Constructing indicators of progresswellbeing with citizenscommunities - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

About This Presentation
Title:

Constructing indicators of progresswellbeing with citizenscommunities

Description:

Constructing indicators of progress/well-being with citizens/communities. Dr Jonathan POTTER ... Agency deciding who to interact with ... – PowerPoint PPT presentation

Number of Views:36
Avg rating:3.0/5.0
Slides: 12
Provided by: mira70
Category:

less

Transcript and Presenter's Notes

Title: Constructing indicators of progresswellbeing with citizenscommunities


1
Constructing indicators of progress/well-being
with citizens/communities
  • Dr Jonathan POTTER
  • OECD Local Economic and Employment Development
    Programme

2
What is an indicator of progress?
  • Key considerations
  • Defining progress
  • Agency deciding who to interact with
  • Distinguishing progress monitoring and assessment
    of results of actions to influence progress
  • Models of progress
  • Objective v. subjective indicators
  • Mixing top-down and bottom-up information
  • Benchmarking

3
Defining progress
  • Peoples views vary
  • relative importance of trust, safety,
    distribution of income
  • right level of trust, safety, income
    distribution
  • whether progress means participative democracy,
    high cohesion, collective provision
  • or representative democracy, high incentives,
    private provision
  • If we are seeking empowerment, should let local
    people decide their own objectives and how to get
    there
  • Suggests a decentralised approach handbook on
    how to collect and use but not a prescription of
    indicators to use

4
Agency who to interact with
  • Most citizens do not have the time or inclination
    to engage more than superficially
  • Danger of capture by elites and interest groups
  • Process of strategy design and delivery delegated
    to local agencies
  • Suggests designing a handbook to be used
    principally by local agencies local
    governments, development agencies, NGOs

5
Monitoring v. action assessment
  • Two levels of progress indicator
  • Monitoring What is the situation, what is
    changing
  • Indicates where may need to intervene to improve
  • Assessment What are the results of actions taken
    to achieve progress
  • Indicates whether actions are working as intended
  • Difficult to use monitoring for assessment of
    actions
  • Suggests choice to be made on focus of the
    Handbook, monitoring only or monitoring and
    assessment?

6
Models of progress
  • Need some conceptual framework or theory of
    change
  • These models are likely to vary by locality or
    agency
  • FIELD approach . . .
  • Suggests including indicators on influences of
    policy actions on drivers of progress and on the
    enablers of progress

7
OUTPUT TRENDS IN LOCAL DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE
2
POLICY ACTIONS ON DRIVERS
5
4
3
Business incubators
Effective labour market functioning
-
- Etc
-
Support for higher education
-
-
1
8
Objective v. subjective indicators
  • Simple principle
  • Measure what can quantitatively, but without
    distorting the target
  • Measure the rest qualitatively, but with maximum
    quality
  • Drivers Quantitative traditional statistics
  • Enablers Qualitative local surveys, expert
    polls
  • Policy results Quantitative and qualitative
    evaluations
  • Suggests using many subjective indicators because
    much of what we want to understand requires it

9
Top-down bottom-up info
  • NSO information not sufficiently spatially
    disaggregated and not covering what local
    agencies believe is important
  • Trento example
  • Invest in knowledge and education (e.g. learning
    over life course)
  • Internationalise research and innovation (e.g.
    professors from outside Italy spend on
    international research projects)
  • Maintain cohesive social model (e.g. cooperative
    membership, women with key role in enterprises)
  • Suggests combining self-collected and external
    information

10
(No Transcript)
11
Benchmarking
  • Useful to have the same indicators in each
    locality to compare progress/well-being
  • But
  • Difficulties if we dont compare like with like
  • Local people/agencies may have different visions
    of progress and how to achieve it
  • Suggests
  • core set of indicators
  • complementary tailoring to each area
  • no composite indicator
  • groupings of comparator areas with same
    objectives and legacy
Write a Comment
User Comments (0)
About PowerShow.com