Title: Fluorescence%20Correlation%20Spectroscopy%20technique%20and%20its%20applications%20to%20DNA%20dynamics
1Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy technique
and its applications to DNA dynamics Oleg
Krichevsky Ben-Gurion University in the Negev
2Outline
- Tutorial on FCS
- The basic idea of the technique
- Instrumentation
- Standard applications
- - measurements of concentrations
- - diffusion kinetics
- - binding assay
- DNA dynamics
33) Polymer conformational dynamics - flexible
polymers (ssDNA) - semi-flexible polymers
(dsDNA) - semi-rigid polymers (F-actin)
4- Tools
- specific fluorescence labeling
- attaching fluorophores at precise positions
- Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy (FCS)
5Fluorescence Correlation Spectroscopy
(FCS) Magde, Elson Webb (1972) Rigler et al
(1993)
6General Properties of FCS Correlation Function
7Correlation function for simple diffusion
8Principles of confocal setup
Sampling volume 0.5 fl (Ø 0.45 x 2 mm) Incident
light power 10 - 50mW 0.1-300 molecules per
sampling volume on average
9(No Transcript)
10(No Transcript)
11(No Transcript)
12(No Transcript)
13- Enhancements and variations of the standard
setup - Two-color FCS (Schwille et al)
- Two-photon FCS (Berland et al)
- Scanning FCS (Petersen et al)
References and technical details in G. Bonnet
and O.K., Reports on Progress in Physics,
65(2002), 251-297
14Standard applications
- Amplitude of G(t) ? concentration of moving
molecules - Decay ? diffusion kinetics (in vitro and in vivo)
- Binding assay
15FCS as a Binding Assay
Protein
Few nm
16Methyltransferase Lambda-DNA (methyltransferase
courtesy of Albert Jeltsch and Vikas Handa)
17with Grégore Altan-Bonnet Noel Goddard Albert
Libchaber Rockefeller University
18DNA hairpin fluctuations Molecular beacon
design TyagiKramer (1996)
to (k-)
tc (k)
5 - Rh6G CCCAA (Xn) TTGGG DABCYL 3
(n12-30) Signal/background Io/ Ic 50-100
I (kHz)
T (oC)
19FCS on Molecular beacons two processes two
characteristic time scales
20structural fluctuations
diffusion
21Control
Beacon
22Correlation functions of beacon control
Ratio of the correlation functions pure
conformational kinetics
23Conformational kinetics at different temperatures
Gconf
t (ms)
24The experimental procedure
1) Melting curves I(T)
I
T
2) FCS on beacons 3) FCS on controls
25Characteristic time scales of opening and closing
of T21 loop hairpin
26Different lengths of T-loops
27The loops of equal length but different sequence
T21 vs. A21
28Stacking interaction between bases
29Opening and closing times of different poly-A
loops
30Placing a defect in a poly-A loop
no defect
PNAS 95, 8602-8606 (1998) Phys. Rev. Letters
85, 2400-2403 (2000)
31In some simple situations we have some
understanding of the sequence-dependence of
hairpin closing kinetics
- In a number of other situations we have no
undersanding - poly-C loops
- short poly-T loops (below 7 bases(
32The experimental construct
33(No Transcript)
34(No Transcript)
35(No Transcript)
36Phys. Rev. Letters 90, 138101 (2003)
37Conformational dynamics of polymers in good
solvents on the model of dsDNA and ssDNA
molecules
38Diffusion of dsDNA 6700bp
39(No Transcript)
40(No Transcript)
41Polymer Statistics Freely Jointed Chain model
Random Walks in Space
b
Ree
Ree
42Polymer conformational dynamics
Rouse (1953) Zimm (1956)
43Theory
b2
t
44Rouse theory of Polymer Dynamics
b
g
45Rouse modes
n
0
N
46Rouse model connectivity friction of polymer
segments
47Rouse model is nice but wrong
48Zimm model Rouse model hydrodynamic
interactions
Diverge with N gt cannot be neglected even for
distant monomers
49(No Transcript)
50Zimm model Rouse model hydrodynamic
interactions
51From polymer coil diffusion measurements
Zimm model is right Rouse model is wrong
52Real polymers limited flexibility
b - Kuhn length defines polymer flexibility b
several monomers flexible polymer b gtgt monomer
size semi-flexible or stiff polymer Polymer can
be considered as flexible at the length scale gt b
dsDNA semi-flexible, b100nm340bp, dsDNA width
d2nm ssDNA flexible, b1-5nm2-10bases
53(No Transcript)
54Results 2400 bp fragment
r2 (mm2)
Why no Zimm behavior?
2400bp 7b
t (ms)
small polymer
55(No Transcript)
56Interpretation of g the friction of cylinder
with length b100nm and diameter d2nm
57Why not Zimm-model behavior? dsDNA is
semi-flexible, the hydrodynamic interactions are
weak
Korteweg-Helmholtz theorem when inertia can be
neglected, the flow is organized to have minimal
viscous losses
Rouse model
Zimm model
Rouse regime below
58For dsDNA b100nm, d2nm
Rouse regime from b2 (0.01 mm2) to 18b2 (0.2 mm2)
or R2ee
59Above r2c Zimm behavior 23000bp
Zimm regime No free parameters, No polymer
parameters
Best power fit gives power 0.64
60For flexible polymer No Rouse regime, Zimm
regime only
61Single-stranded DNA
62Theory for semi-flexible polymers parameters
b,d. Harnau, Winkler, Reineker (1996)
63Conclusions
- 1) First measurements of individual monomer
dynamics within large polymer coil - 2) There is a large range of dsDNA dynamics
unaffected by hydrodynamic interactions (Rouse
model) - 3) The dynamics of ssDNA is dominated by
hydrodynamic interactions (Zimm theory)
Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 048303 (2004)
64Thanks to my group Roman Shusterman Sergey
Alon Tatiana Gavrinyov Carmit Gabay
And to friends and collaborators Grégoire
Altan-Bonnet Noel Goddard Albert Libchaber Didier
Chatenay Rony Granek David Mukamel Albert
Jeltsch Vikas Handa Dina Raveh Anna Bakhrat