Transitional Justice - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 / 22
About This Presentation
Title:

Transitional Justice

Description:

Transitional Justice Introduction * * * * * Transitional justice - definition The set of judicial and non-judicial measures that have been implemented by different ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:1972
Avg rating:5.0/5.0
Slides: 23
Provided by: Anon276
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Transitional Justice


1
Transitional Justice
  • Introduction

2
(No Transcript)
3
Transitional justice - definition
  • The set of judicial and non-judicial measures
    that have been implemented by different countries
    in order to redress the legacies of massive human
    rights abuses. These measures include criminal
    prosecutions, truth commissions, reparations
    programs, and various kinds of institutional
    reforms. (International Center for Transitional
    Justice, New York)

4
Transitional justice - definition
  • The conception of justice associated with
    periods of political change, characterized by
    legal responses to confront the wrongdoings of
    repressive predecessor regimes. (Ruti Teitel,
    Transitional Justice Genealogy,
    http//www.law.harvard.edu/students/orgs/hrj/iss16
    /teitel.pdf)

5
Transitional justice - definition
  • For the UN system, TJ is the full range of
    processes and mechanisms associated with a
    societys attempt to come to terms with a legacy
    of large-scale past abuses, in order to ensure
    accountability, serve justice and achieve
    reconciliation. It consists of both judicial and
    non-judicial processes and mechanisms, including
    prosecution initiatives, facilitating initiatives
    in respect of the right to truth, delivering
    reparations, institutional reform and national
    consultations. Whatever combination is chosen
    must be in conformity with international legal
    standards and obligations. (UN Rule of Law)

6
(No Transcript)
7
History of TJ
  • TJ implemented after each wave of democratization
  • 1st wave (1886-1926)
  • 2nd wave (1945-1962)
  • 3rd wave (1974-1995)
  • Reckoning with the past gained in importance
    after WWII
  • Term first used in reference to Latin American
    post-junta regimes (1980s)

8
Cont.
  • By 2011 many countries have already implemented
    TJ, and many others have repressive pasts that
    could/should be investigated
  • TJ considered today a must for every new
    democracy see Arab Spring countries

9
Transitional Justice
  • TJ Transition Justice
  • But
  • Transition no longer needed for TJ
  • TJ goes beyond justice

10
Transition
  • Regime change, major political transformation
    that affects political institutions and political
    culture
  • From authoritarianism to democracy (Western
    Europe after 1945, Eastern Europe after 1989,
    some Arab countries after 2011)
  • From conflict to peace and stability (Asia, Latin
    America after the 1970s, some African countries)
  • Change in mentality within the same democratic
    political system (Canada, Australia, the US)

11
Justice
  • Judicial methods
  • Prosecuting high-ranking and low-ranking
    officials and perpetrators in
  • International tribunals (ICC, ICTR, ICTY)
  • Hybrid courts with both international and
    national elements/staff (SCSL)
  • National courts (Saddam, Ceausescu)
  • Local, gacaca courts (Rwanda)

12
Judicial methods cont.
  • Reparation/compensation for victims and/or their
    surviving relatives
  • Rehabilitation of former political prisoners
    annulling their sentence and recognizing their
    innocence and political persecution

13
Non-judicial methods
  • Truth (and reconciliation) commissions
  • Programs for reconciling fractured societies
  • Reforming repressive state institutions (army,
    police, secret police)
  • Rewriting history books
  • Opening museums, erecting statues and monuments,
    changing street names (Memorializing and
    remembering victims)
  • Official apologies and condemnations delivered by
    presidents and prime ministers

14
Cont.
  • Diminishing the pensions and salaries of
    perpetrators
  • Citizens opinion tribunals
  • Lustration and purges
  • Access to secret files
  • Reintegration of former combatants
  • Property restitution
  • Forensic investigations
  • Symbolic reparation medals, decorations

15
Synonyms for TJ
  • Justice during transition
  • Politics of memory, politics of the past
  • Coming to terms with the past
  • Reckoning with the past
  • Wiedergutmachung (making good again)
  • Geschichtsbewältigung (the process of coming to
    terms with history) and Vergangenheitsbewältigung
    (the process of coming to terms with the past)

16
Goals of TJ
  • Truth
  • Justice
  • Reconciliation
  • Not all methods are equally adept to reach all
    these goals at all times. Not all countries want
    truth, justice and reconciliation. And not all
    goals can be achieved at all times.

17
Why some methods are adopted at some times?
  • The methods countries adopt to deal with their
    past are determined by
  • The nature of past repression
  • Deep vs. wide repression (court trials vs.
    lustration)
  • Property restitution is not applied in countries
    where no property was abusively confiscated
  • The goals countries seek to reach (truth, justice
    or reconciliation)
  • The politics of the present (old, tainted
    elites oppose, whereas new, untainted elites
    support TJ)
  • International factors presence/absence of
    international interest for the country

18
Effects of TJ
  • Prevents future human rights abuses
  • Strengthens rule of law by showing that nobody is
    above the law
  • Provides reparations for victims and imposes
    sanctions on those responsible
  • Reconstitutes the community
  • A must for democracy (respect for human rights)
  • Break with the repressive past
  • Allows for elite replacement lustration/purges

19
Dangers of implementing TJ
  • Revenge, extra-judicial killings
  • Perpetuates social conflict
  • Divides society/community further
  • Prevents full democratization by not allowing
    societies to move away from past issues

20
Dangers of not implementing TJ
  • Citizens cannot trust each other
  • Crimes go unpunished impunity
  • Cruel, undemocratic elites continue to dominate
    the political process
  • Old elites can use their new positions to destroy
    evidence implicating them in human rights abuses
  • Leaks of information will occur, leading to
    recurrent public scandals tainting the entire
    political class
  • The past must be addressed, even if later (see
    Spain)

21
Obstacles to TJ
  • Large number of victims and perpetrators beyond
    capacity of judiciary
  • Weak, corrupt, tainted and ineffective judiciary
  • Amnesties negotiated through transition
  • Statutes of limitations
  • Categories not clear-cut (victims might also be
    victimizers)
  • Crimes not recognized as such by previous
    systems legislation
  • Perpetrators still influential

22
What TJ refers to?
  • Current political attempts to deal with the past
  • Investigations of actions of governments (or
    institutions or organizations sponsored or
    supported by the government)
  • Widespread human rights abuses not one killing
    (even if of a very important person)
  • Usually abuses committed during a defined period
    of time (several years to a decade), but
    sometimes entire regimes (Apartheid, the Soviet
    regime)
  • The past must be somewhat recent
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com