAFE community
  • Workshop on Remote Manipulations / Diagnostics in
    Radioactive Areas and Handling of Radioactive
    Material 6th May 2013

2
Aim of this presentation
  • Briefly, presenting the PURESAFE ITN
  • Presenting some of the PURESAFE outcomes

3
What is it?

  • Preventing hUman intervention for incrREased
    SAfety in inFrastructures Emitting ionizing
    radiation
  • Initial Training Network (ITN)
  • Training of Early Stage Researchers (ESR)
  • Funded under the European Commission's
  • 7th Framework Programme (FP7)
  • Marie Curie Actions Programme

4
The starting point
  • Visits of some CERNs teleoperated areasby
    academics active in the field of telerobotics
  • Through discussions with CERN expects
    specificities of teleoperated means suited to
    these areas captured
  • CERN invited as a beneficiary for a EU funded
    project proposal, that was successful
  • Project launched in 2011
  • Budget 3.9 M euros over 4 years

5
The stakeholders
  • 15 Research Projects (RP1 to RP15) and 15 ESRs
  • 8 beneficiaries 1 associated partner
  • Tampere University of Technology TUT Finland
  • Technical University of Madrid UPM Spain
  • Karlsruhe Institute of Technology KIT Germany
  • CERN Switzerland
  • GSI Germany
  • Bgator Ltd. SenseTrix Ltd. Finland
  • Oxford Technologies Ltd. OTL United Kingdom
  • FRRC Russia

6
15 Research Projects 3 Work Packages
WP1Processes modeling
RP1
RP2
RP3
RP4
RP5
TUT
CERN
Bgator
KIT
KIT
WP2Softwareplatforms
RP10
RP12
RP13
RP14
RP15
RP11
TUT
CERN
SenseTrix
UPM
TUT
OTL
WP3Hardwareplatforms
RP8
RP6
RP7
RP9
UPM
CERN
GSI
GSI
CERN Cases
Super-FRS Cases
7
The research approach
  • A systems engineering based approach
  • RPs start after needs are correctly gathered
  • ESRs convert these needs into requirements
  • Outcomes are verified then validated
  • WP1 also consists of a systems engineering
    framework conceived to embed telerobotics
    requirements as early as possible in the process
    of developing new facilities or systems subject
    to ionized radiations

8
An overview of the 9 RPsthat are telerobotics
software or hardware oriented
9
RP6 Energy and communication modules for mobile
robotRamviyas Parasuraman, CERN, Geneva,
Switzerland
  • Research focus
  • Mobile robot for remote radiation survey and
    inspection tasks
  • Energy management in mobile robot
  • Wireless communication management
  • Benefits Save dose and time during interventions
  • Motivation Avoid manual recovery or loss of
    mobile robots in the event that the robot runs
    out of energy or if there is a communication
    failure (detecting and taking actions before such
    events occur)
  • Methodology
  • Energy management Algorithms for power
    characterization, online State-Of-Charge analysis
  • Wireless Communication Algorithms for tethering
    a robot to establish long-range and robust
    wireless communication

KUKA Youbot(omnidirectional)
Energy Management system architecture
Train Inspection Monorail (TIM) Case study
Experiments in LHC Mockup facility
10
RP7 Remote Handling (RH) concept study for the
Super-FRS Plug SystemLuis Orona, Super-FRS, GSI,
Darmstadt, Germany
  • Due to the importance of integrating RH features
    into the components designs during the
    development of scientific machines, this project
    focuses in developing RH-compatibility studies
    between
  • The Plug System and the RH System

Use of Virtual Reality tools to conduct the RH
compatibility studies
11
RP8 Providing a modular robot solution for the
maintenance tasksPrithvi Pagala, CAR UPM-CSIC,
Madrid, Spain
  • Challenges
  • Environment, structure requirements
  • Modular robots, design and configuration
  • Advantages same components are able for
    locomotion and manipulation.Reconfiguration is
    required
  • Simulator
  • For training, planning and procedure
  • evaluation

12
RP9  Study of a logistic concept for Super-FRS
RH componentsFaraz Amjad, Super-FRS, GSI,
Darmstadt, Germany
  • Shielding Flask
  • Develop requirements for the design and
    development for the Shielding Flask
  • Conduct shielding flask Functional Analysis (FA),
    Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) and physical interface
    analysis to determine the links and logistics
    tasks
  • Task sequence definitions and simulation (if
    required) for shielding flask.
  • Detailed logistics design report for Shielding
    flask
  • Mobile Robot System
  • Conduct safety analysis for existing FRS robots
    installed at target and S1.
  • Mobile platform feasibility studies for Super-FRS
    robot concept.
  • Comparison between robot mounted on rails and
    mobile platform (Risk and maintainability
    analysis)
  • Radiation environmental / civil analysis for
    robot installation.
  • Task sequence definitions and simulation (if
    required) for mobile robot.
  • Detailed logistics design report for mobile robot

13
RP10  Fault-tolerant remote handling control
systemMohammad M. Aref, TUT, Tampere, Finland
  • iMoro Mobile Manipulator Perception
  • Stereo Camera
  • Laser Range Finder (LRF)
  • Time of Flight Camera
  • Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)
  • Wheel Odometry
  • Current
  • Main Tasks
  • Sensor Fusion
  • Localization
  • Pallet Picking by Fork Lift
  • Visual Servo Control of iMoro
  • Hybrid Vision/Force Control
  • Kinematic Analysis of Mobile Manipulation
  • Case Studies based on iMoro, Avant

See, Touch, Pick
14
RP10  Augmented reality-based maintenance tool
for hazardous places Héctor Martínez, Sensetrix,
Helsinki,
Finland
  • Goal Build an Augmented Reality (AR) system for
    maintenance.
  • The system helps workers to perform maintenance
    tasks faster and safer
  • The system is oriented to human intervention and
    to remote handling
  • Development of authoring tool
  • Use case scenario Collimator
  • Instructions for collimator exchange
  • Telerobotics operator is guided through the
    process by using AR

15
RP12 Interconnection of multi-robot and
multi-user systems for cooperative tasksAlex
Owen-Hill, CAR UPM-CSIC, Madrid, Spain
  • New methods for complex (multi-user) maintenance
    procedures.
  • How multiple users can interact on the same task
    through telerobotics
  • Types of feedback (haptic/visual)
  • Fresh uses of haptics to simplify tasks
  • Assisted planning/assignment of subtasks
  • Categorizing types of movement/subtask

16
RP14  Assisting autonomous functionalities for
safe teleoperationReza Oftadeh, TUT, Tampere,
Finland
  • iMoro Mobile Manipulator
  • Designed and Built in TUT
  • Four wheel Independently Steering
  • Eight Actuators (Four Driving/ Four Steering)
  • Six Degrees of Freedom Manipulator
  • Six Degrees of Force/Torque
  • Two Finger Gripper
  • Main Tasks
  • Focused on Mobile Manipulation
  • Obstacle-Free Path Planning of Mobile
    Manipulators
  • Path Following and Motion Control of iMoro
  • Autonomous Mobile Grasping
  • Case Studies based on iMoro

17
RP15 Sensorless teleoperation of an industrial
robot with a dissimilar masterEnrique del Sol,
Oxford Technologies, Abington, UK
  • Benefits
  • Cope with problem occurrences
  • Avoid human intervention
  • New needs
  • Save time
  • Other manipulation tasks

18
What about WP1that is focussed on processes
19
  • A systems engineering (SE) framework suited to
    scientific facilities and systems that are
    subject to ionizing radiation
  • It is an editorial project
  • Some PM and SE related guidelines
  • Several telerobotics guidelines

20
Telerobotics-related guidelines
  • 10 brochures will be dedicated to telerobotics
  • Designing for Telerobotics Inspections Enrique
  • Designing for Remote Handling Enrique
  • Benchmarking Telemanipulators Alexander
  • Allocating Tasks for Multi-Operator Remote
    Handling Alexander
  • Designing Mobile Platforms/Robots for Energy
    Autonomy Ramviyas
  • Designing Mobile Platforms/Robots for
    Communication Autonomy Ramviyas
  • Designing Mechatronics for Mobile
    Manipulators Reza
  • Designing Mobile Platforms/Robots for Fault
    Tolerant Perception Aref
  • Designing Mobile Manipulators for (Radiation)
    Inspections Reza Aref
  • Designing Robots for Modularity Prithvi
  • Designing for Maintainability Héctor
  • Designing for Augmented Reality (incl. systems
    tagging) Héctor

21
In summary
  • Telerobotics solutions off-the-shelves are not
    necessarily suited to ionized radiation
    environments ? RAMS issues
  • PURESAFE aims at understanding specific
    requirements and proposing solutions
  • Remote operations are transverse problems
    shared by all/most systems installed in
    facilitiesthey shall be considered as from the
    beginning of their development phase.

22
The PURESAFE Community Liisa Aha, Faraz Amjad,
Mohammad M. Aref, Mathieu Baudin, Pierre Bonnal,
Enrique del Sol, Thomas Fabry, Manuel Ferre,
Bruno Féral, Reza Ghabcheloo, Antti Heikkila,
Jenni Hyppola, Juho-Pekka Karjalainen, Pietari
Kauttu, Keith Kershaw, Douzi Imran Khan, Seppo
Laukkanen, Marja Lintala, Héctor Martínez, Jouni
Mattila, Ramviyas Nattanmai Parasuraman, Masoud
Niknam, Reza Oftadeh, Luis Orona, Jjivka
Ovtcharova, Alex Owen-Hill, Prithvi Pagala,
Stefan Roesler, Alan Rolfe, Danai Skournetou,
Seppo Virtanen, Helmut Weick
23
(No Transcript)
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com